This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 03 26.1198* 04 04 10.08 +15 50 05.3 13.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461125.6198,13.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260326.1198 13.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 04:04:10.08 +15:50:05.3 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0151_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0305_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0151_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0304_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0151_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0305_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0151_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0304_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 03 26.1198* 04 06 41.00 +14 17 09.5 14.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461125.6198,14.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260326.1198 14.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 04:06:41.00 +14:17:09.5 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0151_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0305_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0151_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0304_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0151_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0305_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0151_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0304_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 03 26.1198* 04 52 02.13 +17 32 14.9 10.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V Tau,2461125.6198,10.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V Tau 20260326.1198 10.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 04:52:02.13 +17:32:14.9 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0151_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0305_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0151_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0304_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0151_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0305_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0151_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0304_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68246666 09.01.2026 04:22:35.119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
First image: 2461049.68246666 09.01.2026 04:22:35.119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Last image: 2461125.62006150 26.03.2026 02:52:43.314 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.54
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7501
Objects passed selection criteria: 7472
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6047.5
Average stars matched: 5925 (97.9744 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 114044 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20251122 p4) 15.2.1 20251122
VaST compiled on Sat Mar 21 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-354-ge3e751fc
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-03-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Mar 25 22:08:09 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.68246666 09.01.2026 04:22:35.119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
First image: 2461049.68246666 09.01.2026 04:22:35.119 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Last image: 2461125.62006150 26.03.2026 02:52:43.314 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 89
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 20 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 50428
Objects passed selection criteria: 50337
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.1 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 41194.8
Average stars matched: 39845 (96.7235 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 154468 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20251122 p4) 15.2.1 20251122
VaST compiled on Sat Mar 21 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-354-ge3e751fc
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-03-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Mar 25 22:09:05 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461125.61952662
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits'
wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:39.772 +13:59:59.36
Second-epoch image center 04:26:31.921 +13:58:06.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.04 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:39.772 +13:59:59.36
Second-epoch image center 04:26:30.446 +13:58:09.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.05 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:26:31.921 +13:58:06.25
Second-epoch second image center 04:26:30.446 +13:58:09.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00605 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FfnHzZ54ek
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wQD3SEeAff
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits &> /tmp/tmp.58K4WlB0QT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NfPdRinHPZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Matched with Tycho-2 3668 out of 9344 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.980751
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.980751
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.54
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.44
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
2.0 pix Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
2.5 pix fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
15.4 mag. Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.FfnHzZ54ek (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=728, passed=9344
Got 9344 stars (including 8597 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9344 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wQD3SEeAff (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=774, passed=9398
Got 9398 stars (including 8612 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9398 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.58K4WlB0QT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=390, passed=4908
Got 4908 stars (including 4512 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4908 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 955 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.54"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.55"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NfPdRinHPZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=394, passed=4901
Got 4901 stars (including 4505 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4901 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:39.772 +13:59:59.36
Second-epoch image center 04:26:31.921 +13:58:06.25
Angular distance between the image centers 0.04 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:39.772 +13:59:59.36
Second-epoch image center 04:26:30.446 +13:58:09.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.05 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:26:31.921 +13:58:06.25
Second-epoch second image center 04:26:30.446 +13:58:09.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00605 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.6fqUwWsu0Z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qZQFcHjWyL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits &> /tmp/tmp.mIEQC8pnJH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vTIjDPTjxT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Matched with Tycho-2 3671 out of 62263 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.844170
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.844170
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.23
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.61
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.61
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 61 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
1.9 pix Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
2.3 pix fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
2.2 pix fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
15.6 mag. Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.6fqUwWsu0Z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=3506, passed=62251
Got 62251 stars (including 58602 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62251 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 954 stars left (next iteration limit 1049)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qZQFcHjWyL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=3460, passed=62369
Got 62369 stars (including 58780 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 62369 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.mIEQC8pnJH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1638, passed=30884
Got 30884 stars (including 29188 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30884 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.57"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.56"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.58"
Excluding outliers - 951 stars left (next iteration limit 1046)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vTIjDPTjxT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1353, passed=30780
Got 30780 stars (including 29373 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30780 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.64"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.60"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.62"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-22-35_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/wcs_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_22-23-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0152.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-51-57_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0304.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_220504_TTUQ2b1x1_973_GrsIkLOT/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out77052.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out77056.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out77063.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out77077.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out77083.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out77123.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out77141.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out77143.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out77147.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out77192.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out09875.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out77109.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out77427.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77052_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77052_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:27:02.57 +15:03:04.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.69, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.67)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.316 3310989949185380736 066.76103661678 +15.05115115437 14.4963 13.7393 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.316#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77056_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77056_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:03.16 +15:00:15.7 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.97)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77063_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77063_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:09:14.65 +10:17:10.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.57, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.55)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.206 3303454102648644864 062.31162011464 +10.28545380354 13.6300 12.8209 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.206#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77075_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77075_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77077_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77077_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:26:24.85 +15:35:08.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.03, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.01)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.532 3312758444919426048 066.60356424806 +15.58557609750 11.8304 11.2931 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.532#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77083_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77083_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:10.39 +16:28:20.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.41, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.39)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.548 3313068816434633472 069.04355364044 +16.47212340253 12.3024 11.6564 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.548#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77088_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77088_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77106_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77106_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77107_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77107_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77109_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
Preparing report for the candidate 77109_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77112_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77112_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:59.59 +14:06:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77116_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77116_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:35.47 +17:25:29.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77121_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77121_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:13.75 +15:39:27.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77123_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77123_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:33:52.66 +13:15:18.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.60, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.58)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.306 3307528342983868160 068.47003391310 +13.25500016606 13.4643 12.6537 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.306#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77131_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77131_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77133_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77133_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77135_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77135_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77136_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77136_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:30:08.18 +15:40:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77141_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77141_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:44.71 +11:09:34.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.61, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.59)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.842 3303975129423283072 063.18614937248 +11.15869521854 13.4267 12.5954 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.842#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77143_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77143_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:39.05 +16:08:31.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.60, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.58)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.441 3312988723887299456 068.91369554093 +16.14196444679 13.4070 12.5537 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.441#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77147_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77147_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:34:19.07 +12:36:39.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.61, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.59)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.152 3306706148804398208 068.57940306635 +12.61195717653 13.6726 12.8734 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.152#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77163_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77163_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77174_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77174_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77178_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77178_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:24:45.45 +14:21:10.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77186_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77186_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:48.56 +13:50:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77190_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77190_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77192_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77192_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:31.26 +14:26:00.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.84, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.82)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.705 3311025099198148352 065.38005573865 +14.43352641473 13.3927 12.4300 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.705#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77201_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77201_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77213_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77213_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77235_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77235_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77245_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77245_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77330_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77330_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77338_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77338_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77359_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77359_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77367_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77367_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77371_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77371_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77387_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77387_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77395_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77395_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77397_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77397_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77403_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77403_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77405_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77405_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77408_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77408_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77425_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77425_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77427_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
Preparing report for the candidate 77427_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77431_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77431_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77450_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77450_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77456_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77456_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77477_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77477_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77493_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77493_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77498_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77498_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77516_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77516_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77538_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77538_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77545_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77545_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77562_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77562_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77566_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77566_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77571_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77571_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77579_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 77579_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09875_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
Preparing report for the candidate 09875_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54361_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 54361_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:18.41 +11:10:46.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17553_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 17553_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:12.15 +16:26:17.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47416_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305
The candidate 47416_fd_Tau-06-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-52-43_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0305 did not pass the final checks