NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Tau-06-Q2b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 03 26.11953    2461125.61953    13.39    04:04:10.09 +15:50:04.8   8067 2059   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    13.52    04:04:10.08 +15:50:05.8   8064 2060   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 03 26.1198  2461125.6198  13.46  04:04:10.08 +15:50:05.3
176.18510 -26.51730 galactic  Tau  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 3.7 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
487 Venetia                 -2     -0       2  13.7     0    0
Check this position in TNS.
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?) 2nd epoch FITS
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports Make finder charts with VaST

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 03 26.11953    2461125.61953    14.32    04:06:41.04 +14:17:10.7   7705 3005   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    14.57    04:06:40.96 +14:17:08.3   7702 3006   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 03 26.1198  2461125.6198  14.45  04:06:41.00 +14:17:09.5
177.93351 -27.09386 galactic  Tau  Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.7" and 3.7 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
56 Melete                  -2     -0       2  14.5    -0    0
Check this position in TNS.
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?) 2nd epoch FITS
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports Make finder charts with VaST

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Reference image   2026 01 09.18247    2461049.68247    11.87    04:52:02.10 +17:32:14.3   1132 0984   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Discovery image 1   2026 01 09.18303    2461049.68303    11.88    04:52:02.10 +17:32:14.5   1128 0977   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.11953    2461125.61953    10.54    04:52:02.13 +17:32:14.8   1114 0927   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Discovery image 3   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    10.50    04:52:02.13 +17:32:15.0   1111 0927   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 03 26.1198  2461125.6198  10.52  04:52:02.13 +17:32:14.9
182.56355 -16.55835 galactic  Tau  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.2" and 3.6 pix   
The object was found in VSX
 3"  V Tau                         
Type: M
#   Max.           Min./Amp.       JD0           Period
     8.500   V            14.600   V         2445316.00000        168.700000000000   M0e-M4.5e                    
The object was not found in astcheck.
Check this position in TNS.
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?) 2nd epoch FITS
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports Make finder charts with VaST

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 3

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= 500
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 3000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 2000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Tau-06-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Tau-06-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Tau-06-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 203111 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 203111 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.png' -> 'transient_report/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits_preview.png'
Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits

renamed 'Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.png' -> 'transient_report/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits_preview.png'
Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 559.8035 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 711.9893 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2445.1470 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 805.6612 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2450.0013 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 805.6241 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 4.36787 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.fit EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= -10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 25.2199993133545 / [degC] Focuser temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits CCD-TEMP= -10.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits SET-TEMP= -10.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-03-25T21:51:57.1005723' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-03-26T02:51:57.1005723' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61125.1194108794 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-03-26T02:52:07.0006053' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61125.1195254629 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 66.6646732352021 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 13.9994469738608 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 34.5094444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 263.982777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.76153210114564 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Tau-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 26 40' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 21982 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 21982 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.2199993133545 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.2199993133545 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 56: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 58: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 59: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 60: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 61: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 62: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 63: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 64: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= -10.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits SET-TEMP= -10.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-10C_20s_2026-03-21.fit CCD-TEMP= -10.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits CCD-TEMP= -10.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-10C_20s_2026-03-21.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-10C_20s_2026-03-21.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/d_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits :) Spent 0.494812 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-10C_20s_2026-03-21.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/d_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37165.080609 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23810.0, right_median=27365.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= -10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 25.25 / [degC] Focuser temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits CCD-TEMP= -10.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits SET-TEMP= -10.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-03-25T21:52:43.3146604' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-03-26T02:52:43.3146604' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61125.1199457641 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-03-26T02:52:53.2157990' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61125.1200603587 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -10.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 66.6646732464159 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 13.9994469700442 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 34.3505555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 264.100833333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.768630193337 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Tau-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 26 40' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 21982 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 21982 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 25.25 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 25.25 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 56: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 58: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 59: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 60: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 61: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 62: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 63: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 64: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= -10.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits SET-TEMP= -10.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-10C_20s_2026-03-21.fit CCD-TEMP= -10.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits CCD-TEMP= -10.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-10C_20s_2026-03-21.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-10C_20s_2026-03-21.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/d_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits :) Spent 0.496259 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-10C_20s_2026-03-21.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/d_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37165.080609 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23810.0, right_median=27365.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits


fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461125.61952662 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images 'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt' wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits' wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits' wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits' The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:26:39.772 +13:59:59.36 Second-epoch image center 04:26:31.921 +13:58:06.25 Angular distance between the image centers 0.04 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:26:39.772 +13:59:59.36 Second-epoch image center 04:26:30.446 +13:58:09.88 Angular distance between the image centers 0.05 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 04:26:31.921 +13:58:06.25 Second-epoch second image center 04:26:30.446 +13:58:09.88 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00605 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FfnHzZ54ek Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wQD3SEeAff Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits &> /tmp/tmp.58K4WlB0QT Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NfPdRinHPZ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Matched with Tycho-2 3668 out of 9344 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.980751 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.980751 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.54 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44
Magnitude calibration plot:

____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 2.0 pix Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits 2.5 pix fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits 2.5 pix fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 15.4 mag. Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits 14.4 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits 14.4 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.FfnHzZ54ek (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=728, passed=9344 Got 9344 stars (including 8597 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.wQD3SEeAff (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=774, passed=9398 Got 9398 stars (including 8612 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9398 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.58K4WlB0QT (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=390, passed=4908 Got 4908 stars (including 4512 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4908 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54" Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55" Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.NfPdRinHPZ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=394, passed=4901 Got 4901 stars (including 4505 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4901 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57" Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57" Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 No candidates found here Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits exists and is non-empty The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:26:39.772 +13:59:59.36 Second-epoch image center 04:26:31.921 +13:58:06.25 Angular distance between the image centers 0.04 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 04:26:39.772 +13:59:59.36 Second-epoch image center 04:26:30.446 +13:58:09.88 Angular distance between the image centers 0.05 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 04:26:31.921 +13:58:06.25 Second-epoch second image center 04:26:30.446 +13:58:09.88 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00605 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6fqUwWsu0Z Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qZQFcHjWyL Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mIEQC8pnJH Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vTIjDPTjxT Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Matched with Tycho-2 3671 out of 62263 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.844170 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.844170 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.61 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.61
Magnitude calibration plot:

____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 61 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 1.9 pix Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits 2.3 pix fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits 2.2 pix fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 15.6 mag. Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits 14.6 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits 14.6 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.6fqUwWsu0Z (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=3506, passed=62251 Got 62251 stars (including 58602 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62251 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.qZQFcHjWyL (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=3460, passed=62369 Got 62369 stars (including 58780 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62369 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.mIEQC8pnJH (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1638, passed=30884 Got 30884 stars (including 29188 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30884 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56" Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58" Excluding outliers - 951 stars left (next iteration limit 1046) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.vTIjDPTjxT (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1353, passed=30780 Got 30780 stars (including 29373 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30780 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60" Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62" Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out77052.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out77056.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out77063.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out77077.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out77083.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out77123.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out77141.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out77143.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out77147.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out77192.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out09875.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out77109.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out77427.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77052_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77052_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    14.83    04:27:02.50 +15:03:04.5   4719 2541   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits **** FOUND 04:27:02.57 +15:03:04.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.69, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.67)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.316 3310989949185380736 066.76103661678 +15.05115115437 14.4963 13.7393 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.316#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77056_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77056_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    13.90    04:48:03.10 +15:00:14.9   1642 2495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits **** FOUND 04:48:03.16 +15:00:15.7 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.97) xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77063_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77063_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    13.63    04:09:14.64 +10:17:10.1   7341 5438   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits **** FOUND 04:09:14.65 +10:17:10.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.57, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.55)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.206 3303454102648644864 062.31162011464 +10.28545380354 13.6300 12.8209 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.206#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77075_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77075_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    11.86    04:29:14.44 +16:43:02.7   4413 1528   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77077_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77077_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    12.03    04:26:24.86 +15:35:08.5   4814 2219   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits **** FOUND 04:26:24.85 +15:35:08.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.03, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.01)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.532 3312758444919426048 066.60356424806 +15.58557609750 11.8304 11.2931 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.532#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77083_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77083_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    12.41    04:36:10.39 +16:28:20.9   3405 1657   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits **** FOUND 04:36:10.39 +16:28:20.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.41, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.39)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.548 3313068816434633472 069.04355364044 +16.47212340253 12.3024 11.6564 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.548#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77088_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77088_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    12.56    04:11:49.01 +17:37:50.8   6939 0981   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77106_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77106_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    13.25    04:06:43.96 +09:58:41.4   7720 5625   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77107_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77107_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    13.27    04:54:32.57 +16:14:43.1   0711 1700   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77109_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 Preparing report for the candidate 77109_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77112_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77112_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    13.31    04:21:59.60 +14:06:14.8   5451 3120   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits **** FOUND 04:21:59.59 +14:06:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77116_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77116_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    13.73    04:38:35.43 +17:25:28.5   3067 1070   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits **** FOUND 04:38:35.47 +17:25:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77121_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77121_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    13.48    04:30:13.78 +15:39:28.4   4260 2168   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits **** FOUND 04:30:13.75 +15:39:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77123_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77123_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    13.74    04:33:52.66 +13:15:18.6   3701 3610   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits **** FOUND 04:33:52.66 +13:15:18.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.60, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.58)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.306 3307528342983868160 068.47003391310 +13.25500016606 13.4643 12.6537 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.306#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77131_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77131_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    13.65    04:30:43.92 +16:43:18.5   4197 1522   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77133_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77133_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    13.71    04:20:17.23 +17:53:44.9   5714 0824   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77135_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77135_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    13.65    04:06:04.06 +09:52:29.6   7821 5688   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77136_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77136_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    13.56    04:30:08.20 +15:40:01.0   4273 2162   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits **** FOUND 04:30:08.18 +15:40:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77141_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77141_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    13.61    04:12:44.63 +11:09:33.3   6814 4906   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits **** FOUND 04:12:44.71 +11:09:34.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.61, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.59)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.842 3303975129423283072 063.18614937248 +11.15869521854 13.4267 12.5954 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.842#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77143_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77143_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    13.57    04:35:38.96 +16:08:31.7   3477 1859   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits **** FOUND 04:35:39.05 +16:08:31.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.60, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.58)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.441 3312988723887299456 068.91369554093 +16.14196444679 13.4070 12.5537 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.441#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77147_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77147_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    13.61    04:34:18.93 +12:36:39.3   3628 3999   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits **** FOUND 04:34:19.07 +12:36:39.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.61, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.59)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.152 3306706148804398208 068.57940306635 +12.61195717653 13.6726 12.8734 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.152#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77163_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77163_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    13.77    04:32:18.47 +11:21:59.6   3911 4757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77174_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77174_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    13.74    04:17:12.82 +13:33:49.2   6151 3449   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77178_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77178_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    13.78    04:24:45.28 +14:21:07.0   5048 2967   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits **** FOUND 04:24:45.45 +14:21:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77186_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77186_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    13.88    04:20:48.53 +13:50:46.5   5624 3276   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits **** FOUND 04:20:48.56 +13:50:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77190_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77190_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    13.88    04:08:45.03 +13:52:44.0   7398 3255   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77192_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77192_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    13.84    04:21:31.24 +14:25:60.0   5521 2921   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits **** FOUND 04:21:31.26 +14:26:00.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.84, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.82)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.705 3311025099198148352 065.38005573865 +14.43352641473 13.3927 12.4300 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.705#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77201_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77201_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    14.06    04:51:23.00 +12:33:32.0   1093 3964   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77213_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77213_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    13.65    04:51:47.68 +16:31:10.3   1123 1551   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77235_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77235_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    13.90    04:39:47.32 +09:57:57.0   2777 5588   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77245_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77245_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    13.94    04:12:07.09 +14:56:18.7   6899 2616   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77330_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77330_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    14.02    04:47:40.42 +14:55:25.3   1696 2546   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77338_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77338_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    14.13    04:46:52.64 +17:32:57.8   1865 0953   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77359_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77359_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    14.47    04:01:53.78 +14:56:21.6   8406 2599   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77367_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77367_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    14.13    04:07:52.16 +11:10:22.3   7542 4897   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77371_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77371_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    14.39    04:10:35.41 +16:41:59.0   7119 1546   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77387_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77387_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    14.22    04:46:26.52 +10:02:15.6   1779 5522   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77395_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77395_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    14.16    04:28:29.98 +10:00:08.8   4464 5593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77397_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77397_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    14.25    04:15:22.36 +12:47:50.0   6422 3913   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77403_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77403_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    14.12    04:36:29.86 +14:22:45.3   3330 2923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77405_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77405_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    14.09    04:11:50.83 +10:23:26.2   6950 5374   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77408_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77408_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    14.21    04:45:26.71 +17:40:45.3   2076 0882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77425_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77425_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    14.33    04:30:42.63 +09:52:48.9   4133 5663   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77427_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 Preparing report for the candidate 77427_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77431_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77431_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    14.37    04:02:05.85 +13:36:00.9   8387 3414   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77450_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77450_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    14.30    04:05:28.46 +14:02:05.2   7882 3156   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77456_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77456_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    13.95    04:50:27.85 +11:17:03.1   1201 4745   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77477_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77477_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    14.73    04:15:32.58 +14:16:24.4   6397 3020   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77493_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77493_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    14.71    04:45:08.86 +13:47:56.1   2047 3241   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77498_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77498_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    14.32    04:37:32.89 +11:47:18.8   3139 4487   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77516_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77516_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    14.27    04:46:21.13 +09:38:09.2   1784 5768   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77538_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77538_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    14.32    04:33:33.19 +13:38:39.5   3753 3376   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77545_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77545_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    14.75    04:16:51.93 +14:16:30.2   6203 3019   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77562_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77562_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    14.64    04:32:49.38 +14:31:48.6   3870 2843   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77566_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77566_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    14.52    04:11:50.39 +14:23:59.7   6941 2942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77571_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77571_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    14.51    04:40:53.41 +13:35:00.6   2672 3389   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 77579_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 77579_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    14.68    04:26:37.14 +14:08:00.4   4774 3096   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 09875_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 Preparing report for the candidate 09875_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 54361_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 54361_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    13.29    04:54:18.49 +11:10:46.5   0619 4790   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits **** FOUND 04:54:18.41 +11:10:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 17553_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 17553_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    12.94    04:21:12.13 +16:26:17.6   5576 1709   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits **** FOUND 04:21:12.15 +16:26:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 47416_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 The candidate 47416_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 03 26.12006    2461125.62006    8.50    04:28:18.01 +10:09:46.4   4495 5496   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits **** FOUND 04:28:18.02 +10:09:46.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 9s Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 04:52:02.13 +17:32:14.9 04:04:10.08 +15:50:05.3 04:06:41.00 +14:17:09.5 ########### Completed Tau-06-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 04:04:10.08 +15:50:05.3 04:06:41.00 +14:17:09.5 04:52:02.13 +17:32:14.9 ################################################################################### 04:04:10.08 +15:50:05.3 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 04:06:41.00 +14:17:09.5 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 04:52:02.13 +17:32:14.9 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' 04:52:02.13 +17:32:14.9 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) 04:52:02.13 +17:32:14.9 -- a known variable star Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### Adding identified Gaia sources from exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 04:52:02.13 +17:32:14.9 04:27:02.57 +15:03:04.8 04:48:03.16 +15:00:15.7 04:09:14.65 +10:17:10.1 04:26:24.85 +15:35:08.6 04:36:10.39 +16:28:20.9 04:33:52.66 +13:15:18.8 04:12:44.71 +11:09:34.1 04:35:39.05 +16:08:31.5 04:34:19.07 +12:36:39.9 04:21:31.26 +14:26:00.5 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is 500 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461125.61952662 -observatory 500 22:44:16.76 -08:15:00.6 Mercury (0.6mag) 01:29:58.22 +08:41:24.0 Venus (-3.9mag) 23:18:03.34 -05:39:55.8 Mars (1.2mag) 07:05:38.63 +22:56:52.9 Jupiter (-2.2mag) 00:19:41.72 -00:11:03.7 Saturn (0.9mag) 03:43:44.72 +19:34:34.9 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:08:00.14 -00:33:26.6 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:32:26.54 -22:53:11.3 Pluto (14.5mag) 06:41:31.83 +27:35:49.9 Moon (-10.5mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Mar 25 22:08 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461125.61952662: 07:05:45.41 +22:56:41.5 Io (5.6mag) 07:05:49.70 +22:56:32.8 Europa (5.8mag) 07:05:49.82 +22:56:24.7 Ganymede (5.2mag) 07:05:37.50 +22:57:05.5 Callisto (6.4mag) 07:09:37.29 +22:55:31.4 Himalia (15.2mag) 07:05:39.49 +22:56:48.5 Thebe (16.1mag) 07:09:18.84 +23:20:55.4 Elara (17.2mag) 07:03:06.79 +23:47:51.1 Pasiphae (17.3mag) 07:14:21.71 +22:52:13.6 Carme (18.3mag) 00:19:53.37 -00:11:07.9 Titan (8.8mag) 00:19:47.58 -00:10:59.8 Rhea (10.1mag) 00:20:05.16 -00:08:51.5 Iapetus (11.5mag) 00:19:48.28 -00:10:44.4 Hyperion (14.8mag) 00:21:33.02 -00:00:13.0 Phoebe (16.8mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Mar 25 22:08 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461125.61952662: 13:30:46.30 +03:17:24.2 JWST 14:40:39.53 +54:15:32.4 Chandra 15:56:20.96 -56:04:56.8 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Mar 25 22:08 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461125.61952662 -observatory 500 18:39:34.26 -27:41:34.1 14.0mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 04:53:40.74 -70:44:39.2 17.5mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:29:07.77 +31:19:12.0 17.1mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:30:20.52 +08:01:25.1 17.6mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 23:03:30.75 +28:32:49.3 17.0mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 04:05:51.67 +25:26:33.8 15.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:01:31.99 +31:38:00.7 16.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:29:51.35 -02:32:40.7 17.2mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:56:29.63 +16:43:59.1 17.5mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:45:43.59 -11:47:42.4 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 09:20:25.18 -15:25:30.6 17.4mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS) 21:29:07.36 +61:52:47.3 17.4mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 19:31:39.53 -03:32:18.5 14.4mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 21:40:09.62 +83:20:57.7 17.7mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 06:14:09.52 +63:43:00.0 16.9mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 04:21:58.75 +08:42:22.4 9.5mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 11:18:27.57 +03:44:02.2 18.0mag C/2024 G2 (ATLAS) 16:30:21.11 +02:58:36.9 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:12:40.67 +09:57:17.7 14.8mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 03:08:39.69 -25:45:57.9 16.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 05:00:42.88 +51:00:51.3 17.6mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 14:58:49.66 +24:19:05.6 14.5mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 02:55:03.71 -23:14:25.5 17.7mag C/2025 Q3 (ATLAS) 22:36:46.64 +19:21:34.8 11.8mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 13:03:03.61 +01:39:15.9 17.6mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 01:55:22.86 -03:06:29.4 12.8mag C/2026 A1 (MAPS) 22:55:53.86 +32:30:49.2 13.9mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 18:02:06.44 -10:40:39.6 13.0mag 10P/Tempel 15:23:41.15 +04:51:42.3 12.2mag 24P/Schaumasse 11:09:53.40 -02:16:58.6 15.6mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 17:48:36.11 -10:26:43.6 17.4mag 40P/Vaisala 10:42:39.76 -06:02:27.7 16.5mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington 01:16:40.84 +13:50:26.4 17.0mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 06:35:45.70 +41:19:49.1 17.1mag 63P/Wild 23:01:19.62 -14:04:17.5 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 03:10:28.03 +13:25:22.5 15.9mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 00:20:19.52 +04:04:14.4 14.6mag 78P/Gehrels 21:56:13.44 -15:23:17.1 14.5mag 88P/Howell 01:13:50.29 +14:44:37.4 15.2mag 93P/Lovas 04:18:27.98 +31:01:28.1 16.4mag 123P/West-Hartley 08:09:48.16 +47:57:59.5 16.2mag 124P/Mrkos 02:01:45.65 +11:57:42.0 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 02:07:06.88 +11:45:17.7 17.4mag 131P/Mueller 23:43:01.20 +05:09:44.6 12.4mag 141P/Machholz 23:53:16.62 -02:44:44.7 12.4mag 141P-A/Machholz 22:50:44.02 -05:38:53.5 15.5mag 141P-D/Machholz 00:04:33.50 -11:45:50.1 15.4mag 162P/SidingSpring 10:36:03.50 +31:58:00.6 17.6mag 164P/Christensen 05:58:35.24 +24:42:07.7 17.6mag 198P/ODAS 15:26:23.13 -02:40:09.7 17.0mag 210P/Christensen 20:30:56.53 -16:25:24.5 17.2mag 218P/LINEAR 17:04:21.25 -16:12:55.5 16.2mag 235P/LINEAR 04:51:17.48 +32:38:50.2 16.4mag 240P/NEAT 07:30:50.87 -07:41:12.6 17.5mag 242P/Spahr 15:48:08.53 +05:29:13.1 17.6mag 391P/Kowalski 07:28:34.01 +21:11:14.6 17.6mag 450P/LONEOS 05:07:15.66 +46:17:19.9 17.3mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.8K Mar 25 22:08 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82 16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54 17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39 19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81 08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27 12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6 18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16 12:16:02.87 -53:16:33.70 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.08 3.93 13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33 19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26 14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31 13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97 06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67 12:20:27.90 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-19.05 16.24 07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74 06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48 11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95 10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53 20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83 06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93 07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78 19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2 04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS 11:10:34.24 +02:58:48.10 SN2026drr 2026-03-14.08 0.2 07:26:45.73 -27:45:13.90 ASASSN-26bo 2026-03-14.17 13.8 16:35:46.94 +58:12:28.40 SN2026ebt 2026-03-12.41 17.12 13:01:19.45 +15:42:15.00 SN2026ehe 2026-03-12.11 -0.29 09:15:55.41 +10:08:09.70 SN2026efq 2026-03-12.16 0.06 03:31:20.92 -35:29:29.00 SN2026evh 2026-03-12.05 17.29 06:26:19.15 -85:18:28.10 AT2026ffp 2026-03-12.16 0.37 14:16:42.30 -41:18:36.50 AT2026fij 2026-03-12.05 15.97 10:45:04.71 +00:06:13.10 SN 2026exe 2026-03-11.78 16.48 18:07:45.58 +69:43:01.00 SN2026ess 2026-03-12.37 17.37 13:11:03.58 +49:06:31.80 AT2026ewa 2026-03-12.42 16.77 15:03:25.23 -63:11:22.20 ASASSN-26bp 2026-03-11.92 13.33 13:09:37.25 -35:50:25.20 AT2024cmo 2026-03-11.12 16.29 13:06:01.97 -15:50:14.40 AT2026fdy 2026-03-10.33 16.68 11:30:09.67 -47:26:43.70 ASASSN-26bn 2026-03-10.12 15.2 05:03:25.25 -24:16:50.40 (= Gaia 2026-03-9.09 14.32 03:42:32.53 -04:17:53.70 ASASSN-26bm 2026-03-8.04 15.22 04:31:00.53 -68:29:50.20 ASASSN-26bl 2026-03-7.9 10.26 16:18:17.61 +41:25:11.40 SN 2026dkf 2026-03-6.31 16.7 13:45:00.35 +61:16:50.90 SN 2026ejl 2026-03-6.41 -0.66 09:27:45.48 -37:49:32.80 ASASSN-26bk 2026-03-2.3 13.11 20:22:01.20 +23:47:47.30 ASASSN-26bi 2026-02-28.51 15.86 11:16:22.10 +29:26:22.80 AT2026enm 2026-02-28.39 16.88 08:05:59.83 -48:39:35.60 ASASSN-26bh 2026-02-26.05 14.64 13:24:27.02 -45:57:01.40 ASASSN-26bg 2026-02-26.35 15.28 17:27:50.95 -68:28:46.40 ASASSN-26bf 2026-02-26.3 16.28 18:03:39.29 +19:58:46.30 ASASSN-26be 2026-02-25.56 14.95 17:40:18.19 +07:20:59.60 SN 2026crm 2026-02-24.34 16.9 18:38:35.79 -79:28:57.30 ASASSN-26bb 2026-02-24.37 16.2 17:43:29.75 +11:24:00.60 ASASSN-26bc 2026-02-23.37 -3.37 16:59:41.08 -80:01:51.20 ASASSN-26bd 2026-02-23.3 14.38 11:23:31.77 -08:39:15.40 SN2026cff 2026-02-23.15 -1.08 14:55:17.39 -05:56:05.30 SN2026dmk 2026-02-23.22 -0.76 12:28:15.19 +44:27:20.80 SN2026cjz 2026-02-23.47 15.62 12:12:29.55 -02:40:43.30 AT2026dsk 2026-02-23.4 17.21 09:21:05.29 +06:11:42.80 SN2026chr 2026-02-23.1 17.39 16:05:38.61 +18:06:07.40 SN 2026dsy 2026-02-23.36 17.15 04:55:50.66 -29:52:57.70 SN 2026dpg 2026-02-23.11 15.75 04:21:28.18 -53:22:54.40 AT2026drl 2026-02-21.03 17.31 11:50:37.32 +55:21:13.70 SN 2026dix 2026-02-21.43 16.39 16:21:19.69 -63:47:29.40 ASASSN-26az 2026-02-21.03 17.02 02:45:30.93 -54:17:43.10 SN 2026cju 2026-02-21.04 17.54 01:58:40.68 +47:34:50.10 ASASSN-26av 2026-02-21.09 15.97 18:35:53.01 -42:31:38.90 ASASSN-26aw 2026-02-21.12 15.89 11:40:18.88 -39:45:09.20 ASASSN-26ax 2026-02-21.08 15.73 02:26:23.52 -51:42:29.80 ASASSN-26ay 2026-02-21.04 13.93 08:46:07.66 +01:17:43.90 ASASSN-26ba 2026-02-20.23 15.43 14:15:47.69 -48:05:16.40 SN2026dez 2026-02-19.19 15.93 17:25:53.90 -23:28:31.50 ASASSN-26au 2026-02-18.33 15.82 16:07:59.09 -24:00:10.00 SN2026cmv 2026-02-17.28 16.19 18:15:01.25 -37:43:36.70 ASASSN-26at 2026-02-16.36 15.94 13:01:07.08 -11:25:16.30 AT2026bzh 2026-02-12.45 17.3 10:56:29.81 -07:07:25.30 SN 2026bre 2026-02-12.16 17.15 08:55:43.51 -53:26:11.50 ASASSN-26as 2026-02-12.2 16.54 06:33:50.98 -41:46:25.10 ASASSN-26ar 2026-02-12.04 16.42 12:15:22.43 +23:59:39.60 SN2026bzg 2026-02-11.27 16.32 08:01:10.95 -03:43:14.30 AT2026coj 2026-02-9.25 13.73 12:44:00.18 -57:03:46.80 ASASSN-26aq 2026-02-9.18 16 06:26:33.34 -54:06:39.90 AT2026cih 2026-02-8.06 17.26 23:08:59.40 -88:59:11.60 SN 2026bsu 2026-02-8.03 16.02 01:04:14.94 -62:31:02.30 SN 2026azk 2026-02-8.04 16.41 08:44:55.41 +64:55:09.90 SN 2026anq 2026-02-7.16 17.62 12:37:42.99 +33:26:05.40 SN 2026bnm 2026-02-7.29 16.74 00:12:55.45 +33:21:25.90 SN2026cbh 2026-02-7.09 16.33 08:02:12.64 -04:14:20.90 SN 2026auh 2026-02-7.11 16.64 18:03:52.67 -31:27:26.00 TCP J18035290-3127298 2026-02-7.37 15.76 12:18:03.59 +50:27:10.20 SN 2026bjz 2026-02-7.25 16.48 07:51:51.12 +55:05:27.60 SN 2026ail 2026-02-6.21 16.85 08:10:56.38 +36:49:42.80 AT2026bsa 2026-02-6.29 17.47 04:43:45.47 -15:49:01.00 SN2026azr 2026-02-5.24 16.96 06:14:48.48 -34:20:08.90 ASASSN-26ap 2026-02-5.2 13.77 02:42:33.90 -27:21:02.60 SN 2026aip 2026-02-4.09 15.85 00:43:12.26 +38:35:47.90 AT2026brt 2026-02-3.12 14.92 14:34:27.21 +21:56:59.90 SN2026atb 2026-01-29.32 15.59 13:12:04.11 -60:56:12.40 ASASSN-26ao 2026-01-28.35 15.61 13:00:36.49 -06:28:26.00 SN2026azd 2026-01-28.23 15.69 10:33:50.27 -31:00:53.40 SN 2026ayz 2026-01-25.11 15.3 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K Mar 25 22:08 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 15:33:45.28 -22:11:07.3 TCP J15334528-2211073 2026-01-16.8451 14.9mag 22:34:01.26 +39:53:32.8 TCP J22340126+3953328 2026-01-17.5738 16.79Cmag 00:42:52.36 +41:16:13.3 PNV J00425236+4116133 2026-01-18.5502 17.41Cmag 06:57:11.19 -17:24:43.9 TCP J06571119-1724439 2026-01-18.5375 14.2mag 00:42:52.23 +41:01:44.7 PNV J00425223+4101447 2026-01-19.5505 18.74Cmag 09:54:46.47 +69:06:31.7 PNV J09544647+6906317 2026-01-26.8081 19.3mag 18:08:51.99 -26:16:21.9 TCP J18085199-2616219 2026-01-31.8519 12.2mag 08:01:11.02 -03:43:14.1 TCP J08011102-0343141 2026-02-08.8090 15.10Cmag 05:19:15.40 -02:04:51.5 TCP J05191540-0204515 2026-02-13.4306 14.5mag 10:52:41.26 +36:40:08.9 TCP J10524126+3640089 2026-02-17.6065 17.4mag 05:50:50.81 +36:22:45.1 TCP J05505081+3622451 2026-02-17.5511 15.7mag 00:42:51.33 +41:13:49.1 PNV J00425133+4113491 2026-02-20.738 18.3mag 00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4 PNV J00430488+4129414 2026-02-20.5923 18.84Cmag 17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag 09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag 07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag 00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag 07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag 17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag 08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 187K Mar 25 22:08 tocp_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 68 C