This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 02 11.1983* 05 29 00.55 -04 41 32.4 8.8 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
S Ori,2461082.6983,8.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
S Ori 20260211.1983 8.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 05:29:00.55 -04:41:32.4 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0301_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0154_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0301_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0153_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0301_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0154_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0301_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0153_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 02 11.1983* 05 34 35.12 -05 20 02.2 13.2 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461082.6983,13.22,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260211.1983 13.22CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 05:34:35.12 -05:20:02.2 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0301_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0154_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0301_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0153_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0301_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0154_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0301_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0153_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 02 11.1983 2461082.6983 13.86 05:19:15.76 -02:04:52.8
203.90777 -21.38931 galactic Ori Second-epoch detections are separated by 1.1" and 9.3 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | ATO J079.8146-02.0813 | 05:19:15.76 -02:04:52.8 (user input) | IRR (ATLAS) | (ATLAS) | (position from user input) SpType: em 1991PASJ...43...27W Kiso A-0975 46
Check this position in TNS.Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 02 11.1983* 05 19 15.76 -02 04 52.8 13.9 U Ori 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ATO J079.8146-02.0813,2461082.6983,13.86,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ATO J079.8146-02.0813 20260211.1983 13.86CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 05:19:15.76 -02:04:52.8 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0301_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0154_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0301_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0153_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0301_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0154_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0301_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0153_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.76284740 23.12.2025 06:18:20.015 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits
First image: 2461032.76284740 23.12.2025 06:18:20.015 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits
Last image: 2461082.69862219 11.02.2026 04:45:50.957 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 8
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.69
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 4 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 14541
Objects passed selection criteria: 14534
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 14151.5
Average stars matched: 13885.5 (98.1203 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 119300 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20251122 p4) 15.2.1 20251122
VaST compiled on Tue Feb 10 15:05:05 CST 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-299-g877bacc0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-02-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Feb 10 23:18:33 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.76284740 23.12.2025 06:18:20.015 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits
First image: 2461032.76284740 23.12.2025 06:18:20.015 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits
Last image: 2461082.69862219 11.02.2026 04:45:50.957 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 103
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 37 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 85952
Objects passed selection criteria: 85751
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 82443.8
Average stars matched: 80101.8 (97.1593 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2012096 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20251122 p4) 15.2.1 20251122
VaST compiled on Tue Feb 10 15:05:05 CST 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-299-g877bacc0
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-02-10)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Tue Feb 10 23:20:09 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461082.69798723
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits'
wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits'
wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:15.177 -01:59:04.10
Second-epoch image center 05:08:23.993 -02:01:44.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.06 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:15.177 -01:59:04.10
Second-epoch image center 05:08:21.353 -02:01:04.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.04 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:08:23.993 -02:01:44.93
Second-epoch second image center 05:08:21.353 -02:01:04.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01572 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits &> /tmp/tmp.AuUAxUB6Ny
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits &> /tmp/tmp.844YS7NoSz
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.KE8elWgkOA
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XvJ5CnoKTy
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits and wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits and wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits and wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Matched with Tycho-2 8007 out of 14808 detected stars.
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.921444
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.921444
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.69
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.23
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 8 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.0 pix Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits
2.0 pix Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits
2.3 pix fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.3 pix fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.2 mag. Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits
15.2 mag. Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits
15.0 mag. fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.1 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 14.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.AuUAxUB6Ny (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1520, passed=14808
Got 14808 stars (including 13268 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14808 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 946 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 944 stars left (next iteration limit 1038)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits -region wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.844YS7NoSz (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1525, passed=14761
Got 14761 stars (including 13221 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 14761 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 947 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits -region wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.KE8elWgkOA (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1356, passed=13698
Got 13698 stars (including 12325 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13698 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 940 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 937 stars left (next iteration limit 1030)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XvJ5CnoKTy (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1391, passed=13708
Got 13708 stars (including 12306 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 13708 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 943 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.39"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ori-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out11561.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 4s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 0s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20797_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 20797_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:16.44 +02:27:37.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20802_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 20802_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:55.29 -05:30:22.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_tycho2.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20840_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 20840_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:35.92 +00:25:01.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20846_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 20846_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:00.19 -06:33:27.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20851_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 20851_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:10:25.64 -00:12:30.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20855_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 20855_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:23:37.95 -02:48:44.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 20858_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 20858_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:11:47.90 -01:22:50.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 11561_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
Preparing report for the candidate 11561_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s
make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 5s
Prepared the HTML report for the field Ori-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
05:29:00.55 -04:41:32.4
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits.cat to cache
SExtractor catalog cache: saved Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat to cache
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:15.177 -01:59:04.10
Second-epoch image center 05:08:23.993 -02:01:44.93
Angular distance between the image centers 0.06 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 05:08:15.177 -01:59:04.10
Second-epoch image center 05:08:21.353 -02:01:04.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.04 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 05:08:23.993 -02:01:44.93
Second-epoch second image center 05:08:21.353 -02:01:04.46
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01572 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits &> /tmp/tmp.NHPZ6ndyT3
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits &> /tmp/tmp.XVZPbIj7AU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits &> /tmp/tmp.xVUiBHZ7ip
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits &> /tmp/tmp.1oGQ4mm5vU
Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits and wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits and wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits and wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits) and catalog (wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Matched with Tycho-2 8144 out of 88569 detected stars.
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.802433
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.802433
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.39
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Applying consolidated magnitude filters...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 36 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits
1.9 pix Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits
2.2 pix fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits
2.2 pix fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.4 mag. Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits
15.4 mag. Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 14.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.NHPZ6ndyT3 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=33, blended=7123, passed=88536
Got 88536 stars (including 81282 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 88536 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 948 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 945 stars left (next iteration limit 1039)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits -region wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-18-20_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0301.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.XVZPbIj7AU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits' -> 'wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=27, blended=7114, passed=88410
Got 88410 stars (including 81149 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 88410 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 944 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 941 stars left (next iteration limit 1035)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits -region wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_00-19-57_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0303.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.xVUiBHZ7ip (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=26, blended=6547, passed=77649
Got 77649 stars (including 70970 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 77649 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.42"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 942 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Excluding outliers - 940 stars left (next iteration limit 1034)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.1oGQ4mm5vU (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)...
/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=36, blended=6427, passed=77312
Got 77312 stars (including 70770 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 77312 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 945 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.41"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.40"
Excluding outliers - 942 stars left (next iteration limit 1036)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits -region wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-44-56_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0153.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_231520_TTUQ1b1x1_18143_O6zJA1Oy/wcs_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Ori-05-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out105350.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out105359.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out105361.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out105375.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out105378.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out105382.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out105383.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out105386.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out105656.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out105726.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out105517.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out105629.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 20s
Pre-generating preview images in parallel...
Done pre-generating preview images.
Pre-generating finding charts in parallel...
Done pre-generating finding charts.
make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105347_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 105347_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:45.08 -01:33:47.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105350_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 105350_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:52:39.76 -04:14:56.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.47, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.45)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.478 3224611284914224256 073.16472302321 -04.24913536651 14.8058 14.0120 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.478#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105359_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 105359_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:53:43.60 -05:54:18.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.41, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.39)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.062 3188224493782068096 073.43083172593 -05.90506637093 14.2905 13.7898 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.062#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105361_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 105361_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:56.23 -03:06:23.3 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.21, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.19)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.481 3224856166770796032 073.73360932995 -03.10636873245 14.1052 13.5868 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.481#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105363_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 105363_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:59:12.51 -03:45:35.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105373_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 105373_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:19:49.55 -07:00:14.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105374_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 105374_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:03.52 -05:20:57.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105375_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 105375_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:28.64 +00:13:34.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.88, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.86)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.614 3220881535314916864 083.36835998124 +00.22592065193 14.1489 13.5423 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.614#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105378_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 105378_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:48:38.02 -04:38:48.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.01, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.99)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.950 3200610698427710208 072.15761615208 -04.64699198697 13.9552 13.5023 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.950#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105381_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 105381_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:43:14.57 -00:23:10.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105382_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 105382_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:38:26.82 -02:47:51.6 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.97, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.95)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.806 3205021835999781888 069.61071118609 -02.79746437728 13.9554 13.4225 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.806#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105383_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 105383_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:36:23.20 -03:32:22.7 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.86, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.84)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.850 3215902018952885888 084.09615577692 -03.53957470883 13.9964 13.4898 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.850#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105385_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 105385_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:41:26.59 -04:35:12.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105386_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 105386_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:23.97 +01:53:00.1 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.65, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.63)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 0.641 3234993457821577216 076.59980989002 +01.88319526035 13.9294 13.2967 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#0.641#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105389_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 105389_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:55.72 +00:29:38.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105393_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 105393_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:06:55.59 -06:45:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105396_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 105396_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:34:25.76 -04:06:32.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105398_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 105398_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:04:32.94 -05:56:30.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105399_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 105399_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:54:16.64 -01:54:38.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105401_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 105401_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:46:44.49 -00:41:31.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105517_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
Preparing report for the candidate 105517_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105574_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 105574_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:32:09.18 -00:15:31.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bbsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105582_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 105582_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:43:36.37 -04:11:54.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105629_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
Preparing report for the candidate 105629_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105637_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 105637_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:50:30.64 -02:56:42.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105641_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 105641_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:12:20.91 -05:36:43.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105656_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 105656_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:14.06 -05:57:58.5 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=13.96, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=14.94)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 2.830 3209152666825373440 081.05780116953 -05.96613603780 14.3823 13.5825 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#2.830#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105726_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 105726_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:24:46.60 -05:27:11.2 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.15, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.13)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 3.637 3209315184091745920 081.19319150406 -05.45283143399 13.7117 12.8704 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#3.637#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9#
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105737_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 105737_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:26:58.52 -04:16:37.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 105812_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 105812_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:33:41.12 -03:24:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 63280_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 63280_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:29:35.99 -06:29:23.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 27716_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 27716_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:16:35.93 +00:25:01.1 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 62508_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 62508_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 05:37:00.18 -06:33:27.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 61248_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 61248_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:24.06 -06:55:48.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 85178_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 85178_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:55:02.00 -03:48:20.5 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 75547_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154
The candidate 75547_fd_Ori-05-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-45-50_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0154 did not pass the final checks