NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Vir-04-Q2b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= 500
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 3000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 2000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Vir-04-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Vir-04-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing Vir-04-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 233288 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 233288 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.png' -> 'transient_report/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits_preview.png'
Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits

renamed 'Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.png' -> 'transient_report/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits_preview.png'
Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 590.2101 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 495.5201 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1663.9708 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 474.4590 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1726.5640 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 471.0809 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.81929 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.007 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.fit EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 10.4200000762939 / [degC] Focuser temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits CCD-TEMP= -15.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-03-25T06:08:25.1586226' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-03-25T11:08:25.1586226' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61124.4641800695 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-03-25T11:08:35.0626700' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61124.464294699 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 205.713857440749 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 6.00025399577849 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 42.0969444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 244.022222222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.48990593823218 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Vir-04' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '13 42 51' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+06 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 21933 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 21933 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 10.4200000762939 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 10.4200000762939 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 56: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 58: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 59: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 60: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 61: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 62: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 63: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 64: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-03-21.fit CCD-TEMP= -15.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits CCD-TEMP= -14.900000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-03-21.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-03-21.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/d_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits :) Spent 0.578701 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-03-21.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/d_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37165.080609 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23810.0, right_median=27365.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 10.0699996948242 / [degC] Focuser temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits CCD-TEMP= -15.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-03-25T06:09:16.0936307' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-03-25T11:09:16.0936307' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61124.4647695948 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-03-25T11:09:25.9973879' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61124.4648842243 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 205.713857382785 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 6.0002540029867 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 41.9408333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 244.206388888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.49439980411161 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Vir-04' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '13 42 51' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+06 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 21933 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 21933 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 10.0699996948242 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 10.0699996948242 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 56: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 58: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 59: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 60: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 61: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 62: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 63: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 64: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-03-21.fit CCD-TEMP= -15.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits CCD-TEMP= -14.900000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-03-21.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-03-21.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/d_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits :) Spent 0.493923 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-03-21.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/d_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37165.080609 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23810.0, right_median=27365.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits


fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461124.96429581 Plate-solving the images 'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt' 'asassn_transients_list.txt' -> '../asassn_transients_list.txt' wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits' wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits' wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits' wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits' The image scale is 5.88"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.8" ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 13:42:51.358 +05:59:16.47 Second-epoch image center 13:42:42.158 +05:59:03.47 Angular distance between the image centers 0.04 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 13:42:51.358 +05:59:16.47 Second-epoch image center 13:42:44.968 +05:58:42.24 Angular distance between the image centers 0.03 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 13:42:42.158 +05:59:03.47 Second-epoch second image center 13:42:44.968 +05:58:42.24 Angular distance between the image centers 0.01305 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XAyzjwL3Fa Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits &> /tmp/tmp.u34DcGibbE Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits &> /tmp/tmp.d2irpPCkfS Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2Q6I1HJuf6 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits and wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits and wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits and wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Matched with Tycho-2 3468 out of 6371 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.948201 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.948201 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.63 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.32
Magnitude calibration plot:

____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.3 pix Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits 2.3 pix Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits 2.4 pix fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits 2.4 pix fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.3 mag. Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits 15.3 mag. Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits 14.1 mag. fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits 14.0 mag. fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.0 (SNR ) 11.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.XAyzjwL3Fa (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=356, passed=6371 Got 6371 stars (including 6012 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6371 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 982 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 982 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 982 stars left (next iteration limit 1080) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits -region wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.u34DcGibbE (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits 571.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=378, passed=6255 Got 6255 stars (including 5875 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6255 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.7' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.7 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013024 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010419 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 982 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 982 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Excluding outliers - 982 stars left (next iteration limit 1080) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits -region wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.d2irpPCkfS (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=139, passed=2542 Got 2542 stars (including 2403 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2542 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.2Q6I1HJuf6 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=142, passed=2318 Got 2318 stars (including 2176 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 2318 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.1' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.1 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013015 (46.9 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010412 (37.5 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 975 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Excluding outliers - 975 stars left (next iteration limit 1072) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/wcs_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/wcs_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20244.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20253.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20214_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190 The candidate 20214_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.46489    2461124.96489    11.57    14:00:09.41 +03:55:55.8   2139 4386   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits **** FOUND 14:00:09.42 +03:55:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20217_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190 The candidate 20217_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.46489    2461124.96489    8.65    13:23:40.69 +02:43:35.3   7650 5202   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits **** FOUND 13:23:40.70 +02:43:35.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20244_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190 The candidate 20244_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.46489    2461124.96489    10.50    13:18:20.91 +03:37:35.9   8468 4663   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits **** FOUND 13:18:20.90 +03:37:35.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.38, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.36)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.148 3715799309846693760 199.58680202054 +03.62646001289 8.8807 8.1438 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.148#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20253_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190 The candidate 20253_fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.46489    2461124.96489    10.75    13:21:33.62 +01:47:18.0   7972 5780   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits **** FOUND 13:21:33.62 +01:47:18.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=10.63, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=11.61)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.946 3688166589775761536 200.38989053745 +01.78818236348 9.7798 9.1760 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.946#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s Prepared the HTML report for the field Vir-04-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits Last image: 2461124.96429581 25.03.2026 11:08:25.158 UTC ERROR running VaST on the field Vir-04-Q2b1x1 (wrong field? clouds? very bad focus? -- transient_factory_test31.txt) ____ VaST output ____ --==VaST 1.0rc89==-- Parsing command line arguments... opt 'r': assuming no rotation larger than 15.0 degrees! opt 'F': Will NOT create flag images for SExtractor opt '5': 4.000000 pix is the new fixed star matching radius! opt 'b': Using 500 reference stars for image matching! opt '3': Will try to select best aperture for each source! opt 'y': 0 SysRem iterations will be conducted! opt 't 4': robust linear magnitude calibration (vary zero-point and slope) opt 'x': 99 is the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag! WARNING: disabling the mag-size filter in order not to reject blended stars. opt 'u': Stick with UTC time system, no conversion to TT will be done! opt 'f': Run ./find_candidates manually! opt 'k': "JD" keyword in FITS image header will be ignored! INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: symlinks_to_images INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: converted_images INFO from vast_remove_directory(): Could not open directory: unpacked_images Checking the list of input images specified on the command line ... Looking for the list of input images with time corrections in vast_list_of_input_images_with_time_corrections.txt ... list not found. This is OK if you specify the input images on the command line, not through this text file. Checking write permissions for the current directory (/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb)... OK Found a system-wide installation of SExtractor Cleaning old outNNNNN.dat files. Done with cleaning! VaST was started with the following command line: ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits Preparing to process 4 input FITS images... ######## Forcing special settings for the transient detection ######## transient search mode: disabling the mag-size filter as it should be switched off when running a transient search! transient search mode: disabling the bad image filter as it will not help during the transient search! transient search mode: will not try to gues image saturation limit transient search mode: no UTC-to-TT time system conversion will be performed!!! transient search mode: setting the maximum acceptable SExtractor flag to 3 transient search mode: disabling rejectin of images with elliptical stars transient search mode: not discarding large sources ################ Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 8500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 2000.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Setting the fixed star match radius of 4.00 pix We have 4 images to process. The number of processor cores determined from /proc/cpuinfo is 24. Running SExtractor in 4 parallel threads... The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 8500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 2000.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00001.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits > image00001.cat.sex_log 2>&1 The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 8500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 2000.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00002.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits > image00002.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits The gain value (GAIN=0.830) from default.sex will be used for image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits The above guess is based on the non-default gain value specified in default.sex by user Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 8500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 2000.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is running SExtractor on /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits Excluding image region: -1.0 -1.0 1.0 1.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 8500.0 0.0 9576.0 6388.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) Excluding image region: 7500.0 0.0 9576.0 2000.0 (defined in bad_region.lst) autodetect_aperture() is doing a preliminary SExtractor run to determine an appropriate aperture size sex -c default.sex -PARAMETERS_NAME autodetect_aper.param -CATALOG_NAME autodetect_aper_image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 5.1,5.1,4.6,5.6,6.1,6.6 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00004.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits > image00004.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 5.1,5.1,4.5,5.6,6.1,6.6 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00003.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits > image00003.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 5.0,5.0,4.5,5.5,6.0,6.5 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00002.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits > image00002.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is doing the main SExtractor run sex -PARAMETERS_NAME default.param -PHOT_APERTURES 5.0,5.0,4.5,5.5,6.0,6.5 -VERBOSE_TYPE NORMAL -CATALOG_NAME image00001.cat /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits > image00001.cat.sex_log 2>&1 autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits Parent process says: we are done fork()ing. Waiting for thread 3 to finish... autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits Waiting for thread 2 to finish... autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits autodetect_aperture() is done with image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-43-43_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0445.fits Waiting for thread 1 to finish... Done with SExtractor! TIMING SExtractor: 9 seconds Matching stars between images! No manually selected comparison stars file manually_selected_comparison_stars.lst which is fine. Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-02-22T10:42:57.7631186 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-02-22T10:42:57.7631186 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-02-22T10:42:57.763 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00001.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_04-42-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0444.fits Exposure 20 sec, 22.02.2026 10:42:57.763 UTC = JD(UTC) 2461093.94661763 mid. exp. The reference image star 8674.080 26.773 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8358.777 22.403 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 9116.281 16.240 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8293.785 14.389 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8700.325 12.129 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 9311.518 12.645 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8603.616 11.401 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8631.888 6.478 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 8489.503 10.192 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The reference image star 7571.987 9.204 is rejected, see bad_region.lst Excluding more reference image stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all) SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 29607, (29606 good for image matching) * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 10 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 3625 * rejected close to frame edge: 134 * rejected as being too small (<1.2 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>5.0 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 50 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. Please note: the CCD position-dependent magnitude correction will be applied. get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.33 Detection limit from the magnitude-SNR relation= -7.3 (5.0 sigma detection) The simple faintest star detection limit= -6.6 80 percent brightest stars detection limit= -7.8 Selected detection limit= -7.8 Final detection limit= -7.8 (after subtracting MAG_TRANSIENT_ABOVE_THE_REFERENCE_FRAME_LIMIT=0.0) Parameter box for transient search: 10.05.0 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 82 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 29754 * detected, using 502/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.001210, number_of_ambiguous_matches=36 refining the coordinate transformation... fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.001210, number_of_ambiguous_matches=36 27536 * matched, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.001210, number_of_ambiguous_matches=36 27536 * matched (2nd iteration). fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.001210, number_of_ambiguous_matches=36 27536 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = -0.000 29754 stars detected, 27536 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 26446, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 26446 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 26445 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = -0.00000*X_pix -0.00000*Y_pix +0.00535 Iteratively removing outliers from the mag-mag relation (weighted linear/polynomial fit)... Computing robust linear magnitude calibration. Used 25111 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.34 31825 objects stored in memory (400000 max.) Magnitude calibration is performed successfully! Saving observations to the cache... OK memory: 121668 kB used, 132684 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM processed 2 of 4 images ( 50.0%) Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-03-25T11:08:25.1586226 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-03-25T11:08:25.1586226 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-03-25T11:08:25.158 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00003.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-08-25_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0189.fits The star 9439.140 20.295 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8207.276 7.759 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8293.839 1.997 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7785.007 20.846 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7787.043 21.123 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7652.314 28.953 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7604.452 60.883 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7516.828 94.594 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7577.274 136.092 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 9215.889 143.892 is rejected, see bad_region.lst Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all) SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 13906 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 3 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 692 * rejected close to frame edge: 56 * rejected as being too small (<1.3 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>5.1 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 28 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 13906 * detected, using 234/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000660, number_of_ambiguous_matches=21 refining the coordinate transformation... fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000063, number_of_ambiguous_matches=2 13258 * matched, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000063, number_of_ambiguous_matches=2 13230 * matched (2nd iteration). fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000063, number_of_ambiguous_matches=2 13217 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = 3.878 13906 stars detected, 13217 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 12528, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 12528 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 11057 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = 0.00016*X_pix +0.00004*Y_pix -0.55129 ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_A * X_im_size + lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_A * X_im_size + lin_mag_B * Y_im_size + lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG Used 11057 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.69  ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image.  31825 objects stored in memory (400000 max.) The transient candidate (new frame position 7421.365 321.554 ; ref frame position: 7631.923 514.512) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst The transient candidate (new frame position 7433.408 448.743 ; ref frame position: 7635.273 642.126) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst The transient candidate (new frame position 7400.457 419.625 ; ref frame position: 7604.410 610.850) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst The transient candidate (new frame position 7370.484 76.426 ; ref frame position: 7597.883 266.677) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst The transient candidate (new frame position 7438.218 443.979 ; ref frame position: 7640.393 637.706) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst The transient candidate (new frame position 7414.127 777.880 ; ref frame position: 7593.662 968.922) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst The transient candidate (new frame position 7422.141 1010.849 ; ref frame position: 7585.799 1201.712) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst The transient candidate (new frame position 7398.537 447.332 ; ref frame position: 7600.611 638.341) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst The transient candidate (new frame position 7383.665 516.292 ; ref frame position: 7581.094 706.071) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst The transient candidate (new frame position 7304.042 193.378 ; ref frame position: 7523.697 378.732) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst The transient candidate (new frame position 7402.142 281.101 ; ref frame position: 7615.513 472.874) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst The transient candidate (new frame position 7487.496 299.133 ; ref frame position: 7699.368 496.673) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst The transient candidate (new frame position 7402.901 1470.344 ; ref frame position: 7535.359 1658.462) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst The transient candidate (new frame position 7459.724 1152.498 ; ref frame position: 7613.624 1345.484) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst The transient candidate (new frame position 7440.155 460.099 ; ref frame position: 7641.227 653.907) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst The transient candidate (new frame position 7337.188 650.663 ; ref frame position: 7525.625 836.852) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst The transient candidate (new frame position 7465.616 139.933 ; ref frame position: 7688.390 336.476) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst The transient candidate (new frame position 7367.644 333.945 ; ref frame position: 7577.531 523.199) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst The transient candidate (new frame position 7408.997 670.700 ; ref frame position: 7595.840 861.725) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst The transient candidate (new frame position 7444.101 1397.811 ; ref frame position: 7581.361 1588.965) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst The transient candidate (new frame position 7417.946 1379.802 ; ref frame position: 7556.516 1569.229) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst The transient candidate (new frame position 7409.679 485.425 ; ref frame position: 7609.125 677.075) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst The transient candidate (new frame position 7453.796 561.375 ; ref frame position: 7647.934 755.798) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst The transient candidate (new frame position 7348.910 288.425 ; ref frame position: 7561.954 476.543) is rejected as at the reference frame it would land at a bad region listed in bad_region.lst memory: 127000 kB used, 132684 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM processed 3 of 4 images ( 75.0%) Processing /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits 9576x6388 FITS image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits Trying to guess the time system by parsing the comment string 'Time of observation (UTC)' Time system set from the comment to DATE-OBS keyword: 'Time of observation (UTC)' The input time system is identified as: UTC (blank if unknown) Setting observation date using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-03-25T11:09:16.0936307 Setting observation time using DATE-OBS keyword: 2026-03-25T11:09:16.0936307 Observing time converted to the "standard" FITS header format: DATE-OBS= 2026-03-25T11:09:16.093 EXPTIME = 20.000 Using the catalog image00004.cat SExtracted earlier from the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_060959_TTUQ2b1x1_22912_5JZA3ygb/fd_Vir-04-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_06-09-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0190.fits The star 9446.335 16.717 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8214.518 4.152 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7659.458 25.531 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7792.560 17.255 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 9223.119 140.342 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7584.437 132.486 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 9009.390 169.653 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7677.914 195.347 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 7551.585 180.795 is rejected, see bad_region.lst The star 8760.930 187.739 is rejected, see bad_region.lst Excluding more stars falling at bad regions!.. (will not print them all) SExtractor output filtering results: * passed selection: 12902 * rejected as having no flux measurement: 0 * rejected as having SNR<3.0: 3 * rejected inside rectangles defined in bad_region.lst: 521 * rejected close to frame edge: 58 * rejected as being too small (<1.3 pix): 0 * rejected as being too large (>5.1 pix): 0 * rejected as outliers in mag-size plot: 0 * rejected as having SExtractor flags > 99 and <= 7: 0 * rejected as having hopelessly bad SExtractor flags (>7): 24 * rejected due to an external image flag: 0 * rejected as having bad PSF fit: 0 --- You may change some of the filtering parameters by editing src/vast_limits.h and re-running 'make'. 12902 * detected, using 217/ 500 * for reference/current image matching, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000189, number_of_ambiguous_matches=6 refining the coordinate transformation... fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000189, number_of_ambiguous_matches=6 12256 * matched, fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000157, number_of_ambiguous_matches=5 12295 * matched (2nd iteration). fraction_of_ambiguous_matches= 0.000126, number_of_ambiguous_matches=4 12308 * matched (3rd iteration). Success! rotation [degrees] = 3.896 12902 stars detected, 12308 stars matched Performing magnitude calibration using automatically selected comparison stars Expecting to find at least 40 * for magnitude calibration We have N_good_stars = 11641, N_manually_selected_comparison_stars = 0 Using 11641 stars for magnitude calibration (before filtering). Iteratively removing outliers from the linear mag-mag relation (unweighted fit)... After removing outliers in (X,Y,dm) plane, we are left with 10178 stars for magnitude calibration. Using the linear CCD position-dependent magnitude correction: delta_m = 0.00017*X_pix -0.00001*Y_pix -0.38538 ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_A * X_im_size + lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG ERROR in magnitude calibration: fabs(lin_mag_A * X_im_size + lin_mag_B * Y_im_size + lin_mag_C) > MAX_LIN_CORR_MAG Used 10178 stars for magnitude calibration (after filtering). get_detection_limit_sn(): Detection limit: -7.71  ERROR!!! Magnitude calibration failure. Dropping image.  31825 objects stored in memory (400000 max.) memory: 127000 kB used, 132684 kB peak, 65263848 kB available RAM processed 4 of 4 images (100.0%) TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds Done with measurements! =) Total number of measurements 59361 (59361 measurements stored in RAM) Freeing up some memory... Sorting the measurements cached in memory... Writing lightcurve (outNNNNN.dat) files... TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds The lightcurve files have been written, freeing up more memory... Creating vast_image_details.log ... Writing summary file: vast_summary.log ... OK Selecting the best aperture for each source Aperture with index 0 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 5158 stars Aperture with index 1 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.00*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 0 stars Aperture with index 2 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER -0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 7618 stars Aperture with index 3 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.10*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 4599 stars Aperture with index 4 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.20*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 3516 stars Aperture with index 5 (REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER +0.30*REFERENCE_APERTURE_DIAMETER) seems best for 6645 stars done! =) TIMING select_aperture: 1 seconds Computing lightcurve statistics... Will not compute variability indexes for objects having <1 points in lightcurve You may disable this by commenting out the line '#define DROP_LIGHTCURVES_WITH_SMALL_NUMBER_OF_POINTS_FROM_ALL_PLOTS' in src/vast_limits.h an re-compiling VaST with 'make' Computing, please wait a bit .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. vast_lightcurve_statistics.log: 27403 objects, the longest string is 383 bytes. Allocating memory for resorting the file. Variability index idx00_STD is enabled Variability index idx01_wSTD is enabled Variability index idx08_Npts is enabled Variability index idx09_MAD is enabled Variability index idx11_RoMS is enabled Variability index idx12_rCh2 is enabled Variability index idx17_Jtim is enabled Variability index idx18_Ltim is enabled Variability index idx21_eta is enabled Variability index idx23_S_B is enabled Variability index idx25_IQR is enabled Computing the expected values of variability indexes and their scatter as a function of magnitude .......... .......... .......... .......... Wriring the list of candidate variables to vast_autocandidates.log ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ----***** VaST processing WARNING *****---- You asked VaST to process 4 images, but only 1 were actually matched to the reference one. Please investigate this! ************************************************************** This error might be a bug, but it is far more likely that it is caused by inappropriate input data. A few simple things to check in the diagnostic messages printed above (or the vast*.log files): * How many of the input images are matched? * Does the number of detected stars on each image look reasonable? * Do images have a sufficient overlap of at least about 41 percent? You may run ./sextract_single_image /path/to/my/image/file.fit to see how well VaST detects stars with the current SExtractor settings (star detection settings can be changed in the default.sex configuration file, see various examples in the VaST directory). If you cannot identify the problem, please e-mail Kirill Sokolovsky Please try to describe the problem in details and, if possible, attach vast_summary.log file and a few example images. If the images are too big to be sent by e-mail, please upload them through a web-form http://scan.sai.msu.ru/upload/ ************************************************************** Low percentage of matched images - we'll declare this an unsuccessful VaST run (exit code 1) _____________________ ########### Completed Vir-04-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### Adding identified Gaia sources from exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 13:18:20.90 +03:37:35.8 13:21:33.62 +01:47:18.1 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is 500 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461124.96429581 -observatory 500 22:42:59.26 -08:13:47.7 Mercury (0.7mag) 01:26:57.85 +08:22:08.7 Venus (-3.9mag) 23:16:09.41 -05:52:04.8 Mars (1.2mag) 07:05:30.69 +22:57:03.6 Jupiter (-2.3mag) 00:19:23.69 -00:12:59.5 Saturn (0.9mag) 03:43:38.27 +19:34:13.5 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:07:54.67 -00:34:01.8 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:32:23.33 -22:53:15.3 Pluto (14.5mag) 05:59:55.23 +28:17:59.8 Moon (-10.2mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Mar 25 06:12 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461124.96429581: 07:05:22.23 +22:57:20.0 Io (5.6mag) 07:05:28.58 +22:57:10.8 Europa (5.8mag) 07:05:49.82 +22:56:23.7 Ganymede (5.2mag) 07:05:20.46 +22:57:32.6 Callisto (6.4mag) 07:09:29.87 +22:56:04.7 Himalia (15.2mag) 07:05:30.75 +22:57:00.6 Thebe (16.1mag) 07:09:10.52 +23:21:13.5 Elara (17.2mag) 07:02:56.25 +23:48:22.6 Pasiphae (17.2mag) 07:14:14.36 +22:52:17.8 Carme (18.3mag) 00:19:34.28 -00:13:06.2 Titan (8.8mag) 00:19:27.95 -00:12:58.7 Rhea (10.1mag) 00:19:48.15 -00:10:47.6 Iapetus (11.5mag) 00:19:32.52 -00:12:43.3 Hyperion (14.8mag) 00:21:15.37 -00:02:05.4 Phoebe (16.8mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Mar 25 06:12 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461124.96429581: 13:25:44.72 +04:00:36.6 JWST 19:35:43.77 +07:07:18.6 Chandra 09:12:24.73 -50:01:07.1 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Mar 25 06:12 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461124.96429581 -observatory 500 18:39:03.34 -27:39:45.1 14.0mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 04:53:20.62 -70:46:51.7 17.5mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:29:04.23 +31:19:02.1 17.1mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:30:15.86 +07:56:38.8 17.6mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 23:03:16.00 +28:31:53.7 16.9mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 04:05:10.06 +25:25:26.1 15.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:01:33.87 +31:36:42.8 16.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:29:53.25 -02:37:29.3 17.2mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:56:30.37 +16:40:34.9 17.5mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:45:49.20 -11:48:06.9 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 09:20:55.62 -15:32:25.3 17.4mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS) 21:28:11.67 +61:51:18.6 17.4mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 19:31:52.86 -03:32:09.1 14.4mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 21:39:43.56 +83:16:59.7 17.7mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 06:14:16.34 +63:43:32.7 16.9mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 04:20:05.01 +08:17:25.9 9.5mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 11:18:59.30 +03:36:24.4 18.0mag C/2024 G2 (ATLAS) 16:30:36.84 +02:52:19.5 17.4mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:12:21.08 +09:48:00.2 14.8mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 03:08:08.81 -25:52:43.5 16.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 05:00:17.56 +51:12:50.2 17.6mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 15:00:51.95 +23:27:13.5 14.5mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 02:54:12.52 -23:09:19.0 17.7mag C/2025 Q3 (ATLAS) 22:36:12.08 +19:19:03.0 11.9mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 13:03:19.45 +01:36:37.5 17.6mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 01:57:28.42 -03:32:52.2 13.0mag C/2026 A1 (MAPS) 22:53:44.89 +32:20:02.5 13.9mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 18:00:48.77 -10:42:01.2 13.1mag 10P/Tempel 15:24:08.76 +04:53:54.1 12.2mag 24P/Schaumasse 11:10:09.30 -02:18:29.6 15.6mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 17:48:00.09 -10:28:17.4 17.4mag 40P/Vaisala 10:42:57.72 -06:06:28.6 16.5mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington 01:15:41.36 +13:43:26.0 17.0mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 06:34:49.07 +41:27:41.4 17.1mag 63P/Wild 23:00:25.16 -14:09:25.5 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 03:08:54.86 +13:09:28.6 15.9mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 00:18:56.06 +03:56:23.0 14.6mag 78P/Gehrels 21:54:00.22 -15:33:56.1 14.5mag 88P/Howell 01:12:08.85 +14:33:03.2 15.2mag 93P/Lovas 04:17:26.40 +30:58:54.7 16.4mag 123P/West-Hartley 08:09:29.61 +48:15:45.6 16.2mag 124P/Mrkos 02:00:48.28 +11:53:03.6 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 02:05:52.06 +11:39:49.2 17.4mag 131P/Mueller 23:40:01.69 +04:53:49.0 12.4mag 141P/Machholz 23:50:16.51 -02:58:02.6 12.5mag 141P-A/Machholz 22:48:09.05 -05:49:27.5 15.5mag 141P-D/Machholz 00:02:44.75 -12:04:22.6 15.4mag 162P/SidingSpring 10:36:27.15 +31:58:49.6 17.6mag 164P/Christensen 05:57:26.94 +24:42:30.7 17.6mag 198P/ODAS 15:27:19.24 -02:45:33.9 17.0mag 210P/Christensen 20:28:32.32 -16:34:16.9 17.2mag 218P/LINEAR 17:03:44.29 -16:16:35.8 16.2mag 235P/LINEAR 04:50:01.09 +32:34:04.7 16.4mag 240P/NEAT 07:30:42.40 -07:46:24.7 17.5mag 242P/Spahr 15:48:13.01 +05:26:15.7 17.6mag 391P/Kowalski 07:28:28.70 +21:10:40.5 17.6mag 450P/LONEOS 05:06:26.47 +46:19:50.4 17.9mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.8K Mar 25 06:12 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82 16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54 17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39 19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81 08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27 12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6 18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16 12:16:02.87 -53:16:33.70 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.08 3.93 13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33 19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26 14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31 13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97 06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67 12:20:27.90 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-19.05 16.24 07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74 06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48 11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95 10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53 20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83 06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93 07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78 19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2 04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS 11:10:34.24 +02:58:48.10 SN2026drr 2026-03-14.08 0.2 07:26:45.73 -27:45:13.90 ASASSN-26bo 2026-03-14.17 13.8 16:35:46.94 +58:12:28.40 SN2026ebt 2026-03-12.41 17.12 13:01:19.45 +15:42:15.00 SN2026ehe 2026-03-12.11 -0.29 09:15:55.41 +10:08:09.70 SN2026efq 2026-03-12.16 0.06 03:31:20.92 -35:29:29.00 SN2026evh 2026-03-12.05 17.29 06:26:19.15 -85:18:28.10 AT2026ffp 2026-03-12.16 0.37 14:16:42.30 -41:18:36.50 AT2026fij 2026-03-12.05 15.97 10:45:04.71 +00:06:13.10 SN 2026exe 2026-03-11.78 16.48 18:07:45.58 +69:43:01.00 SN2026ess 2026-03-12.37 17.37 13:11:03.58 +49:06:31.80 AT2026ewa 2026-03-12.42 16.77 15:03:25.23 -63:11:22.20 ASASSN-26bp 2026-03-11.92 13.33 13:09:37.25 -35:50:25.20 AT2024cmo 2026-03-11.12 16.29 13:06:01.97 -15:50:14.40 AT2026fdy 2026-03-10.33 16.68 11:30:09.67 -47:26:43.70 ASASSN-26bn 2026-03-10.12 15.2 05:03:25.25 -24:16:50.40 (= Gaia 2026-03-9.09 14.32 03:42:32.53 -04:17:53.70 ASASSN-26bm 2026-03-8.04 15.22 04:31:00.53 -68:29:50.20 ASASSN-26bl 2026-03-7.9 10.26 16:18:17.61 +41:25:11.40 SN 2026dkf 2026-03-6.31 16.7 13:45:00.35 +61:16:50.90 SN 2026ejl 2026-03-6.41 -0.66 09:27:45.48 -37:49:32.80 ASASSN-26bk 2026-03-2.3 13.11 20:22:01.20 +23:47:47.30 ASASSN-26bi 2026-02-28.51 15.86 11:16:22.10 +29:26:22.80 AT2026enm 2026-02-28.39 16.88 08:05:59.83 -48:39:35.60 ASASSN-26bh 2026-02-26.05 14.64 13:24:27.02 -45:57:01.40 ASASSN-26bg 2026-02-26.35 15.28 17:27:50.95 -68:28:46.40 ASASSN-26bf 2026-02-26.3 16.28 18:03:39.29 +19:58:46.30 ASASSN-26be 2026-02-25.56 14.95 17:40:18.19 +07:20:59.60 SN 2026crm 2026-02-24.34 16.9 18:38:35.79 -79:28:57.30 ASASSN-26bb 2026-02-24.37 16.2 17:43:29.75 +11:24:00.60 ASASSN-26bc 2026-02-23.37 -3.37 16:59:41.08 -80:01:51.20 ASASSN-26bd 2026-02-23.3 14.38 11:23:31.77 -08:39:15.40 SN2026cff 2026-02-23.15 -1.08 14:55:17.39 -05:56:05.30 SN2026dmk 2026-02-23.22 -0.76 12:28:15.19 +44:27:20.80 SN2026cjz 2026-02-23.47 15.62 12:12:29.55 -02:40:43.30 AT2026dsk 2026-02-23.4 17.21 09:21:05.29 +06:11:42.80 SN2026chr 2026-02-23.1 17.39 16:05:38.61 +18:06:07.40 SN 2026dsy 2026-02-23.36 17.15 04:55:50.66 -29:52:57.70 SN 2026dpg 2026-02-23.11 15.75 04:21:28.18 -53:22:54.40 AT2026drl 2026-02-21.03 17.31 11:50:37.32 +55:21:13.70 SN 2026dix 2026-02-21.43 16.39 16:21:19.69 -63:47:29.40 ASASSN-26az 2026-02-21.03 17.02 02:45:30.93 -54:17:43.10 SN 2026cju 2026-02-21.04 17.54 01:58:40.68 +47:34:50.10 ASASSN-26av 2026-02-21.09 15.97 18:35:53.01 -42:31:38.90 ASASSN-26aw 2026-02-21.12 15.89 11:40:18.88 -39:45:09.20 ASASSN-26ax 2026-02-21.08 15.73 02:26:23.52 -51:42:29.80 ASASSN-26ay 2026-02-21.04 13.93 08:46:07.66 +01:17:43.90 ASASSN-26ba 2026-02-20.23 15.43 14:15:47.69 -48:05:16.40 SN2026dez 2026-02-19.19 15.93 17:25:53.90 -23:28:31.50 ASASSN-26au 2026-02-18.33 15.82 16:07:59.09 -24:00:10.00 SN2026cmv 2026-02-17.28 16.19 18:15:01.25 -37:43:36.70 ASASSN-26at 2026-02-16.36 15.94 13:01:07.08 -11:25:16.30 AT2026bzh 2026-02-12.45 17.3 10:56:29.81 -07:07:25.30 SN 2026bre 2026-02-12.16 17.15 08:55:43.51 -53:26:11.50 ASASSN-26as 2026-02-12.2 16.54 06:33:50.98 -41:46:25.10 ASASSN-26ar 2026-02-12.04 16.42 12:15:22.43 +23:59:39.60 SN2026bzg 2026-02-11.27 16.32 08:01:10.95 -03:43:14.30 AT2026coj 2026-02-9.25 13.73 12:44:00.18 -57:03:46.80 ASASSN-26aq 2026-02-9.18 16 06:26:33.34 -54:06:39.90 AT2026cih 2026-02-8.06 17.26 23:08:59.40 -88:59:11.60 SN 2026bsu 2026-02-8.03 16.02 01:04:14.94 -62:31:02.30 SN 2026azk 2026-02-8.04 16.41 08:44:55.41 +64:55:09.90 SN 2026anq 2026-02-7.16 17.62 12:37:42.99 +33:26:05.40 SN 2026bnm 2026-02-7.29 16.74 00:12:55.45 +33:21:25.90 SN2026cbh 2026-02-7.09 16.33 08:02:12.64 -04:14:20.90 SN 2026auh 2026-02-7.11 16.64 18:03:52.67 -31:27:26.00 TCP J18035290-3127298 2026-02-7.37 15.76 12:18:03.59 +50:27:10.20 SN 2026bjz 2026-02-7.25 16.48 07:51:51.12 +55:05:27.60 SN 2026ail 2026-02-6.21 16.85 08:10:56.38 +36:49:42.80 AT2026bsa 2026-02-6.29 17.47 04:43:45.47 -15:49:01.00 SN2026azr 2026-02-5.24 16.96 06:14:48.48 -34:20:08.90 ASASSN-26ap 2026-02-5.2 13.77 02:42:33.90 -27:21:02.60 SN 2026aip 2026-02-4.09 15.85 00:43:12.26 +38:35:47.90 AT2026brt 2026-02-3.12 14.92 14:34:27.21 +21:56:59.90 SN2026atb 2026-01-29.32 15.59 13:12:04.11 -60:56:12.40 ASASSN-26ao 2026-01-28.35 15.61 13:00:36.49 -06:28:26.00 SN2026azd 2026-01-28.23 15.69 10:33:50.27 -31:00:53.40 SN 2026ayz 2026-01-25.11 15.3 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K Mar 25 06:12 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 15:33:45.28 -22:11:07.3 TCP J15334528-2211073 2026-01-16.8451 14.9mag 22:34:01.26 +39:53:32.8 TCP J22340126+3953328 2026-01-17.5738 16.79Cmag 00:42:52.36 +41:16:13.3 PNV J00425236+4116133 2026-01-18.5502 17.41Cmag 06:57:11.19 -17:24:43.9 TCP J06571119-1724439 2026-01-18.5375 14.2mag 00:42:52.23 +41:01:44.7 PNV J00425223+4101447 2026-01-19.5505 18.74Cmag 09:54:46.47 +69:06:31.7 PNV J09544647+6906317 2026-01-26.8081 19.3mag 18:08:51.99 -26:16:21.9 TCP J18085199-2616219 2026-01-31.8519 12.2mag 08:01:11.02 -03:43:14.1 TCP J08011102-0343141 2026-02-08.8090 15.10Cmag 05:19:15.40 -02:04:51.5 TCP J05191540-0204515 2026-02-13.4306 14.5mag 10:52:41.26 +36:40:08.9 TCP J10524126+3640089 2026-02-17.6065 17.4mag 05:50:50.81 +36:22:45.1 TCP J05505081+3622451 2026-02-17.5511 15.7mag 00:42:51.33 +41:13:49.1 PNV J00425133+4113491 2026-02-20.738 18.3mag 00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4 PNV J00430488+4129414 2026-02-20.5923 18.84Cmag 17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag 09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag 07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag 00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag 07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag 17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag 08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 187K Mar 25 06:12 tocp_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 93 C