This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 02 27.1763 2461098.6763 12.44 03:58:18.99 +68:28:24.8
138.75415 11.55428 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.0" and 7.4 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 493779608198576640 | 03:58:15.05 +68:28:25.0 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Check this position in TNS.Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 493779608198576640,2461098.6763,12.44,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 493779608198576640 20260227.1763 12.44CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 03:58:18.99 +68:28:24.8 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0151_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0150_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0151_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0150_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 02 27.1763 2461098.6763 12.35 03:54:15.60 +74:39:39.0
134.29080 15.98157 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.0" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | target | 03:54:15.60 +74:39:39.0 (user input) | T | P | (position from user input) J-Ks=0.673+/-0.031 (K)
Check this position in TNS.Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461098.6763,12.35,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260227.1763 12.35CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 03:54:15.60 +74:39:39.0 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0151_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0150_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0151_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0150_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 493778100669253888,2461098.6763,12.38,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 493778100669253888 20260227.1763 12.38CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 03:58:25.67 +68:22:15.9 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0151_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0150_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0151_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0150_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 02 27.1763 2461098.6763 12.48 04:12:33.46 +69:52:50.2
138.71735 13.44586 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.1" and 7.2 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J063.1410+69.8818 | 04:12:33.46 +69:52:50.2 (user input) | dubious (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input)
Check this position in TNS.Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J063.1410+69.8818,2461098.6763,12.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J063.1410+69.8818 20260227.1763 12.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 04:12:33.46 +69:52:50.2 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0151_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0150_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0151_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0150_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 02 27.1763* 03 36 20.69 +73 19 22.2 12.4 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461098.6763,12.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260227.1763 12.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 03:36:20.69 +73:19:22.2 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0151_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0150_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0151_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0150_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.82849338 23.12.2025 07:52:51.828 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
First image: 2461032.82849338 23.12.2025 07:52:51.828 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Last image: 2461098.67670149 27.02.2026 04:14:17.009 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 15150
Objects passed selection criteria: 15117
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.3 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 12899.8
Average stars matched: 12621.8 (97.8449 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 120432 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20251122 p4) 15.2.1 20251122
VaST compiled on Wed Feb 11 15:05:05 CST 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-300-g65540497
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-02-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Feb 26 22:19:51 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.82849338 23.12.2025 07:52:51.828 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
First image: 2461032.82849338 23.12.2025 07:52:51.828 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Last image: 2461098.67670149 27.02.2026 04:14:17.009 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 104
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 31 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 104378
Objects passed selection criteria: 104176
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.4 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 94088.5
Average stars matched: 91437.8 (97.1827 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1936068 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20251122 p4) 15.2.1 20251122
VaST compiled on Wed Feb 11 15:05:05 CST 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-300-g65540497
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-02-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Feb 26 22:29:40 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461098.67591044
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits'
wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits'
The image scale is 5.84"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.8" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:47:48.196 +70:00:29.12
Second-epoch image center 04:47:03.128 +70:00:36.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.06 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:47:48.196 +70:00:29.12
Second-epoch image center 04:47:26.080 +70:00:16.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.03 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:47:03.128 +70:00:36.88
Second-epoch second image center 04:47:26.080 +70:00:16.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.03320 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VnKq8MBXzt
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FXEydJcau5
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qzCW8aGAdr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qeH8hTICsG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Matched with Tycho-2 58 out of 16183 detected stars.
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.881698
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.881698
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.26
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.26
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
2.1 pix Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
15.2 mag. Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 11.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 14.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.VnKq8MBXzt (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1300, passed=16183
Got 16183 stars (including 14865 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16183 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 931.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 931.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012935 (46.6 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010348 (37.3 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 292 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.79"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.09"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 360 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.02"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.56"
Excluding outliers - 323 stars left (next iteration limit 245)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.FXEydJcau5 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1282, passed=16167
Got 16167 stars (including 14867 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16167 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qzCW8aGAdr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=799, passed=9724
Got 9724 stars (including 8906 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9724 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 931.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 931.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012936 (46.6 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010349 (37.3 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 291 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.06"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 359 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.99"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.96"
Excluding outliers - 329 stars left (next iteration limit 256)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qeH8hTICsG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=783, passed=9806
Got 9806 stars (including 9007 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9806 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21088_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 21088_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (474.2") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.84"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.8" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:47:48.196 +70:00:29.12
Second-epoch image center 04:47:03.128 +70:00:36.88
Angular distance between the image centers 0.06 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:47:48.196 +70:00:29.12
Second-epoch image center 04:47:26.080 +70:00:16.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.03 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:47:03.128 +70:00:36.88
Second-epoch second image center 04:47:26.080 +70:00:16.22
Angular distance between the image centers 0.03320 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hceSYrqEdP
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits &> /tmp/tmp.rPbbcJVtvJ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SAoa1H0yrN
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits &> /tmp/tmp.K1GqhMK26K
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Matched with Tycho-2 85 out of 113524 detected stars.
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 21.485425
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=21.485425
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.18
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.18
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 95 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
1.9 pix Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
1.9 pix fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
1.9 pix fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.2 mag. Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
14.2 mag. Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
13.6 mag. fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.6 (SNR ) 13.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 14.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.hceSYrqEdP (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=31, blended=9713, passed=113493
Got 113493 stars (including 103609 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 113493 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 931.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 931.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012935 (46.6 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010348 (37.3 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 303 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 368 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.45"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.59"
Excluding outliers - 329 stars left (next iteration limit 266)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.rPbbcJVtvJ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=9545, passed=112768
Got 112768 stars (including 103038 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 112768 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SAoa1H0yrN (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=4395, passed=76488
Got 76488 stars (including 71973 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 76488 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 931.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 931.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012936 (46.6 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010349 (37.3 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 295 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.16"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 358 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.30"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.00"
Excluding outliers - 319 stars left (next iteration limit 256)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.K1GqhMK26K (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=4410, passed=75680
Got 75680 stars (including 71158 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 75680 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-13-08_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0150.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_221749_TTUQ1b1x1_15379_sGd5abci/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out133320.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out133335.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out133373.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out133393.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out133396.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 15s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132945_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 132945_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (132.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132953_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 132953_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (162.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132966_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 132966_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (84.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132968_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 132968_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (255.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132972_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 132972_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (478.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132984_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 132984_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (411.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132993_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 132993_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (226.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132997_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 132997_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (510.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132998_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 132998_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (180.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133001_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133001_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (771.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133002_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133002_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133038_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133038_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (453.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133146_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133146_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (233.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133154_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133154_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (105.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133155_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133155_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (744.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133161_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133161_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (104.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133164_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133164_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:40.55 +72:09:21.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133172_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133172_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133191_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133191_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133194_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133194_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (324.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133213_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133213_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:32.15 +72:06:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133228_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133228_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (128.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133239_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133239_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (177.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133244_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133244_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (272.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133256_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133256_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (347.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133268_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133268_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (130.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133283_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133283_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (348.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133284_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133284_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (116.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133287_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133287_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (346.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133300_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133300_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (382.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133310_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133310_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (652.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133312_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133312_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (104.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133320_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
Preparing report for the candidate 133320_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133322_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133322_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (385.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133325_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133325_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:10:08.96 +68:21:12.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133327_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133327_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (234.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133335_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
Preparing report for the candidate 133335_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133336_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133336_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (396.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133345_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133345_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (62.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133358_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133358_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (599.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133369_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133369_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (331.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133371_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133371_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (662.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133372_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133372_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:57:23.68 +71:24:58.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133373_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
Preparing report for the candidate 133373_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133374_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133374_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133378_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133378_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (43.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133383_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133383_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (90.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133384_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133384_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (694.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133393_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
Preparing report for the candidate 133393_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133396_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
Preparing report for the candidate 133396_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133405_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133405_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (30.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133409_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133409_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (241.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133412_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133412_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (90.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133421_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133421_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133428_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133428_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (236.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133450_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133450_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (140.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133452_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133452_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (124.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133455_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133455_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (271.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133456_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133456_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (236.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133458_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133458_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (169.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133466_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133466_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (82.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133467_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133467_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (95.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133488_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133488_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (51.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133492_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133492_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (119.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133497_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133497_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (418.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133498_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133498_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133508_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133508_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (195.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133510_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133510_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (405.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133514_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133514_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (587.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133517_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133517_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (116.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133518_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133518_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (566.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133522_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133522_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (196.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133530_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133530_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (214.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133552_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133552_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (590.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133560_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133560_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (343.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133565_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133565_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133567_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133567_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133603_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133603_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (423.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133613_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133613_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (181.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133653_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133653_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (227.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133657_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133657_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (279.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133660_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133660_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (316.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133685_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133685_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (193.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133703_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133703_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (510.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133706_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133706_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133718_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133718_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (216.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133725_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133725_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (87.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133726_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133726_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133727_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133727_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (632.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133728_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133728_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (382.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133744_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 133744_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (83.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 72928_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 72928_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (478.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77457_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 77457_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:41:03.60 +67:38:50.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 90043_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 90043_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62200_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151
The candidate 62200_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_22-14-17_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0151 did not pass the final checks