NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Tau-05-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 02 22.15048    2461093.65048    11.27    03:32:29.31 +18:04:18.3   4964 0742   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 02 22.15148    2461093.65148    11.26    03:32:29.45 +18:04:18.5   4957 0749   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 02 22.1510  2461093.6510  11.27  03:32:29.38 +18:04:18.4
168.28574 -30.27728 galactic  Tau  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.9" and 9.4 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
471 Papagena                 0     -0       1  11.1     0    0
Check this position in TNS.
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?) 2nd epoch FITS
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports Make finder charts with VaST

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 02 22.15048    2461093.65048    11.68    03:30:03.02 +12:39:21.1   5306 4007   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 02 22.15148    2461093.65148    11.68    03:30:03.07 +12:39:20.6   5299 4014   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 02 22.1510  2461093.6510  11.68  03:30:03.04 +12:39:20.9
172.12723 -34.65748 galactic  Tau  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.8" and 9.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
52 Europa                   0     -0       1  12.1     0    0
Check this position in TNS.
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?) 2nd epoch FITS
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports Make finder charts with VaST

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 02 22.15048    2461093.65048    12.46    03:04:25.01 +15:11:28.6   9061 2430   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 02 22.15148    2461093.65148    12.48    03:04:25.09 +15:11:28.9   9054 2437   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 02 22.1510  2461093.6510  12.47  03:04:25.05 +15:11:28.7
164.27793 -36.78624 galactic  Ari  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.2" and 9.7 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
12 Victoria                -0     -1       1  12.5    -0    0
Check this position in TNS.
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?) 2nd epoch FITS
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports Make finder charts with VaST

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 02 22.15048    2461093.65048    13.05    03:19:23.00 +11:21:38.3   6882 4786   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 02 22.15148    2461093.65148    13.12    03:19:23.06 +11:21:38.6   6875 4792   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 02 22.1510  2461093.6510  13.09  03:19:23.03 +11:21:38.5
170.86150 -37.38383 galactic  Ari  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.0" and 9.6 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
487 Venetia                 -2      1       3  13.5    -0   -0
Check this position in TNS.
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?) 2nd epoch FITS
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports Make finder charts with VaST

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 02 22.15048    2461093.65048    13.38    03:14:54.12 +17:57:51.9   7494 0785   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 02 22.15148    2461093.65148    13.35    03:14:54.15 +17:57:52.1   7488 0792   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 02 22.1510  2461093.6510  13.37  03:14:54.13 +17:57:52.0
164.61041 -33.05454 galactic  Ari  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 9.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
423 Diotima                  1     -0       1  13.3    -0    0
Check this position in TNS.
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?) 2nd epoch FITS
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports Make finder charts with VaST

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 02 22.15048    2461093.65048    14.10    03:32:32.20 +11:52:41.3   4939 4474   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 02 22.15148    2461093.65148    14.09    03:32:32.27 +11:52:40.3   4932 4481   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 02 22.1510  2461093.6510  14.10  03:32:32.23 +11:52:40.8
173.31648 -34.79383 galactic  Tau  Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.5" and 9.6 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
56 Melete                   1     -1       1  14.2     0    0
Check this position in TNS.
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?) 2nd epoch FITS
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports Make finder charts with VaST

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 02 22.15048    2461093.65048    14.24    03:39:21.34 +13:35:20.3   3947 3436   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 02 22.15148    2461093.65148    14.24    03:39:21.49 +13:35:19.2   3940 3443   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 02 22.1510  2461093.6510  14.24  03:39:21.41 +13:35:19.7
173.29323 -32.40809 galactic  Tau  Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.4" and 9.6 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
415 Palatia                  2     -1       2  13.6     0    0
Check this position in TNS.
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?) 2nd epoch FITS
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports Make finder charts with VaST

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 02 22.15048    2461093.65048    14.39    03:12:41.03 +16:31:12.9   7829 1655   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 02 22.15148    2461093.65148    14.27    03:12:41.18 +16:31:13.2   7822 1662   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 02 22.1510  2461093.6510  14.33  03:12:41.10 +16:31:13.1
165.19515 -34.51386 galactic  Ari  Second-epoch detections are separated by 2.2" and 9.7 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
261 Prymno                  -0     -0       0  14.3     0    0
Check this position in TNS.
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?) 2nd epoch FITS
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports Make finder charts with VaST

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 8

Processing log:

Filtering log:

 
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 14.5
FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-01-17.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= 500
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 3000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 2000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Tau-05-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Tau-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Tau-05-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1030560 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1030560 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 

Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:

MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes


renamed 'Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.png' -> 'transient_report/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits_preview.png'

Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits


renamed 'Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.png' -> 'transient_report/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits_preview.png'

Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits




Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 578.4410
INFO:         REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 529.3422
INFO:    SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1378.8779
INFO:            SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 548.5759
INFO:   SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1380.3969
INFO:           SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 548.7200
----------------------------------------------
INFO:      ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.38378
INFO:                  SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-01-17.fit
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -15.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Header: 61 keys total, 10 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-02-21T21:36:31.3909465' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-02-22T03:36:31.3909465' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61093.1503633102 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-02-22T03:36:41.2944623' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61093.1504779398 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     53.3307717450422 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     13.9994703025582 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     40.3033333333333 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     259.465277777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.54392296242441 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1013.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =            33.748239 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958391 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Tau-05'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '03 33 20'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 50: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 51: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 52: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 53: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 54: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 55: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 56: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 57: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 58: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 59: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 60: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 61: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-01-17.fit
CCD-TEMP= -15.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
CCD-TEMP= -16.400000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-01-17.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-01-17.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/d_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits :)

Spent 0.665304 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-01-17.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/d_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-01-17.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 28880.787099
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=20680.5, right_median=19489.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-01-17.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP=                -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP=                -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits 
CCD-TEMP= -15.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Header: 61 keys total, 10 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE  =                    T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX  =                   16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS   =                    2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1  =                 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2  =                 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO   =                32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND  =                    T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT'              / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE=                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME =                 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-02-21T21:37:57.7779279' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-02-22T03:37:57.7779279' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS =     61093.1513631595 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-02-22T03:38:07.6781433' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG =     61093.1514777546 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING=                    1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING=                    1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN    =                   30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET  =                   30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ  =                 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M'            / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP=                -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP=                -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0'             / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT=                   50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1'       / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN=                135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO=                  2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA      =     53.3307718187228 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC     =     13.9994703287053 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT =     40.0094444444444 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ  =     259.710555555556 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS =     1.55329531492395 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East'               / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV=               1013.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT =            33.748239 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG=          -101.958391 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky'         / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview'        / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= ''                   / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL  = 'Simulator'          / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER  = 'CV'                 / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT  = 'Tau-05'             / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '03 33 20'           / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+14 00 00'          / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT=                  0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN'           / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 50: "EQUINOX =               2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 51: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 52: "QHY_EXP =            20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 53: "QHY_PP  =              13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 54: "QHY_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 55: "GPS_LP  =              85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 56: "QHY_FP  =           20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 57: "QHY_CPL =               6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 58: "QHY_LPF =             235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 59: "QHY_AET =           20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 60: "QHY_LEM =                    T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 61: "QHY_OFF0=             3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-01-17.fit
CCD-TEMP= -15.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
CCD-TEMP= -16.400000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-01-17.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-01-17.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/d_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits :)

Spent 0.719076 seconds 
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-01-17.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/d_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-01-17.fit 9576 6388  16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 28880.787099
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits :)


No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=20680.5, right_median=19489.0)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-01-17.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:



after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:


fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits



fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits




Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461093.65047905
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits'
wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:33:23.423 +13:58:13.15
Second-epoch image center 03:33:36.234 +14:00:08.13
Angular distance between the image centers 0.06 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:33:23.423 +13:58:13.15
Second-epoch image center 03:33:33.529 +14:00:47.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.06 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  03:33:36.234 +14:00:08.13
Second-epoch second image center 03:33:33.529 +14:00:47.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01546 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits &> /tmp/tmp.tHAQz4NgXM
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits &> /tmp/tmp.C2sTFskrQl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Y8fqmLpGDO
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XwWBSAXBy3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat 
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat 
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Matched with Tycho-2 3739 out of 7783 detected stars.
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.966592
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.966592
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.56
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.41

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.41
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 4 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 2.0 pix  Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
 2.0 pix  Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
 2.1 pix  fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
 2.1 pix  fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.4 mag.  Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
 15.4 mag.  Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
 15.1 mag.  fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
 15.1 mag.  fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  15.1 (SNR )  12.1 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 14.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.tHAQz4NgXM (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=546, passed=7783
Got 7783 stars (including 7229 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7783 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits -region wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.C2sTFskrQl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=528, passed=7791
Got 7791 stars (including 7252 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7791 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" 
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits -region wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Y8fqmLpGDO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=463, passed=6170
Got 6170 stars (including 5702 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6170 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XwWBSAXBy3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=461, passed=6160
Got 6160 stars (including 5688 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6160 stars from the SExtractor catalog
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/util/fov_of_wcs_calibrated_image.sh: line 144: echo: write error: Broken pipe
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20347.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20360.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20347_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101
Preparing report for the candidate 20347_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20360_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101
Preparing report for the candidate 20360_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20369_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 20369_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 22.15148    2461093.65148    11.95    03:59:23.46 +10:56:25.3   0936 4985   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits

**** FOUND  03:59:23.46 +10:56:25.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03677_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 03677_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 02 22.15148    2461093.65148    7.69    03:11:03.19 +14:47:58.8   8078 2698   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits

**** FOUND  03:11:03.18 +14:47:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 14s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
03:32:29.38 +18:04:18.4
03:30:03.04 +12:39:20.9
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL

  ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
  
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:33:23.423 +13:58:13.15
Second-epoch image center 03:33:36.234 +14:00:08.13
Angular distance between the image centers 0.06 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg.  Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 03:33:23.423 +13:58:13.15
Second-epoch image center 03:33:33.529 +14:00:47.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.06 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center  03:33:36.234 +14:00:08.13
Second-epoch second image center 03:33:33.529 +14:00:47.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01546 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fqy3KrnWQX
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits &> /tmp/tmp.lSBxbMpwKa
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits &> /tmp/tmp.fhzMT9Mm0A
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Running  util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2  /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits &> /tmp/tmp.sw35sFjQzF
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat 
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat 
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits and wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Matched with Tycho-2 3759 out of 48147 detected stars.
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.842888
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.842888
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  -7.26
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.58

Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed!  =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.:  15.58
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 23 candidate transients before the final filtering.  (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
 1.9 pix  Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
 1.9 pix  Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
 2.0 pix  fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
 1.9 pix  fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
 15.6 mag.  Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
 15.6 mag.  Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
 15.2 mag.  fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
 15.2 mag.  fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate:  15.2 (SNR )  14.6 (80% of stars)  with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of  following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). 
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. 
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 14.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.fqy3KrnWQX (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=2189, passed=48134
Got 48134 stars (including 45857 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48134 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" 
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits -region wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-48-17_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0264.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.lSBxbMpwKa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=2150, passed=48205
Got 48205 stars (including 45953 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 48205 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" 
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" 
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits -region wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-49-07_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0265.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.fhzMT9Mm0A (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=1583, passed=39291
Got 39291 stars (including 37645 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 39291 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39" 
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40" 
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.sw35sFjQzF (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat 
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=9, blended=1595, passed=39232
Got 39232 stars (including 37580 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat 
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 39232 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
                    catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
                    catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
                    catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)

ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36" 
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 

ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37" 
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38" 
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.


 The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)

The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
 ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-36-31_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0100.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/wcs_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53570.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53621.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53708.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53733.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out53848.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53624.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53657.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53687.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53776.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53805.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out53834.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 10s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 5s
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53570_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 53570_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 22.15148    2461093.65148    14.40    03:32:42.44 +16:18:08.7   4920 1818   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits

**** FOUND  03:32:42.44 +16:18:09.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.35, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.33)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.122   42727438469801472 053.17664074259 +16.30153667258 14.5216 13.9319 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.122#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53574_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 53574_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 22.15148    2461093.65148    13.39    04:01:03.61 +13:38:39.5   0745 3336   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits

**** FOUND  04:01:03.58 +13:38:39.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53602_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 53602_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 22.15148    2461093.65148    11.67    03:30:03.07 +12:39:20.6   5299 4014   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits

**** FOUND  03:30:03.05 +12:39:20.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53621_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 53621_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 22.15148    2461093.65148    12.59    03:25:19.44 +11:57:18.0   5995 4436   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits

**** FOUND  03:25:19.38 +11:57:18.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.51, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.49)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.024   16641658242251264 051.33102709475 +11.95499692296 12.3839 11.6232 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.024#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53624_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101
Preparing report for the candidate 53624_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53649_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 53649_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 22.15148    2461093.65148    13.12    03:54:47.31 +09:11:54.4   1594 6062   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits

**** FOUND  03:54:47.30 +09:11:54.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53657_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101
Preparing report for the candidate 53657_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53673_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 53673_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 22.15148    2461093.65148    13.25    03:33:21.98 +13:45:07.3   4816 3352   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits

**** FOUND  03:33:21.95 +13:45:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53687_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101
Preparing report for the candidate 53687_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53708_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 53708_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 22.15148    2461093.65148    13.65    03:57:37.31 +18:20:39.7   1343 0502   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits

**** FOUND  03:57:37.31 +18:20:39.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.63, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.61)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.332   49779220716461696 059.40507338603 +18.34365942778 13.6788 13.0207 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.332#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53733_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 53733_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 22.15148    2461093.65148    13.81    03:01:52.56 +16:30:10.6   9410 1627   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits

**** FOUND  03:01:52.64 +16:30:10.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.81, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.79)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.024   34263913353445632 045.46973206763 +16.50225218621 14.0436 13.3900 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.024#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53750_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 53750_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 22.15148    2461093.65148    14.03    03:30:52.41 +18:47:15.0   5190 0315   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits

**** FOUND  03:30:52.35 +18:47:14.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53755_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 53755_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 22.15148    2461093.65148    13.84    03:07:55.03 +16:03:54.8   8525 1921   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits

**** FOUND  03:07:54.89 +16:03:55.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53776_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101
Preparing report for the candidate 53776_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53779_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 53779_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 22.15148    2461093.65148    14.10    03:54:00.33 +15:36:14.6   1823 2184   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits

**** FOUND  03:54:00.32 +15:36:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53800_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 53800_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 22.15148    2461093.65148    14.25    03:07:04.57 +09:22:18.6   8742 5986   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits

**** FOUND  03:07:04.52 +09:22:18.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53805_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101
Preparing report for the candidate 53805_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53817_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 53817_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 22.15148    2461093.65148    14.05    03:50:27.37 +13:04:09.8   2305 3728   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits

**** FOUND  03:50:27.43 +13:04:09.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53834_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101
Preparing report for the candidate 53834_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53847_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 53847_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 22.15148    2461093.65148    14.48    03:29:29.49 +17:56:01.5   5387 0833   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits

**** FOUND  03:29:29.48 +17:56:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 53848_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 53848_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 2     2026 02 22.15148    2461093.65148    14.40    03:33:53.62 +18:14:07.4   4757 0649   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits

**** FOUND  03:33:53.56 +18:14:07.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.44, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.42)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.189   56529672355501056 053.47383194610 +18.23603744645 14.6158 13.9032 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.189#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 22778_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 22778_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 02 22.15148    2461093.65148    7.93    03:11:03.18 +14:47:58.9   8078 2698   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits

**** FOUND  03:11:03.17 +14:47:59.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
  
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06511_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101
The candidate 06511_fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101 did not pass the final checks
Discovery image 3     2026 02 22.15148    2461093.65148    11.30    03:32:29.45 +18:04:18.7   4957 0749   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-21_CI_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_213837_TTUQ1b1x1_8529_shE6LUKM/fd_Tau-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-21_21-37-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0101.fits

**** FOUND  03:32:29.39 +18:04:18.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 3s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 18s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
03:32:29.38 +18:04:18.4
03:30:03.04 +12:39:20.9
03:04:25.05 +15:11:28.7
03:19:23.03 +11:21:38.5
03:14:54.13 +17:57:52.0
03:32:32.23 +11:52:40.8
03:39:21.41 +13:35:19.7
03:12:41.10 +16:31:13.1
########### Completed Tau-05-Q1b1x1 ###########
The analysis was running at tau
We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host
Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
#### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources ####
03:32:29.38 +18:04:18.4
03:30:03.04 +12:39:20.9
03:04:25.05 +15:11:28.7
03:19:23.03 +11:21:38.5
03:14:54.13 +17:57:52.0
03:32:32.23 +11:52:40.8
03:39:21.41 +13:35:19.7
03:12:41.10 +16:31:13.1
###################################################################################
03:32:29.38 +18:04:18.4  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
03:30:03.04 +12:39:20.9  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
03:04:25.05 +15:11:28.7  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
03:19:23.03 +11:21:38.5  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
03:14:54.13 +17:57:52.0  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
03:32:32.23 +11:52:40.8  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
03:39:21.41 +13:35:19.7  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
03:12:41.10 +16:31:13.1  -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list)
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt'
# Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix)
Found 0 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars).
###################################################################################
0 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels)
This does not look like a test run
###################################################################################
Adding identified Gaia sources from exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND
IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO   ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES
#### Adding the following to the exclusion list ####
03:32:42.44 +16:18:09.6
03:25:19.38 +11:57:18.3
03:57:37.31 +18:20:39.1
03:01:52.64 +16:30:10.8
03:33:53.56 +18:14:07.5
####################################################
The observatory MPC code is 500
############################################################
Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461093.65047905 -observatory 500
23:23:23.96 -01:59:22.8 Mercury (-0.1mag)
23:04:23.04 -07:30:20.2 Venus (-3.9mag)
21:42:45.52 -14:53:06.6 Mars (1.1mag)
07:06:06.26 +22:54:19.6 Jupiter (-2.5mag)
00:05:25.74 -01:44:31.0 Saturn (1.0mag)
03:39:59.43 +19:21:43.5 Uranus (5.7mag)
00:03:40.76 -01:01:38.2 Neptune (7.8mag)
20:29:06.92 -22:59:34.5 Pluto (14.5mag)
01:53:19.59 +16:09:26.5 Moon (-9.6mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Feb 22 04:03 planets.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461093.65047905:
07:06:10.21 +22:54:14.4 Io (5.4mag)
07:06:17.71 +22:53:58.6 Europa (5.5mag)
07:05:56.91 +22:54:45.4 Ganymede (4.9mag)
07:06:25.21 +22:53:54.3 Callisto (6.2mag)
07:09:15.18 +23:10:42.8 Himalia (15.0mag)
07:06:07.44 +22:54:19.7 Thebe (15.9mag)
07:08:40.26 +23:19:11.0 Elara (17.0mag)
07:01:39.78 +24:02:18.2 Pasiphae (17.0mag)
07:15:07.16 +22:42:19.3 Carme (18.1mag)
00:05:37.43 -01:44:35.6 Titan (8.8mag)
00:05:31.20 -01:44:29.6 Rhea (10.1mag)
00:05:21.11 -01:45:52.0 Iapetus (11.5mag)
00:05:26.55 -01:44:34.0 Hyperion (14.8mag)
00:07:30.02 -01:31:30.9 Phoebe (16.8mag)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Feb 22 04:03 moons.txt
############################################################
Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461093.65047905:
08:45:45.08 +24:30:42.7 JWST
11:32:20.26 +48:15:25.2 Chandra
15:21:10.95 -59:56:28.5 XMM-Newton
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Feb 22 04:03 spacecraft.txt
############################################################
Positions of bright comets (listed at http://astro.vanbuitenen.nl/comets and http://aerith.net/comet/weekly/current.html ) from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461093.65047905 at 500
16:59:41.16 -11:03:49.1 17.5mag 10P/Tempel 2
03:37:18.51 +28:57:48.5 18.0mag 123P/West-Hartley
04:45:17.27 +19:20:57.0  0.0mag 124P/Mrkos
21:19:33.81 -07:38:51.1 22.1mag 141P/Machholz
04:45:17.27 +19:20:57.0  0.0mag 145P/Shoemaker-Levy 5
00:00:00.00 +00:00:00.0 cannot get JPL HORIZONS designation for periodic comet 164P/Christensen  -- you may manually insert its ID in util/comets.sh
09:33:08.10 -33:51:48.7 18.0mag 195P/Hill
15:52:03.26 -06:35:54.5 19.2mag 210P/Christensen
18:16:50.33 -21:28:31.6 17.3mag 218P/LINEAR
16:21:33.74 -18:10:56.6 15.2mag 235P/LINEAR
03:56:23.01 +27:44:28.1 17.8mag 240P/NEAT
15:17:37.52 +06:38:26.1 14.8mag 24P/Schaumasse
11:23:31.17 -03:23:10.0 17.4mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 1
07:03:47.89 +27:24:49.9 19.6mag 407P/PanSTARRS-Fuls
17:07:08.36 -11:19:14.3 17.6mag 40P/Vaisala 1
11:02:13.01 -08:51:53.7 16.6mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington
13:25:29.73 -05:49:38.4 20.0mag 489P/Denning
04:34:21.94 +48:34:35.0 17.8mag 493P/2024 Q2 (LONEOS)
06:04:23.09 +47:31:30.1 17.7mag 63P/Wild 1
23:14:36.08 -02:07:33.3 16.2mag 78P/Gehrels 2
20:01:29.46 -22:18:20.0 15.0mag 88P/Howell
15:27:54.56 -29:00:39.9 18.7mag P/2023 S1 (PanSTARRS)
04:43:27.09 -72:35:55.0 16.5mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein)
05:29:50.02 +31:12:54.1 18.2mag C/2017 K2 (PanSTARRS)
20:06:38.14 -65:11:37.8 18.1mag C/2020 V2 (ZTF)
17:21:40.33 +04:21:21.8 16.3mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS)
03:35:40.86 +24:36:42.0 15.8mag C/2022 N2 (PanSTARRS)
09:08:13.31 +29:49:33.7 15.3mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS)
08:35:40.61 -06:33:48.2 16.7mag C/2022 R6 (PanSTARRS)
23:53:01.95 +48:26:45.1 18.0mag C/2023 C2 (ATLAS)
09:51:08.01 -20:46:00.6 17.5mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS)
20:34:44.97 +61:14:30.9 17.3mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon)
19:34:30.11 -03:24:15.8 16.1mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS)
02:48:55.23 +35:40:34.3 18.5mag C/2023 RS61 (PanSTARRS)
21:01:26.82 +81:19:56.3 18.0mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon)
06:39:09.96 +63:49:13.2 17.3mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS)
01:56:44.27 -24:38:00.9 11.2mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos)
11:44:58.80 -02:34:52.5 18.1mag C/2024 G2 (ATLAS)
19:28:18.87 +00:39:12.3 19.0mag C/2024 G4 (PanSTARRS)
16:37:11.73 -01:42:53.8 17.7mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS)
19:53:27.50 +03:15:05.5 15.6mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS)
02:47:14.53 -31:34:30.2 15.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS)
16:25:06.38 -58:13:46.0 15.6mag C/2025 A6 (Lemmon)
04:50:29.51 +62:14:33.5 16.7mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov)
00:00:00.00 +00:00:00.0 cannot get JPL HORIZONS ephemerides for non-periodic comet C/2025 K1 (ATLAS)
15:56:43.52 -13:01:22.1 14.8mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS)
02:20:13.98 -19:05:57.2 16.7mag C/2025 Q3 (ATLAS)
02:09:34.37 +17:16:43.4 21.2mag C/2025 R2 (SWAN)
22:20:45.82 +17:39:14.5 16.4mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS)
21:46:01.13 -16:50:23.8 21.5mag C/2025 T1 (ATLAS)
03:06:14.67 -20:34:04.8 18.3mag C/2026 A1 (MAPS)
21:03:01.58 +20:55:35.0 16.9mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao)
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Feb 22 04:05 comets.txt
############################################################
List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html :
17:25:53.90 -23:28:31.50  ASASSN-26au  2026-02-18.33 15.82
16:07:59.09 -24:00:10.00  SN2026cmv  2026-02-17.28 16.19
18:15:01.25 -37:43:36.70  ASASSN-26at  2026-02-16.36 15.94
13:01:07.08 -11:25:16.30  AT2026bzh  2026-02-12.45 17.3
10:56:29.81 -07:07:25.30  SN 2026bre  2026-02-12.16 17.15
08:55:43.51 -53:26:11.50  ASASSN-26as  2026-02-12.2 16.54
06:33:50.98 -41:46:25.10  ASASSN-26ar  2026-02-12.04 16.42
12:15:22.43 +23:59:39.60  SN2026bzg  2026-02-11.27 16.32
08:01:10.95 -03:43:14.30  AT2026coj  2026-02-9.25 13.73
12:44:00.18 -57:03:46.80  ASASSN-26aq  2026-02-9.18 16
06:26:33.34 -54:06:39.90  AT2026cih  2026-02-8.06 17.26
23:08:59.40 -88:59:11.60  SN 2026bsu  2026-02-8.03 16.02
01:04:14.94 -62:31:02.30  SN 2026azk  2026-02-8.04 16.41
08:44:55.41 +64:55:09.90  SN 2026anq  2026-02-7.16 17.62
12:37:42.99 +33:26:05.40  SN 2026bnm  2026-02-7.29 16.74
00:12:55.45 +33:21:25.90  SN2026cbh  2026-02-7.09 16.33
08:02:12.64 -04:14:20.90  SN 2026auh  2026-02-7.11 16.64
18:03:52.67 -31:27:26.00  TCP J18035290-3127298  2026-02-7.37 15.76
12:18:03.59 +50:27:10.20  SN 2026bjz  2026-02-7.25 16.48
07:51:51.12 +55:05:27.60  SN 2026ail  2026-02-6.21 16.85
08:10:56.38 +36:49:42.80  AT2026bsa  2026-02-6.29 17.47
04:43:45.47 -15:49:01.00  SN2026azr  2026-02-5.24 16.96
06:14:48.48 -34:20:08.90  ASASSN-26ap  2026-02-5.2 13.77
02:42:33.90 -27:21:02.60  SN 2026aip  2026-02-4.09 15.85
00:43:12.26 +38:35:47.90  AT2026brt  2026-02-3.12 14.92
14:34:27.21 +21:56:59.90  SN2026atb  2026-01-29.32 15.59
13:12:04.11 -60:56:12.40  ASASSN-26ao  2026-01-28.35 15.61
13:00:36.49 -06:28:26.00  SN2026azd  2026-01-28.23 15.69
10:33:50.27 -31:00:53.40  SN 2026ayz  2026-01-25.11 15.3
05:14:22.36 -60:47:20.70  SN 2026apb  2026-01-24.08 17.35
06:39:26.57 -21:49:19.60  AT2026afe  2026-01-23.11 16.17
09:27:23.48 -32:00:31.10  SN 2023kuy  2026-01-21.24 15.33
09:38:44.42 -20:00:54.30  SN2026afi  2026-01-20.24 17.43
06:30:51.72 -74:35:50.10  AT2026ahr  2026-01-20.19 17.09
13:33:03.15 -16:14:28.70  SN2026amc  2026-01-20.29 16.9
06:57:11.13 -17:24:42.80  ASASSN-26an  2026-01-19.31 13.99
17:41:29.59 +68:57:34.90  2026abj  2026-01-18.64 17.02
10:22:24.99 +04:00:02.20  SN 2026kc  2026-01-18.61 16.1
12:42:03.30 +00:41:41.80  SN 2026pg  2026-01-18.5 17.44
03:36:21.80 -31:44:39.30  AT2025aibn  2026-01-17.04 16.7
13:45:00.71 -32:34:53.00  AT2026yi  2026-01-17.26 16.22
09:27:07.17 +62:45:24.20  AT2026nu  2026-01-17.29 17.09
12:38:41.73 +07:36:37.40  SN 2025afcr  2026-01-17.49 17.11
12:12:12.65 +13:13:18.50  SN 2026acd  2026-01-17.3 16.15
16:21:54.73 -63:36:53.10  ASASSN-26al  2026-01-17.36 15.34
15:33:45.22 -22:11:07.90  ASASSN-26aj  2026-01-16.51 14
12:27:08.33 -58:19:36.10  ASASSN-26ak  2026-01-16.2 13.94
17:21:53.10 +04:39:07.10  ASASSN-26ai  2026-01-16.67 14.83
14:46:54.08 -64:04:30.10  ASASSN-26ah  2026-01-15.07 16.84
23:02:43.24 +20:04:53.00  SN2025ajvh  2026-01-15.07 16.03
14:12:27.38 -30:12:29.10  ASASSN-26ag  2026-01-14.27 15.35
14:33:53.58 +05:27:35.40  SN 2025ajnc  2026-01-14.32 15.79
01:43:00.31 -34:11:40.60  AT2025afcm  2026-01-13.08 0.45
00:26:17.71 -52:11:38.60  AT2025ahal  2026-01-11.06 17.57
00:51:36.17 +29:42:40.10  SN2025ahxd  2026-01-11.21 15
10:19:19.14 -37:54:58.30  AT2025ahrt  2026-01-10.26 -0.54
14:37:48.78 +15:51:04.20  SN2025ajng  2026-01-9.42 16.35
05:01:03.70 -08:34:13.20  SN2026A  2026-01-9.28 16.83
00:02:52.11 +13:05:42.90  SN2025ajvg  2026-01-9.13 15.89
08:37:09.62 -02:18:08.80  SN2025aigm  2026-01-9.55 17.66
09:52:50.71 +39:36:55.70  SN2025ahyt  2026-01-9.37 16.97
11:22:19.08 -27:21:40.90  AT2026ta  2026-01-9.32 15.88
14:35:00.21 +00:59:11.40  SN 2025ahsa  2026-01-8.35 -2
09:25:42.42 +22:20:06.10  SN2025ahkt  2026-01-8.03 15.88
22:39:53.44 +34:53:50.00  SN 2025aikz  2026-01-7.09 16.3
08:21:20.95 +20:52:01.60  SN 2025aiks  2026-01-7.13 15.82
07:35:31.38 +09:10:32.40  AT2025ajvk  2026-01-7.12 -1.82
02:50:07.71 -16:37:02.30  AT2026nl  2026-01-7.16 14.19
14:05:12.75 -33:46:00.80  SN 2025ajmj  2026-01-7.31 14.93
12:35:08.33 +28:03:22.70  SN 2025aiaj  2026-01-5.44 15.76
05:30:00.47 -66:43:29.40  ASASSN-26af  2026-01-5.12 14.38
14:05:05.13 -44:14:24.00  ASASSN-26ac  2026-01-5.3 16.01
11:29:16.57 +20:35:09.00  AT2025alco  2026-01-4.39 15.93
16:42:59.28 +26:21:02.80  ASASSN-26ae  2026-01-4.52 14.31
04:13:46.60 -05:02:16.60  ASASSN-26ad  2026-01-4.32 14.58
05:00:01.32 -57:14:29.70  ASASSN-25fj/ASASSN-26ab  2026-01-1.19 13.38
13:53:51.35 -17:55:38.10  ASASSN-25fg  2025-12-23.33 16.66
06:18:15.27 +15:47:38.10  AT2025ahtd  2025-12-23.31 16.96
07:20:53.12 -33:02:58.20  SN 2025agvw  2025-12-23.32 16.84
02:58:15.63 +44:47:45.80  ASASSN-25fh  2025-12-23.13 15.63
04:51:03.78 -36:13:59.00  AT2025aftm  2025-12-20.14 17.35
03:12:59.31 +17:41:45.20  SN2025afzm  2025-12-20.15 17.22
13:33:14.27 -46:03:33.90  ASASSN-25fc  2025-12-19.32 SDSS
07:07:30.84 +24:37:55.60  SN2025agie  2025-12-19.19 16.96
12:31:24.34 -59:07:09.00  ASASSN-25fd  2025-12-19.06 14.94
14:02:20.59 -20:28:28.70  ASASSN-25fe  2025-12-19.34 SDSS
08:08:51.65 -16:39:31.50  ASASSN-25ff  2025-12-19.22 SDSS
00:34:05.69 +05:21:07.50  SN2025afty  2025-12-18.21 16.92
01:35:25.55 -05:40:42.00  AT2025agsf  2025-12-18.12 17.67
06:12:00.84 -46:50:40.70  AT2025aetd  2025-12-15.08 17.32
11:07:12.05 -55:12:59.00  ASASSN-25fa  2025-12-14.25 16.07
02:48:09.78 +37:45:17.90  AT2025afje  2025-12-13.28 17.65
08:17:38.99 +59:57:25.90  SN2025afcy  2025-12-13.43 16.8
22:58:25.70 +26:38:19.80  SN 2025afve  2025-12-12.1 16.63
03:44:52.10 -59:08:22.80  SN 2025aegk  2025-12-12.1 SDSS
04:55:47.45 -18:56:49.70  SN 2025aetg  2025-12-11.36 16.92
23:15:07.77 +13:10:19.80  SN 2025afwb  2025-12-11.2 17.13
02:19:39.33 -45:39:00.60  SN 2025aeqg  2025-12-10.07 16.77
02:03:03.89 +04:14:37.30  SN2025afih  2025-12-8.1 16.49
22:23:03.49 -56:35:57.50  AT2025aeei  2025-12-8.03 16.01
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 6.2K Feb 22 04:03 asassn_transients_list.txt
############################################################
Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html :
14:45:58.45 +39:05:10.3  TCP J14455845+3905103  2025-12-30.8196  14.1mag
00:43:23.44 +41:24:35.7  PNV J00432344+4124357  2025-12-11.684  19.7mag
00:41:01.11 +41:59:28.2  PNV J00410111+4159282  2026-01-06.1994  18.7mag
00:42:52.01 +41:14:29.2  PNV J00425201+4114292  2026-01-08.7863  18.37Cmag
02:50:07.72 -16:37:02.3  TCP J02500772-1637023  2026-01-06.6352  14.53Cmag
00:42:58.52 +41:14:44.2  PNV J00425852+4114442  2026-01-13.4991  16.89Cmag
14:47:33.95 -10:02:56.8  TCP J14473395-1002568  2026-01-13.8185  14.0mag
15:33:45.28 -22:11:07.3  TCP J15334528-2211073  2026-01-16.8451  14.9mag
22:34:01.26 +39:53:32.8  TCP J22340126+3953328  2026-01-17.5738  16.79Cmag
00:42:52.36 +41:16:13.3  PNV J00425236+4116133  2026-01-18.5502  17.41Cmag
06:57:11.19 -17:24:43.9  TCP J06571119-1724439  2026-01-18.5375  14.2mag
00:42:52.23 +41:01:44.7  PNV J00425223+4101447  2026-01-19.5505  18.74Cmag
09:54:46.47 +69:06:31.7  PNV J09544647+6906317  2026-01-26.8081  19.3mag
18:08:51.99 -26:16:21.9  TCP J18085199-2616219  2026-01-31.8519  12.2mag
08:01:11.02 -03:43:14.1  TCP J08011102-0343141  2026-02-08.8090  15.10Cmag
05:19:15.40 -02:04:51.5  TCP J05191540-0204515  2026-02-13.4306  14.5mag
10:52:41.26 +36:40:08.9  TCP J10524126+3640089  2026-02-17.6065  17.4mag
05:50:50.81 +36:22:45.1  TCP J05505081+3622451  2026-02-17.5511  15.7mag
00:42:51.33 +41:13:49.1  PNV J00425133+4113491  2026-02-20.738  18.3mag
00:43:04.88 +41:29:41.4  PNV J00430488+4129414  2026-02-20.5923  18.84Cmag
-rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 187K Feb 22 04:03 tocp_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

 CPU temperature: 89 C