This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461125.6142,14.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260326.1142 14.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 05:10:48.39 -13:56:28.4 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0272_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0295_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0272_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0294_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0272_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0295_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0272_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0294_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 03 26.1142* 05 29 35.81 -06 29 23.2 13.1 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V1160 Ori,2461125.6142,13.14,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V1160 Ori 20260326.1142 13.14CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 05:29:35.81 -06:29:23.2 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0272_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0295_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0272_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0294_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0272_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0295_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0272_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0294_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.74620664 23.12.2025 05:54:22.254 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
First image: 2461032.74620664 23.12.2025 05:54:22.254 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Last image: 2461125.61442882 26.03.2026 02:44:36.650 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.76
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9345
Objects passed selection criteria: 9321
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 7709
Average stars matched: 7550.5 (97.944 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 115652 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20251122 p4) 15.2.1 20251122
VaST compiled on Sat Mar 21 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-354-ge3e751fc
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-03-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Mar 25 21:59:16 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.74620664 23.12.2025 05:54:22.254 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
First image: 2461032.74620664 23.12.2025 05:54:22.254 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Last image: 2461125.61442882 26.03.2026 02:44:36.650 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 98
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.49
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 14 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 56218
Objects passed selection criteria: 56100
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 48330.8
Average stars matched: 47070.2 (97.3919 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 158744 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20251122 p4) 15.2.1 20251122
VaST compiled on Sat Mar 21 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-354-ge3e751fc
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-03-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Mar 25 22:00:10 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461125.61392325
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits'
wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits'
wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits'
wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:28.242 -09:58:49.63
Second-epoch image center 05:08:50.853 -09:58:20.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.09 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:28.242 -09:58:49.63
Second-epoch image center 05:08:50.179 -09:58:21.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.09 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:08:50.853 -09:58:20.99
Second-epoch second image center 05:08:50.179 -09:58:21.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00277 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XJdGcfzExt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zySxdx2X5a
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Qtj9FBg0Dt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nVFBqIsFSd
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits and wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits and wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits and wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits) and catalog (wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Matched with Tycho-2 6827 out of 11318 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.909973
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.909973
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.76
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
2.1 pix Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
2.5 pix fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
2.5 pix fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
15.1 mag. Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.XJdGcfzExt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=978, passed=11318
Got 11318 stars (including 10327 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11318 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits -region wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zySxdx2X5a (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=940, passed=11334
Got 11334 stars (including 10382 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11334 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits -region wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Qtj9FBg0Dt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=526, passed=6583
Got 6583 stars (including 6054 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6583 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nVFBqIsFSd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=523, passed=6575
Got 6575 stars (including 6051 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6575 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Eri-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20570_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 20570_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:58.67 -09:28:27.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20609_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 20609_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:23.98 -06:55:50.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 0s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Eri-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:28.242 -09:58:49.63
Second-epoch image center 05:08:50.853 -09:58:20.99
Angular distance between the image centers 0.09 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:28.242 -09:58:49.63
Second-epoch image center 05:08:50.179 -09:58:21.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.09 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:08:50.853 -09:58:20.99
Second-epoch second image center 05:08:50.179 -09:58:21.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00277 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BXjTNihKd6
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1CWvPgRqZ7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits &> /tmp/tmp.h5wAD30IGZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits &> /tmp/tmp.UD7fYDCZR8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits and wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits and wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits and wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits) and catalog (wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Matched with Tycho-2 7019 out of 67696 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.795473
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.795473
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.49
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 69 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
2.0 pix Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
2.2 pix fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
2.3 pix fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
15.3 mag. Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
14.5 mag. fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.5 (SNR ) 13.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.BXjTNihKd6 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=4120, passed=67673
Got 67673 stars (including 63458 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 67673 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits -region wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1CWvPgRqZ7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=4078, passed=66937
Got 66937 stars (including 62752 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66937 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits -region wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.h5wAD30IGZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1887, passed=40471
Got 40471 stars (including 38545 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40471 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.UD7fYDCZR8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=2058, passed=40060
Got 40060 stars (including 37972 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 40060 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 950 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 950 stars left (next iteration limit 1045)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/wcs_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-43-52_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0294.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_215704_TTUQ2b1x1_27657_EvKzRf0O/wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Eri-05-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out81910.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out81915.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out81918.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82139.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82151.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82178.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82187.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82199.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82203.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82208.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82218.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82224.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82289.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82302.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82317.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82373.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out12607.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82488.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 16s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81905_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 81905_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:36.81 -13:46:21.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81910_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 81910_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:08.50 -09:10:54.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.43, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.41)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.036 3013886308039764992 082.28539682618 -09.18217593862 13.3270 12.7781 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.036#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81913_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 81913_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:05.67 -07:54:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81915_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 81915_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:18.97 -08:20:29.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.750 3014796944185930624 082.32893650999 -08.34159720736 12.5131 11.4918 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.750#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81917_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 81917_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:50.28 -09:25:36.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81918_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 81918_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:00:49.38 -13:57:14.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.08, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.06)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.779 2987292862678534144 075.20553093523 -13.95406776397 12.1781 11.7546 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.779#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81943_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 81943_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:01.38 -06:11:49.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81966_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 81966_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:58.70 -09:28:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 81999_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 81999_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82061_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82061_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82088_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82088_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82105_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82105_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:46.04 -08:24:16.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82125_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82125_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:25.86 -07:12:26.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82130_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82130_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82139_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82139_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:58:44.08 -10:30:49.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.97)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.295 3182932922275105664 074.68375876388 -10.51351292398 13.3500 12.8036 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.295#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82151_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82151_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:14:33.69 -13:56:24.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.629 2988218209089527680 078.64040256820 -13.94047962309 13.0117 12.4203 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.629#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82157_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82157_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:32.87 -07:11:35.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82158_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82158_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:22.77 -10:39:10.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82162_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82162_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:22.67 -07:47:39.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82178_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82178_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:45.04 -13:35:25.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.12, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.10)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.540 3173885247250135168 071.68737534058 -13.59068160498 12.9984 12.1971 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.540#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82186_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82186_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:34.26 -06:18:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82187_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82187_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:47:59.57 -10:35:45.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.22, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.20)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.229 3181614917070930944 071.99780248141 -10.59644573680 13.2578 12.7777 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.229#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82199_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82199_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:49.57 -12:32:08.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.21, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.19)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.599 3180202834903960448 074.20592950738 -12.53526138926 13.3560 12.8640 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.599#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82203_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82203_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:06.24 -11:34:03.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.20, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.18)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.455 3181162742913842304 071.52585584980 -11.56793417407 13.1239 12.6570 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.455#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82204_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82204_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82208_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82208_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:24.16 -10:22:08.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.30, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.28)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.824 3013406366918681344 081.10089549549 -10.36945400274 13.2847 12.7459 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.824#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82218_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82218_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:57:09.92 -06:32:23.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.39, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.37)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.339 3187367355749097472 074.29160672724 -06.54000406563 13.4963 13.1029 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.339#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82221_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82221_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82224_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82224_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:13:50.94 -06:44:10.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.48, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.46)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.673 3208325593563351040 078.46269801569 -06.73573897558 13.5669 13.1189 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.673#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82253_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82253_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:46.11 -08:38:15.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82257_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82257_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:30.83 -05:47:39.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82271_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82271_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82283_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82283_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82289_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82289_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:11.79 -11:06:15.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.59, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.57)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.141 3182086367041984512 075.54970096698 -11.10451854779 13.6937 12.9875 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.141#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82294_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82294_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82302_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82302_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:27.79 -07:59:03.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.66, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.64)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.691 3186747059392375936 073.11546746647 -07.98473158229 13.6199 13.2156 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.691#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82305_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82305_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82317_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82317_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:56.07 -06:23:28.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.58, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.56)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.558 3207657812047889280 080.23446330521 -06.39178187650 13.7672 13.1081 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.558#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82342_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82342_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:57.72 -07:03:52.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82347_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82347_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82364_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82364_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:09:28.47 -12:02:33.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82373_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82373_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:26.25 -09:04:22.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.983 3182820050535320960 077.60858601011 -09.07311556995 14.1732 13.6954 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.983#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82383_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82383_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82389_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82389_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82399_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82399_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82401_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82401_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82431_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82431_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82439_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82439_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82450_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82450_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82457_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82457_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82458_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82458_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82459_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82459_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82464_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82464_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82468_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82468_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82469_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82469_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82470_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82470_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82481_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82481_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82484_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82484_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82488_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
Preparing report for the candidate 82488_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82491_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82491_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82492_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82492_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82497_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82497_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82506_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82506_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82508_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82508_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82516_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 82516_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13648_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 13648_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:15.73 -06:36:04.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54431_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 54431_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12607_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
Preparing report for the candidate 12607_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14374_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295
The candidate 14374_fd_Eri-05-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-44-36_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0295 did not pass the final checks