This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 02 22.2571* 10 55 41.67 +71 52 16.5 11.9 U UMa 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VX UMa,2461093.7571,11.89,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VX UMa 20260222.2571 11.89CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 10:55:41.67 +71:52:16.5 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0539_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0257_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0539_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0256_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0539_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0257_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0539_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0256_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
NSVS J1340591+794543,2461093.7571,11.94,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
NSVS J1340591+794543 20260222.2571 11.94CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 13:40:59.02 +79:45:34.5 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0538_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0257_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0538_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0256_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0538_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0257_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0538_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0256_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.92475351 23.12.2025 10:11:28.703 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits
First image: 2461032.92475351 23.12.2025 10:11:28.703 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits
Last image: 2461093.75745605 22.02.2026 06:10:34.203 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.54
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 5 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9597
Objects passed selection criteria: 9593
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 9313.5
Average stars matched: 9135.25 (98.0861 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 115180 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20251122 p4) 15.2.1 20251122
VaST compiled on Wed Feb 11 15:05:05 CST 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-300-g65540497
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-02-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Feb 22 00:18:39 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.92475351 23.12.2025 10:11:28.703 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits
First image: 2461032.92475351 23.12.2025 10:11:28.703 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits
Last image: 2461093.75745605 22.02.2026 06:10:34.203 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 168
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 27 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 53031
Objects passed selection criteria: 52911
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 51219.8
Average stars matched: 49441 (96.5272 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 152504 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20251122 p4) 15.2.1 20251122
VaST compiled on Wed Feb 11 15:05:05 CST 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-300-g65540497
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-02-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Feb 22 00:20:27 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461093.75665375
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits'
wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:58:49.332 +77:29:23.51
Second-epoch image center 11:59:41.269 +77:26:23.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.07 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:58:49.332 +77:29:23.51
Second-epoch image center 11:59:35.436 +77:27:01.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.06 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:59:41.269 +77:26:23.51
Second-epoch second image center 11:59:35.436 +77:27:01.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01178 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits &> /tmp/tmp.hcxhcTjiio
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits &> /tmp/tmp.x7SpfJsR1o
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3LLykcv3As
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4LykyLVuoo
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Matched with Tycho-2 5758 out of 9680 detected stars.
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.916595
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.916595
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.54
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.38
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits
2.1 pix Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
2.2 pix fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits
15.4 mag. Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 14.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.hcxhcTjiio (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=625, passed=9680
Got 9680 stars (including 9036 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9680 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.x7SpfJsR1o (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=617, passed=9696
Got 9696 stars (including 9064 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9696 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3LLykcv3As (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=684, passed=9087
Got 9087 stars (including 8397 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9087 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4LykyLVuoo (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=672, passed=9022
Got 9022 stars (including 8332 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9022 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out06251.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20408.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 5s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20502_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 20502_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:58:06.97 +81:03:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20513_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 20513_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:24:27.70 +78:09:30.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20530_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 20530_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:28:24.44 +74:14:07.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20531_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 20531_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:00:07.36 +75:27:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06251_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 06251_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:40:59.05 +79:45:34.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.86, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.84)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.465 1718311446128901248 205.24663043210 +79.75950758152 11.5150 10.1913 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.465#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20408_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
Preparing report for the candidate 20408_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 08241_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 08241_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:42:24.21 +77:51:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 6s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
10:55:41.67 +71:52:16.5
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:58:49.332 +77:29:23.51
Second-epoch image center 11:59:41.269 +77:26:23.51
Angular distance between the image centers 0.07 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 11:58:49.332 +77:29:23.51
Second-epoch image center 11:59:35.436 +77:27:01.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.06 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 11:59:41.269 +77:26:23.51
Second-epoch second image center 11:59:35.436 +77:27:01.41
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01178 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits &> /tmp/tmp.m1nY0jFVq4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tayg98ajQv
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits &> /tmp/tmp.RZl1JRugE9
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3dgbnLhbsH
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits and wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Matched with Tycho-2 5805 out of 52163 detected stars.
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.815023
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.815023
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.30
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.52
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 37 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits
2.0 pix Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits
2.0 pix fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
2.0 pix fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.5 mag. Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits
15.5 mag. Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
15.4 mag. fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.4 (SNR ) 14.7 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 14.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.m1nY0jFVq4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=2411, passed=52153
Got 52153 stars (including 49651 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52153 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-11-28_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0538.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.tayg98ajQv (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=11, blended=2442, passed=52270
Got 52270 stars (including 49745 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 52270 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 965 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 964 stars left (next iteration limit 1060)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits -region wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_04-12-23_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0539.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.RZl1JRugE9 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=20, blended=2627, passed=50915
Got 50915 stars (including 48198 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50915 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 962 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3dgbnLhbsH (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=30, blended=2667, passed=50921
Got 50921 stars (including 48144 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 50921 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 966 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 965 stars left (next iteration limit 1061)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-09-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0256.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-22_CI_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_001121_TTUQ1b1x1_7881_1LLnhuXA/wcs_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out65909.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out65912.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out65913.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out65919.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out65922.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out65926.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out66095.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out66127.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out66148.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out66150.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out66204.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out49932.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 9s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65909_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 65909_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:10:41.01 +79:08:32.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.39, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.37)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.371 1715415680395209984 212.67319580647 +79.14288141393 14.5280 14.0063 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.371#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65912_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 65912_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:56:59.60 +73:06:55.3 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.98, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.96)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65913_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 65913_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:48:50.85 +80:34:57.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.17, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.15)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.468 1133164212665385216 162.21229509069 +80.58241747722 14.2192 13.7125 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.468#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65916_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 65916_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:09:45.80 +82:02:20.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65917_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 65917_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:42:54.95 +77:01:53.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65919_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 65919_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:33:11.51 +78:44:13.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.82, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.80)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.594 1718159202424225920 203.29839949447 +78.73719617565 13.6358 13.1717 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.594#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65920_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 65920_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:55:00.13 +81:28:04.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65922_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 65922_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:42:23.86 +72:48:03.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.50, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.48)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.784 1687604873799794688 205.59894975005 +72.80125168794 13.4115 12.9378 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.784#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65924_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 65924_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:17:52.14 +76:41:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65925_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 65925_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:10:41.08 +80:56:10.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65926_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 65926_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:38:08.75 +75:42:42.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.95, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.93)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.979 1712754140701261440 204.53732990783 +75.71166717436 12.8670 12.3034 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.979#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65929_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 65929_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:44:46.88 +82:06:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65930_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 65930_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:33:38.62 +74:25:28.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65931_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 65931_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:55:32.37 +78:24:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65932_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 65932_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:34:00.86 +77:25:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65934_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 65934_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:43:04.81 +78:13:34.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65935_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 65935_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:28:26.77 +77:07:21.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65967_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 65967_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:58:07.02 +81:03:12.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65981_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 65981_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:24:27.83 +78:09:31.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 65984_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 65984_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:47:06.49 +81:07:51.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66022_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 66022_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:28:34.37 +81:24:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66024_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 66024_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 10:55:00.83 +80:44:46.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66063_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 66063_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:13:08.65 +79:04:53.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66085_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 66085_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:51:00.46 +77:05:18.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66093_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 66093_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:46:54.53 +80:19:13.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66095_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 66095_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:11:19.18 +77:06:26.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.82, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.80)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.881 1714017204683304192 212.82878673196 +77.10682021775 14.1664 13.6640 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.881#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66111_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 66111_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:01:37.08 +74:06:44.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66127_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 66127_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:14:53.62 +79:25:29.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.23, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.21)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.796 1718252420394545408 198.72408199143 +79.42467690485 14.1782 13.4620 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.796#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66132_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 66132_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 14:09:37.16 +75:09:18.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66138_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 66138_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:55:58.78 +82:13:31.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66148_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 66148_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:26:41.52 +81:24:31.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.16, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.14)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.898 1719113750316424448 201.67138480986 +81.40863078123 14.0677 13.4871 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.898#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66150_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 66150_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:58:11.30 +80:33:36.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.36, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.34)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 5.608 1715828134694825728 209.54389796557 +80.56152309397 14.9642 14.4589 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#5.608#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66194_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 66194_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:17:28.63 +72:14:45.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 66204_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 66204_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 13:39:56.50 +72:45:19.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.43, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.41)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.711 1687606626146447616 204.98604226478 +72.75529305223 14.5143 13.9393 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.711#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 49932_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
Preparing report for the candidate 49932_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 40531_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 40531_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 09:42:24.19 +77:51:09.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20692_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257
The candidate 20692_fd_Cam-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-22_00-10-34_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0257 did not pass the final checks