This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461098.6208,12.80,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260227.1208 12.80CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 01:41:13.81 +17:29:30.4 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0204_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0062_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0204_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0061_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0204_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0062_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0204_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0061_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 02 27.1209* 01 58 24.30 +22 11 01.8 13.3 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461098.6208,13.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260227.1208 13.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 01:58:24.30 +22:11:01.8 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0204_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0062_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0204_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0061_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0204_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0062_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0204_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0061_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 02 27.1209* 01 58 09.59 +22 08 32.0 13.8 U Ari 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461098.6208,13.85,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260227.1208 13.85CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 01:58:09.59 +22:08:32.0 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0204_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0062_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0204_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0061_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0204_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0062_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0204_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0061_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.70468422 23.12.2025 04:54:34.717 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
First image: 2461032.70468422 23.12.2025 04:54:34.717 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
Last image: 2461098.62105720 27.02.2026 02:54:09.342 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 8468
Objects passed selection criteria: 8440
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.0 3.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 6637
Average stars matched: 6481.25 (97.6533 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 114488 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20251122 p4) 15.2.1 20251122
VaST compiled on Wed Feb 11 15:05:05 CST 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-300-g65540497
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-02-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Feb 26 20:56:39 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.70468422 23.12.2025 04:54:34.717 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
First image: 2461032.70468422 23.12.2025 04:54:34.717 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
Last image: 2461098.62105720 27.02.2026 02:54:09.342 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 111
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 13 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 46989
Objects passed selection criteria: 46902
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.2 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 39711.2
Average stars matched: 38812 (97.7355 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 148964 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20251122 p4) 15.2.1 20251122
VaST compiled on Wed Feb 11 15:05:05 CST 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-300-g65540497
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-02-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Feb 26 20:57:33 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461098.62063462
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
'tocp_transients_list.txt' -> '../tocp_transients_list.txt'
wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits'
wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits'
wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:50:46.264 +21:59:54.92
Second-epoch image center 01:50:46.373 +21:59:57.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:50:46.264 +21:59:54.92
Second-epoch image center 01:50:45.199 +21:59:53.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 01:50:46.373 +21:59:57.20
Second-epoch second image center 01:50:45.199 +21:59:53.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00468 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FQ9uhMoKjb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Xeu2vYQWqD
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ReJlJIpYGB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits &> /tmp/tmp.c4kPTi5fWl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits and wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits and wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits and wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Matched with Tycho-2 4718 out of 8897 detected stars.
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.938143
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.938143
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.53
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 2 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
2.1 pix Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits
2.1 pix fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
2.1 pix fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
15.4 mag. Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
14.4 mag. fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.4 (SNR ) 11.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 14.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.FQ9uhMoKjb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits' -> 'wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=658, passed=8897
Got 8897 stars (including 8229 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8897 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits -region wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Xeu2vYQWqD (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits' -> 'wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=644, passed=9039
Got 9039 stars (including 8380 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9039 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits -region wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ReJlJIpYGB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=539, passed=4503
Got 4503 stars (including 3953 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4503 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 960 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Excluding outliers - 959 stars left (next iteration limit 1054)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits -region wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.c4kPTi5fWl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=517, passed=4452
Got 4452 stars (including 3927 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 4452 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits -region wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ari-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 1s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20525_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 20525_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:09:29.34 +25:57:38.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01815_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 01815_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:16:07.09 +25:03:22.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ari-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:50:46.264 +21:59:54.92
Second-epoch image center 01:50:46.373 +21:59:57.20
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 01:50:46.264 +21:59:54.92
Second-epoch image center 01:50:45.199 +21:59:53.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 01:50:46.373 +21:59:57.20
Second-epoch second image center 01:50:45.199 +21:59:53.02
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00468 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fVnu4gwQu7
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Eonl6Tt7mH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1jOHTasRX3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PXMY9OaomT
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits and wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits and wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits and wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Matched with Tycho-2 4767 out of 50992 detected stars.
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.829274
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.829274
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.56
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.56
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 93 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
2.0 pix Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits
1.9 pix fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
1.9 pix fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
15.5 mag. Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
14.6 mag. fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.6 (SNR ) 14.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 14.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.fVnu4gwQu7 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits' -> 'wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=22, blended=2447, passed=50970
Got 50970 stars (including 48436 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50970 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits -region wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-54-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0204.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Eonl6Tt7mH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits' -> 'wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=2397, passed=50304
Got 50304 stars (including 47804 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50304 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits -region wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_22-55-34_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0205.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1jOHTasRX3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=1087, passed=29223
Got 29223 stars (including 28067 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29223 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits -region wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PXMY9OaomT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=6, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=4, blended=1096, passed=29398
Got 29398 stars (including 28251 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 29398 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.9'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.9 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013082 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010466 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits -region wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-53-32_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0061.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-26_CI_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_205450_TTUQ1b1x1_19939_iUfZfPiq/wcs_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ari-02-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out64229.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out64273.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out64279.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out64308.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out64349.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out64377.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out64276.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out64304.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out64374.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64229_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64229_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:11:42.21 +22:40:01.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.27, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.25)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.833 100674793628088576 032.92591656009 +22.66733938346 14.0293 13.4489 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.833#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64264_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64264_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64267_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64267_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64268_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64268_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64269_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64269_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:29:18.71 +25:15:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64270_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64270_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:06:55.94 +25:41:40.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64272_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64272_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64273_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64273_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:38:32.14 +21:25:09.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.69, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.67)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.235 288934235392255616 024.63396203749 +21.41972929742 12.5863 12.0429 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.235#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64275_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64275_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64276_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
Preparing report for the candidate 64276_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64277_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64277_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64279_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64279_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:24:47.77 +20:10:32.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.93, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.91)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.460 2786522284260151808 021.19923668990 +20.17640836436 12.9199 12.4113 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.460#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64281_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64281_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64282_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64282_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64283_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64283_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64284_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64284_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64285_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64285_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64286_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64286_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64289_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64289_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64290_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64290_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64292_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64292_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:17:07.28 +17:19:45.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64296_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64296_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64300_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64300_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64303_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64303_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64304_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
Preparing report for the candidate 64304_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64306_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64306_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64307_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64307_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64308_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64308_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:41:36.25 +19:48:26.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.36, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.34)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.976 96279289737661184 025.40117780902 +19.80706675388 13.3707 13.0620 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.976#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64317_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64317_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64318_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64318_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64321_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64321_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64323_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64323_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64329_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64329_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64330_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64330_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64332_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64332_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64336_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64336_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64337_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64337_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64338_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64338_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:44:10.22 +26:39:46.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64339_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64339_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64345_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64345_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64346_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64346_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64349_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64349_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:54:22.15 +21:54:38.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.57, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.55)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.558 97746278767182208 028.59246010469 +21.91112582182 13.3907 12.6530 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.558#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64351_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64351_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64355_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64355_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64356_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64356_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64357_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64357_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:47:13.09 +17:54:20.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64359_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64359_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64361_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64361_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64363_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64363_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64365_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64365_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:08:16.43 +19:22:17.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64367_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64367_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:11:10.62 +25:58:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64374_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
Preparing report for the candidate 64374_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64376_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64376_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64377_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64377_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:06:24.51 +24:20:34.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.81, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.79)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.669 104454708446170624 031.60175599309 +24.34360513929 13.9175 13.4137 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.669#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64378_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64378_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64381_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64381_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64384_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64384_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 01:58:18.41 +18:17:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64385_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64385_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64390_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64390_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64391_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64391_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64392_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64392_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 02:06:29.24 +18:38:12.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64398_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64398_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64402_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64402_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64405_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64405_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64406_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64406_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64407_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64407_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64410_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64410_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64412_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64412_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64415_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64415_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64419_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64419_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64420_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64420_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64424_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64424_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64425_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64425_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64426_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64426_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64427_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64427_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64431_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64431_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64434_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64434_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64439_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64439_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64440_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64440_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64441_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64441_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64442_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64442_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64443_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64443_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64447_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64447_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64448_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64448_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64449_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64449_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64451_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64451_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64454_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64454_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64456_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64456_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64464_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64464_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64477_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64477_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 64480_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 64480_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47505_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 47505_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 10645_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062
The candidate 10645_fd_Ari-02-Q1b1x1_2026-02-26_20-54-09_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0062 did not pass the final checks