This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 03 27.1965 2461126.6965 13.97 10:20:50.07 +42:58:20.4
175.46855 55.73035 galactic UMa Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 1.8 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Large-amplitude variable Gaia DR2 805700512853938560 | 10:20:50.07 +42:58:20.4 (user input) | 2021A&A...648A..44M | | (position from user input) (the VSX policy as of May 2022 seems to be NOT to regard variables from 2021A&A...648A..44M as 'known' for the lack of classification) J-Ks=1.170+/-0.117 (M)
Check this position in TNS.Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 03 27.1965* 10 20 50.07 +42 58 20.4 14.0 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Large-amplitude variable Gaia DR2 805700512853938560,2461126.6965,13.97,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Large-amplitude variable Gaia DR2 805700512853938560 20260327.1965 13.97CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 10:20:50.07 +42:58:20.4 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0352_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0169_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0352_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0168_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0352_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0169_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0352_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0168_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 03 27.1965* 11 03 58.75 +47 04 52.8 14.8 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461126.6965,14.84,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260327.1965 14.84CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 11:03:58.75 +47:04:52.8 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0352_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0169_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0352_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0168_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0352_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0169_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0352_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0168_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.82824008 12.02.2026 07:52:29.943 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
First image: 2461083.82824008 12.02.2026 07:52:29.943 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
Last image: 2461126.69672188 27.03.2026 04:43:06.770 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5539
Objects passed selection criteria: 5528
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 4780.25
Average stars matched: 4650.25 (97.2805 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112076 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20251122 p4) 15.2.1 20251122
VaST compiled on Sat Mar 21 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-354-ge3e751fc
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-03-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Mar 26 23:46:48 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.82824008 12.02.2026 07:52:29.943 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
First image: 2461083.82824008 12.02.2026 07:52:29.943 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
Last image: 2461126.69672188 27.03.2026 04:43:06.770 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 41
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.16
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 8 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 29347
Objects passed selection criteria: 29276
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 25265.8
Average stars matched: 24563.8 (97.2215 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 133488 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20251122 p4) 15.2.1 20251122
VaST compiled on Sat Mar 21 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-354-ge3e751fc
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-03-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Mar 26 23:47:24 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461126.69620894
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits'
wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits'
wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:48:01.381 +45:59:57.55
Second-epoch image center 10:48:00.036 +46:00:23.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:48:01.381 +45:59:57.55
Second-epoch image center 10:48:00.441 +46:00:13.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:48:00.036 +46:00:23.45
Second-epoch second image center 10:48:00.441 +46:00:13.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00295 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WH9rJSS8Xt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9YWnkeDLhL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ePjEDropLV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RZ0kEwAxO1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Matched with Tycho-2 3303 out of 6790 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.941863
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.941863
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.42
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
2.0 pix UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
2.4 pix fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
2.4 pix fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
15.5 mag. UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
14.8 mag. fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
14.8 mag. fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.8 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.WH9rJSS8Xt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=471, passed=6790
Got 6790 stars (including 6304 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6790 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits -region wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9YWnkeDLhL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=455, passed=6829
Got 6829 stars (including 6359 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6829 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits -region wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ePjEDropLV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=313, passed=4639
Got 4639 stars (including 4322 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4639 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1052)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RZ0kEwAxO1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=311, passed=4646
Got 4646 stars (including 4331 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4646 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:48:01.381 +45:59:57.55
Second-epoch image center 10:48:00.036 +46:00:23.45
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 10:48:01.381 +45:59:57.55
Second-epoch image center 10:48:00.441 +46:00:13.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 10:48:00.036 +46:00:23.45
Second-epoch second image center 10:48:00.441 +46:00:13.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00295 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RKAXbzeGCS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits &> /tmp/tmp.cTQvEN6mTG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VyzwjkZ9Zr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits &> /tmp/tmp.b27ebSSgmD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits and wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Matched with Tycho-2 3313 out of 34879 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.846261
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.846261
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.16
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.69
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.69
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 22 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
1.9 pix UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
2.3 pix fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
2.3 pix fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
15.7 mag. UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
15.0 mag. fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
14.9 mag. fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.RKAXbzeGCS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1431, passed=34864
Got 34864 stars (including 33366 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34864 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1052)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits -region wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.cTQvEN6mTG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=1414, passed=34861
Got 34861 stars (including 33384 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34861 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits -region wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VyzwjkZ9Zr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=816, passed=23047
Got 23047 stars (including 22205 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23047 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.b27ebSSgmD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=792, passed=22820
Got 22820 stars (including 22002 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22820 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-52-29_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0352.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/wcs_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-02-12_01-53-05_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0353.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-42-22_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0168.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_234442_TTUQ2b1x1_12913_TOEv1D2a/wcs_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-10-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out51938.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52679.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 14s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51938_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169
Preparing report for the candidate 51938_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 51941_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 51941_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:59:48.83 +45:34:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52068_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52068_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52118_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52118_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:16:46.06 +49:26:50.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52124_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52124_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:53:27.75 +49:13:03.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52127_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52127_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52165_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52165_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52177_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52177_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:20:39.46 +45:00:34.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52240_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52240_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52297_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52297_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:54:08.97 +43:10:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52310_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52310_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52451_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52451_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:54:31.71 +45:27:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52479_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52479_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:57:24.74 +43:55:56.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52590_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52590_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52643_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52643_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52656_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52656_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52670_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52670_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52679_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169
Preparing report for the candidate 52679_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52699_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52699_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52700_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52700_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52719_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 52719_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17878_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169
The candidate 17878_fd_UMa-10-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_23-43-06_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0169 did not pass the final checks