NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Cet-01-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 02 27.12160    2461098.62160    13.02    02:32:19.08 +08:30:56.3   5101 1676   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    12.99    02:32:19.13 +08:30:56.3   5099 1677   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 02 27.1218  2461098.6218  13.01  02:32:19.11 +08:30:56.3
160.91172 -46.78202 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.7" and 1.6 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
85 Io                      -1     -1       2  13.3     0    0
Check this position in TNS.
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?) 2nd epoch FITS
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports Make finder charts with VaST

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 02 27.12160    2461098.62160    13.19    02:45:26.47 +07:46:11.9   3144 2124   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.22    02:45:26.49 +07:46:12.2   3143 2125   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 02 27.1218  2461098.6218  13.21  02:45:26.48 +07:46:12.1
165.35419 -45.50419 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.4" and 1.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
202 Chryseis                -1     -1       1  13.5     0    0
Check this position in TNS.
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?) 2nd epoch FITS
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports Make finder charts with VaST

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 02 27.12160    2461098.62160    13.83    02:07:11.12 +01:09:57.2   8934 6101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.94    02:07:10.70 +01:10:01.2   8933 6101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 02 27.1218  2461098.6218  13.88  02:07:10.91 +01:09:59.2
158.76325 -56.34262 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 7.5" and 0.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 02:07:10.91 +01:09:59.2 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Check this position in TNS.
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?) 2nd epoch FITS
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports Make finder charts with VaST

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 02 27.12160    2461098.62160    14.08    03:04:23.86 +07:39:36.9   0284 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    14.28    03:04:23.56 +07:39:40.7   0283 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 02 27.1218  2461098.6218  14.18  03:04:23.71 +07:39:38.8
170.49931 -42.60543 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.9" and 0.6 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 03:04:23.71 +07:39:38.8 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Check this position in TNS.
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?) 2nd epoch FITS
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports Make finder charts with VaST

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 02 27.12160    2461098.62160    14.22    02:59:36.59 +10:53:30.0   1029 0203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    14.29    02:59:36.46 +10:53:34.2   1028 0203   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 02 27.1218  2461098.6218  14.26  02:59:36.52 +10:53:32.1
166.49894 -40.89282 galactic  Ari  Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.6" and 1.0 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 02:59:36.52 +10:53:32.1 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Check this position in TNS.
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?) 2nd epoch FITS
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports Make finder charts with VaST

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 02 27.12160    2461098.62160    14.28    03:00:30.19 +08:57:49.4   0884 1377   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    14.34    03:00:29.84 +08:57:53.4   0884 1377   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 02 27.1218  2461098.6218  14.31  03:00:30.02 +08:57:51.4
168.35800 -42.24603 galactic  Cet  Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.5" and 0.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 03:00:30.02 +08:57:51.4 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Check this position in TNS.
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?) 2nd epoch FITS
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports Make finder charts with VaST

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 6

Processing log:

Filtering log:

 
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 14.5
FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-01-17.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= 500
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 3000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 2000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Cet-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cet-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cet-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 847564 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 847564 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits_preview.png'

Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits


renamed 'Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.png' -> 'transient_report/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits_preview.png'

Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 635.0493
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 558.6809
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2789.0839
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 716.7672
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 2795.2495
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 717.5259
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 4.39192
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-01-17.fit
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -15.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
Header: 61 keys total, 10 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-02-26T20:54:56.5514176' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-02-27T02:54:56.5514176' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61098.1214878587 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-02-27T02:55:06.4545690' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =      61098.121602477 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     38.5684612709111 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     6.00003427438818 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     28.2702777777778 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     257.651388888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     2.10434319426135 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1013.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =            33.748239 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958391 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cet-01'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '02 34 17'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+06 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 50: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 51: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 52: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 53: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 54: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 55: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 56: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 57: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 58: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 59: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 60: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 61: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-02-21.fit
CCD-TEMP= -15.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
CCD-TEMP= -15.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-02-21.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-02-21.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/d_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits :)

Spent 0.437810 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-02-21.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/d_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-01-17.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 28880.787099
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=20680.5, right_median=19489.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-01-17.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -15.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Header: 61 keys total, 10 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-02-26T20:55:33.0654808' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-02-27T02:55:33.0654808' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61098.1219104747 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-02-27T02:55:42.9695955' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61098.1220251042 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =      38.568461278962 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     6.00003427067486 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     28.1480555555556 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     257.750555555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     2.11265442788342 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1013.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =            33.748239 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958391 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Cet-01'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '02 34 17'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+06 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 50: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 51: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 52: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 53: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 54: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 55: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 56: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 57: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 58: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 59: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 60: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 61: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-02-21.fit
CCD-TEMP= -15.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
CCD-TEMP= -15.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-02-21.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-02-21.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/d_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits :)

Spent 0.442657 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-02-21.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/d_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-01-17.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 28880.787099
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=20680.5, right_median=19489.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-01-17.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits



fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461098.62160360
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits'
wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits'
wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits'
wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:34:05.473 +05:59:28.46
Second-epoch image center 02:34:25.456 +05:59:40.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.08 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:34:05.473 +05:59:28.46
Second-epoch image center 02:34:24.908 +05:59:44.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.08 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  02:34:25.456 +05:59:40.37
Second-epoch second image center 02:34:24.908 +05:59:44.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00256 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Oth4JNKkud
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits &> /tmp/tmp.raMrjdRr2t
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits &> /tmp/tmp.apgvmket5K
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.83w1pK6Ki1
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits and wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat 
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits and wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits and wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Matched with Tycho-2 3725 out of 7100 detected stars.
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.925639
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.925639
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.60
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.33

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.33
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 0 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.1 pix  Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
 2.1 pix  Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
 2.1 pix  fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
 2.0 pix  fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.3 mag.  Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
 15.3 mag.  Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
 14.4 mag.  fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
 14.4 mag.  fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.4 (SNR )  11.5 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 14.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.Oth4JNKkud (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=484, passed=7100
Got 7100 stars (including 6611 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7100 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 967 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.24" 
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits -region wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.raMrjdRr2t (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=486, passed=7027
Got 7027 stars (including 6535 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7027 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" 
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits -region wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.apgvmket5K (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=330, passed=3692
Got 3692 stars (including 3358 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3692 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" 
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.83w1pK6Ki1 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=349, passed=3682
Got 3682 stars (including 3323 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 3682 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
No candidates found here
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:34:05.473 +05:59:28.46
Second-epoch image center 02:34:25.456 +05:59:40.37
Angular distance between the image centers 0.08 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 02:34:05.473 +05:59:28.46
Second-epoch image center 02:34:24.908 +05:59:44.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.08 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  02:34:25.456 +05:59:40.37
Second-epoch second image center 02:34:24.908 +05:59:44.63
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00256 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits &> /tmp/tmp.EQcoQX0Yff
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WUkNPfvhmv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1414Lb6rPS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits &> /tmp/tmp.YBccT6vm8e
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits and wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat 
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits and wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat 
Found non-empty wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits and wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Matched with Tycho-2 3771 out of 36889 detected stars.
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.832485
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.832485
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.38
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.45

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.45
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 91 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.0 pix  Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
 2.0 pix  Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
 2.0 pix  fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
 1.9 pix  fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.5 mag.  Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
 15.5 mag.  Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
 14.6 mag.  fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
 14.6 mag.  fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  14.6 (SNR )  14.0 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 14.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.EQcoQX0Yff (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1585, passed=36879
Got 36879 stars (including 35234 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 36879 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25" 
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits -region wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-59-03_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0208.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WUkNPfvhmv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits' -> 'wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1594, passed=37071
Got 37071 stars (including 35410 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 37071 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" 
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" 
Excluding outliers - 966 stars left (next iteration limit 1062)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits -region wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-00-07_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0209.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1414Lb6rPS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=867, passed=23139
Got 23139 stars (including 22230 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 23139 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.YBccT6vm8e (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=825, passed=22926
Got 22926 stars (including 22055 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 22926 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" 
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits -region wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-56_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0063.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/wcs_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cet-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52618.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52612.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52635.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52878.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52965.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53027.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53047.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 16s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 4s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52589_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52589_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    12.33    02:04:24.80 +10:27:29.2   9274 0432   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52590_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52590_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    12.45    02:57:59.60 +06:03:13.0   1247 3148   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52593_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52593_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    12.54    02:59:37.21 +09:26:00.1   1019 1094   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52598_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52598_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    12.50    02:07:19.67 +02:51:37.1   8894 5066   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52602_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52602_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    12.62    02:12:57.14 +01:42:56.1   8043 5768   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52603_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52603_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    12.84    02:22:22.04 +01:15:37.0   6614 6049   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52608_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52608_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    12.91    02:37:56.57 +08:14:58.9   4262 1839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52612_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
Preparing report for the candidate 52612_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52615_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52615_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.05    02:48:28.96 +01:13:33.9   2665 6078   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52616_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52616_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.13    02:10:10.25 +09:16:51.7   8410 1173   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52617_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52617_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.09    02:31:22.62 +02:03:21.6   5250 5569   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52618_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52618_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    12.99    02:09:35.61 +04:13:33.6   8535 4238   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

**** FOUND  02:09:35.60 +04:13:33.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.98, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.96)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.177 2518134313418534400 032.39774311132 +04.22572283380 13.0592 12.6110 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.177#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52619_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52619_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    12.93    02:20:28.14 +01:25:13.0   6901 5951   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52622_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52622_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.13    03:05:21.71 +06:48:52.3   0129 2673   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52623_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52623_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.08    02:11:39.74 +08:47:24.3   8188 1476   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52626_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52626_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    12.94    02:03:21.39 +07:55:29.1   9456 1976   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52627_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52627_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.22    03:03:15.45 +11:00:20.5   0477 0121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52633_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52633_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.30    02:42:40.81 +02:34:58.8   3547 5253   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52635_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
Preparing report for the candidate 52635_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52637_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52637_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.17    03:02:57.70 +04:54:12.0   0482 3839   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52641_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52641_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.30    02:19:19.17 +10:16:25.2   7031 0595   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52645_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52645_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.27    02:46:50.21 +01:58:41.8   2917 5620   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

**** FOUND  02:46:50.18 +01:58:41.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52662_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52662_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.32    03:04:23.46 +03:23:00.2   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52666_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52666_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.43    02:56:08.65 +08:21:41.2   1539 1753   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

**** FOUND  02:56:08.65 +08:21:40.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52669_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52669_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.41    02:39:41.83 +09:06:21.1   4001 1322   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52671_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52671_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.54    02:50:51.29 +04:06:19.6   2318 4332   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52685_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52685_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.56    02:16:46.98 +08:18:35.9   7420 1780   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52687_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52687_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.51    03:01:27.32 +06:43:50.7   0725 2732   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52689_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52689_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.49    02:45:08.97 +01:45:44.1   3172 5751   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52690_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52690_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.39    02:37:13.19 +02:25:44.1   4369 5345   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

**** FOUND  02:37:13.14 +02:25:44.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52692_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52692_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.42    02:39:41.42 +01:58:27.1   3997 5621   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52695_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52695_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.48    03:03:57.85 +08:07:46.3   0352 1876   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52716_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52716_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.51    02:30:31.31 +02:59:57.9   5377 4998   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52728_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52728_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.51    02:50:55.84 +02:52:03.8   2301 5081   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52731_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52731_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.49    02:36:25.63 +09:57:10.8   4487 0810   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52732_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52732_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.51    02:59:36.82 +08:53:40.5   1017 1422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

**** FOUND  02:59:36.76 +08:53:41.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52740_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52740_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.52    02:41:22.01 +03:55:38.0   3747 4441   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52741_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52741_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.41    02:22:15.57 +02:28:13.9   6624 5314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

**** FOUND  02:22:15.54 +02:28:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52743_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52743_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.42    02:03:46.87 +10:52:07.5   9367 0177   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52749_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52749_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.75    02:52:45.40 +05:06:53.6   2035 3721   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52753_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52753_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.74    02:43:17.87 +01:22:10.7   3451 5989   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52760_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52760_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.61    02:09:33.99 +09:46:18.6   8498 0872   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52763_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52763_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.72    02:30:41.36 +08:51:26.2   5341 1470   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52765_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52765_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.89    02:12:34.02 +08:24:01.3   8054 1715   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52778_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52778_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    14.16    03:00:30.94 +09:35:18.3   0884 0997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52784_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52784_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.53    02:51:30.54 +02:48:23.7   2213 5118   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52785_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52785_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.64    02:25:44.22 +10:31:26.8   6074 0455   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

**** FOUND  02:25:44.20 +10:31:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52802_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52802_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.79    02:43:23.22 +09:26:24.6   3452 1118   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52807_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52807_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.84    02:45:14.35 +01:57:18.0   3159 5634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52810_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52810_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.81    02:47:27.77 +02:05:26.9   2823 5552   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52825_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52825_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.81    02:05:19.46 +07:23:05.8   9160 2311   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52845_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52845_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    14.04    03:00:55.28 +02:16:21.1   0774 5442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52846_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52846_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.97    02:24:17.47 +03:36:06.1   6313 4631   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52860_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52860_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.69    02:40:59.96 +03:01:45.0   3801 4983   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52873_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52873_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.92    03:05:03.79 +08:48:54.2   0189 1455   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52878_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
Preparing report for the candidate 52878_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52880_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52880_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.55    02:11:39.47 +04:42:23.1   8217 3950   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52885_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52885_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    14.13    02:05:36.78 +05:26:17.4   9133 3495   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52894_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52894_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.92    03:01:22.22 +05:50:33.3   0732 3271   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52896_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52896_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    14.14    02:42:15.73 +08:54:49.8   3619 1437   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52921_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52921_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    14.03    02:29:27.64 +10:52:23.0   5520 0248   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52946_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52946_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.85    03:04:57.03 +04:12:04.6   0171 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52948_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52948_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.98    02:51:20.54 +01:43:29.7   2233 5775   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52965_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
Preparing report for the candidate 52965_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52966_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52966_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.94    02:19:33.42 +01:29:37.4   7039 5906   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52970_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52970_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.90    03:03:49.54 +03:51:06.2   0341 4478   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52977_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52977_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    14.31    02:28:24.61 +10:49:42.3   5676 0274   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52999_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 52999_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    14.10    02:57:00.26 +06:36:28.2   1400 2814   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53000_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 53000_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    14.18    02:45:07.88 +10:03:59.2   3193 0737   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53007_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 53007_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    14.19    02:12:01.50 +04:09:51.5   8165 4279   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53013_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 53013_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    14.31    02:27:10.91 +03:14:25.4   5879 4851   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53027_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
Preparing report for the candidate 53027_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53028_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 53028_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    14.30    03:04:53.49 +05:47:14.4   0193 3299   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53029_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 53029_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    14.45    02:56:37.25 +06:04:49.5   1455 3134   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53034_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 53034_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.82    02:11:39.02 +01:36:05.5   8243 5837   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53035_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 53035_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    14.48    02:50:39.44 +03:24:57.6   2345 4749   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53037_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 53037_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    14.21    02:28:59.22 +08:34:24.4   5595 1640   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53040_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 53040_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    14.31    02:31:09.32 +02:51:13.8   5282 5086   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53046_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 53046_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.81    02:16:33.80 +08:41:38.4   7451 1547   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53047_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
Preparing report for the candidate 53047_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53048_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 53048_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    14.25    02:51:48.34 +04:18:43.5   2175 4207   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53050_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 53050_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    14.28    03:04:23.81 +09:01:46.4   0292 1326   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53052_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 53052_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    14.14    02:08:51.61 +02:12:07.0   8665 5469   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53055_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 53055_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    14.36    02:56:29.39 +02:13:19.4   1452 5473   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53058_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 53058_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    14.60    03:00:32.73 +09:04:40.1   0877 1308   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53061_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 53061_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    14.11    02:06:00.74 +04:26:33.5   9081 4101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53064_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 53064_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    14.38    02:58:59.02 +07:31:17.8   1105 2257   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53071_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 53071_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    13.98    02:30:26.05 +06:07:38.2   5384 3114   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53075_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 53075_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    14.15    02:33:30.64 +07:16:12.6   4923 2428   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53078_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 53078_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    14.38    02:30:45.72 +02:17:54.3   5342 5422   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53086_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064
The candidate 53086_fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 27.12203    2461098.62203    14.37    02:48:49.70 +07:47:37.4   2636 2108   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_205624_TTUQ1b1x1_5971_15TsljPl/fd_Cet-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-55-33_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0064.fits

Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 21s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cet-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
02:32:19.11 +08:30:56.3
02:45:26.48 +07:46:12.1
02:07:10.91 +01:09:59.2
03:04:23.71 +07:39:38.8
02:59:36.52 +10:53:32.1
03:00:30.02 +08:57:51.4
########### Completed Cet-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
02:32:19.11 +08:30:56.3
02:45:26.48 +07:46:12.1
02:07:10.91 +01:09:59.2
03:04:23.71 +07:39:38.8
02:59:36.52 +10:53:32.1
03:00:30.02 +08:57:51.4
###################################################################################
02:32:19.11 +08:30:56.3  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
02:45:26.48 +07:46:12.1  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
02:07:10.91 +01:09:59.2  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
03:04:23.71 +07:39:38.8  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
02:59:36.52 +10:53:32.1  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
03:00:30.02 +08:57:51.4  -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
02:07:10.91 +01:09:59.2  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
02:59:36.52 +10:53:32.1  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
03:00:30.02 +08:57:51.4  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
03:04:23.71 +07:39:38.8  -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
02:07:10.91 +01:09:59.2  -- not a known variable star
02:59:36.52 +10:53:32.1  -- not a known variable star
03:00:30.02 +08:57:51.4  -- not a known variable star
03:04:23.71 +07:39:38.8  -- not a known variable star
Found 4 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
4 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
Adding identified Gaia sources from exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO   ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
02:07:10.91 +01:09:59.2
02:59:36.52 +10:53:32.1
03:00:30.02 +08:57:51.4
03:04:23.71 +07:39:38.8
02:09:35.60 +04:13:33.1
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is 500
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461098.62160360 -observatory 500
23:26:27.49 -00:23:53.1 Mercury (1.2mag)
23:27:17.32 -05:02:09.0 Venus (-3.9mag)
21:57:59.10 -13:34:25.8 Mars (1.1mag)
07:05:05.74 +22:56:15.3 Jupiter (-2.5mag)
00:07:33.20 -01:30:21.6 Saturn (1.0mag)
03:40:21.43 +19:23:02.0 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:04:18.99 -00:57:25.7 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:29:42.88 -22:58:12.7 Pluto (14.5mag)
06:55:56.46 +27:13:29.9 Moon (-11.2mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Feb 26 20:58 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461098.62160360:
07:04:59.51 +22:56:29.2 Io (5.4mag)
07:04:59.86 +22:56:22.7 Europa (5.6mag)
07:04:47.30 +22:56:43.8 Ganymede (5.0mag)
07:05:33.76 +22:55:14.6 Callisto (6.2mag)
07:08:34.00 +23:10:13.4 Himalia (15.1mag)
07:05:06.63 +22:56:11.0 Thebe (15.9mag)
07:07:56.46 +23:21:40.5 Elara (17.0mag)
07:00:54.86 +24:01:36.1 Pasiphae (17.1mag)
07:14:05.46 +22:45:40.6 Carme (18.1mag)
00:07:33.29 -01:30:02.1 Titan (8.8mag)
00:07:38.85 -01:30:17.8 Rhea (10.1mag)
00:07:40.78 -01:31:09.0 Iapetus (11.5mag)
00:07:47.87 -01:30:28.6 Hyperion (14.8mag)
00:09:36.22 -01:17:36.8 Phoebe (16.8mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Feb 26 20:58 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461098.62160360:
09:27:11.35 +24:04:26.0 JWST
20:07:15.63 -03:05:11.8 Chandra
07:34:14.77 -19:07:11.2 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Feb 26 20:58 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets (listed at http://astro.vanbuitenen.nl/comets and http://aerith.net/comet/weekly/current.html ) from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461098.62160360 at 500
17:09:19.18 -11:06:30.6 17.4mag 10P/Tempel 2
03:42:22.42 +29:15:34.6 18.0mag 123P/West-Hartley
08:16:46.92 +59:06:17.9 18.3mag 124P/Mrkos
21:36:20.97 -06:12:23.9 22.0mag 141P/Machholz
01:32:14.80 +13:18:08.6 17.7mag 145P/Shoemaker-Levy 5
10:58:13.50 +31:04:59.2 18.0mag 164P/Christensen
09:30:26.24 -33:36:23.7 18.0mag 195P/Hill
15:50:59.43 -06:05:53.0 19.5mag 210P/Christensen
18:39:41.81 -21:05:28.3 17.2mag 218P/LINEAR
16:29:45.85 -18:01:54.1 15.2mag 235P/LINEAR
04:03:44.48 +28:37:45.7 17.9mag 240P/NEAT
15:22:43.54 +06:17:41.9 14.9mag 24P/Schaumasse
11:21:27.72 -03:14:56.5 17.3mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 1
07:03:35.38 +27:25:31.6 19.6mag 407P/PanSTARRS-Fuls
17:15:07.67 -11:15:47.5 17.6mag 40P/Vaisala 1
10:58:55.50 -08:32:58.4 16.6mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
13:25:17.19 -06:03:00.6 20.2mag 489P/Denning
04:38:20.15 +48:10:45.6 17.8mag 493P/2024 Q2 (LONEOS)
06:06:52.12 +46:35:37.3 17.6mag 63P/Wild 1
23:24:32.54 -01:12:11.4 16.2mag 78P/Gehrels 2
20:20:02.02 -21:31:05.4 14.9mag 88P/Howell
20:47:33.52 -28:45:16.0  0.0mag P/2010 H3 (SOHO)
15:30:08.43 -29:23:39.3 18.6mag P/2023 S1 (PanSTARRS)
04:44:07.15 -72:18:37.5 16.5mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:29:12.38 +31:13:43.3 18.2mag C/2017 K2 (PanSTARRS)
20:09:17.85 -65:21:43.0 18.1mag C/2020 V2 (ZTF)
17:23:39.52 +04:53:09.6 16.3mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
03:39:47.09 +24:43:04.8 15.8mag C/2022 N2 (PanSTARRS)
09:06:34.86 +30:12:36.3 15.3mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:34:14.71 -05:56:44.6 16.7mag C/2022 R6 (PanSTARRS)
23:59:18.49 +48:39:56.1 18.0mag C/2023 C2 (ATLAS)
09:45:43.14 -20:01:07.5 17.5mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS)
20:44:27.72 +61:15:41.1 17.3mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
19:34:57.34 -03:26:24.3 16.0mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
02:50:41.84 +35:38:46.0 18.5mag C/2023 RS61 (PanSTARRS)
21:09:26.57 +81:28:16.3 18.0mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
06:32:27.32 +63:54:08.7 17.4mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
02:30:10.18 -17:49:45.0 11.5mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
11:40:59.17 -01:37:37.5 18.1mag C/2024 G2 (ATLAS)
19:33:00.70 +00:49:45.9 18.9mag C/2024 G4 (PanSTARRS)
16:36:54.83 -01:03:12.9 17.7mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
19:56:49.51 +04:10:54.2 15.5mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
02:50:00.02 -30:38:19.8 15.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
16:09:51.64 -60:06:35.9 15.7mag C/2025 A6 (Lemmon)
04:50:04.60 +60:18:24.5 16.7mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
15:52:35.86 -08:37:16.4 14.7mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
02:24:39.73 -19:46:44.5 16.8mag C/2025 Q3 (ATLAS)
02:15:53.41 +17:44:48.3 21.3mag C/2025 R2 (SWAN)
22:22:36.42 +17:48:08.6 16.1mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
21:51:12.59 -17:53:09.8 22.1mag C/2025 T1 (ATLAS)
02:55:20.34 -18:07:33.7 18.1mag C/2026 A1 (MAPS)
21:21:29.91 +23:06:17.2 17.0mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.6K Feb 26 20:59 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
18:38:36.11 -79:28:58.40  ASASSN-26bb  2026-02-24.36 16.11
17:43:29.75 +11:24:00.60  ASASSN-26bc  2026-02-23.37 -3.37
16:59:41.08 -80:01:51.20  ASASSN-26bd  2026-02-23.3 14.38
11:23:31.77 -08:39:15.40  SN2026cff  2026-02-23.15 -1.08
14:55:17.39 -05:56:05.30  SN2026dmk  2026-02-23.22 -0.76
12:28:15.19 +44:27:20.80  SN2026cjz  2026-02-23.47 15.62
12:12:29.55 -02:40:43.30  AT2026dsk  2026-02-23.4 17.21
09:21:05.29 +06:11:42.80  SN2026chr  2026-02-23.1 17.39
16:05:38.61 +18:06:07.40  SN 2026dsy  2026-02-23.36 17.15
04:55:50.66 -29:52:57.70  SN 2026dpg  2026-02-23.11 15.75
04:21:28.18 -53:22:54.40  AT2026drl  2026-02-21.03 17.31
11:50:37.32 +55:21:13.70  SN 2026dix  2026-02-21.43 16.39
16:21:19.69 -63:47:29.40  ASASSN-26az  2026-02-21.03 17.02
02:45:30.93 -54:17:43.10  SN 2026cju  2026-02-21.04 17.54
01:58:40.68 +47:34:50.10  ASASSN-26av  2026-02-21.09 15.97
18:35:53.01 -42:31:38.90  ASASSN-26aw  2026-02-21.12 15.89
11:40:18.88 -39:45:09.20  ASASSN-26ax  2026-02-21.08 15.73
02:26:23.52 -51:42:29.80  ASASSN-26ay  2026-02-21.04 13.93
08:46:07.66 +01:17:43.90  ASASSN-26ba  2026-02-20.23 15.43
14:15:47.49 -48:05:16.60  SN2026dez  2026-02-19.31 15.91
17:25:53.90 -23:28:31.50  ASASSN-26au  2026-02-18.33 15.82
16:07:59.09 -24:00:10.00  SN2026cmv  2026-02-17.28 16.19
18:15:01.25 -37:43:36.70  ASASSN-26at  2026-02-16.36 15.94
13:01:07.08 -11:25:16.30  AT2026bzh  2026-02-12.45 17.3
10:56:29.81 -07:07:25.30  SN 2026bre  2026-02-12.16 17.15
08:55:43.51 -53:26:11.50  ASASSN-26as  2026-02-12.2 16.54
06:33:50.98 -41:46:25.10  ASASSN-26ar  2026-02-12.04 16.42
12:15:22.43 +23:59:39.60  SN2026bzg  2026-02-11.27 16.32
08:01:10.95 -03:43:14.30  AT2026coj  2026-02-9.25 13.73
12:44:00.18 -57:03:46.80  ASASSN-26aq  2026-02-9.18 16
06:26:33.34 -54:06:39.90  AT2026cih  2026-02-8.06 17.26
23:08:59.40 -88:59:11.60  SN 2026bsu  2026-02-8.03 16.02
01:04:14.94 -62:31:02.30  SN 2026azk  2026-02-8.04 16.41
08:44:55.41 +64:55:09.90  SN 2026anq  2026-02-7.16 17.62
12:37:42.99 +33:26:05.40  SN 2026bnm  2026-02-7.29 16.74
00:12:55.45 +33:21:25.90  SN2026cbh  2026-02-7.09 16.33
08:02:12.64 -04:14:20.90  SN 2026auh  2026-02-7.11 16.64
18:03:52.67 -31:27:26.00  TCP J18035290-3127298  2026-02-7.37 15.76
12:18:03.59 +50:27:10.20  SN 2026bjz  2026-02-7.25 16.48
07:51:51.12 +55:05:27.60  SN 2026ail  2026-02-6.21 16.85
08:10:56.38 +36:49:42.80  AT2026bsa  2026-02-6.29 17.47
04:43:45.47 -15:49:01.00  SN2026azr  2026-02-5.24 16.96
06:14:48.48 -34:20:08.90  ASASSN-26ap  2026-02-5.2 13.77
02:42:33.90 -27:21:02.60  SN 2026aip  2026-02-4.09 15.85
00:43:12.26 +38:35:47.90  AT2026brt  2026-02-3.12 14.92
14:34:27.21 +21:56:59.90  SN2026atb  2026-01-29.32 15.59
13:12:04.11 -60:56:12.40  ASASSN-26ao  2026-01-28.35 15.61
13:00:36.49 -06:28:26.00  SN2026azd  2026-01-28.23 15.69
10:33:50.27 -31:00:53.40  SN 2026ayz  2026-01-25.11 15.3
05:14:22.36 -60:47:20.70  SN 2026apb  2026-01-24.08 17.35
06:39:26.57 -21:49:19.60  AT2026afe  2026-01-23.11 16.17
09:27:23.49 -32:00:30.90  SN 2023kuy  2026-01-21.16 15.43
09:38:44.42 -20:00:54.30  SN2026afi  2026-01-20.24 17.43
06:30:51.41 -74:35:46.80  AT2026ahr  2026-01-20.09 16.98
13:33:03.15 -16:14:28.70  SN2026amc  2026-01-20.29 16.9
06:57:11.13 -17:24:42.80  ASASSN-26an  2026-01-19.31 13.99
17:41:29.59 +68:57:34.90  2026abj  2026-01-18.64 17.02
10:22:24.99 +04:00:02.20  SN 2026kc  2026-01-18.61 16.1
12:42:03.30 +00:41:41.80  SN 2026pg  2026-01-18.5 17.44
03:36:21.80 -31:44:39.30  AT2025aibn  2026-01-17.04 16.7
13:45:00.71 -32:34:53.00  AT2026yi  2026-01-17.26 16.22
09:27:07.17 +62:45:24.20  AT2026nu  2026-01-17.29 17.09
12:38:41.73 +07:36:37.40  SN 2025afcr  2026-01-17.49 17.11
12:12:12.65 +13:13:18.50  SN 2026acd  2026-01-17.3 16.15
16:21:54.73 -63:36:53.10  ASASSN-26al  2026-01-17.36 15.34
15:33:45.22 -22:11:07.90  ASASSN-26aj  2026-01-16.51 14
12:27:08.33 -58:19:36.10  ASASSN-26ak  2026-01-16.2 13.94
17:21:53.10 +04:39:07.10  ASASSN-26ai  2026-01-16.67 14.83
14:46:54.08 -64:04:30.10  ASASSN-26ah  2026-01-15.07 16.84
23:02:43.24 +20:04:53.00  SN2025ajvh  2026-01-15.07 16.03
14:12:27.38 -30:12:29.10  ASASSN-26ag  2026-01-14.27 15.35
14:33:53.58 +05:27:35.40  SN 2025ajnc  2026-01-14.32 15.79
01:43:00.31 -34:11:40.60  AT2025afcm  2026-01-13.08 0.45
00:26:17.71 -52:11:38.60  AT2025ahal  2026-01-11.06 17.57
00:51:36.17 +29:42:40.10  SN2025ahxd  2026-01-11.21 15
10:19:19.14 -37:54:58.30  AT2025ahrt  2026-01-10.26 -0.54
14:37:48.78 +15:51:04.20  SN2025ajng  2026-01-9.42 16.35
05:01:03.70 -08:34:13.20  SN2026A  2026-01-9.28 16.83
00:02:52.11 +13:05:42.90  SN2025ajvg  2026-01-9.13 15.89
08:37:09.62 -02:18:08.80  SN2025aigm  2026-01-9.55 17.66
09:52:50.71 +39:36:55.70  SN2025ahyt  2026-01-9.37 16.97
11:22:19.08 -27:21:40.90  AT2026ta  2026-01-9.32 15.88
14:35:00.21 +00:59:11.40  SN 2025ahsa  2026-01-8.35 -2
09:25:42.42 +22:20:06.10  SN2025ahkt  2026-01-8.03 15.88
22:39:53.44 +34:53:50.00  SN 2025aikz  2026-01-7.09 16.3
08:21:20.95 +20:52:01.60  SN 2025aiks  2026-01-7.13 15.82
07:35:31.38 +09:10:32.40  AT2025ajvk  2026-01-7.12 -1.82
02:50:07.71 -16:37:02.30  AT2026nl  2026-01-7.16 14.19
14:05:12.75 -33:46:00.80  SN 2025ajmj  2026-01-7.31 14.93
12:35:08.33 +28:03:22.70  SN 2025aiaj  2026-01-5.44 15.76
05:30:00.47 -66:43:29.40  ASASSN-26af  2026-01-5.12 14.38
14:05:05.13 -44:14:24.00  ASASSN-26ac  2026-01-5.3 16.01
11:29:16.57 +20:35:09.00  AT2025alco  2026-01-4.39 15.93
16:42:59.28 +26:21:02.80  ASASSN-26ae  2026-01-4.52 14.31
04:13:46.60 -05:02:16.60  ASASSN-26ad  2026-01-4.32 14.58
05:00:01.32 -57:14:29.70  ASASSN-25fj/ASASSN-26ab  2026-01-1.19 13.38
13:53:51.35 -17:55:38.10  ASASSN-25fg  2025-12-23.33 16.66
06:18:15.27 +15:47:38.10  AT2025ahtd  2025-12-23.31 16.96
07:20:53.12 -33:02:58.20  SN 2025agvw  2025-12-23.32 16.84
02:58:15.63 +44:47:45.80  ASASSN-25fh  2025-12-23.13 15.63
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 5.7K Feb 26 20:58 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
00:41:01.11 +41:59:28.2  PNV J00410111+4159282  2026-01-06.1994  18.7mag
00:42:52.01 +41:14:29.2  PNV J00425201+4114292  2026-01-08.7863  18.37Cmag
02:50:07.72 -16:37:02.3  TCP J02500772-1637023  2026-01-06.6352  14.53Cmag
00:42:58.52 +41:14:44.2  PNV J00425852+4114442  2026-01-13.4991  16.89Cmag
14:47:33.95 -10:02:56.8  TCP J14473395-1002568  2026-01-13.8185  14.0mag
15:33:45.28 -22:11:07.3  TCP J15334528-2211073  2026-01-16.8451  14.9mag
22:34:01.26 +39:53:32.8  TCP J22340126+3953328  2026-01-17.5738  16.79Cmag
00:42:52.36 +41:16:13.3  PNV J00425236+4116133  2026-01-18.5502  17.41Cmag
06:57:11.19 -17:24:43.9  TCP J06571119-1724439  2026-01-18.5375  14.2mag
00:42:52.23 +41:01:44.7  PNV J00425223+4101447  2026-01-19.5505  18.74Cmag
09:54:46.47 +69:06:31.7  PNV J09544647+6906317  2026-01-26.8081  19.3mag
18:08:51.99 -26:16:21.9  TCP J18085199-2616219  2026-01-31.8519  12.2mag
08:01:11.02 -03:43:14.1  TCP J08011102-0343141  2026-02-08.8090  15.10Cmag
05:19:15.40 -02:04:51.5  TCP J05191540-0204515  2026-02-13.4306  14.5mag
10:52:41.26 +36:40:08.9  TCP J10524126+3640089  2026-02-17.6065  17.4mag
05:50:50.81 +36:22:45.1  TCP J05505081+3622451  2026-02-17.5511  15.7mag
00:42:51.33 +41:13:49.1  PNV J00425133+4113491  2026-02-20.738  18.3mag
00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4  PNV J00430488+4129414  2026-02-20.5923  18.84Cmag
17:43:29.74 +11:24:00.3  TCP J17432974+1124003  2026-02-22.3773  13.6mag
09:55:01.59 +69:08:42.7  PNV J09550159+6908427  2026-02-20.893  19.0mag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 187K Feb 26 20:58 tocp_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

 CPU temperature: 103 C - WARNING