This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 02 12.1672* 05 35 02.09 -05 15 54.4 12.8 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0403 Ori,2461083.6672,12.83,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0403 Ori 20260212.1672 12.83CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 05:35:02.09 -05:15:54.4 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0272_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0126_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0272_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0125_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0272_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0126_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0272_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0125_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 02 12.1672* 05 35 50.74 -05 35 42.0 13.4 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
V0947 Ori,2461083.6672,13.40,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
V0947 Ori 20260212.1672 13.40CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 05:35:50.74 -05:35:42.0 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0272_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0126_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0272_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0125_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0272_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0126_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0272_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0125_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.74620664 23.12.2025 05:54:22.254 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
First image: 2461032.74620664 23.12.2025 05:54:22.254 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Last image: 2461083.66738991 12.02.2026 04:00:52.488 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 9
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.76
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 3 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 11243
Objects passed selection criteria: 11236
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 10882
Average stars matched: 10662 (97.9783 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 116484 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20251122 p4) 15.2.1 20251122
VaST compiled on Wed Feb 11 15:05:05 CST 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-300-g65540497
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-02-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Feb 11 22:10:52 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.74620664 23.12.2025 05:54:22.254 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
First image: 2461032.74620664 23.12.2025 05:54:22.254 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Last image: 2461083.66738991 12.02.2026 04:00:52.488 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 210
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 26 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 69512
Objects passed selection criteria: 69333
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 67411.2
Average stars matched: 64794.2 (96.1179 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2015952 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20251122 p4) 15.2.1 20251122
VaST compiled on Wed Feb 11 15:05:05 CST 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-300-g65540497
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-02-11)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Wed Feb 11 22:12:04 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461083.66695168
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits'
wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits'
wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits'
wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:28.242 -09:58:49.63
Second-epoch image center 05:08:33.886 -09:59:58.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.03 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:28.242 -09:58:49.63
Second-epoch image center 05:08:32.851 -09:59:38.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.02 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:08:33.886 -09:59:58.80
Second-epoch second image center 05:08:32.851 -09:59:38.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00704 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits &> /tmp/tmp.pIfydlusxe
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits &> /tmp/tmp.SbjjsJyQDl
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits &> /tmp/tmp.qV8CKgfAnu
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Cx4Xmk7PIR
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits and wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits and wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits and wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits) and catalog (wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Matched with Tycho-2 6827 out of 11318 detected stars.
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.909973
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.909973
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.76
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.15
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
2.1 pix Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
2.0 pix fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
2.0 pix fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.1 mag. Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
15.1 mag. Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
15.1 mag. fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 14.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.pIfydlusxe (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=978, passed=11318
Got 11318 stars (including 10327 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11318 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 961 stars left (next iteration limit 1057)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits -region wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.SbjjsJyQDl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=940, passed=11334
Got 11334 stars (including 10382 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 11334 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 964 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29"
Excluding outliers - 963 stars left (next iteration limit 1059)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits -region wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.qV8CKgfAnu (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=943, passed=10601
Got 10601 stars (including 9643 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10601 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 961 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 960 stars left (next iteration limit 1056)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Cx4Xmk7PIR (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=919, passed=10568
Got 10568 stars (including 9641 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 10568 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 963 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 962 stars left (next iteration limit 1058)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Eri-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 0s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20621_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 20621_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:56.94 -14:46:35.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20624_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 20624_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:55.31 -05:30:22.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20632_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 20632_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:32.68 -11:45:38.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20633_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 20633_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:43.52 -14:23:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20640_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 20640_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:33.90 -05:28:24.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20642_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 20642_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:00.07 -06:33:27.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20643_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 20643_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:09.32 -13:49:14.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 03639_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 03639_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:48.22 -07:57:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 1s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Eri-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:28.242 -09:58:49.63
Second-epoch image center 05:08:33.886 -09:59:58.80
Angular distance between the image centers 0.03 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:28.242 -09:58:49.63
Second-epoch image center 05:08:32.851 -09:59:38.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.02 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:08:33.886 -09:59:58.80
Second-epoch second image center 05:08:32.851 -09:59:38.59
Angular distance between the image centers 0.00704 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0ycsC3mNt4
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits &> /tmp/tmp.0obcPZpwnr
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits &> /tmp/tmp.LCeCSUMvtW
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits &> /tmp/tmp.VQEkUCStOb
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits and wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits and wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits and wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits) and catalog (wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Matched with Tycho-2 7019 out of 67696 detected stars.
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.795473
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.795473
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.50
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.30
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 71 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
2.0 pix Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
1.8 pix fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
1.8 pix fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
15.3 mag. Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
15.3 mag. fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.3 (SNR ) 14.6 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 14.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.0ycsC3mNt4 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=23, blended=4120, passed=67673
Got 67673 stars (including 63458 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 67673 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits -region wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-54-22_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0272.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.0obcPZpwnr (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=4078, passed=66937
Got 66937 stars (including 62752 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 66937 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 955 stars left (next iteration limit 1050)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits -region wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-55-03_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0273.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.LCeCSUMvtW (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=3950, passed=68184
Got 68184 stars (including 64152 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 68184 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 954 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Excluding outliers - 953 stars left (next iteration limit 1048)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.VQEkUCStOb (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=3883, passed=68421
Got 68421 stars (including 64441 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 68421 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 956 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Excluding outliers - 956 stars left (next iteration limit 1051)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-14_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0125.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-11_CI_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_220814_TTUQ1b1x1_5398_1Fz0gwmQ/wcs_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Eri-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82376.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82378.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82381.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82390.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82400.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82405.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82406.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82437.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82447.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82495.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82503.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82534.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82554.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82557.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82561.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82594.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82621.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82625.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82627.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82629.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82651.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82678.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82693.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82694.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82705.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out82708.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82463.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out82505.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 2s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82376_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82376_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:02.31 -08:32:21.0 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.46, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.44)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82378_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82378_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:28.15 -05:09:22.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.48, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.46)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.478 3210088866617298176 080.86739072703 -05.15664848088 14.3600 13.7974 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.478#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82381_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82381_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:05.58 -09:17:56.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.48, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.46)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.987 3185746194573116800 070.52318808685 -09.29921182258 14.3585 13.8068 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.987#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82390_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82390_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:35.18 -08:51:57.7 in Gaia DR2 blend (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.18, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.16)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82394_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82394_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:07.27 -14:55:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82395_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82395_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:47.90 -13:00:56.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82399_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82399_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:03.38 -05:20:55.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82400_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82400_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:44.40 -08:27:29.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.94, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.92)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.609 3186058352796722688 069.93513605071 -08.45798069425 13.9825 13.4059 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.609#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82402_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82402_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:40.86 -09:11:01.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82405_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82405_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:14.67 -05:08:50.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.73, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.71)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.408 3211789295708221696 077.81094437454 -05.14797748092 13.6321 12.7684 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.408#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82406_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82406_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:58:51.32 -09:56:58.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.69, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.67)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.058 3183035073777375744 074.71378200800 -09.94995621169 13.6952 13.1692 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.058#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82407_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82407_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:15:36.81 -13:46:22.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82409_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82409_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:03.83 -14:25:42.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82411_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82411_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:50.25 -09:25:37.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82412_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82412_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:18.96 -08:20:28.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82416_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82416_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:40:15.46 -12:02:00.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82417_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82417_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:27:56.95 -14:46:35.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82418_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82418_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:26.24 -05:24:59.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82426_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82426_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:01.41 -06:11:48.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82431_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82431_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:32.69 -11:45:38.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82436_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82436_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:29.90 -05:32:53.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82437_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82437_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:07.06 -12:55:05.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=11.87, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=12.85)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.695 2985766603101269120 081.52948082268 -12.91840482807 11.9038 11.5550 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.695#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82447_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82447_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:15.39 -06:24:22.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=12.47, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=13.45)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.506 3016776301337446144 083.31371217685 -06.40624899335 12.6284 12.0750 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.506#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82457_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82457_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:18.15 -08:29:02.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82463_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
Preparing report for the candidate 82463_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82466_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82466_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:09.08 -05:29:59.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82469_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82469_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:01:25.81 -07:12:25.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82473_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82473_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:22.73 -07:47:40.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82477_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82477_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:22:28.86 -09:23:06.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82480_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82480_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:58:44.06 -10:30:49.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82489_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82489_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:58.62 -09:28:26.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82495_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82495_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:02.28 -10:22:21.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.26, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.24)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.224 3013404069110847744 081.25899603748 -10.37289629739 12.8925 11.8546 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.224#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82503_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82503_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:34.28 -06:18:18.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.28, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.26)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.130 3208228149345343232 077.64293600360 -06.30532461434 13.3718 12.7338 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.130#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82505_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
Preparing report for the candidate 82505_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82534_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82534_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:24.21 -07:56:05.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.64, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.62)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.355 3207729688324048000 077.60066132250 -07.93528337566 13.8196 13.3035 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.355#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82552_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82552_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:51:37.35 -08:23:05.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82554_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82554_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:58:33.92 -05:46:35.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.69, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.67)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.296 3212196527327599872 074.64115724925 -05.77684233179 13.7129 13.2076 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.296#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82557_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82557_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:56:12.19 -09:41:52.4 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.74, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.72)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.820 3183253842231398784 074.05064686548 -09.69865918581 14.3014 13.8363 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.820#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82561_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82561_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:28:42.50 -08:46:30.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.188 3014744305066819328 082.17705464690 -08.77503953633 14.1293 13.5788 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.188#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82565_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82565_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:12:20.77 -05:36:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82590_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82590_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:42:00.81 -12:53:13.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82594_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82594_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:31.88 -11:51:51.8 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.93, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.91)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.020 3180908274691570432 072.13300839712 -11.86461457876 13.6665 12.9307 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.020#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82621_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82621_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:41.94 -12:35:25.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.16, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.14)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.966 2989356306703452032 076.92366603724 -12.59061320953 14.3962 13.8650 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.966#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82625_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82625_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:02:23.11 -12:44:32.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.04, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.02)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.367 2988074791541545984 075.59639247933 -12.74244572422 13.9439 13.2324 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.367#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82627_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82627_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:45.04 -10:17:11.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.23, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.21)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 4.284 3013410185145730304 081.43653933190 -10.28684788608 14.3625 13.6796 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#4.284#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82629_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82629_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:20:53.92 -14:40:02.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.21, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.19)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.842 2984895175712958848 080.22417663234 -14.66802010380 14.3763 13.7256 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.842#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82651_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82651_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:36.91 -05:07:22.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.40, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.38)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.974 3211699273193596928 077.65405652292 -05.12271755448 14.5776 14.0259 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.974#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82656_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82656_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:56.72 -05:58:58.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82659_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82659_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:18.53 -05:46:52.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82660_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82660_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:07:39.82 -05:05:31.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82662_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82662_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:38:42.75 -14:50:11.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82667_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82667_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:10.92 -06:51:34.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82670_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82670_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:40.41 -10:18:07.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82671_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82671_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:27.26 -14:04:22.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82678_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82678_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:33.99 -07:24:33.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.35, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.33)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.001 3016584131618271872 082.39157792079 -07.40980398343 14.5650 14.0138 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.001#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82682_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82682_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:39:20.21 -12:45:50.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82693_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82693_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:35:48.91 -12:10:55.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.43, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.41)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.419 3009711599828496896 083.95350599650 -12.18222276587 14.8805 14.3272 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.419#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82694_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82694_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:16.58 -10:59:56.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.48, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.46)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.814 3010411129742092032 084.06859182015 -10.99964268893 14.8157 14.2684 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.814#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82698_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82698_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:39:08.86 -12:50:40.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82705_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82705_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:40:41.51 -14:07:52.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.44, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.42)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.594 3174499152694564480 070.17262645650 -14.13155406771 14.5321 13.9052 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.594#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82706_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82706_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:03:49.17 -14:32:08.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82708_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82708_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:31:05.43 -09:45:33.0 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.40, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.38)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.991 3013790650528377216 082.77255895426 -09.75943410773 14.4993 13.9102 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.991#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82711_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82711_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:43.61 -14:45:31.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82733_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82733_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:04.06 -12:07:38.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 82756_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 82756_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:24.10 -10:40:00.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 13382_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 13382_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:00.09 -06:33:27.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 47097_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 47097_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:25:43.53 -14:23:31.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 12607_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 12607_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:35.84 -06:29:22.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20770_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 20770_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:48.22 -07:57:20.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 60207_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 60207_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (23.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 14374_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126
The candidate 14374_fd_Eri-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-11_22-00-52_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0126 did not pass the final checks