NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields UMa-01-Q2b1x1

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 0

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ2b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 15.0
FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 600
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= 500
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 3000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 2000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 4
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
UMa-01-Q2b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting UMa-01-Q2b1x1 ###########
Processing UMa-01-Q2b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 249215 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 249215 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits_preview.png'
UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits

renamed 'UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.png' -> 'transient_report/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits_preview.png'
UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 491.2199 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 573.1830 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1128.6986 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 559.9901 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1131.7459 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 557.5441 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.29775 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.004 ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.fit EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -14.9 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 10.5900001525879 / [degC] Focuser temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits CCD-TEMP= -14.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-03-25T04:56:56.0562820' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-03-25T09:56:56.0562820' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61124.414537685 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-03-25T09:57:05.9609453' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61124.414652315 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -14.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 143.998064539142 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 69.9994928206982 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 32.9122222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 335.89 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.83623120227759 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 21931 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 21931 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 10.5900001525879 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 10.5900001525879 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 56: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 58: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 59: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 60: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 61: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 62: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 63: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 64: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-03-21.fit CCD-TEMP= -14.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits CCD-TEMP= -14.900000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-03-21.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-03-21.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/d_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits :) Spent 0.514645 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-03-21.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/d_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37165.080609 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23810.0, right_median=27365.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature FOCTEMP = 10.8100004196167 / [degC] Focuser temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits CCD-TEMP= -15.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Header: 67 keys total, 4 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-03-25T04:57:38.7045380' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-03-25T09:57:38.7045380' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61124.4150312962 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-03-25T09:57:48.6044217' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61124.4151458796 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-84137c4dbbbd119a9' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU2' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 143.99806457836 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = 69.9994927962585 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 32.85 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 335.901944444444 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.83929830656571 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1009.5 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.7482925 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958319 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'UMa-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '09 36 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "FOCNAME = 'ZWO Focuser' / Focusing equipment name" status=0 Record 50: "FOCPOS = 21931 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 51: "FOCUSPOS= 21931 / [step] Focuser position" status=0 Record 52: "FOCUSSZ = 0.0 / [um] Focuser step size" status=0 Record 53: "FOCTEMP = 10.8100004196167 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 54: "FOCUSTEM= 10.8100004196167 / [degC] Focuser temperature" status=0 Record 55: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 56: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 57: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 58: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 59: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 60: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 61: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 62: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 63: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 64: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 65: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 66: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 67: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-03-21.fit CCD-TEMP= -15.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits CCD-TEMP= -14.900000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-03-21.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-03-21.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/d_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits :) Spent 0.509481 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ2b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-03-21.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/d_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 37165.080609 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=23810.0, right_median=27365.5) renamed 'mff_TTUQ2b1x1_2026-03-20.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits


fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461124.91465343 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits' wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits' wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits' wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits' The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:36:12.813 +69:59:27.41 Second-epoch image center 09:35:50.727 +70:00:05.56 Angular distance between the image centers 0.03 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:36:12.813 +69:59:27.41 Second-epoch image center 09:35:20.663 +70:00:41.73 Angular distance between the image centers 0.08 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 09:35:50.727 +70:00:05.56 Second-epoch second image center 09:35:20.663 +70:00:41.73 Angular distance between the image centers 0.04399 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Gkln1kDcEf Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits &> /tmp/tmp.yfFjFCNj64 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ldBbHUDhPE Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits &> /tmp/tmp.2bNZw8uaCf Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat) found 'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Matched with Tycho-2 5451 out of 9450 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.910180 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.910180 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.51 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.40
Magnitude calibration plot:

____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.2 pix UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits 2.2 pix UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits 2.5 pix fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits 2.5 pix fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits 15.4 mag. UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits 15.0 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits 15.0 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.Gkln1kDcEf (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=712, passed=9450 Got 9450 stars (including 8721 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9450 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.yfFjFCNj64 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=727, passed=9454 Got 9454 stars (including 8716 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9454 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.ldBbHUDhPE (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=435, passed=7739 Got 7739 stars (including 7299 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7739 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 919.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 919.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012775 (46.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010220 (36.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 193 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.99" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.78" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 231 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.69" Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.11" Excluding outliers - 214 stars left (next iteration limit 179) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.2bNZw8uaCf (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=427, passed=7601 Got 7601 stars (including 7170 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7601 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 930.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 930.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012922 (46.5 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010338 (37.2 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 651 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.52" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.68" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 679 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.54" Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.44" Excluding outliers - 673 stars left (next iteration limit 704) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 01472_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 01472_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    10.05    10:55:07.98 +71:55:43.5   1053 1455   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (260.3") between the two second-epoch detections make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits exists and is non-empty The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:36:12.813 +69:59:27.41 Second-epoch image center 09:35:50.727 +70:00:05.56 Angular distance between the image centers 0.03 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 09:36:12.813 +69:59:27.41 Second-epoch image center 09:35:20.663 +70:00:41.73 Angular distance between the image centers 0.08 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 09:35:50.727 +70:00:05.56 Second-epoch second image center 09:35:20.663 +70:00:41.73 Angular distance between the image centers 0.04399 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XDAVVI6PP3 Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XptfeA7yON Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0CsxNIS3Jl Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ltaNWin07i Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits and wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits) and catalog (wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat) found 'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Matched with Tycho-2 5497 out of 53181 detected stars. The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.784760 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.784760 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.19 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.59 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.59
Magnitude calibration plot:

____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 79 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits 2.0 pix UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits 2.3 pix fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits 2.3 pix fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.6 mag. UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits 15.6 mag. UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits 15.2 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits 15.2 mag. fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 15.0 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.XDAVVI6PP3 (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=2966, passed=53168 Got 53168 stars (including 50099 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 53168 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.XptfeA7yON (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits' -> 'wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=2952, passed=53157 Got 53157 stars (including 50104 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 53157 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits -region wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.0CsxNIS3Jl (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1871, passed=39823 Got 39823 stars (including 37905 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 39823 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 919.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 919.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012775 (46.0 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010220 (36.8 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 194 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.10" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.13" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 242 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 8.07" Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.28" Excluding outliers - 220 stars left (next iteration limit 178) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.ltaNWin07i (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1856, passed=39445 Got 39445 stars (including 37546 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 39445 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 930.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 930.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012922 (46.5 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010338 (37.2 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 638 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.60" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.65" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 675 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 2.61" Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 1.40" Excluding outliers - 669 stars left (next iteration limit 691) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits -region wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-18-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0264.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/wcs_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-02-22_00-19-18_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-56-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0129.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/wcs_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66289_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 66289_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.64    10:10:45.26 +68:53:48.7   2853 3749   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (136.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66291_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 66291_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    13.73    08:42:27.43 +65:23:49.5   8120 5632   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (616.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66292_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 66292_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    13.93    08:42:29.36 +65:26:12.6   8112 5608   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (616.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66293_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 66293_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    13.80    08:52:35.54 +67:30:02.1   7258 4492   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (508.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66294_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 66294_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    13.86    08:35:36.56 +71:21:46.8   7648 2012   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (709.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66295_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 66295_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    13.67    09:48:26.37 +72:45:16.8   4197 1522   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (215.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66640_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 66640_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    12.12    09:10:22.46 +67:05:25.8   6262 4883   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (336.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66648_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 66648_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    12.11    08:48:35.59 +65:32:12.9   7720 5625   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (546.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66706_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 66706_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    12.44    08:44:13.18 +72:18:42.5   7119 1546   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (643.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66949_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 66949_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    13.23    10:56:07.80 +70:07:52.3   0628 2495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (451.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 66975_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 66975_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    13.15    10:40:04.90 +68:03:03.9   1093 3964   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (503.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67024_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67024_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    13.22    08:46:51.34 +72:23:38.2   6990 1523   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (620.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67042_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67042_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    13.21    10:59:57.75 +71:23:00.9   0711 1700   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (357.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67103_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67103_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    13.38    08:51:21.42 +73:43:57.6   6639 0763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (623.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67125_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67125_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    13.45    09:06:34.55 +73:11:40.2   6039 1189   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (482.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67142_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67142_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    13.32    10:02:08.68 +69:50:26.8   3396 3227   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67183_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67183_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    13.50    09:13:07.09 +69:38:48.9   5955 3358   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (332.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67208_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67208_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    13.54    09:17:49.76 +69:53:15.1   5697 3234   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (298.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67292_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67292_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    13.59    10:28:38.08 +70:00:43.6   2026 2923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (203.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67311_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67311_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    13.75    09:50:28.85 +67:23:43.5   3911 4757   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (93.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67394_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67394_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    13.84    09:41:05.31 +70:16:26.4   4496 3034   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (150.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67401_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67401_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.02    08:26:08.70 +70:06:49.1   8310 2617   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (798.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67404_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67404_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    13.88    09:43:37.53 +72:45:33.7   4413 1528   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (236.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67413_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67413_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    13.86    10:36:29.39 +70:29:53.7   1696 2546   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (232.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67452_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67452_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    13.77    10:06:03.40 +69:09:17.0   3135 3621   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (79.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67480_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67480_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    13.84    09:13:10.70 +73:51:01.0   5714 0824   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (468.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67497_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67497_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    13.86    10:06:33.34 +66:20:04.2   2871 5332   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (242.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67518_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67518_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    13.90    09:53:30.49 +66:54:25.2   3705 5047   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (131.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67527_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67527_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.29    11:02:22.01 +72:54:35.7   0940 0773   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (245.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67530_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67530_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.03    09:06:08.93 +68:26:40.2   6409 4040   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (382.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67561_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67561_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.11    10:46:54.31 +71:02:30.9   1272 2092   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (277.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67567_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67567_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.05    10:15:04.31 +69:26:27.4   2672 3389   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (146.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67641_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67641_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.28    10:26:59.83 +71:33:26.9   2316 2015   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (146.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67691_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67691_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.20    08:52:58.80 +70:39:05.1   6899 2616   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (529.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67706_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67706_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.29    09:09:27.97 +69:12:56.3   6174 3598   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (357.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67718_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67718_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.35    09:38:03.52 +73:06:12.4   4664 1324   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (277.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67723_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67723_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.26    09:25:39.75 +71:17:46.5   5255 2408   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (275.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67731_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67731_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.19    08:37:26.24 +69:41:01.2   7805 3023   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (673.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67754_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67754_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.21    09:23:23.82 +72:39:30.9   5322 1579   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (348.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67757_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67757_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.58    10:03:59.04 +67:44:55.6   3139 4487   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (147.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67758_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67758_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.32    10:36:11.32 +70:02:09.9   1638 2825   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (264.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67763_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67763_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.25    10:41:50.92 +73:04:33.3   1865 0953   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (169.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67777_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67777_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.28    10:07:27.23 +65:54:25.5   2777 5588   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (292.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67802_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67802_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.11    09:45:57.21 +65:55:37.7   4133 5663   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (132.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67813_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67813_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.25    10:22:40.01 +69:49:26.9   2313 3094   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (176.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67815_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67815_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.40    10:20:54.21 +68:48:20.1   2284 3723   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (219.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67816_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67816_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.38    08:59:23.23 +71:40:49.5   6488 2053   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (496.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67817_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67817_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.30    09:18:43.18 +70:13:01.1   5637 3039   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (302.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67819_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67819_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.38    09:13:00.67 +69:43:22.5   5956 3312   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (335.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67836_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67836_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.27    09:53:12.01 +66:20:11.3   3696 5396   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (147.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67861_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67861_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.50    09:03:40.36 +73:18:41.9   6156 1102   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (511.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67903_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67903_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.24    08:58:21.73 +66:45:06.4   6997 4996   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (452.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67955_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67955_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.22    09:05:37.74 +68:39:02.0   6422 3913   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (389.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67963_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67963_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.53    09:37:53.72 +73:03:06.1   4671 1356   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (275.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67966_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67966_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.53    10:18:58.87 +72:24:05.9   2797 1575   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (106.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67973_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67973_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.24    09:55:06.90 +69:38:52.2   3753 3376   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 67975_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 67975_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.59    09:49:15.98 +71:34:32.2   4122 2233   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (155.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68102_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 68102_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.58    10:00:45.53 +66:07:32.5   3215 5493   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (206.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68132_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 68132_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.67    08:28:53.73 +68:49:10.8   8387 3414   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (771.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68157_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 68157_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.54    09:54:31.01 +69:13:55.5   3765 3629   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68166_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 68166_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.50    10:37:49.57 +73:16:13.2   2076 0882   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (151.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68177_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 68177_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.52    09:40:43.42 +66:02:55.6   4464 5593   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (135.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68204_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 68204_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    15.13    08:54:07.00 +66:59:30.7   7224 4812   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (493.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68210_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 68210_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.56    10:41:25.75 +71:03:13.6   1542 2156   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (237.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68231_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 68231_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.86    10:43:27.12 +71:06:02.9   1451 2103   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (245.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68238_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 68238_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.60    08:51:30.77 +67:10:47.9   7355 4673   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (523.3") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68250_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 68250_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.71    10:04:04.82 +70:19:39.7   3330 2923   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68267_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 68267_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.67    08:47:14.17 +65:24:15.7   7821 5688   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (567.9") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68280_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 68280_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    15.01    09:22:26.17 +71:49:46.3   5393 2078   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (318.5") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68296_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 68296_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.75    10:17:23.78 +66:42:15.6   2241 5026   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (347.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68318_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 68318_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.52    10:22:41.63 +67:44:25.0   2051 4349   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (320.0") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68325_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 68325_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.88    10:33:50.59 +68:39:35.0   1547 3676   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (362.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68336_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 68336_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.81    08:53:41.27 +73:38:03.0   6552 0840   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (607.4") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68346_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 68346_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.70    09:34:08.61 +70:33:05.7   4849 2868   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (201.2") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68352_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 68352_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.43    08:24:16.58 +70:05:49.3   8406 2599   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (826.8") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68369_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 68369_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.93    10:01:22.28 +71:58:08.2   3572 1949   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (117.7") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 68374_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 68374_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    14.96    08:53:17.36 +70:06:34.0   6941 2942   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (520.6") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 42429_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 42429_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    13.73    10:22:06.77 +65:25:10.6   1784 5768   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (551.1") between the two second-epoch detections xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 07659_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 The candidate 07659_fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 3   2026 03 25.41515    2461124.91515    10.52    10:55:08.26 +71:55:41.1   1053 1455   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-25_CI_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_050030_TTUQ2b1x1_6961_NW7iHnoK/fd_UMa-01-Q2b1x1_2026-03-25_04-57-38_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0130.fits Rejecting candidate due to large distance (260.4") between the two second-epoch detections make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 2s Prepared the HTML report for the field UMa-01-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### ########### Completed UMa-01-Q2b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ2.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### ################################################################################### renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt NOT FOUND exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN=NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Nothing to add to the exclusion list #### The observatory MPC code is 500 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461124.91465343 -observatory 500 22:42:53.68 -08:13:39.8 Mercury (0.7mag) 01:26:44.20 +08:20:40.9 Venus (-3.9mag) 23:16:00.77 -05:53:00.0 Mars (1.2mag) 07:05:30.10 +22:57:04.3 Jupiter (-2.3mag) 00:19:22.32 -00:13:08.3 Saturn (0.9mag) 03:43:37.78 +19:34:11.8 Uranus (5.8mag) 00:07:54.26 -00:34:04.4 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:32:23.08 -22:53:15.7 Pluto (14.5mag) 05:56:44.21 +28:19:15.9 Moon (-10.2mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Mar 25 05:02 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461124.91465343: 07:05:21.40 +22:57:20.7 Io (5.6mag) 07:05:26.84 +22:57:13.8 Europa (5.8mag) 07:05:49.60 +22:56:24.1 Ganymede (5.2mag) 07:05:19.20 +22:57:34.6 Callisto (6.4mag) 07:09:29.32 +22:56:07.2 Himalia (15.2mag) 07:05:32.10 +22:56:58.1 Thebe (16.1mag) 07:09:09.91 +23:21:14.9 Elara (17.2mag) 07:02:55.47 +23:48:24.9 Pasiphae (17.2mag) 07:14:13.81 +22:52:18.1 Carme (18.3mag) 00:19:32.81 -00:13:15.1 Titan (8.8mag) 00:19:26.34 -00:13:07.5 Rhea (10.1mag) 00:19:46.85 -00:10:56.4 Iapetus (11.5mag) 00:19:31.32 -00:12:52.4 Hyperion (14.8mag) 00:21:14.03 -00:02:13.9 Phoebe (16.8mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Mar 25 05:02 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461124.91465343: 13:25:21.72 +04:03:53.0 JWST 19:25:27.33 +10:38:57.7 Chandra 08:57:44.59 -47:09:34.0 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Mar 25 05:02 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets computed with util/comet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461124.91465343 -observatory 500 18:39:01.04 -27:39:37.3 14.0mag P/2010 H2 (Vales) 04:53:19.09 -70:47:01.5 17.5mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:29:03.96 +31:19:01.2 17.1mag C/2017 K2 (PANSTARRS) 17:30:15.51 +07:56:17.2 17.6mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 23:03:14.91 +28:31:49.5 16.9mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 04:05:06.91 +25:25:20.6 15.8mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:01:33.97 +31:36:36.7 16.0mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:29:53.37 -02:37:51.2 17.2mag C/2022 R6 (PANSTARRS) 18:56:30.44 +16:40:19.5 17.5mag C/2023 A3 (Tsuchinshan-ATLAS) 15:45:49.61 -11:48:08.9 17.6mag P/2023 B1 (PANSTARRS) 09:20:57.90 -15:32:56.8 17.4mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS) 21:28:07.53 +61:51:12.0 17.4mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 19:31:53.90 -03:32:08.4 14.4mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 21:39:41.92 +83:16:41.8 17.7mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 06:14:16.82 +63:43:34.6 16.9mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 04:19:56.30 +08:15:30.9 9.5mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 11:19:01.66 +03:35:49.7 18.0mag C/2024 G2 (ATLAS) 16:30:38.03 +02:51:51.0 17.5mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 20:12:19.63 +09:47:18.1 14.8mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 03:08:06.48 -25:53:14.0 16.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 05:00:15.62 +51:13:44.2 17.6mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 15:01:01.08 +23:23:18.1 14.5mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 02:54:08.68 -23:08:55.3 17.7mag C/2025 Q3 (ATLAS) 22:36:09.70 +19:18:51.3 11.9mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 13:03:20.61 +01:36:25.5 17.6mag C/2025 Y1 (ATLAS) 01:57:37.80 -03:34:50.7 13.0mag C/2026 A1 (MAPS) 22:53:35.21 +32:19:12.9 13.9mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) 18:00:42.98 -10:42:07.7 13.1mag 10P/Tempel 15:24:10.77 +04:54:04.4 12.1mag 24P/Schaumasse 11:10:10.47 -02:18:36.5 15.6mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 17:47:57.40 -10:28:24.8 17.4mag 40P/Vaisala 10:42:58.99 -06:06:46.9 16.5mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington 01:15:36.89 +13:42:53.9 17.0mag 47P/Ashbrook-Jackson 06:34:44.69 +41:28:16.3 17.1mag 63P/Wild 23:00:21.09 -14:09:48.8 15.7mag 65P/Gunn 03:08:47.83 +13:08:15.8 15.9mag 76P/West-Kohoutek-Ikemura 00:18:49.80 +03:55:47.2 14.6mag 78P/Gehrels 21:53:50.23 -15:34:44.4 14.5mag 88P/Howell 01:12:01.23 +14:32:10.3 15.2mag 93P/Lovas 04:17:21.74 +30:58:42.4 16.4mag 123P/West-Hartley 08:09:28.01 +48:17:05.5 16.2mag 124P/Mrkos 02:00:43.97 +11:52:42.3 16.4mag 128P/Shoemaker-Holt 02:05:46.43 +11:39:24.1 17.4mag 131P/Mueller 23:39:48.24 +04:52:36.6 12.4mag 141P/Machholz 23:50:03.00 -02:59:02.7 12.5mag 141P-A/Machholz 22:47:57.45 -05:50:15.2 15.5mag 141P-D/Machholz 00:02:36.59 -12:05:46.6 15.4mag 162P/SidingSpring 10:36:28.85 +31:58:53.3 17.6mag 164P/Christensen 05:57:21.70 +24:42:31.8 17.6mag 198P/ODAS 15:27:23.45 -02:45:58.6 17.0mag 210P/Christensen 20:28:21.54 -16:34:57.3 17.2mag 218P/LINEAR 17:03:41.51 -16:16:53.0 16.2mag 235P/LINEAR 04:49:55.29 +32:33:42.2 16.4mag 240P/NEAT 07:30:41.73 -07:46:48.3 17.5mag 242P/Spahr 15:48:13.33 +05:26:02.4 17.6mag 391P/Kowalski 07:28:28.27 +21:10:37.8 17.6mag 450P/LONEOS 05:06:22.72 +46:20:01.2 17.9mag 493P/LONEOS -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.8K Mar 25 05:02 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 17:34:53.03 +06:04:29.70 AT2026gzl 2026-03-23.27 15.82 16:54:25.33 +37:49:56.60 SN 2026evz 2026-03-21.32 17.54 17:06:19.20 -18:54:19.50 ASASSN-26bx 2026-03-21.25 16.39 19:01:16.28 -29:29:23.10 ASASSN-26bw 2026-03-21.33 15.81 08:46:05.75 +10:47:39.80 ASASSN-26ca 2026-03-21.13 14.27 12:14:58.16 +63:47:16.20 SN 2026fvx 2026-03-21.12 15.6 18:02:55.90 -75:23:02.60 ASASSN-26bz 2026-03-21.32 16.16 12:16:02.87 -53:16:33.70 ASASSN-26cc 2026-03-20.08 3.93 13:08:21.85 +29:13:44.20 SN 2026fmh 2026-03-20.16 -0.33 19:56:38.48 -34:45:21.50 ASASSN-26cb 2026-03-20.35 -3.26 14:32:41.15 -41:38:48.50 ASASSN-26by 2026-03-20.15 -1.31 13:00:42.99 +37:18:34.60 SN2026fjc 2026-03-19.5 15.97 06:02:44.21 -04:11:06.20 ASASSN-26bv 2026-03-19.19 15.67 12:20:27.90 -45:55:38.40 ASASSN-26bt 2026-03-19.05 16.24 07:49:57.30 -56:14:35.10 ASASSN-26bu 2026-03-19.19 15.74 06:04:29.75 +53:23:34.00 SN 2026eza 2026-03-18.2 17.48 11:54:57.87 +69:19:28.90 AT2026fsf 2026-03-18.14 16.95 10:44:46.95 +58:27:29.30 SN 2026enn 2026-03-18.13 17.53 20:45:54.04 -73:26:43.00 AT 2026ezy 2026-03-18.13 16.83 06:53:18.10 -59:10:49.30 ASASSN-26bs 2026-03-18.02 16.93 07:45:09.29 -62:14:36.20 ASASSN-26br 2026-03-16.16 16.78 19:24:27.93 -52:04:36.40 AT 2023uk 2026-03-16.35 14.2 04:52:54.50 -15:20:57.10 AT2026fhw 2026-03-14.06 SDSS 11:10:34.24 +02:58:48.10 SN2026drr 2026-03-14.08 0.2 07:26:45.73 -27:45:13.90 ASASSN-26bo 2026-03-14.17 13.8 16:35:46.94 +58:12:28.40 SN2026ebt 2026-03-12.41 17.12 13:01:19.45 +15:42:15.00 SN2026ehe 2026-03-12.11 -0.29 09:15:55.41 +10:08:09.70 SN2026efq 2026-03-12.16 0.06 03:31:20.92 -35:29:29.00 SN2026evh 2026-03-12.05 17.29 06:26:19.15 -85:18:28.10 AT2026ffp 2026-03-12.16 0.37 14:16:42.30 -41:18:36.50 AT2026fij 2026-03-12.05 15.97 10:45:04.71 +00:06:13.10 SN 2026exe 2026-03-11.78 16.48 18:07:45.58 +69:43:01.00 SN2026ess 2026-03-12.37 17.37 13:11:03.58 +49:06:31.80 AT2026ewa 2026-03-12.42 16.77 15:03:25.23 -63:11:22.20 ASASSN-26bp 2026-03-11.92 13.33 13:09:37.25 -35:50:25.20 AT2024cmo 2026-03-11.12 16.29 13:06:01.97 -15:50:14.40 AT2026fdy 2026-03-10.33 16.68 11:30:09.67 -47:26:43.70 ASASSN-26bn 2026-03-10.12 15.2 05:03:25.25 -24:16:50.40 (= Gaia 2026-03-9.09 14.32 03:42:32.53 -04:17:53.70 ASASSN-26bm 2026-03-8.04 15.22 04:31:00.53 -68:29:50.20 ASASSN-26bl 2026-03-7.9 10.26 16:18:17.61 +41:25:11.40 SN 2026dkf 2026-03-6.31 16.7 13:45:00.35 +61:16:50.90 SN 2026ejl 2026-03-6.41 -0.66 09:27:45.48 -37:49:32.80 ASASSN-26bk 2026-03-2.3 13.11 20:22:01.20 +23:47:47.30 ASASSN-26bi 2026-02-28.51 15.86 11:16:22.10 +29:26:22.80 AT2026enm 2026-02-28.39 16.88 08:05:59.83 -48:39:35.60 ASASSN-26bh 2026-02-26.05 14.64 13:24:27.02 -45:57:01.40 ASASSN-26bg 2026-02-26.35 15.28 17:27:50.95 -68:28:46.40 ASASSN-26bf 2026-02-26.3 16.28 18:03:39.29 +19:58:46.30 ASASSN-26be 2026-02-25.56 14.95 17:40:18.19 +07:20:59.60 SN 2026crm 2026-02-24.34 16.9 18:38:35.79 -79:28:57.30 ASASSN-26bb 2026-02-24.37 16.2 17:43:29.75 +11:24:00.60 ASASSN-26bc 2026-02-23.37 -3.37 16:59:41.08 -80:01:51.20 ASASSN-26bd 2026-02-23.3 14.38 11:23:31.77 -08:39:15.40 SN2026cff 2026-02-23.15 -1.08 14:55:17.39 -05:56:05.30 SN2026dmk 2026-02-23.22 -0.76 12:28:15.19 +44:27:20.80 SN2026cjz 2026-02-23.47 15.62 12:12:29.55 -02:40:43.30 AT2026dsk 2026-02-23.4 17.21 09:21:05.29 +06:11:42.80 SN2026chr 2026-02-23.1 17.39 16:05:38.61 +18:06:07.40 SN 2026dsy 2026-02-23.36 17.15 04:55:50.66 -29:52:57.70 SN 2026dpg 2026-02-23.11 15.75 04:21:28.18 -53:22:54.40 AT2026drl 2026-02-21.03 17.31 11:50:37.32 +55:21:13.70 SN 2026dix 2026-02-21.43 16.39 16:21:19.69 -63:47:29.40 ASASSN-26az 2026-02-21.03 17.02 02:45:30.93 -54:17:43.10 SN 2026cju 2026-02-21.04 17.54 01:58:40.68 +47:34:50.10 ASASSN-26av 2026-02-21.09 15.97 18:35:53.01 -42:31:38.90 ASASSN-26aw 2026-02-21.12 15.89 11:40:18.88 -39:45:09.20 ASASSN-26ax 2026-02-21.08 15.73 02:26:23.52 -51:42:29.80 ASASSN-26ay 2026-02-21.04 13.93 08:46:07.66 +01:17:43.90 ASASSN-26ba 2026-02-20.23 15.43 14:15:47.69 -48:05:16.40 SN2026dez 2026-02-19.19 15.93 17:25:53.90 -23:28:31.50 ASASSN-26au 2026-02-18.33 15.82 16:07:59.09 -24:00:10.00 SN2026cmv 2026-02-17.28 16.19 18:15:01.25 -37:43:36.70 ASASSN-26at 2026-02-16.36 15.94 13:01:07.08 -11:25:16.30 AT2026bzh 2026-02-12.45 17.3 10:56:29.81 -07:07:25.30 SN 2026bre 2026-02-12.16 17.15 08:55:43.51 -53:26:11.50 ASASSN-26as 2026-02-12.2 16.54 06:33:50.98 -41:46:25.10 ASASSN-26ar 2026-02-12.04 16.42 12:15:22.43 +23:59:39.60 SN2026bzg 2026-02-11.27 16.32 08:01:10.95 -03:43:14.30 AT2026coj 2026-02-9.25 13.73 12:44:00.18 -57:03:46.80 ASASSN-26aq 2026-02-9.18 16 06:26:33.34 -54:06:39.90 AT2026cih 2026-02-8.06 17.26 23:08:59.40 -88:59:11.60 SN 2026bsu 2026-02-8.03 16.02 01:04:14.94 -62:31:02.30 SN 2026azk 2026-02-8.04 16.41 08:44:55.41 +64:55:09.90 SN 2026anq 2026-02-7.16 17.62 12:37:42.99 +33:26:05.40 SN 2026bnm 2026-02-7.29 16.74 00:12:55.45 +33:21:25.90 SN2026cbh 2026-02-7.09 16.33 08:02:12.64 -04:14:20.90 SN 2026auh 2026-02-7.11 16.64 18:03:52.67 -31:27:26.00 TCP J18035290-3127298 2026-02-7.37 15.76 12:18:03.59 +50:27:10.20 SN 2026bjz 2026-02-7.25 16.48 07:51:51.12 +55:05:27.60 SN 2026ail 2026-02-6.21 16.85 08:10:56.38 +36:49:42.80 AT2026bsa 2026-02-6.29 17.47 04:43:45.47 -15:49:01.00 SN2026azr 2026-02-5.24 16.96 06:14:48.48 -34:20:08.90 ASASSN-26ap 2026-02-5.2 13.77 02:42:33.90 -27:21:02.60 SN 2026aip 2026-02-4.09 15.85 00:43:12.26 +38:35:47.90 AT2026brt 2026-02-3.12 14.92 14:34:27.21 +21:56:59.90 SN2026atb 2026-01-29.32 15.59 13:12:04.11 -60:56:12.40 ASASSN-26ao 2026-01-28.35 15.61 13:00:36.49 -06:28:26.00 SN2026azd 2026-01-28.23 15.69 10:33:50.27 -31:00:53.40 SN 2026ayz 2026-01-25.11 15.3 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.8K Mar 25 05:02 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 15:33:45.28 -22:11:07.3 TCP J15334528-2211073 2026-01-16.8451 14.9mag 22:34:01.26 +39:53:32.8 TCP J22340126+3953328 2026-01-17.5738 16.79Cmag 00:42:52.36 +41:16:13.3 PNV J00425236+4116133 2026-01-18.5502 17.41Cmag 06:57:11.19 -17:24:43.9 TCP J06571119-1724439 2026-01-18.5375 14.2mag 00:42:52.23 +41:01:44.7 PNV J00425223+4101447 2026-01-19.5505 18.74Cmag 09:54:46.47 +69:06:31.7 PNV J09544647+6906317 2026-01-26.8081 19.3mag 18:08:51.99 -26:16:21.9 TCP J18085199-2616219 2026-01-31.8519 12.2mag 08:01:11.02 -03:43:14.1 TCP J08011102-0343141 2026-02-08.8090 15.10Cmag 05:19:15.40 -02:04:51.5 TCP J05191540-0204515 2026-02-13.4306 14.5mag 10:52:41.26 +36:40:08.9 TCP J10524126+3640089 2026-02-17.6065 17.4mag 05:50:50.81 +36:22:45.1 TCP J05505081+3622451 2026-02-17.5511 15.7mag 00:42:51.33 +41:13:49.1 PNV J00425133+4113491 2026-02-20.738 18.3mag 00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4 PNV J00430488+4129414 2026-02-20.5923 18.84Cmag 17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3 TCP J17432974+1124003 2026-02-22.3773 13.6mag 09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7 PNV J09550159+6908427 2026-02-20.893 19.0mag 07:03:25.76 -12:41:40.1 TCP J07032576-1241401 2026-03-10.4268 15.4mag 00:42:36.82 +41:16:05.8 PNV J00423682+4116058 2026-03-12.5744 17.24Cmag 07:26:45.79 -27:45:14.1 TCP J07264579-2745141 2026-03-17.4417 14.8mag 17:57:19.56 -28:08:14.7 TCP J17571956-2808147 2026-03-19.7972 14.5mag 08:46:05.73 +10:47:39.7 TCP J08460573+1047397 2026-03-21.1936 14.5mag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 187K Mar 25 05:02 tocp_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 88 C