Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 02 27.2400  2461098.7400  14.13  15:57:34.32 +58:37:29.2
 90.58006  45.07810 galactic  Dra  Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.6" and 0.4 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 15:57:34.32 +58:37:29.2 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Check this position in TNS.
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits


fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits


fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits  wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits -crosshair 7038.99512 5905.99609 image    wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits -crosshair 7039.02148 5906.40234 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 02 27.24000 15 57 34.32 +58 37 29.2          14.1 R      500

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 02 27.23980 15 57 34.14 +58 37 27.4          14.1 R      500
     TAU0008  C2026 02 27.24019 15 57 34.49 +58 37 31.1          14.2 R      500

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 02 27.2400*  15 57 34.32 +58 37 29.2  14.1 U             Dra       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461098.7400,14.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260227.2400 14.13CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 15:57:34.32 +58:37:29.2 ;done 
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0606_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0241_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0606_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0240_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0   resample_wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0606_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0241_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0   resample_wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0606_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0240_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 02 27.2400  2461098.7400  14.31  16:10:42.42 +55:52:42.9
 86.07772  44.39558 galactic  Dra  Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.2" and 0.4 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 16:10:42.42 +55:52:42.9 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Check this position in TNS.
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits


fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits


fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits  wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits -crosshair 8164.81885 4279.00000 image    wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits -crosshair 8164.92969 4279.40283 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 02 27.24000 16 10 42.42 +55 52 42.9          14.3 R      500

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 02 27.23980 16 10 42.21 +55 52 41.0          14.3 R      500
     TAU0008  C2026 02 27.24019 16 10 42.63 +55 52 44.8          14.3 R      500

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 02 27.2400*  16 10 42.42 +55 52 42.9  14.3 U             Dra       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461098.7400,14.31,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260227.2400 14.31CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 16:10:42.42 +55:52:42.9 ;done 
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0606_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0241_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0606_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0240_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0   resample_wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0606_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0241_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0   resample_wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0606_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0240_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 02 27.2400  2461098.7400  14.22  15:43:26.99 +49:15:42.6
 78.67023  50.37681 galactic  Boo  Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.1" and 0.8 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 15:43:26.99 +49:15:42.6 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Check this position in TNS.
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits


fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits


fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits  wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits -crosshair 5675.39551 273.48541 image    wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits -crosshair 5675.97559 274.03421 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 02 27.24000 15 43 26.99 +49 15 42.6          14.2 R      500

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 02 27.23980 15 43 26.66 +49 15 40.1          14.3 R      500
     TAU0008  C2026 02 27.24019 15 43 27.31 +49 15 45.0          14.1 R      500

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 02 27.2400*  15 43 26.99 +49 15 42.6  14.2 U             Boo       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461098.7400,14.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260227.2400 14.22CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 15:43:26.99 +49:15:42.6 ;done 
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0606_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0241_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0606_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0240_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0   resample_wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0606_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0241_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0   resample_wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0606_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0240_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif

Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 02 27.2400  2461098.7400  14.40  15:56:40.37 +57:11:34.2
 88.77349  45.75389 galactic  Dra  Second-epoch detections are separated by 3.0" and 0.4 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 15:56:40.37 +57:11:34.2 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Check this position in TNS.
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits


fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits


fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i ;done
# Display the solved FITS images
ds9 -frame lock wcs  wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits  wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits -crosshair 6968.99219 5036.38867 image    wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits -crosshair 6969.08008 5035.99268 image   

./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits  && util/transients/search_for_transients_single_field.sh

REFERENCE_IMAGES=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs  util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V

Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code! The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter. Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code. The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:

     TAU0008  C2026 02 27.24000 15 56 40.37 +57 11 34.2          14.4 R      500

Position measured on individual images:

     TAU0008  C2026 02 27.23980 15 56 40.19 +57 11 34.6          14.4 R      500
     TAU0008  C2026 02 27.24019 15 56 40.56 +57 11 33.9          14.4 R      500

You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services:
MPChecker (in case the button does not work)
NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets)
sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work)
fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)

Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP. Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!

TCP 2026 02 27.2400*  15 56 40.37 +57 11 34.2  14.4 U             Dra       9 0

Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!

 **** AAVSO file format ****

#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461098.7400,14.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS


 **** VSNET file format ****

# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829   <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746    12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732    12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260227.2400 14.40CV NMW


The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs

The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to  vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp

# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 15:56:40.37 +57:11:34.2 ;done 
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0606_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0241_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0606_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0240_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0   resample_wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0606_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0241_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0   resample_wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0606_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0240_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif

## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461032.96666212 23.12.2025 11:11:49.607   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits
First image: 2461032.96666212 23.12.2025 11:11:49.607   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits
Last  image: 2461098.74019398 27.02.2026 05:45:42.760   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 0
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.59
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  10.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     55000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.37            # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  6962
Objects passed selection criteria:  6939
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.2    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.2    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 5716.75
Average stars matched: 5627.25 (98.4344 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   113156 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20251122 p4) 15.2.1 20251122
VaST compiled on  Wed Feb 11 15:05:05 CST 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc88-300-g65540497
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-02-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Thu Feb 26 23:49:23 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref.  image: 2461032.96666212 23.12.2025 11:11:49.607   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits
First image: 2461032.96666212 23.12.2025 11:11:49.607   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits
Last  image: 2461098.74019398 27.02.2026 05:45:42.760   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 95
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.33
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 9 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA  2.0             # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH   3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0             #  or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL     57000.0         # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN            0.83            # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times):  38522
Objects passed selection criteria:  38454
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.3    4.0    2    4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max):    3.3    4.0    2    4
Average stars detected per image: 33496.2
Average stars matched: 32700 (97.6229 %)
Memory usage VmPeak:   141272 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20251122 p4) 15.2.1 20251122
VaST compiled on  Wed Feb 11 15:05:05 CST 2026
VaST build number  1.0rc88-300-g65540497
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-02-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on  Thu Feb 26 23:50:06 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 14.5
FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-01-17.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= 500
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 3000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 2000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Dra-09-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Dra-09-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Dra-09-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 799324 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 799324 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.png' -> 'transient_report/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits_preview.png'

Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits


renamed 'Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.png' -> 'transient_report/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits_preview.png'

Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 636.0808
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 511.6129
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2481.3114
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 660.1985
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2475.6394
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 659.5322
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 3.90094
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-01-17.fit
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                -14.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -14.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits
SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits
Header: 61 keys total, 10 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-02-26T23:45:08.6962639' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-02-27T05:45:08.6962639' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61098.2396839815 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-02-27T05:45:18.5957610' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61098.2397985533 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                -14.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     232.940527204707 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     53.9999095244804 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     25.7841666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     40.8447222222222 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     2.28944137684417 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1013.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =            33.748239 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958391 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Dra-09'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '15 31 46'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 50: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 51: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 52: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 53: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 54: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 55: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 56: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 57: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 58: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 59: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 60: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 61: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits
SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-02-21.fit
CCD-TEMP= -14.900000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits
CCD-TEMP= -15.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-02-21.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-02-21.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/d_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits :)

Spent 0.433439 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-02-21.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/d_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-01-17.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 28880.787099
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=20680.5, right_median=19489.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-01-17.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -15.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Header: 61 keys total, 10 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-02-26T23:45:42.7603130' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-02-27T05:45:42.7603130' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61098.2400782406 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-02-27T05:45:52.6660446' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61098.2401928934 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     232.940527125011 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     53.9999095287682 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     25.8611111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     40.8802777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =      2.2831630408859 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'West'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1013.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =            33.748239 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958391 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Dra-09'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '15 31 46'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+54 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 50: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 51: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 52: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 53: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 54: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 55: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 56: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 57: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 58: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 59: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 60: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 61: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-02-21.fit
CCD-TEMP= -15.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
CCD-TEMP= -15.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-02-21.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-02-21.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/d_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits :)

Spent 0.441696 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-02-21.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/d_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-01-17.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 28880.787099
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=20680.5, right_median=19489.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-01-17.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits



fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461098.73979972
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits'
wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits'
wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits'
wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:31:46.461 +54:00:24.83
Second-epoch image center 15:31:57.976 +53:59:53.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.03 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:31:46.461 +54:00:24.83
Second-epoch image center 15:31:58.277 +53:59:54.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.03 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  15:31:57.976 +53:59:53.09
Second-epoch second image center 15:31:58.277 +53:59:54.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00081 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00081 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Kl7SNiTpwx
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7hLz0JIOrS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits &> /tmp/tmp.7MzOrPtIhO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits &> /tmp/tmp.06MDzBvuw3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits and wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits.cat 
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits and wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits.cat 
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits and wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits) and catalog (wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Matched with Tycho-2 4551 out of 7367 detected stars.
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.867539
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.867539
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.59
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.28

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.28
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.1 pix  Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits
 2.1 pix  Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits
 2.1 pix  fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits
 2.1 pix  fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.3 mag.  Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits
 15.3 mag.  Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits
 14.5 mag.  fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits
 14.5 mag.  fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.5 (SNR )  11.5 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 14.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Kl7SNiTpwx (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=494, passed=7367
Got 7367 stars (including 6858 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7367 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits -region wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7hLz0JIOrS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=491, passed=7339
Got 7339 stars (including 6840 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7339 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" 
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits -region wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.7MzOrPtIhO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=350, passed=4161
Got 4161 stars (including 3809 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4161 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013090 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010472 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.06MDzBvuw3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=362, passed=4157
Got 4157 stars (including 3793 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4157 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013089 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010471 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Excluding outliers - 947 stars left (next iteration limit 1041)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Dra-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Dra-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:31:46.461 +54:00:24.83
Second-epoch image center 15:31:57.976 +53:59:53.09
Angular distance between the image centers 0.03 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 15:31:46.461 +54:00:24.83
Second-epoch image center 15:31:58.277 +53:59:54.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.03 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  15:31:57.976 +53:59:53.09
Second-epoch second image center 15:31:58.277 +53:59:54.32
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00081 deg.
###################################
ERROR: no shift applied between second-epoch images! The distance between image centers is 0.00081 deg. (min. required shift: 0.00164 deg.)
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits &> /tmp/tmp.z78z5pjvBc
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NfhL60mlSL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tvnZ7d6ceQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rovrWqSaVl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits and wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits.cat 
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits and wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits.cat 
Found non-empty wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits and wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits) and catalog (wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Matched with Tycho-2 4628 out of 41444 detected stars.
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.752198
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.752198
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.33
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.42

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.42
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 77 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.0 pix  Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits
 2.0 pix  Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits
 2.0 pix  fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits
 2.0 pix  fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.4 mag.  Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits
 15.4 mag.  Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits
 14.6 mag.  fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits
 14.6 mag.  fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.6 (SNR )  14.1 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 14.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.z78z5pjvBc (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=1619, passed=41427
Got 41427 stars (including 39733 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41427 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits -region wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-11-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0606.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NfhL60mlSL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits' -> 'wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=1617, passed=41465
Got 41465 stars (including 39775 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 41465 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.0'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.0 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013083 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010467 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits -region wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_05-12-29_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0607.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tvnZ7d6ceQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=8, blended=812, passed=25960
Got 25960 stars (including 25097 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 25960 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013090 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010472 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 941 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rovrWqSaVl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=819, passed=26003
Got 26003 stars (including 25131 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 26003 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 942.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 942.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013089 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010471 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Excluding outliers - 943 stars left (next iteration limit 1037)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits -region wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-08_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0240.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/wcs_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Dra-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53035.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53048.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53092.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53071.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53091.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53100.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53108.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 16s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52941_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 52941_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    14.05    15:10:20.80 +56:47:54.6   3161 5096   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

**** FOUND  15:10:20.58 +56:47:55.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52948_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 52948_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    13.23    16:10:56.52 +49:04:52.0   8406 0158   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

**** FOUND  16:10:56.50 +49:04:51.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52949_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 52949_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    13.55    15:10:32.11 +58:03:49.5   3298 5850   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52964_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 52964_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    12.07    14:46:22.46 +58:05:30.9   1398 6272   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52969_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 52969_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    12.39    15:43:19.77 +51:37:59.2   5727 1708   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52970_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 52970_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    12.35    16:02:03.67 +58:36:00.6   7394 5899   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

**** FOUND  16:02:03.70 +58:36:00.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52973_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 52973_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    12.54    14:53:01.92 +53:01:44.1   1247 3148   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52976_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 52976_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    12.55    16:19:45.96 +49:26:44.3   9274 0432   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52978_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 52978_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    12.63    16:19:56.39 +57:04:50.4   8894 5066   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52980_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 52980_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    12.79    14:55:23.45 +49:38:42.3   1019 1094   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52987_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 52987_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    13.12    16:10:08.05 +58:20:14.4   8043 5768   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52989_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 52989_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    13.07    15:52:09.92 +58:51:43.2   6614 6049   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52993_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 52993_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    13.21    15:19:39.19 +58:19:19.7   4039 5898   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52994_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 52994_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    12.96    16:23:04.67 +51:56:15.9   9456 1976   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52997_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 52997_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    13.11    15:02:05.51 +55:18:28.1   2318 4332   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52999_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 52999_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    13.50    15:14:41.36 +57:09:17.6   3547 5253   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53003_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53003_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    13.17    15:20:05.03 +51:59:23.2   3592 2105   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

**** FOUND  15:20:05.00 +51:59:23.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53005_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53005_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    13.17    15:52:09.44 +49:40:48.0   6538 0500   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

**** FOUND  15:52:09.40 +49:40:47.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53006_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53006_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    13.24    16:11:33.27 +50:44:27.3   8410 1173   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53008_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53008_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    13.26    14:52:16.65 +47:54:38.9   0477 0121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53010_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53010_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    13.50    14:43:04.62 +53:50:23.8   0482 3839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53012_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53012_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    13.33    15:55:49.61 +58:42:03.4   6901 5951   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53013_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53013_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    13.39    16:02:05.07 +58:35:24.3   7396 5893   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

**** FOUND  16:02:04.76 +58:35:25.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53014_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53014_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    13.34    14:42:37.58 +51:50:21.6   0129 2673   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53015_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53015_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    13.32    15:00:12.55 +56:31:02.5   2301 5081   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53016_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53016_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    13.42    15:26:16.42 +52:02:55.7   4165 2076   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

**** FOUND  15:26:16.48 +52:02:56.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53018_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53018_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    13.65    15:22:04.91 +55:39:50.2   4039 4279   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

**** FOUND  15:22:04.96 +55:39:50.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53019_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53019_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    13.56    14:48:34.95 +52:10:04.7   0725 2732   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53024_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53024_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    13.32    15:57:11.68 +49:50:38.1   7031 0595   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53027_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53027_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    13.84    14:37:50.69 +55:12:18.9   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53028_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53028_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    13.44    15:38:33.48 +50:23:48.1   5236 0987   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

**** FOUND  15:38:33.58 +50:23:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53030_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53030_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    13.67    15:09:05.91 +49:21:23.0   2318 0677   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

**** FOUND  15:09:06.01 +49:21:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53031_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53031_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    13.64    16:20:27.65 +49:01:15.6   9367 0177   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53032_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53032_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    13.48    15:25:23.14 +50:46:40.8   4001 1322   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53034_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53034_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    13.76    15:19:34.32 +57:51:36.6   3997 5621   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53035_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53035_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    13.62    15:35:38.61 +55:32:19.6   5179 4094   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

**** FOUND  15:35:38.66 +55:32:19.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.64, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.62)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.331 1601186146074162432 233.91171986516 +55.53872150505 13.4100 12.3350 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.331#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53036_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53036_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    13.66    16:12:16.68 +50:14:26.0   8498 0872   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53039_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53039_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    13.85    15:09:11.07 +57:52:07.8   3172 5751   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53042_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53042_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    13.87    15:00:15.40 +54:13:29.0   2035 3721   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53044_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53044_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    13.48    16:01:54.65 +52:54:07.4   7452 2451   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

**** FOUND  16:01:54.64 +52:54:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53045_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53045_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    13.81    15:30:56.82 +50:00:46.8   4487 0810   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53046_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53046_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    13.80    14:46:56.87 +50:39:31.3   0352 1876   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53048_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53048_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    13.72    15:02:23.04 +51:37:50.7   1925 2146   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

**** FOUND  15:02:23.02 +51:37:51.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.74, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.72)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.892 1592995093685705088 225.59558311641 +51.63102511588 13.7699 13.1396 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.892#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53052_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53052_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    13.75    14:51:44.72 +49:58:15.3   0711 1363   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53053_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53053_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    14.18    14:38:30.80 +54:22:51.8   0171 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53055_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53055_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    13.87    15:37:15.87 +57:03:21.9   5377 4998   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53056_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53056_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    13.90    16:21:30.88 +58:45:39.8   8934 6101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53057_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53057_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    14.11    15:19:56.53 +50:20:19.6   3452 1118   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53061_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53061_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    13.75    15:42:32.92 +54:32:46.5   5737 3463   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

**** FOUND  15:42:32.77 +54:32:47.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53062_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53062_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    13.87    15:35:59.40 +52:03:00.8   5060 1998   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

**** FOUND  15:35:59.37 +52:03:00.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53063_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53063_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    13.84    15:46:55.36 +53:05:54.1   6091 2578   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

**** FOUND  15:46:55.26 +53:05:54.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53064_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53064_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    14.12    14:59:05.55 +56:32:52.7   2213 5118   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53065_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53065_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    14.03    15:39:21.23 +51:12:20.3   5341 1470   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53066_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53066_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    13.97    15:41:53.27 +49:12:25.8   5520 0248   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53068_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53068_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    14.40    14:47:16.19 +53:02:01.6   0732 3271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53069_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53069_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    14.33    16:01:24.58 +51:47:35.8   7420 1780   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53071_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
Preparing report for the candidate 53071_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53072_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53072_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    13.86    15:18:24.98 +55:52:11.0   3747 4441   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53075_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53075_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    14.09    15:05:21.49 +57:26:41.7   2823 5552   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53076_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53076_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    13.92    16:08:07.27 +51:39:26.9   8054 1715   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53079_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53079_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    14.14    14:53:45.39 +51:09:20.2   1063 2025   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53081_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53081_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    14.03    16:11:06.87 +55:19:52.7   8217 3950   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53083_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53083_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    14.02    16:20:16.83 +52:31:37.7   9160 2311   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53084_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53084_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    14.22    15:18:12.11 +56:46:18.9   3801 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53085_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53085_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    14.56    14:51:22.24 +51:53:13.7   0941 2507   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53086_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53086_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    13.83    15:35:12.41 +57:59:00.9   5250 5569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53089_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53089_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    14.21    14:41:35.90 +56:30:40.7   0774 5442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.2 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53090_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53090_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    14.22    16:21:07.43 +54:28:18.2   9133 3495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53091_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
Preparing report for the candidate 53091_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53092_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53092_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    14.21    14:49:31.50 +57:18:26.3   1535 5744   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

**** FOUND  14:49:31.59 +57:18:26.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.25, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.23)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.892 1613739339048486144 222.38311184890 +57.30742006430 14.3607 13.7494 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.892#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53095_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53095_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    14.04    16:01:41.39 +51:24:27.8   7451 1547   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53097_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53097_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    14.25    15:09:15.70 +57:40:30.4   3159 5634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53099_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53099_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    14.34    15:21:15.43 +50:53:45.4   3619 1437   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53100_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
Preparing report for the candidate 53100_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53102_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 53102_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    14.40    15:43:27.99 +56:51:24.9   5879 4851   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53108_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
Preparing report for the candidate 53108_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 35996_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241
The candidate 35996_fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 02 27.24019    2461098.74019    12.45    15:38:39.46 +57:01:34.1   5490 4973   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_234620_TTUQ1b1x1_32419_zGefVI0V/fd_Dra-09-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_23-45-42_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0241.fits

**** FOUND  15:38:39.46 +57:01:33.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 20s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Dra-09-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
15:57:34.32 +58:37:29.2
16:10:42.42 +55:52:42.9
15:43:26.99 +49:15:42.6
15:56:40.37 +57:11:34.2
########### Completed Dra-09-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
15:57:34.32 +58:37:29.2
16:10:42.42 +55:52:42.9
15:43:26.99 +49:15:42.6
15:56:40.37 +57:11:34.2
###################################################################################
15:57:34.32 +58:37:29.2  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
16:10:42.42 +55:52:42.9  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
15:43:26.99 +49:15:42.6  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
15:56:40.37 +57:11:34.2  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
15:43:26.99 +49:15:42.6  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
15:56:40.37 +57:11:34.2  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
15:57:34.32 +58:37:29.2  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
16:10:42.42 +55:52:42.9  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
15:43:26.99 +49:15:42.6  -- not a known variable star
15:56:40.37 +57:11:34.2  -- not a known variable star
15:57:34.32 +58:37:29.2  -- not a known variable star
16:10:42.42 +55:52:42.9  -- not a known variable star
Found 4 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
4 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
Adding identified Gaia sources from exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO   ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
15:43:26.99 +49:15:42.6
15:56:40.37 +57:11:34.2
15:57:34.32 +58:37:29.2
16:10:42.42 +55:52:42.9
15:35:38.66 +55:32:19.7
15:02:23.02 +51:37:51.2
14:49:31.59 +57:18:26.8
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is 500
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461098.73979972 -observatory 500
23:26:21.47 -00:23:00.1 Mercury (1.2mag)
23:27:49.81 -04:58:34.8 Venus (-3.9mag)
21:58:20.70 -13:32:31.0 Mars (1.1mag)
07:05:04.55 +22:56:17.6 Jupiter (-2.5mag)
00:07:36.27 -01:30:01.2 Saturn (1.0mag)
03:40:22.02 +19:23:04.0 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:04:19.91 -00:57:19.7 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:29:43.72 -22:58:10.8 Pluto (14.5mag)
07:03:20.00 +26:58:03.2 Moon (-11.3mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Feb 26 23:49 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461098.73979972:
07:05:01.80 +22:56:25.5 Io (5.4mag)
07:04:55.95 +22:56:30.7 Europa (5.6mag)
07:04:44.65 +22:56:49.5 Ganymede (5.0mag)
07:05:31.25 +22:55:19.0 Callisto (6.2mag)
07:08:33.22 +23:10:12.1 Himalia (15.1mag)
07:05:00.44 +22:56:22.5 Thebe (15.9mag)
07:07:55.64 +23:21:43.5 Elara (17.0mag)
07:00:54.05 +24:01:34.7 Pasiphae (17.1mag)
07:14:04.23 +22:45:44.9 Carme (18.1mag)
00:07:35.88 -01:29:41.3 Titan (8.8mag)
00:07:41.67 -01:29:56.5 Rhea (10.1mag)
00:07:44.13 -01:30:47.7 Iapetus (11.5mag)
00:07:51.06 -01:30:08.0 Hyperion (14.8mag)
00:09:39.26 -01:17:16.8 Phoebe (16.8mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Feb 26 23:49 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461098.73979972:
09:28:14.22 +24:02:59.4 JWST
21:47:01.27 -32:40:07.0 Chandra
08:00:04.07 -30:10:02.9 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Feb 26 23:49 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets (listed at http://astro.vanbuitenen.nl/comets and http://aerith.net/comet/weekly/current.html ) from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461098.73979972 at 500
17:09:32.95 -11:06:32.7 17.4mag 10P/Tempel 2
03:42:30.04 +29:16:00.6 18.0mag 123P/West-Hartley
08:16:38.52 +59:03:51.3 18.3mag 124P/Mrkos
21:36:45.39 -06:10:15.5 22.0mag 141P/Machholz
01:32:30.77 +13:20:06.2 17.7mag 145P/Shoemaker-Levy 5
10:58:06.70 +31:05:38.1 18.0mag 164P/Christensen
09:30:22.51 -33:35:58.3 18.0mag 195P/Hill
15:50:57.11 -06:05:07.9 19.5mag 210P/Christensen
18:40:14.02 -21:04:47.2 17.2mag 218P/LINEAR
16:29:57.19 -18:01:38.5 15.2mag 235P/LINEAR
04:03:55.34 +28:38:59.8 17.9mag 240P/NEAT
15:22:49.67 +06:17:14.5 14.9mag 24P/Schaumasse
11:21:24.72 -03:14:44.0 17.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 1
07:03:35.69 +27:25:31.2 19.5mag 407P/PanSTARRS-Fuls
17:15:18.69 -11:15:40.9 17.6mag 40P/Vaisala 1
10:58:50.74 -08:32:28.4 16.6mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
13:25:16.16 -06:03:16.1 20.2mag 489P/Denning
04:38:26.17 +48:10:12.3 17.8mag 493P/2024 Q2 (LONEOS)
06:06:56.40 +46:34:16.8 17.6mag 63P/Wild 1
23:24:46.79 -01:10:51.6 16.2mag 78P/Gehrels 2
20:20:28.35 -21:29:52.6 14.9mag 88P/Howell
20:47:45.35 -28:44:43.9  0.0mag P/2010 H3 (SOHO)
15:30:11.25 -29:24:10.9 18.6mag P/2023 S1 (PanSTARRS)
04:44:08.37 -72:18:12.6 16.5mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:29:11.63 +31:13:44.4 18.2mag C/2017 K2 (PanSTARRS)
20:09:21.50 -65:21:58.5 18.1mag C/2020 V2 (ZTF)
17:23:42.20 +04:53:55.8 16.3mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
03:39:53.13 +24:43:14.5 15.8mag C/2022 N2 (PanSTARRS)
09:06:32.64 +30:13:07.6 15.3mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:34:12.79 -05:55:51.2 16.7mag C/2022 R6 (PanSTARRS)
23:59:27.47 +48:40:16.3 18.0mag C/2023 C2 (ATLAS)
09:45:35.53 -20:00:01.5 17.5mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS)
20:44:41.24 +61:15:44.0 17.3mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
19:34:57.80 -03:26:26.9 16.0mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
02:50:44.50 +35:38:44.2 18.5mag C/2023 RS61 (PanSTARRS)
21:09:37.49 +81:28:31.1 18.0mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
06:32:18.52 +63:54:13.1 17.4mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
02:30:53.60 -17:40:12.7 11.5mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
11:40:53.37 -01:36:14.7 18.1mag C/2024 G2 (ATLAS)
19:33:07.30 +00:50:01.6 18.9mag C/2024 G4 (PanSTARRS)
16:36:54.23 -01:02:15.0 17.7mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
19:56:54.23 +04:12:15.6 15.5mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
02:50:04.13 -30:37:00.0 15.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
16:09:27.25 -60:09:12.1 15.7mag C/2025 A6 (Lemmon)
04:50:04.76 +60:15:41.4 16.7mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
15:52:28.92 -08:30:33.5 14.7mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
02:24:46.33 -19:47:41.4 16.8mag C/2025 Q3 (ATLAS)
02:16:02.39 +17:45:28.0 21.3mag C/2025 R2 (SWAN)
22:22:39.13 +17:48:23.8 16.1mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
21:51:19.88 -17:54:38.8 22.1mag C/2025 T1 (ATLAS)
02:55:05.37 -18:04:01.5 18.1mag C/2026 A1 (MAPS)
21:21:56.11 +23:09:18.0 17.0mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.6K Feb 26 23:49 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
18:03:39.37 +19:58:46.70  ASASSN-26be  2026-02-25.58 14.8
17:40:18.19 +07:20:59.60  SN 2026crm  2026-02-24.34 16.9
18:38:36.11 -79:28:58.40  ASASSN-26bb  2026-02-24.36 16.11
17:43:29.75 +11:24:00.60  ASASSN-26bc  2026-02-23.37 -3.37
16:59:41.08 -80:01:51.20  ASASSN-26bd  2026-02-23.3 14.38
11:23:31.77 -08:39:15.40  SN2026cff  2026-02-23.15 -1.08
14:55:17.39 -05:56:05.30  SN2026dmk  2026-02-23.22 -0.76
12:28:15.19 +44:27:20.80  SN2026cjz  2026-02-23.47 15.62
12:12:29.55 -02:40:43.30  AT2026dsk  2026-02-23.4 17.21
09:21:05.29 +06:11:42.80  SN2026chr  2026-02-23.1 17.39
16:05:38.61 +18:06:07.40  SN 2026dsy  2026-02-23.36 17.15
04:55:50.66 -29:52:57.70  SN 2026dpg  2026-02-23.11 15.75
04:21:28.18 -53:22:54.40  AT2026drl  2026-02-21.03 17.31
11:50:37.32 +55:21:13.70  SN 2026dix  2026-02-21.43 16.39
16:21:19.69 -63:47:29.40  ASASSN-26az  2026-02-21.03 17.02
02:45:30.93 -54:17:43.10  SN 2026cju  2026-02-21.04 17.54
01:58:40.68 +47:34:50.10  ASASSN-26av  2026-02-21.09 15.97
18:35:53.01 -42:31:38.90  ASASSN-26aw  2026-02-21.12 15.89
11:40:18.88 -39:45:09.20  ASASSN-26ax  2026-02-21.08 15.73
02:26:23.52 -51:42:29.80  ASASSN-26ay  2026-02-21.04 13.93
08:46:07.66 +01:17:43.90  ASASSN-26ba  2026-02-20.23 15.43
14:15:47.49 -48:05:16.60  SN2026dez  2026-02-19.31 15.91
17:25:53.90 -23:28:31.50  ASASSN-26au  2026-02-18.33 15.82
16:07:59.09 -24:00:10.00  SN2026cmv  2026-02-17.28 16.19
18:15:01.25 -37:43:36.70  ASASSN-26at  2026-02-16.36 15.94
13:01:07.08 -11:25:16.30  AT2026bzh  2026-02-12.45 17.3
10:56:29.81 -07:07:25.30  SN 2026bre  2026-02-12.16 17.15
08:55:43.51 -53:26:11.50  ASASSN-26as  2026-02-12.2 16.54
06:33:50.98 -41:46:25.10  ASASSN-26ar  2026-02-12.04 16.42
12:15:22.43 +23:59:39.60  SN2026bzg  2026-02-11.27 16.32
08:01:10.95 -03:43:14.30  AT2026coj  2026-02-9.25 13.73
12:44:00.18 -57:03:46.80  ASASSN-26aq  2026-02-9.18 16
06:26:33.34 -54:06:39.90  AT2026cih  2026-02-8.06 17.26
23:08:59.40 -88:59:11.60  SN 2026bsu  2026-02-8.03 16.02
01:04:14.94 -62:31:02.30  SN 2026azk  2026-02-8.04 16.41
08:44:55.41 +64:55:09.90  SN 2026anq  2026-02-7.16 17.62
12:37:42.99 +33:26:05.40  SN 2026bnm  2026-02-7.29 16.74
00:12:55.45 +33:21:25.90  SN2026cbh  2026-02-7.09 16.33
08:02:12.64 -04:14:20.90  SN 2026auh  2026-02-7.11 16.64
18:03:52.67 -31:27:26.00  TCP J18035290-3127298  2026-02-7.37 15.76
12:18:03.59 +50:27:10.20  SN 2026bjz  2026-02-7.25 16.48
07:51:51.12 +55:05:27.60  SN 2026ail  2026-02-6.21 16.85
08:10:56.38 +36:49:42.80  AT2026bsa  2026-02-6.29 17.47
04:43:45.47 -15:49:01.00  SN2026azr  2026-02-5.24 16.96
06:14:48.48 -34:20:08.90  ASASSN-26ap  2026-02-5.2 13.77
02:42:33.90 -27:21:02.60  SN 2026aip  2026-02-4.09 15.85
00:43:12.26 +38:35:47.90  AT2026brt  2026-02-3.12 14.92
14:34:27.21 +21:56:59.90  SN2026atb  2026-01-29.32 15.59
13:12:04.11 -60:56:12.40  ASASSN-26ao  2026-01-28.35 15.61
13:00:36.49 -06:28:26.00  SN2026azd  2026-01-28.23 15.69
10:33:50.27 -31:00:53.40  SN 2026ayz  2026-01-25.11 15.3
05:14:22.36 -60:47:20.70  SN 2026apb  2026-01-24.08 17.35
06:39:26.57 -21:49:19.60  AT2026afe  2026-01-23.11 16.17
09:27:23.49 -32:00:30.90  SN 2023kuy  2026-01-21.16 15.43
09:38:44.42 -20:00:54.30  SN2026afi  2026-01-20.24 17.43
06:30:51.41 -74:35:46.80  AT2026ahr  2026-01-20.09 16.98
13:33:03.15 -16:14:28.70  SN2026amc  2026-01-20.29 16.9
06:57:11.13 -17:24:42.80  ASASSN-26an  2026-01-19.31 13.99
17:41:29.59 +68:57:34.90  2026abj  2026-01-18.64 17.02
10:22:24.99 +04:00:02.20  SN 2026kc  2026-01-18.61 16.1
12:42:03.30 +00:41:41.80  SN 2026pg  2026-01-18.5 17.44
03:36:21.80 -31:44:39.30  AT2025aibn  2026-01-17.04 16.7
13:45:00.71 -32:34:53.00  AT2026yi  2026-01-17.26 16.22
09:27:07.17 +62:45:24.20  AT2026nu  2026-01-17.29 17.09
12:38:41.73 +07:36:37.40  SN 2025afcr  2026-01-17.49 17.11
12:12:12.65 +13:13:18.50  SN 2026acd  2026-01-17.3 16.15
16:21:54.73 -63:36:53.10  ASASSN-26al  2026-01-17.36 15.34
15:33:45.22 -22:11:07.90  ASASSN-26aj  2026-01-16.51 14
12:27:08.33 -58:19:36.10  ASASSN-26ak  2026-01-16.2 13.94
17:21:53.10 +04:39:07.10  ASASSN-26ai  2026-01-16.67 14.83
14:46:54.08 -64:04:30.10  ASASSN-26ah  2026-01-15.07 16.84
23:02:43.24 +20:04:53.00  SN2025ajvh  2026-01-15.07 16.03
14:12:27.38 -30:12:29.10  ASASSN-26ag  2026-01-14.27 15.35
14:33:53.58 +05:27:35.40  SN 2025ajnc  2026-01-14.32 15.79
01:43:00.31 -34:11:40.60  AT2025afcm  2026-01-13.08 0.45
00:26:17.71 -52:11:38.60  AT2025ahal  2026-01-11.06 17.57
00:51:36.17 +29:42:40.10  SN2025ahxd  2026-01-11.21 15
10:19:19.14 -37:54:58.30  AT2025ahrt  2026-01-10.26 -0.54
14:37:48.78 +15:51:04.20  SN2025ajng  2026-01-9.42 16.35
05:01:03.70 -08:34:13.20  SN2026A  2026-01-9.28 16.83
00:02:52.11 +13:05:42.90  SN2025ajvg  2026-01-9.13 15.89
08:37:09.62 -02:18:08.80  SN2025aigm  2026-01-9.55 17.66
09:52:50.71 +39:36:55.70  SN2025ahyt  2026-01-9.37 16.97
11:22:19.08 -27:21:40.90  AT2026ta  2026-01-9.32 15.88
14:35:00.21 +00:59:11.40  SN 2025ahsa  2026-01-8.35 -2
09:25:42.42 +22:20:06.10  SN2025ahkt  2026-01-8.03 15.88
22:39:53.44 +34:53:50.00  SN 2025aikz  2026-01-7.09 16.3
08:21:20.95 +20:52:01.60  SN 2025aiks  2026-01-7.13 15.82
07:35:31.38 +09:10:32.40  AT2025ajvk  2026-01-7.12 -1.82
02:50:07.71 -16:37:02.30  AT2026nl  2026-01-7.16 14.19
14:05:12.75 -33:46:00.80  SN 2025ajmj  2026-01-7.31 14.93
12:35:08.33 +28:03:22.70  SN 2025aiaj  2026-01-5.44 15.76
05:30:00.47 -66:43:29.40  ASASSN-26af  2026-01-5.12 14.38
14:05:05.13 -44:14:24.00  ASASSN-26ac  2026-01-5.3 16.01
11:29:16.57 +20:35:09.00  AT2025alco  2026-01-4.39 15.93
16:42:59.28 +26:21:02.80  ASASSN-26ae  2026-01-4.52 14.31
04:13:46.60 -05:02:16.60  ASASSN-26ad  2026-01-4.32 14.58
05:00:01.32 -57:14:29.70  ASASSN-25fj/ASASSN-26ab  2026-01-1.19 13.38
13:53:51.35 -17:55:38.10  ASASSN-25fg  2025-12-23.33 16.66
06:18:15.27 +15:47:38.10  AT2025ahtd  2025-12-23.31 16.96
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Feb 26 23:49 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:41:01.11 +41:59:28.2  PNV J00410111+4159282  2026-01-06.1994  18.7mag
00:42:52.01 +41:14:29.2  PNV J00425201+4114292  2026-01-08.7863  18.37Cmag
02:50:07.72 -16:37:02.3  TCP J02500772-1637023  2026-01-06.6352  14.53Cmag
00:42:58.52 +41:14:44.2  PNV J00425852+4114442  2026-01-13.4991  16.89Cmag
14:47:33.95 -10:02:56.8  TCP J14473395-1002568  2026-01-13.8185  14.0mag
15:33:45.28 -22:11:07.3  TCP J15334528-2211073  2026-01-16.8451  14.9mag
22:34:01.26 +39:53:32.8  TCP J22340126+3953328  2026-01-17.5738  16.79Cmag
00:42:52.36 +41:16:13.3  PNV J00425236+4116133  2026-01-18.5502  17.41Cmag
06:57:11.19 -17:24:43.9  TCP J06571119-1724439  2026-01-18.5375  14.2mag
00:42:52.23 +41:01:44.7  PNV J00425223+4101447  2026-01-19.5505  18.74Cmag
09:54:46.47 +69:06:31.7  PNV J09544647+6906317  2026-01-26.8081  19.3mag
18:08:51.99 -26:16:21.9  TCP J18085199-2616219  2026-01-31.8519  12.2mag
08:01:11.02 -03:43:14.1  TCP J08011102-0343141  2026-02-08.8090  15.10Cmag
05:19:15.40 -02:04:51.5  TCP J05191540-0204515  2026-02-13.4306  14.5mag
10:52:41.26 +36:40:08.9  TCP J10524126+3640089  2026-02-17.6065  17.4mag
05:50:50.81 +36:22:45.1  TCP J05505081+3622451  2026-02-17.5511  15.7mag
00:42:51.33 +41:13:49.1  PNV J00425133+4113491  2026-02-20.738  18.3mag
00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4  PNV J00430488+4129414  2026-02-20.5923  18.84Cmag
17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3  TCP J17432974+1124003  2026-02-22.3773  13.6mag
09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7  PNV J09550159+6908427  2026-02-20.893  19.0mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 187K Feb 26 23:49 tocp_transients_list.txt

=== Transient Factory Profiling ===
Started: Thu Feb 26 23:49:05 CST 2026
=======================================
TIMING SExtractor: 2 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 0 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 0 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 4s (0.07 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 22s (0.37 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 1s (0.02 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 0s (0.00 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 0s (0.00 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 7s (0.12 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 0s (0.00 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1: 34s (0.57 min)
TIMING SExtractor: 6 seconds
TIMING matching_and_photometry: 1 seconds
TIMING lightcurve_write: 0 seconds
TIMING select_aperture: 2 seconds
    VAST_RUN_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 13s (0.22 min)
    WCS_CACHE_SETUP: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_CALIBRATION_AND_EPHEMERIS: 1s (0.02 min)
    PLATE_VERIFY_AND_POINTING: 0s (0.00 min)
    UCAC5_PLATE_SOLVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    MAGNITUDE_CALIBRATION: 2s (0.03 min)
    MAGCAL_SANITY_CHECK: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_MAGNITUDE_CONSOLIDATED: 1s (0.02 min)
      FILTER_FRAME_EDGE: 0s (0.00 min)
      FILTER_SECOND_EPOCH_VERIFY: 1s (0.02 min)
    CANDIDATE_FILTERING_TOTAL: 2s (0.03 min)
    EXCLUSION_LIST_PREPARATION: 0s (0.00 min)
    SEEING_AND_LIMITING_MAG: 0s (0.00 min)
    WAIT_FOR_UCAC5: 0s (0.00 min)
    WCS_IMAGE_ARCHIVING: 0s (0.00 min)
    HTML_REPORT: 20s (0.33 min)
  SE_CONFIG_default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL: 38s (0.63 min)
FIELD_Dra-09-Q1b1x1: 83s (1.38 min)
=======================================
TOTAL_RUNTIME: 86s (1.43 min)
Finished: Thu Feb 26 23:50:31 CST 2026