This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 03 27.1067* 05 11 58.07 +25 53 11.4 12.3 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461126.6067,12.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260327.1067 12.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 05:11:58.07 +25:53:11.4 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0031_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0039_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0031_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0038_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0031_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0039_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0031_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0038_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461126.6067,13.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260327.1067 13.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 05:27:09.52 +30:55:45.8 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0031_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0039_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0031_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0038_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0031_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0039_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0031_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0038_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461126.6067,14.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260327.1067 14.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 05:27:01.76 +30:07:50.1 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0031_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0039_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0031_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0038_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0031_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0039_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0031_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0038_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
First image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Last image: 2461126.60692654 27.03.2026 02:33:48.453 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 13281
Objects passed selection criteria: 13244
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 10833
Average stars matched: 10566.8 (97.5422 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 119608 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20251122 p4) 15.2.1 20251122
VaST compiled on Sat Mar 21 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-354-ge3e751fc
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-03-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Mar 26 21:46:48 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
First image: 2461083.60130240 12.02.2026 02:25:42.527 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Last image: 2461126.60692654 27.03.2026 02:33:48.453 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 166
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.19
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 34 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 113280
Objects passed selection criteria: 113026
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 92637
Average stars matched: 89388.8 (96.4936 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1949028 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20251122 p4) 15.2.1 20251122
VaST compiled on Sat Mar 21 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-354-ge3e751fc
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-03-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Mar 26 21:48:52 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461126.60639800
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits'
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 04:59:57.016 +30:00:27.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.02 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 04:59:58.069 +30:00:21.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:59:57.016 +30:00:27.24
Second-epoch second image center 04:59:58.069 +30:00:21.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00413 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits &> /tmp/tmp.HrqCFxzxUL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.dGIuKnGqnL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits &> /tmp/tmp.e6M7Z3ygKg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iWCFw9ng9U
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Matched with Tycho-2 6737 out of 16419 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.972082
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.972082
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.47
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
1.8 pix Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
2.4 pix fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
15.5 mag. Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.HrqCFxzxUL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1510, passed=16419
Got 16419 stars (including 14877 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16419 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 949 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.dGIuKnGqnL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1544, passed=16335
Got 16335 stars (including 14759 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16335 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.e6M7Z3ygKg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=604, passed=8337
Got 8337 stars (including 7724 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8337 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.iWCFw9ng9U (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=554, passed=8344
Got 8344 stars (including 7780 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8344 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 949 stars left (next iteration limit 1043)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06267_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 06267_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.22 +32:10:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08628_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 08628_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:21.32 +30:55:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 04:59:57.016 +30:00:27.24
Angular distance between the image centers 0.02 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:00:00.928 +29:59:47.56
Second-epoch image center 04:59:58.069 +30:00:21.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:59:57.016 +30:00:27.24
Second-epoch second image center 04:59:58.069 +30:00:21.38
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00413 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PGpiORas6F
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3jIRezHN9x
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits &> /tmp/tmp.O8OrVXljGI
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WY0Vw7gata
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits and wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits) and catalog (wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Matched with Tycho-2 6876 out of 137583 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.825942
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.825942
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.19
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.64
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.64
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 118 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.7 pix Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
1.7 pix Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
2.2 pix fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
2.2 pix fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
15.6 mag. Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
14.7 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.PGpiORas6F (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=14362, passed=137559
Got 137559 stars (including 122963 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 137559 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3jIRezHN9x (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits' -> 'wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=14447, passed=138047
Got 138047 stars (including 123396 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 138047 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits -region wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.O8OrVXljGI (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=1, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=4283, passed=66355
Got 66355 stars (including 61972 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66355 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WY0Vw7gata (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=4272, passed=65478
Got 65478 stars (including 61114 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 65478 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.2'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.2 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013017 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010413 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits -region wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-25-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0031.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/wcs_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-02-11_20-26-33_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0032.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-02_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0038.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-26_CI_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_214239_TTUQ2b1x1_7172_HGk4XuH9/wcs_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Aur-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159850.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159851.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159862.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159870.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159881.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159887.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159892.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159900.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159905.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159906.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159908.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159911.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159917.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out159920.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160037.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160144.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160154.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160213.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160249.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160281.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out160288.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out159972.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out160039.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out160299.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159850_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 159850_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:45:37.08 +27:48:35.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.60)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.933 154744652314583936 071.40475447973 +27.81007298137 14.1901 13.4107 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.933#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159851_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 159851_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:05.96 +27:03:41.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.52, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.50)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.262 3420477427293727744 076.02482383504 +27.06198937163 14.2371 13.6524 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.262#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159856_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 159856_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:56.35 +32:25:42.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159859_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 159859_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159862_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 159862_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:18.87 +27:30:58.1 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.13, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.11)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159870_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 159870_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:42.05 +27:40:03.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.06, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.04)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.560 154129372480014464 074.42547379827 +27.66791954646 13.8095 12.8416 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.560#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159873_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 159873_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159881_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 159881_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:44:19.95 +28:54:59.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.84, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.82)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.395 157885750876780288 071.08355650331 +28.91641297219 13.8080 13.3573 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.395#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159887_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 159887_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:00.26 +33:37:55.7 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.79, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.77)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159891_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 159891_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:17.58 +26:48:49.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159892_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 159892_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:21:50.89 +29:38:08.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.74, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.72)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.860 3446496785851166208 080.46224900339 +29.63553760154 13.9532 13.4189 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.860#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159900_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 159900_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:50.39 +29:59:29.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.83, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.81)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.151 3446752662823540352 078.95916864132 +29.99248375052 14.2422 13.6864 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.151#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159905_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 159905_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:41.03 +33:05:29.5 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.46, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.44)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159906_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 159906_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:31.20 +33:17:47.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.49, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.47)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.432 160853985595254144 073.63012907774 +33.29646921216 13.3181 12.6086 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.432#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159908_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 159908_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:45.95 +28:46:06.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.31, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.29)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.066 3445598794088085632 081.19176321304 +28.76854435177 13.0710 12.2226 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.066#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159911_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 159911_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:30:45.49 +28:44:37.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.15, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.13)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.094 3445458297118567168 082.69074086667 +28.74412769768 13.3523 12.6848 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.094#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159912_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 159912_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:51.99 +31:06:34.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159917_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 159917_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:10.24 +30:00:58.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.81, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.79)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.817 156688584575861376 075.79276999999 +30.01651396854 12.6909 12.0867 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.817#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159919_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 159919_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:03.58 +26:37:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159920_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 159920_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:31.21 +27:01:18.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.95)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.385 153677060883689728 073.13042319051 +27.02187479717 10.9784 9.8142 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.385#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159953_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 159953_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:14.07 +28:37:41.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159955_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 159955_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:15.62 +26:10:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159970_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 159970_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:29.69 +32:42:36.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159972_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
Preparing report for the candidate 159972_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159974_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 159974_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159976_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 159976_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 159989_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 159989_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:32.84 +28:37:19.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160003_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160003_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:55.20 +32:26:11.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160007_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160007_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:26.87 +26:55:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160008_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160008_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:21.92 +28:31:15.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160013_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160013_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:17.53 +32:33:38.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160019_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160019_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:28.43 +33:11:29.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160021_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160021_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160024_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160024_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:45.08 +31:09:02.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160037_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160037_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:06.59 +32:46:11.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.14, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.12)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.676 181035693323398016 080.02790459165 +32.76969655317 13.3991 12.9733 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.676#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160038_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160038_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:45.66 +30:29:12.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160039_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
Preparing report for the candidate 160039_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160042_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160042_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:19.62 +33:12:06.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160063_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160063_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:18.85 +29:47:15.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160064_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160064_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160066_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160066_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160072_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160072_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:17:17.82 +33:11:42.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160077_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160077_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:49.05 +33:17:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160086_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160086_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160088_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160088_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:18.15 +33:59:46.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160090_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160090_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160094_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160094_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:17.56 +29:45:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160095_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160095_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:09.02 +33:24:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160096_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160096_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160100_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160100_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:13.36 +28:37:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160103_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160103_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:46.92 +29:10:28.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160106_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160106_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:20.20 +31:44:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160107_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160107_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160114_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160114_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:41.74 +30:48:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160125_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160125_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:24.12 +31:04:55.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160131_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160131_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160137_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160137_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:31.70 +30:49:30.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160142_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160142_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:34.58 +33:55:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160144_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160144_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:47.74 +32:14:40.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.63, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.61)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.342 157587577068356992 075.44869098751 +32.24493144144 12.9844 11.8714 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.342#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160148_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160148_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160154_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160154_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:58.50 +32:57:23.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.70, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.68)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.825 181090806343606400 078.99482011537 +32.95601551494 13.7126 13.1137 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.825#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160157_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160157_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160160_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160160_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160164_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160164_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160166_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160166_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:07.12 +31:46:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160168_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160168_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160171_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160171_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160181_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160181_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160185_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160185_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:52.98 +30:28:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160190_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160190_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160194_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160194_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:05:57.86 +34:00:37.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160197_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160197_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:59.73 +32:25:01.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160199_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160199_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:57.17 +32:25:33.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160209_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160209_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160210_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160210_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:38.12 +31:15:21.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160211_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160211_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160213_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160213_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:00.19 +33:43:33.2 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.83, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.81)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160214_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160214_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:33:27.03 +30:56:07.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160216_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160216_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:21.50 +28:40:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160217_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160217_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160223_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160223_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160224_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160224_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160230_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160230_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160232_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160232_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:18:16.64 +30:56:44.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160233_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160233_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160234_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160234_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160245_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160245_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160247_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160247_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160249_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160249_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:43:27.47 +32:27:47.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.13, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.11)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.223 161306533412484992 070.86466927817 +32.46359497835 13.6732 12.7563 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.223#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160262_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160262_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160268_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160268_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160269_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160269_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160273_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160273_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160275_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160275_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160276_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160276_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160278_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160278_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160281_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160281_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:21.01 +29:22:10.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.14, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.12)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.646 155856155491370240 076.08789215818 +29.37060439694 14.0119 13.0450 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.646#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160282_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160282_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160285_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160285_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160288_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160288_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:48.59 +30:10:09.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.32, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.30)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.754 156741056193678976 074.95398367844 +30.16920636321 14.4699 13.7110 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.754#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160290_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160290_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160292_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160292_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160299_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
Preparing report for the candidate 160299_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160300_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160300_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160303_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160303_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160304_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160304_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160317_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160317_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160318_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160318_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160320_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160320_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160326_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160326_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 160328_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 160328_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 42699_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 42699_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 119154_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 119154_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 136723_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 136723_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 67575_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 67575_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:21.33 +30:55:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61547_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 61547_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:19.73 +31:18:47.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47553_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 47553_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:32.22 +32:10:43.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 110431_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039
The candidate 110431_fd_Aur-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-26_21-33-48_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0039 did not pass the final checks