This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 02 12.2967* 12 00 20.78 -10 11 05.4 9.3 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
SV Vir,2461083.7967,9.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
SV Vir 20260212.2967 9.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 12:00:20.78 -10:11:05.4 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0479_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0313_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0479_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0312_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0479_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0313_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0479_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0312_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461083.7967,13.46,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260212.2967 13.46CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 12:19:28.81 -13:53:45.5 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0479_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0313_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0479_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0312_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0479_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0313_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0479_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0312_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 02 12.2967* 12 27 10.52 -09 54 01.5 13.9 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461083.7967,13.90,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260212.2967 13.90CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 12:27:10.52 -09:54:01.5 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0479_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0313_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0479_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0312_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0479_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0313_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0479_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0312_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 02 12.2967* 11 30 59.78 -06 13 18.2 14.1 U Leo 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461083.7967,14.12,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260212.2967 14.12CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 11:30:59.78 -06:13:18.2 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0479_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0313_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0479_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0312_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0479_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0313_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0479_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0312_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 02 12.2967* 12 09 14.08 -08 59 35.0 14.4 U Vir 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461083.7967,14.45,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260212.2967 14.45CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 12:09:14.08 -08:59:35.0 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0479_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0313_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0479_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0312_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0479_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0313_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0479_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0312_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VX Crv,2461083.7967,13.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VX Crv 20260212.2967 13.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 12:21:52.47 -13:53:09.2 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0479_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0313_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0479_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0312_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0479_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0313_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0479_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0312_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.92100742 18.01.2026 10:06:05.041 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits
First image: 2461058.92100742 18.01.2026 10:06:05.041 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits
Last image: 2461083.79692889 12.02.2026 07:07:24.656 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 2
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.78
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 5648
Objects passed selection criteria: 5642
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 5455
Average stars matched: 5349.5 (98.066 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 111944 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20251122 p4) 15.2.1 20251122
VaST compiled on Wed Feb 11 15:05:05 CST 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-300-g65540497
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-02-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Feb 12 01:12:33 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461058.92100742 18.01.2026 10:06:05.041 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits
First image: 2461058.92100742 18.01.2026 10:06:05.041 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits
Last image: 2461083.79692889 12.02.2026 07:07:24.656 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 143
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 14 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 34624
Objects passed selection criteria: 34561
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 33360.5
Average stars matched: 32296.8 (96.8113 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 135792 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20251122 p4) 15.2.1 20251122
VaST compiled on Wed Feb 11 15:05:05 CST 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-300-g65540497
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-02-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Thu Feb 12 01:13:40 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461083.79651260
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits'
wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits'
wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:15.985 -09:59:22.46
Second-epoch image center 12:00:01.651 -10:00:26.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.06 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:15.985 -09:59:22.46
Second-epoch image center 12:00:02.297 -10:00:25.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.06 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:01.651 -10:00:26.83
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:02.297 -10:00:25.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00269 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits &> /tmp/tmp.jOFqRwud1Z
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits &> /tmp/tmp.PfbgITCSUB
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits &> /tmp/tmp.a6P5Ms8pbS
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3GUBKE6mZk
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits and wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits and wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits and wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Matched with Tycho-2 3607 out of 5759 detected stars.
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.840183
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.840183
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.78
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.06
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.06
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 1 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits
2.0 pix Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
2.1 pix fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
2.0 pix fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits
15.1 mag. Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
14.9 mag. fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.9 (SNR ) 11.9 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 14.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.jOFqRwud1Z (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=392, passed=5759
Got 5759 stars (including 5361 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5759 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.22"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits -region wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.PfbgITCSUB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=376, passed=5760
Got 5760 stars (including 5375 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5760 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.22"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits -region wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.a6P5Ms8pbS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=353, passed=5263
Got 5263 stars (including 4907 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5263 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.23"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3GUBKE6mZk (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=385, passed=5194
Got 5194 stars (including 4803 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 5194 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out02745.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 02745_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
Preparing report for the candidate 02745_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Vir-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
12:00:20.78 -10:11:05.4
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:15.985 -09:59:22.46
Second-epoch image center 12:00:01.651 -10:00:26.83
Angular distance between the image centers 0.06 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 12:00:15.985 -09:59:22.46
Second-epoch image center 12:00:02.297 -10:00:25.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.06 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 12:00:01.651 -10:00:26.83
Second-epoch second image center 12:00:02.297 -10:00:25.11
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00269 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5eMXZMBEEL
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits &> /tmp/tmp.zLV8qh2sON
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits &> /tmp/tmp.4mz7GA4odY
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NnAmAfG4Kz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits and wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits and wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits and wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits) and catalog (wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Matched with Tycho-2 3758 out of 34621 detected stars.
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.712022
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.712022
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.52
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.19
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.19
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 88 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits
1.9 pix Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
2.0 pix fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
1.9 pix fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits
15.2 mag. Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 14.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.5eMXZMBEEL (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=7, blended=1253, passed=34614
Got 34614 stars (including 33296 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34614 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits -region wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-05_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0479.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.zLV8qh2sON (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits' -> 'wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1235, passed=34728
Got 34728 stars (including 33438 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 34728 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 969 stars left (next iteration limit 1065)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits -region wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_04-06-49_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0480.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.4mz7GA4odY (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=6, blended=1082, passed=32050
Got 32050 stars (including 30925 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32050 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.25"
Excluding outliers - 971 stars left (next iteration limit 1068)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.NnAmAfG4Kz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1091, passed=32812
Got 32812 stars (including 31670 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 32812 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.7'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.7 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013079 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010463 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits -region wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-06-48_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0312.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-12_CI_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_011013_TTUQ1b1x1_27738_eVEwcY5G/wcs_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Vir-10-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52616.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52617.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52618.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52818.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52821.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52834.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52885.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52900.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out04355.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52730.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52801.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52829.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52931.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 8s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52616_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52616_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:01:22.24 -13:39:08.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.20, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.18)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.695 3573674959372769536 180.34277194506 -13.65252488930 14.1858 13.6777 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.695#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52617_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52617_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:31:51.83 -08:37:51.1 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.82, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.80)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52618_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52618_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:43:08.44 -10:38:23.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.85, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.83)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.573 3588249604474210560 175.78525153747 -10.64008008099 13.8851 13.3290 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.573#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52651_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52651_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52664_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52664_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52672_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52672_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52673_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52673_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52685_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52685_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52686_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52686_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52694_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52694_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52695_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52695_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52701_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52701_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52704_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52704_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52708_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52708_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52709_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52709_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52715_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52715_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52716_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52716_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52720_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52720_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52722_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52722_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52723_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52723_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52726_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52726_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52727_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52727_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52730_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
Preparing report for the candidate 52730_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52731_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52731_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52732_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52732_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52752_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52752_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52753_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52753_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52759_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52759_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52761_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52761_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52763_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52763_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52769_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52769_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52770_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52770_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52773_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52773_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52774_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52774_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52775_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52775_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52776_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52776_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52779_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52779_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52780_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52780_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52788_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52788_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52793_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52793_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52800_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52800_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52801_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
Preparing report for the candidate 52801_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52802_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52802_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52807_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52807_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52809_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52809_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52811_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52811_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52816_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52816_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52818_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52818_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:20:25.45 -06:32:45.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.99, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.97)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.711 3584397121887993856 185.10618080841 -06.54583117772 14.0265 13.3284 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.711#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52821_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52821_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:31:17.69 -10:42:58.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.13, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.11)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.517 3578499135358098304 187.82384383869 -10.71614028020 14.1333 13.3715 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.517#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52823_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52823_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52824_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52824_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52828_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52828_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52829_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
Preparing report for the candidate 52829_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52831_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52831_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52832_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52832_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52833_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52833_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52834_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52834_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 12:18:24.25 -05:40:31.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.10, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.08)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.273 3584712784805106816 184.60139023547 -05.67526391510 14.2691 13.7970 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.273#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52839_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52839_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52844_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52844_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52852_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52852_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52853_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52853_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52855_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52855_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52857_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52857_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52861_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52861_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52864_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52864_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52865_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52865_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:51:20.98 -12:09:42.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52868_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52868_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52873_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52873_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52879_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52879_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52881_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52881_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52882_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52882_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52885_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52885_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:28:21.19 -14:41:47.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.44, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.42)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.852 3560965773186822784 172.08831393924 -14.69640323813 14.2474 13.6797 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.852#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52889_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52889_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52890_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52890_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52891_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52891_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52892_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52892_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52895_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52895_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52896_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52896_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52897_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52897_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52900_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52900_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 11:38:54.58 -06:08:29.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.46, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.44)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.960 3593522827880166016 174.72767964330 -06.14155283801 14.5444 13.8542 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.960#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52906_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52906_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes'
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52915_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52915_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52916_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52916_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52918_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52918_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52927_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 52927_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 52931_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
Preparing report for the candidate 52931_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 16768_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313
The candidate 16768_fd_Vir-10-Q1b1x1_2026-02-12_01-07-24_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0313 did not pass the final checks