This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 02 12.1804* 04 39 13.03 +18 54 30.7 10.9 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461083.6804,10.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260212.1804 10.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 04:39:13.03 +18:54:30.7 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0306_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0148_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0306_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0147_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0306_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0148_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0306_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0147_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 02 12.1804* 04 31 21.93 +17 39 09.6 10.0 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0718 Tau,2461083.6804,9.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0718 Tau 20260212.1804 9.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 04:31:21.93 +17:39:09.6 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0306_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0148_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0306_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0147_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0306_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0148_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0306_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0147_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 02 12.1804* 04 35 02.35 +16 47 59.5 12.4 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461083.6804,12.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260212.1804 12.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 04:35:02.35 +16:47:59.5 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0306_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0148_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0306_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0147_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0306_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0148_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0306_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0147_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 02 12.1804* 04 58 22.20 +16 08 01.3 12.5 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461083.6804,12.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260212.1804 12.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 04:58:22.20 +16:08:01.3 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0306_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0148_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0306_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0147_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0306_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0148_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0306_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0147_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 02 12.1804* 04 48 50.58 +17 15 38.4 14.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461083.6804,14.06,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260212.1804 14.06CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 04:48:50.58 +17:15:38.4 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0306_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0148_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0306_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0147_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0306_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0148_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0306_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0147_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 02 12.1804* 04 22 08.45 +18 34 39.4 14.1 U Tau 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
VARIABLE_NAME,2461083.6804,14.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
VARIABLE_NAME 20260212.1804 14.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 04:22:08.45 +18:34:39.4 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0306_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0148_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0306_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0147_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0306_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0148_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0306_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0147_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.76560473 23.12.2025 06:22:18.249 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits
First image: 2461032.76560473 23.12.2025 06:22:18.249 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits
Last image: 2461083.68059117 12.02.2026 04:19:53.077 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 6
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 9171
Objects passed selection criteria: 9164
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 8865.25
Average stars matched: 8714.25 (98.2967 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 114892 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20251122 p4) 15.2.1 20251122
VaST compiled on Wed Feb 11 15:05:05 CST 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-300-g65540497
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-02-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Feb 11 22:28:27 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.76560473 23.12.2025 06:22:18.249 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits
First image: 2461032.76560473 23.12.2025 06:22:18.249 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits
Last image: 2461083.68059117 12.02.2026 04:19:53.077 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 322
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 18 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 61776
Objects passed selection criteria: 61648
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 59490.2
Average stars matched: 57318.8 (96.3498 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 163836 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20251122 p4) 15.2.1 20251122
VaST compiled on Wed Feb 11 15:05:05 CST 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-300-g65540497
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-02-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Feb 11 22:29:42 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461083.68016869
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits'
wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits'
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:44.765 +13:59:10.76
Second-epoch image center 04:26:40.418 +13:59:52.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.02 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:44.765 +13:59:10.76
Second-epoch image center 04:26:40.504 +14:00:07.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.02 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:26:40.418 +13:59:52.15
Second-epoch second image center 04:26:40.504 +14:00:07.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00428 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits &> /tmp/tmp.JSymSX8txQ
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZllkCtOTpG
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nvoBT0d6S8
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ZfOTkS6j8y
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Matched with Tycho-2 3665 out of 9359 detected stars.
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.991789
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.991789
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.56
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.43
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 5 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits
2.0 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits
2.0 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
2.0 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits
15.4 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 12.3 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 14.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.JSymSX8txQ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=738, passed=9359
Got 9359 stars (including 8609 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9359 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZllkCtOTpG (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=734, passed=9349
Got 9349 stars (including 8595 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 9349 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Excluding outliers - 957 stars left (next iteration limit 1052)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.nvoBT0d6S8 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=686, passed=8489
Got 8489 stars (including 7788 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8489 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 958 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ZfOTkS6j8y (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=667, passed=8518
Got 8518 stars (including 7835 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 8518 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 957 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out01574.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20443.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20443_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
Preparing report for the candidate 20443_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20459_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 20459_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:12.14 +16:26:17.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20462_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 20462_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:38.84 +13:22:51.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 01574_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
Preparing report for the candidate 01574_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20237_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 20237_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:45.02 +18:04:13.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
04:31:21.93 +17:39:09.6
04:39:13.03 +18:54:30.7
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:44.765 +13:59:10.76
Second-epoch image center 04:26:40.418 +13:59:52.15
Angular distance between the image centers 0.02 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:26:44.765 +13:59:10.76
Second-epoch image center 04:26:40.504 +14:00:07.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.02 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:26:40.418 +13:59:52.15
Second-epoch second image center 04:26:40.504 +14:00:07.50
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00428 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits &> /tmp/tmp.gTolflGbkg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VpvLy2VDYg
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits &> /tmp/tmp.G55zpYqd7a
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits &> /tmp/tmp.ToeDK614Ur
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits and wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits) and catalog (wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Matched with Tycho-2 3674 out of 61474 detected stars.
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.864852
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.864852
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.27
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.59
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.59
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 107 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits
1.9 pix Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits
1.8 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
1.8 pix fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.6 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits
15.6 mag. Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
15.5 mag. fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.5 (SNR ) 14.8 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 14.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.gTolflGbkg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=5, blended=3422, passed=61469
Got 61469 stars (including 57932 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 61469 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-22-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0306.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VpvLy2VDYg (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits' -> 'wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=14, blended=3481, passed=61490
Got 61490 stars (including 57887 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 61490 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 953 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits -region wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-23-18_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0307.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.G55zpYqd7a (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=3080, passed=58522
Got 58522 stars (including 55320 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58522 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 952 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 952 stars left (next iteration limit 1047)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.ToeDK614Ur (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=12, blended=3005, passed=58164
Got 58164 stars (including 55030 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 58164 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.5'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.5 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013076 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010461 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 951 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 951 stars left (next iteration limit 1046)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits -region wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-16_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0147.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_222608_TTUQ1b1x1_19393_TySqWklf/wcs_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Tau-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out76669.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out76751.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out76807.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out76821.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out76829.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out76831.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out76861.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out76866.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76695.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76698.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76804.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out76813.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 3s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76664_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76664_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:37:53.36 +09:20:04.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76666_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76666_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:31:09.22 +17:33:27.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76669_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76669_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:13.63 +10:22:31.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.15, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.13)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.554 3294110590273478528 069.80655363352 +10.37491506107 13.9234 13.2151 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.554#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76670_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76670_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:42.33 +09:22:23.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76672_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76672_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:57:34.71 +10:06:04.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76680_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76680_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:13.03 +18:54:30.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76692_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76692_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76694_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76694_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76695_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
Preparing report for the candidate 76695_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76698_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
Preparing report for the candidate 76698_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76700_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76700_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76702_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76702_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76705_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76705_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76708_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76708_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76710_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76710_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76711_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76711_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76712_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76712_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76716_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76716_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76720_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76720_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76722_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76722_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76723_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76723_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76725_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76725_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76726_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76726_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76727_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76727_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76729_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76729_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76732_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76732_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76733_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76733_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76734_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76734_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76737_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76737_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76738_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76738_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76740_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76740_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76741_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76741_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76742_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76742_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76744_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76744_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76747_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76747_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76751_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76751_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:36:08.11 +16:33:45.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.63, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.61)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.324 3313076031982266624 069.03372848676 +16.56265555831 13.3091 12.3964 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.324#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76752_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76752_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76753_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76753_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76755_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76755_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76760_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76760_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76761_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76761_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76763_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76763_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76764_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76764_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76765_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76765_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76767_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76767_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76768_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76768_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76770_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76770_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76772_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76772_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76779_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76779_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76780_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76780_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76783_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76783_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76784_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76784_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76787_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76787_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76789_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76789_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76791_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76791_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76792_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76792_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76793_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76793_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76795_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76795_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76796_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76796_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76797_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76797_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76798_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76798_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76799_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76799_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76800_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76800_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76801_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76801_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:00:47.46 +15:29:46.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76804_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
Preparing report for the candidate 76804_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76806_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76806_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76807_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76807_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:56:32.27 +15:34:20.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.92, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.90)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.392 40104931438884608 059.13431029177 +15.57208500762 13.6870 13.0146 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.392#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76811_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76811_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76813_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
Preparing report for the candidate 76813_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76814_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76814_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76815_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76815_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76816_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76816_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76817_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76817_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76818_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76818_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76819_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76819_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76820_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76820_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76821_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76821_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:12.33 +11:35:02.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.10, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.08)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.269 3294905880778100224 072.80115384584 +11.58374965525 14.0030 13.1645 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.269#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76822_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76822_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76826_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76826_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:42.32 +13:09:19.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76829_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76829_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:21:21.27 +10:39:52.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.29, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.27)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.342 3300748067091965568 065.33873585603 +10.66408780007 14.1366 13.4542 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.342#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76830_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76830_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76831_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76831_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:49:49.81 +18:29:05.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.31, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.29)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.189 3406805618677863296 072.45730665516 +18.48411493384 14.4671 13.8232 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.189#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76833_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76833_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76834_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76834_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76835_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76835_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76837_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76837_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76839_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76839_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:29:14.33 +09:55:59.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76842_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76842_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76843_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76843_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76845_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76845_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76853_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76853_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76854_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76854_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76857_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76857_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76861_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76861_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:25.74 +09:52:26.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.43, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.41)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.673 3293842756112696448 070.10677875384 +09.87403216587 14.5295 13.7389 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.673#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76865_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76865_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76866_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76866_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:32:21.79 +09:30:00.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.46, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.44)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.696 3293618455740698752 068.09076408497 +09.49989201355 14.2369 13.4531 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.696#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76867_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76867_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76868_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76868_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76872_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76872_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76875_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76875_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:05:25.79 +16:56:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76889_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76889_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:05:45.51 +15:09:04.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76890_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76890_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76894_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76894_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 76897_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 76897_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 06513_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 06513_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:45.01 +18:04:13.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 09628_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 09628_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:31:21.94 +17:39:09.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 17185_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148
The candidate 17185_fd_Tau-06-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-19-53_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0148 did not pass the final checks