This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 03 26.1036* 04 41 47.80 -07 57 20.3 8.9 U Eri 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VZ Eri,2461125.6036,8.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VZ Eri 20260326.1036 8.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 04:41:47.80 -07:57:20.3 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0119_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0277_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0119_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0276_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0119_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0277_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0119_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0276_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 03 26.1036* 03 52 55.51 -09 10 07.5 9.5 U Eri 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
SW Eri,2461125.6036,9.47,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
SW Eri 20260326.1036 9.47CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 03:52:55.51 -09:10:07.5 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0119_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0277_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0119_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0276_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0119_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0277_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0119_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0276_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 03 26.1036* 04 20 19.48 -10 24 26.1 11.7 U Eri 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
AF Eri,2461125.6036,11.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
AF Eri 20260326.1036 11.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 04:20:19.48 -10:24:26.1 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0119_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0277_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0119_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0276_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0119_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0277_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0119_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20_00sec_-10_00C_LIGHT_0276_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.65934169 09.01.2026 03:49:17.122 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
First image: 2461049.65934169 09.01.2026 03:49:17.122 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
Last image: 2461125.60388623 26.03.2026 02:29:25.770 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.74
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 7088
Objects passed selection criteria: 7065
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.9 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5251
Average stars matched: 4977.5 (94.7915 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 113076 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20251122 p4) 15.2.1 20251122
VaST compiled on Sat Mar 21 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-354-ge3e751fc
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-03-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Mar 25 21:37:26 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461049.65934169 09.01.2026 03:49:17.122 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
First image: 2461049.65934169 09.01.2026 03:49:17.122 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
Last image: 2461125.60388623 26.03.2026 02:29:25.770 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 60
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 20 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 40505
Objects passed selection criteria: 40427
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 31533
Average stars matched: 29756.5 (94.3662 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 141784 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20251122 p4) 15.2.1 20251122
VaST compiled on Sat Mar 21 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-354-ge3e751fc
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-03-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Mar 25 21:38:41 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461125.60335417
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits'
wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits'
wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits'
wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:17:06.104 -10:00:23.51
Second-epoch image center 04:17:08.266 -10:00:24.85
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:17:06.104 -10:00:23.51
Second-epoch image center 04:17:08.559 -10:00:03.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:17:08.266 -10:00:24.85
Second-epoch second image center 04:17:08.559 -10:00:03.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00602 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DI3BMwmtyE
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits &> /tmp/tmp.syocRwnOov
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0pYBjuoVdb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits &> /tmp/tmp.g4swUH1Akr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits and wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits and wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits and wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits) and catalog (wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Matched with Tycho-2 5137 out of 8143 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.886224
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.886224
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.74
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
2.0 pix Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
2.5 pix fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
2.5 pix fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
15.1 mag. Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 11.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.DI3BMwmtyE (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=607, passed=8143
Got 8143 stars (including 7525 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8143 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits -region wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.syocRwnOov (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=633, passed=8187
Got 8187 stars (including 7544 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8187 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits -region wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0pYBjuoVdb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=305, passed=4292
Got 4292 stars (including 3982 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4292 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.g4swUH1Akr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=309, passed=4264
Got 4264 stars (including 3949 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4264 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Eri-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20470.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out05316.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20470_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
The candidate 20470_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:52:55.50 -09:10:07.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN= 9.43, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=10.41)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.932 3194456216451739776 058.23015022777 -09.16863055064 10.1473 8.5471 VARIABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.932#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 05316_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
Preparing report for the candidate 05316_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Eri-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
04:41:47.80 -07:57:20.3
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:17:06.104 -10:00:23.51
Second-epoch image center 04:17:08.266 -10:00:24.85
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:17:06.104 -10:00:23.51
Second-epoch image center 04:17:08.559 -10:00:03.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:17:08.266 -10:00:24.85
Second-epoch second image center 04:17:08.559 -10:00:03.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00602 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zvcdK95HCx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits &> /tmp/tmp.E5Wc6E8wy8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NZ5alDh5cL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7uYO23vhEn
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits and wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits and wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits and wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits) and catalog (wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Matched with Tycho-2 5325 out of 46395 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.777551
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.777551
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.47
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.31
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 45 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
1.9 pix Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
2.3 pix fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
2.3 pix fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
15.3 mag. Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
14.3 mag. fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.3 (SNR ) 13.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.zvcdK95HCx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=2229, passed=46386
Got 46386 stars (including 44080 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46386 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013074 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010459 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits -region wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.E5Wc6E8wy8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=2243, passed=46358
Got 46358 stars (including 44037 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 46358 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits -region wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NZ5alDh5cL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=988, passed=25613
Got 25613 stars (including 24591 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25613 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7uYO23vhEn (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1040, passed=25376
Got 25376 stars (including 24301 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25376 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013022 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010418 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-49-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0119.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/wcs_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-01-08_21-50-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0120.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-28-39_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0276.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_213507_TTUQ2b1x1_21814_Ls2M9EG4/wcs_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Eri-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52782.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out55133.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out55396.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out55479.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out55584.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out55638.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out55655.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_apass.txt__out56634.dat to exclusion_list_apass.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out19917.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out25597.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52782_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
The candidate 52782_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:35:26.37 -09:22:54.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.74, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.72)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.726 3185600852881196928 068.86003075823 -09.38199155491 12.6210 12.1829 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.726#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53578_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
The candidate 53578_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53803_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
The candidate 53803_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54065_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
The candidate 54065_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54386_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
The candidate 54386_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 54542_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
The candidate 54542_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55133_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
The candidate 55133_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:14:25.26 -06:57:27.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.27, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.25)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.355 3196112287121303424 063.60494138547 -06.95717199919 13.4065 12.8815 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.355#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55297_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
The candidate 55297_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55396_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
The candidate 55396_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:16:41.52 -07:17:50.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.62, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.60)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.588 3196060610074919296 064.17372409427 -07.29730586740 13.7466 12.9107 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.588#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55479_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
The candidate 55479_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:11:51.18 -08:48:48.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.55, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.53)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.786 3192448989255117952 062.96323373787 -08.81319890928 13.6315 13.0980 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.786#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55513_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
The candidate 55513_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55584_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
The candidate 55584_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:12:52.69 -05:55:52.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.57, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.55)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.733 3197181596539131136 063.21954181368 -05.93115759499 13.5592 12.9317 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.733#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55609_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
The candidate 55609_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55611_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
The candidate 55611_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55638_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
The candidate 55638_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:04:28.08 -10:13:03.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.51, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.49)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.349 3193661888019742592 061.11702253123 -10.21665321184 13.6754 13.0667 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.349#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55655_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
The candidate 55655_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:20:53.67 -11:55:22.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.52, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.50)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.720 3178784361824335488 065.22351384053 -11.92300105210 13.6007 12.9883 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.720#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55678_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
The candidate 55678_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55712_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
The candidate 55712_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55714_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
The candidate 55714_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55890_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
The candidate 55890_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55933_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
The candidate 55933_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 55976_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
The candidate 55976_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56011_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
The candidate 56011_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56133_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
The candidate 56133_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56136_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
The candidate 56136_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56150_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
The candidate 56150_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56210_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
The candidate 56210_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56242_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
The candidate 56242_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56291_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
The candidate 56291_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56359_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
The candidate 56359_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56375_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
The candidate 56375_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56382_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
The candidate 56382_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56485_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
The candidate 56485_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56490_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
The candidate 56490_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56572_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
The candidate 56572_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56573_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
The candidate 56573_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56625_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
The candidate 56625_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56633_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
The candidate 56633_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56634_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
The candidate 56634_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:54.86 -06:50:51.4 in APASS (TIMEOUTCOMMAND_GAIA_VIZIER=#timeout 40 #, MAG_MEAN=14.27, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.25)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56668_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
The candidate 56668_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56710_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
The candidate 56710_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 56714_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
The candidate 56714_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 44488_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277
The candidate 44488_fd_Eri-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_21-29-25_20.00sec_-10.00C_LIGHT_0277 did not pass the final checks