This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461120.7492,10.68,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260321.2492 10.68CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 10:35:12.56 +28:39:40.6 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0666_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0247_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0666_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0246_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0666_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0247_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0666_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0246_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461120.7492,11.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260321.2492 11.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 10:45:10.66 +28:06:18.1 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0666_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0247_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0666_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0246_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0666_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0247_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0666_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0246_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461120.7492,13.17,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260321.2492 13.17CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 10:42:06.98 +26:12:56.2 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0666_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0247_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0666_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0246_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0666_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0247_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0666_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0246_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461120.7492,14.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-2 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260321.2492 14.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 11:06:11.39 +29:20:30.6 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0666_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0247_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0666_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0246_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0666_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0247_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0666_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0246_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461033.00360733 23.12.2025 12:05:01.673 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits
First image: 2461033.00360733 23.12.2025 12:05:01.673 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits
Last image: 2461120.74948369 21.03.2026 05:59:05.391 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 2 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5567
Objects passed selection criteria: 5567
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5391
Average stars matched: 5221.25 (96.8512 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 112072 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20251122 p4) 15.2.1 20251122
VaST compiled on Fri Mar 20 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-352-gfa78ed9d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-03-20)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Mar 21 01:32:05 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461033.00360733 23.12.2025 12:05:01.673 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits
First image: 2461033.00360733 23.12.2025 12:05:01.673 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits
Last image: 2461120.74948369 21.03.2026 05:59:05.391 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 328
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.15
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 11 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 28256
Objects passed selection criteria: 28175
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 27089.2
Average stars matched: 26116.5 (96.4091 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 131920 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20251122 p4) 15.2.1 20251122
VaST compiled on Fri Mar 20 15:05:04 CDT 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-352-gfa78ed9d
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-03-20)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sat Mar 21 01:32:51 CDT 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ2b1x1/TTUQ2_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461120.74892972
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits'
wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits'
wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits'
wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:00:00.503 +30:00:01.23
Second-epoch image center 11:00:02.555 +30:00:03.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:00:00.503 +30:00:01.23
Second-epoch image center 11:00:00.870 +29:59:55.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:00:02.555 +30:00:03.22
Second-epoch second image center 11:00:00.870 +29:59:55.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00643 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3GtgiXKdDC
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits &> /tmp/tmp.64h6NyQPQy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kRlQf0RylJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits &> /tmp/tmp.oIcPpotSp5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits and wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits and wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits and wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits) and catalog (wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits.cat) found
'wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Matched with Tycho-2 3192 out of 6418 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.954440
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.954440
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.41
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.54
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.54
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits
2.0 pix LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits
2.5 pix fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits
2.3 pix fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits
15.5 mag. LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits
15.4 mag. fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits
15.4 mag. fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 12.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 14.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.3GtgiXKdDC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits' -> 'wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=433, passed=6418
Got 6418 stars (including 5979 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6418 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits -region wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.64h6NyQPQy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits' -> 'wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=445, passed=6452
Got 6452 stars (including 6002 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6452 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits -region wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kRlQf0RylJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=320, passed=6681
Got 6681 stars (including 6357 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6681 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits -region wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.oIcPpotSp5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=343, passed=6595
Got 6595 stars (including 6249 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6595 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits -region wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field LMi-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out20321.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20303.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20313.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20303_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
Preparing report for the candidate 20303_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20313_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
Preparing report for the candidate 20313_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20321_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 20321_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:50:44.31 +31:15:12.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.55, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.53)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.657 736661353112670464 162.68483641200 +31.25355704105 12.4295 11.8419 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.657#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s
Prepared the HTML report for the field LMi-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
10:35:12.56 +28:39:40.6
10:45:10.66 +28:06:18.1
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 4 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:00:00.503 +30:00:01.23
Second-epoch image center 11:00:02.555 +30:00:03.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:00:00.503 +30:00:01.23
Second-epoch image center 11:00:00.870 +29:59:55.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:00:02.555 +30:00:03.22
Second-epoch second image center 11:00:00.870 +29:59:55.70
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00643 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Xydoct6VuR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kwCfp45Yt4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DSkb87YSxA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ss3z8JIKIQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits and wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits and wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits and wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits) and catalog (wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits.cat) found
'wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Matched with Tycho-2 3224 out of 33092 detected stars.
The calibration function type and coefficients are written to calib.txt_param
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.854034
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.854034
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.15
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.70
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.70
Magnitude calibration plot:
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 112 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits
1.9 pix LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits
2.5 pix fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits
2.3 pix fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.7 mag. LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits
15.7 mag. LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits
15.5 mag. fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits
15.5 mag. fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.5 (SNR ) 14.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 14.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Xydoct6VuR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits' -> 'wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1312, passed=33081
Got 33081 stars (including 31706 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33081 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits -region wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kwCfp45Yt4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits
WARNING from replace_file_with_symlink_if_filename_contains_white_spaces() the input file /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits is already a symlink and we do not allow symlinks on symlinks
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits' -> 'wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=1400, passed=33219
Got 33219 stars (including 31768 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33219 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits -region wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DSkb87YSxA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1174, passed=29326
Got 29326 stars (including 28118 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29326 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 959 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits -region wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ss3z8JIKIQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1232, passed=30466
Got 30466 stars (including 29203 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 30466 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 937.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 937.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013018 (46.9 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010414 (37.5 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 958 stars left (next iteration limit 1053)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits -region wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-01_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0666.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/wcs_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2025-12-23_06-05-46_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0667.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-58-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0246.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-03-21_CI_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_012823_TTUQ2b1x1_10983_vkL0YPnM/wcs_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field LMi-02-Q2b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52170.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52368.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 7s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52085_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52085_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:46:19.54 +30:19:17.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52086_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52086_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:36:21.11 +26:26:19.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52090_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52090_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:35:12.56 +28:39:40.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52105_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52105_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:45:10.66 +28:06:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52111_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52111_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52115_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52115_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52117_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52117_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52119_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52119_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52128_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52128_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52131_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52131_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52133_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52133_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52135_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52135_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52140_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52140_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52141_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52141_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52142_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52142_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52144_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52144_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52145_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52145_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52146_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52146_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52148_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52148_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52150_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52150_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52151_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52151_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52153_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52153_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52162_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52162_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52163_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52163_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52164_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52164_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52165_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52165_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52169_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52169_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52170_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
Preparing report for the candidate 52170_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52171_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52171_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52177_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52177_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52178_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52178_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52179_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52179_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52183_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52183_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52186_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52186_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52190_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52190_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52193_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52193_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52194_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52194_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52197_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52197_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52201_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52201_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52204_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52204_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52205_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52205_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52206_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52206_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52208_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52208_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52210_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52210_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52214_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52214_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52215_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52215_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52217_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52217_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52221_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52221_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52224_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52224_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52226_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52226_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52228_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52228_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52229_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52229_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:40:16.35 +27:32:24.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52236_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52236_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52237_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52237_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52238_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52238_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52245_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52245_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52247_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52247_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52248_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52248_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52251_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52251_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52259_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52259_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52260_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52260_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52262_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52262_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52263_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52263_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:18:35.38 +33:03:29.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52264_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52264_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52272_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52272_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52277_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52277_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52278_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52278_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52280_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52280_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52285_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52285_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52287_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52287_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52292_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52292_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52293_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52293_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52294_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52294_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52298_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52298_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52300_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52300_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52303_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52303_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52305_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52305_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52308_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52308_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52313_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52313_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52318_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52318_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52320_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52320_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52323_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52323_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52327_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52327_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52328_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52328_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52330_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52330_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52332_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52332_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52333_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52333_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52334_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52334_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52338_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52338_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52347_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52347_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52353_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52353_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52361_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52361_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52365_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52365_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52366_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52366_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52368_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
Preparing report for the candidate 52368_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52369_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52369_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52370_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52370_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52373_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52373_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52374_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52374_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52380_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52380_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52381_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52381_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52384_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52384_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52388_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52388_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52389_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52389_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52390_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52390_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52396_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52396_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52398_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52398_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (24.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52401_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52401_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52418_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52418_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52420_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52420_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52487_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 52487_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 04204_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247
The candidate 04204_fd_LMi-02-Q2b1x1_2026-03-21_00-59-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0247 did not pass the final checks