This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
AC UMi,2461124.9720,12.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
AC UMi 20260325.4720 12.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 16:13:19.63 +81:23:37.0 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0186_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0198_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0186_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0197_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0186_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0198_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0186_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0197_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS 990128,2461124.9720,12.23,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS 990128 20260325.4720 12.23CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 15:41:48.91 +75:26:48.8 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0186_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0198_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0186_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0197_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0186_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0198_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0186_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0197_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
RX UMi,2461124.9720,12.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
RX UMi 20260325.4720 12.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 16:01:48.79 +77:58:05.1 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0186_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0198_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0186_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0197_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0186_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0198_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0186_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0197_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461118.93581177 19.03.2026 10:27:24.137 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
First image: 2461118.93581177 19.03.2026 10:27:24.137 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
Last image: 2461124.97229492 25.03.2026 11:19:56.281 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8986
Objects passed selection criteria: 8935
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.7 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6232.5
Average stars matched: 5907 (94.7774 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 114924 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20251122 p4) 15.2.1 20251122
VaST compiled on Sat Mar 21 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-354-ge3e751fc
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-03-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Mar 25 06:22:12 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461118.93581177 19.03.2026 10:27:24.137 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
First image: 2461118.93581177 19.03.2026 10:27:24.137 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
Last image: 2461124.97229492 25.03.2026 11:19:56.281 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 68
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 21 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 51675
Objects passed selection criteria: 51534
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 2.8 2.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 38391.5
Average stars matched: 36255 (94.435 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 152088 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20251122 p4) 15.2.1 20251122
VaST compiled on Sat Mar 21 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-354-ge3e751fc
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-03-21)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Mar 25 06:23:11 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461124.97179101
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits'
wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits'
wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits'
wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits'
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:59:55.334 +77:30:43.33
Second-epoch image center 16:00:03.633 +77:30:25.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:59:55.334 +77:30:43.33
Second-epoch image center 16:00:07.472 +77:30:29.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:00:03.633 +77:30:25.35
Second-epoch second image center 16:00:07.472 +77:30:29.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00364 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits &> /tmp/tmp.72CVvmxvj0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RsOgMNY8fx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tEPge2PACc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits &> /tmp/tmp.f9isWrgaTZ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits and wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits and wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits and wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Matched with Tycho-2 6625 out of 10765 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.862642
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.862642
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.59
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.27
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.27
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.2 pix UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
2.2 pix UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
2.4 pix fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
2.4 pix fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
15.3 mag. UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
13.6 mag. fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
13.6 mag. fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 11.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.72CVvmxvj0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits' -> 'wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=718, passed=10765
Got 10765 stars (including 10035 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10765 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits -region wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RsOgMNY8fx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits' -> 'wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=710, passed=10700
Got 10700 stars (including 9980 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10700 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.49"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits -region wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tEPge2PACc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=181, passed=4320
Got 4320 stars (including 4133 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4320 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.43"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits -region wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.f9isWrgaTZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=211, passed=4361
Got 4361 stars (including 4146 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4361 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.46"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.48"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits -region wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMi-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field UMi-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.87"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:59:55.334 +77:30:43.33
Second-epoch image center 16:00:03.633 +77:30:25.35
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:59:55.334 +77:30:43.33
Second-epoch image center 16:00:07.472 +77:30:29.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 16:00:03.633 +77:30:25.35
Second-epoch second image center 16:00:07.472 +77:30:29.43
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00364 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lkjsW7IHqU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2JIslkQS1U
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits &> /tmp/tmp.9uyMZpp4BV
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rKFG9aXxz0
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits and wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits and wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits and wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat) found
'wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Matched with Tycho-2 6724 out of 60396 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.736626
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.736626
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.28
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.46
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.46
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 55 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
2.1 pix UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
2.3 pix fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
2.2 pix fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
15.4 mag. UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
13.9 mag. fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
13.9 mag. fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.9 (SNR ) 13.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.lkjsW7IHqU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits' -> 'wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=3499, passed=60372
Got 60372 stars (including 56803 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 60372 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.50"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits -region wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.2JIslkQS1U (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits 571.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits' -> 'wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=3416, passed=60362
Got 60362 stars (including 56856 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 60362 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013019 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010416 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.53"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.51"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.52"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits -region wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.9uyMZpp4BV (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=836, passed=27398
Got 27398 stars (including 26537 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 27398 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits -region wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rKFG9aXxz0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=960, passed=28763
Got 28763 stars (including 27777 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 28763 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.44"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.45"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits -region wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-27-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0186.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/wcs_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-19_05-28-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0187.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-12_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0197.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_062044_TTUQ2b1x1_18192_7bx9X9EG/wcs_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field UMi-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out74146.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out74147.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out74148.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out76175.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out76591.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out76688.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out76798.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out77294.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out77375.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out77457.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out77646.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out77958.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out16915.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out32053.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out40591.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74146_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 74146_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:49:05.89 +80:25:12.7 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.94, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.92)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74147_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 74147_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:12:00.22 +73:54:30.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.95)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.573 1700311513069267456 227.99934807652 +73.90857036430 13.3365 12.8950 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.573#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74148_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 74148_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:20:04.65 +75:07:47.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.19, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.17)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.066 1700794851509654016 230.01878286621 +75.13011516916 12.5458 12.0688 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.066#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 74814_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 74814_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75316_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 75316_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75869_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 75869_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:03:00.48 +76:47:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76033_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 76033_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:30:41.80 +77:25:18.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76175_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 76175_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:44:28.33 +80:57:35.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.46, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.44)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.030 1721106099745962624 236.11801194027 +80.95992360169 12.4701 11.8597 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.030#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76395_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 76395_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:33:05.33 +79:38:43.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76539_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 76539_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76545_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 76545_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76555_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 76555_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76567_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 76567_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76591_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 76591_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:14:02.06 +76:08:30.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.78, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.76)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.173 1701191264106279680 228.50976964001 +76.14196475766 13.1198 12.6683 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.173#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76661_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 76661_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76688_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 76688_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:58:45.26 +76:30:27.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.009 1701925119398477824 224.68741737776 +76.50759500518 13.1465 12.6944 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.009#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76798_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 76798_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:17:23.90 +80:57:47.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.86, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.84)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.744 1710539793002331008 244.34908909316 +80.96395268761 12.9973 12.2516 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.744#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76802_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 76802_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76909_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 76909_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76975_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 76975_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76996_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 76996_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77278_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 77278_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77294_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 77294_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 16:56:57.55 +80:50:43.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.20, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.18)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.621 1709657538000270080 254.23875388092 +80.84546653411 13.5018 12.7969 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.621#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77311_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 77311_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77312_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 77312_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77359_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 77359_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77375_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 77375_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:56:30.04 +74:54:59.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.28, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.26)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.121 1700658894320696192 224.12406550992 +74.91712598318 13.4400 12.8610 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.121#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77457_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 77457_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:09:43.45 +77:01:22.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.33, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.31)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.987 1702049398572453504 227.43083575785 +77.02318701460 13.2261 12.7603 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.987#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77464_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 77464_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77486_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 77486_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77508_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 77508_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77631_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 77631_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77642_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 77642_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77646_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 77646_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 15:14:24.40 +80:15:20.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.18, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.16)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.529 1720648805987379200 228.59752572474 +80.25564537318 13.3650 12.9391 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.529#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77656_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 77656_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77809_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 77809_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77821_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 77821_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77830_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 77830_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77832_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 77832_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77930_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 77930_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77946_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 77946_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77958_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 77958_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:39:37.51 +79:47:22.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.47, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.45)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.544 1720748517948320000 219.90821912200 +79.78978691048 13.5638 13.1012 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.544#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78044_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 78044_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78045_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 78045_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78067_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 78067_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78073_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 78073_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78079_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 78079_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78112_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 78112_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78154_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 78154_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78164_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 78164_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78194_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 78194_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 78222_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198
The candidate 78222_fd_UMi-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-19-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0198 did not pass the final checks