NMW transient search results

This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ

The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.

Processing fields Eri-01-Q1b1x1

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 02 11.17121    2461082.67121    12.25    03:06:56.19 -06:09:06.7   7638 5683   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    12.21    03:06:56.20 -06:09:06.8   7637 5683   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 02 11.1714  2461082.6714  12.23  03:06:56.19 -06:09:06.7
186.04143 -51.58497 galactic  Eri  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.1" and 1.1 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
130 Elektra                 -1     -1       2  12.6     0    0
Check this position in TNS.
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?) 2nd epoch FITS
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports Make finder charts with VaST

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 02 11.17121    2461082.67121    13.16    03:46:20.94 +02:57:47.9   1637 0218   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    13.16    03:46:20.98 +02:57:47.9   1636 0219   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 02 11.1714  2461082.6714  13.16  03:46:20.96 +02:57:47.9
184.41466 -38.22130 galactic  Tau  Second-epoch detections are separated by 0.5" and 1.2 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was found in astcheck.  
25 Phocaea                  1     -0       1  13.1    -0    0
Check this position in TNS.
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?) 2nd epoch FITS
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports Make finder charts with VaST

Date (UTC) JD(UTC) mag. R.A. & Dec.(J2000) X & Y (pix) Image
Discovery image 1   2026 02 11.17121    2461082.67121    14.40    03:52:26.75 -05:37:16.1   0774 5442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits
Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    14.23    03:52:26.38 -05:37:15.1   0774 5442   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images: 
                   2026 02 11.1714  2461082.6714  14.31  03:52:26.56 -05:37:15.6
194.73794 -41.92840 galactic  Eri  Second-epoch detections are separated by 5.7" and 0.5 pix   
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
 online_id        | target                       | 03:52:26.56 -05:37:15.6 (user input)  | T                | P                    |  (position from user input)                                                  
Check this position in TNS.
Search this object in SIMBAD.
Search this object in VizieR catalogs.  WISE atlas  Aladin Lite  SNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.

Full images (clouds? trees? ice on chip?) 2nd epoch FITS
Platesolve and blink FITS with VaST+ds9 VaST command line Re-run transient search script Stub MPC report (for online MPChecker) Stub TOCP report Stub variable star reports Make finder charts with VaST

Processing complete!

Total number of candidates identified: 3

Processing log:

Filtering log:

######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC= 
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 14.5
FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-01-17.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 100
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK= 
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= 500
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 3000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 2000
OMP_NUM_THREADS= 
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN= 
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION= 
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP= 
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION= 
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER= 
HOME= 
#######################################
SExtractor catalog cache: enabled, directory /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/vast_sextractor_cache
Reference image directory is set to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=vizquery (lib/vizquery -> VizieR vizier.cds.unistra.fr)
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory: 
Eri-01-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Eri-01-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Eri-01-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1402688 MB at /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 1402688 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits
Small preview (one of the new images): 
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.png' -> 'transient_report/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits_preview.png'
Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits

renamed 'Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.png' -> 'transient_report/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits_preview.png'
Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits


Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold. ---------------------------------------------- INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 695.3840 INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 558.1025 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1294.2525 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 658.3457 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1289.3482 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 563.4304 ---------------------------------------------- INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.86121 INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.168 ERROR: passing clouds (SD ratio=0.168 soft threshold=0.12) ---------------------------------------------- Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-01-17.fit EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits CCD-TEMP= -15.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits Header: 61 keys total, 10 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-02-10T22:06:22.6171537' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-02-11T04:06:22.6171537' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61082.171095104 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-02-11T04:06:32.5171771' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61082.1712096874 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 51.4256075460768 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -1.99985322929976 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 31.6311111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 242.703333333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.90196735315279 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1013.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.748239 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958391 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Eri-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '03 25 43' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-02 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 50: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 51: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 52: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 53: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 54: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 55: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 56: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 57: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 58: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 59: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 60: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 61: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-01-17.fit CCD-TEMP= -15.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits CCD-TEMP= -16.400000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-01-17.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-01-17.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/d_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits :) Spent 0.618157 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-01-17.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/d_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-01-17.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 28880.787099 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=20680.5, right_median=19489.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-01-17.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration SET-TEMP= -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint CCD-TEMP= -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature Exploring image header: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits CCD-TEMP= -15.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Header: 61 keys total, 10 keys left Record 0: "" status=0 Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0 Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0 Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0 Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0 Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0 Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0 Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0 Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0 Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0 Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-02-10T22:06:57.8194052' / Time of observation (local)" status=0 Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-02-11T04:06:57.8194052' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0 Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61082.1715025348 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0 Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-02-11T04:07:07.7226422' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0 Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61082.1716171526 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0 Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0 Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0 Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0 Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0 Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0 Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0 Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0 Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0 Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0 Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0 Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0 Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0 Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0 Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0 Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0 Record 31: "RA = 51.4256075637945 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0 Record 32: "DEC = -1.99985322440401 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0 Record 33: "CENTALT = 31.5263888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0 Record 34: "CENTAZ = 242.815277777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0 Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.90759110416903 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0 Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0 Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1013.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0 Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.748239 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0 Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958391 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0 Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0 Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0 Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0 Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0 Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0 Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Eri-01' / Name of the object of interest" status=0 Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '03 25 43' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0 Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '-02 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0 Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0 Record 49: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0 Record 50: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0 Record 51: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0 Record 52: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0 Record 53: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0 Record 54: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 55: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0 Record 56: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0 Record 57: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0 Record 58: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0 Record 59: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0 Record 60: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0 Record 61: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0 Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays... Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-01-17.fit CCD-TEMP= -15.000000 for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits CCD-TEMP= -16.400000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-01-17.fit Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-01-17.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/d_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits :) Spent 0.720140 seconds renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-01-17.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png' MegaDivider v7 Reading image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/d_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-01-17.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix Avarage count on flat field image: 28880.787099 Minimal real count (from overscan): 5 Output is written to /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits :) No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=20680.5, right_median=19489.0) renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2026-01-17.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png' Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:

after the calibration attempt: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:

fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits


fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits


Updating neverexclude_list.txt '/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt' Choosing bad regions list '/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst' wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461082.67121085 Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt '../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt' Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt '../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt' Plate-solving the images wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits' wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits' wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits' wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits exists and is non-empty Saving wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits to local_wcs_cache/ 'wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits' The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 03:25:28.507 -01:59:47.55 Second-epoch image center 03:25:42.836 -02:00:12.58 Angular distance between the image centers 0.06 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 03:25:28.507 -01:59:47.55 Second-epoch image center 03:25:42.459 -02:00:08.94 Angular distance between the image centers 0.06 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 03:25:42.836 -02:00:12.58 Second-epoch second image center 03:25:42.459 -02:00:08.94 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00187 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits &> /tmp/tmp.351FFQwGgJ Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kcTsJ3mYaP Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3KcGB3CPhz Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits &> /tmp/tmp.iUOfQRApfX Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits and wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits and wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits and wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits) and catalog (wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Matched with Tycho-2 3941 out of 7333 detected stars. util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.914371 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.914371 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.65 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.26 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.26 ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 2.0 pix Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits 2.0 pix Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits 2.2 pix fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits 2.2 pix fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.3 mag. Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits 15.3 mag. Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits 15.0 mag. fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits 15.0 mag. fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.0 (SNR ) 12.0 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 14.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.351FFQwGgJ (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=549, passed=7333 Got 7333 stars (including 6771 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7333 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.26" Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits -region wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.kcTsJ3mYaP (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=539, passed=7269 Got 7269 stars (including 6717 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 7269 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 977 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.29" Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.27" Excluding outliers - 977 stars left (next iteration limit 1074) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits -region wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.3KcGB3CPhz (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=3, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=470, passed=6310 Got 6310 stars (including 5833 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6310 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 974 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 974 stars left (next iteration limit 1071) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.iUOfQRApfX (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=459, passed=6313 Got 6313 stars (including 5845 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 6313 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 976 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 976 stars left (next iteration limit 1073) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits' Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) 'wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits' -> '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits' Preparing the HTML report for the field Eri-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out20387.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 6s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20350_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 20350_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    11.19    03:05:14.01 -06:26:44.6   7897 5863   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits **** FOUND 03:05:14.00 -06:26:45.0 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20383_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 20383_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    12.24    03:49:24.40 +00:44:34.4   1189 1573   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits **** FOUND 03:49:24.38 +00:44:34.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 20387_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 Preparing report for the candidate 20387_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 0s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 7s Prepared the HTML report for the field Eri-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 03:06:56.19 -06:09:06.7 wait *------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* 'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex' Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ./vast --norotation --noflagimage --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat to cache SExtractor catalog cache: saved Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat to cache VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The four input images were /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images Plate-solving the images wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits exists and is non-empty wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits exists and is non-empty The image scale is 5.90"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.9" and 8.9" ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 03:25:28.507 -01:59:47.55 Second-epoch image center 03:25:42.836 -02:00:12.58 Angular distance between the image centers 0.06 deg. Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy) Reference image center 03:25:28.507 -01:59:47.55 Second-epoch image center 03:25:42.459 -02:00:08.94 Angular distance between the image centers 0.06 deg. ################################### ################################### # Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images) Second-epoch first image center 03:25:42.836 -02:00:12.58 Second-epoch second image center 03:25:42.459 -02:00:08.94 Angular distance between the image centers 0.00187 deg. ################################### Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5... Preparing for ar aprallel run Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits &> /tmp/tmp.MpYa8eShSU Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits &> /tmp/tmp.srkrJXjyuG Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits &> /tmp/tmp.W9ifEtcRmc Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits &> /tmp/tmp.h48ygN7r3h Parallel run for /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Calibrating the magnitude scale Found non-empty wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits ____ Start of magnitude calibration ____ PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits and wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2 Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits and wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat Found non-empty wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits and wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat The reference image (wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits) and catalog (wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat) found 'wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat' Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18 Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19 Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt Matched with Tycho-2 4008 out of 39144 detected stars. util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.808610 a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.808610 From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.40 Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41 Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes Working... Please, PLEASE, be patient!!! All lightcurves processed! =) Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.41 ____ End of magnitude calibration ____ Applying consolidated magnitude filters... Preparing the exclusion lists for this field Done with filtering Found 62 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000) Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars: 1.9 pix Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits 1.9 pix Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits 2.1 pix fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits 2.1 pix fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Limiting magnitude estimates: 15.4 mag. Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits 15.4 mag. Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits 15.1 mag. fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits 15.1 mag. fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.1 (SNR ) 14.5 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50). This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image. The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here. The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images. This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list. The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 14.5 mag. Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver wait ############ /tmp/tmp.MpYa8eShSU (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=16, blended=1703, passed=39128 Got 39128 stars (including 37375 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 39128 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.28" Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits -region wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-08-35_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0220.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.srkrJXjyuG (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The guess is based on the existing WCS header. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits 573.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good. The input image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good... '/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits' -> 'wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits' FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=13, blended=1720, passed=39200 Got 39200 stars (including 37414 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 39200 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.4' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.4 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013075 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010460 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 970 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.30" Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits -region wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2025-12-22_23-09-13_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0221.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.W9ifEtcRmc (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=10, blended=1450, passed=33417 Got 33417 stars (including 31913 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33417 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 972 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35" Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Excluding outliers - 972 stars left (next iteration limit 1069) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations ############ /tmp/tmp.h48ygN7r3h (6) ############ Parsing command line arguments... The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um Internal estimated FoV 605.3' The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword. Trying to blindly solve the plate (local solve-field or remote server)... /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits 605.0 Entering WCS image calibration mode. ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits verification OK: /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve! FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits alredy exist and is non-empty... Catalog wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits found. The catalog is in the new format, as expected. The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=1418, passed=33377 Got 33377 stars (including 31903 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 33377 stars from the SExtractor catalog Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8' Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin UCAC5 catalog search parameters: catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec) catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00 catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50 catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec) ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32" Removing outliers... Correcting the measured astrometric positions... Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow! UCAC5 search strategy: trying local copy first Found a local copy of UCAC5 Reading UCAC5 zone files... Done reading UCAC5 zone files... Matched 973 stars with the local copy of UCAC5. The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34" Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31" Excluding outliers - 973 stars left (next iteration limit 1070) Stop iterations. The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :) The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat.ucac5 The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat.ds9.reg You may view it with the command: ds9 /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits -region wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat.ds9.reg The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0110.fits Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image) The destination file is already there - not rewriting /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/wcs_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Preparing the HTML report for the field Eri-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out52671.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52800.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out52966.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 1 (network queries): 21s Pre-generating preview images in parallel... Done pre-generating preview images. Pre-generating finding charts in parallel... Done pre-generating finding charts. make_report_in_HTML.sh Pre-generation: 1s xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52667_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52667_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    14.31    03:31:10.96 -00:53:30.4   3960 2535   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits **** FOUND 03:31:11.04 -00:53:29.2 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52671_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52671_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    14.45    03:31:28.66 -05:42:08.8   3944 5434   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits **** FOUND 03:31:28.65 -05:42:08.9 in Gaia DR2 single (GAIA_DR2_CLIENT=#vizquery#, MAG_MEAN=14.48, MAG_FAINT_SEARCH_LIMIT=15.46)GAIADR2_OUTPUT=# 1.610 3247496107618890368 052.86898280722 -05.70225367041 14.3101 13.8521 NOT_AVAILABLE#N_GAIA_STARS_WITIN_BLEND_SEARCH_RADIUS=#1#DISTANCE_ARCSEC=#1.610#MAX_ANGULAR_DISTANCE_BETWEEN_MEASURED_POSITION_AND_CATALOG_MATCH_ARCSEC=#5.9# xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52674_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52674_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    14.46    03:22:29.22 -03:13:05.4   5279 3921   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits **** FOUND 03:22:29.14 -03:13:05.6 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52677_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52677_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    13.19    03:12:36.21 -06:45:33.5   6784 6054   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits **** FOUND 03:12:36.20 -06:45:33.9 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52679_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52679_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    11.52    03:00:37.49 -01:56:21.8   8579 3126   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits **** FOUND 03:00:37.48 -01:56:21.8 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52720_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52720_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    12.19    03:50:16.21 -00:00:00.7   1063 2025   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52722_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52722_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    12.19    03:06:56.18 -06:09:06.7   7637 5683   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits **** FOUND 03:06:56.18 -06:09:06.7 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_local.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52738_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52738_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    12.69    02:54:53.21 -00:03:36.9   9456 1976   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52778_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52778_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    12.93    02:58:38.89 -05:08:07.1   8894 5066   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52782_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52782_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    12.98    03:50:28.15 +01:31:55.1   1019 1094   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52783_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52783_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    12.94    03:42:12.06 -03:50:25.8   2318 4332   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52784_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52784_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    13.02    02:56:02.18 +02:28:14.8   9274 0432   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52792_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52792_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    13.03    03:06:30.12 -05:22:36.2   7699 5212   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52800_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 Preparing report for the candidate 52800_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52812_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52812_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    13.29    03:04:15.84 -06:17:24.8   8043 5768   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52815_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52815_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    13.31    03:04:25.20 -02:50:27.7   8004 3675   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52818_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52818_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    13.49    03:42:21.99 -05:04:40.5   2301 5081   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52821_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52821_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    13.66    03:56:24.75 -01:03:04.7   0129 2673   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52824_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52824_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    13.26    03:13:43.88 -06:45:04.4   6614 6049   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52828_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52828_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    13.55    03:11:49.27 -06:35:28.3   6901 5951   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52831_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52831_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    13.68    03:01:40.31 +01:16:51.4   8410 1173   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52834_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52834_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    13.83    03:53:53.88 +03:07:33.1   0477 0121   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52836_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52836_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    13.70    03:34:06.56 -05:23:39.8   3547 5253   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52837_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52837_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    13.80    03:30:52.44 -06:28:11.2   4039 5898   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52838_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52838_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    13.67    03:55:48.35 -04:29:18.2   0250 4763   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52840_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52840_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    13.88    03:36:38.11 -06:12:24.7   3172 5751   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52855_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52855_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    13.94    03:31:08.18 -06:00:43.9   3997 5621   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52857_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52857_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    13.77    03:49:09.85 -01:51:24.4   1247 3148   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52858_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52858_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    13.75    03:02:00.17 -01:20:00.5   8367 2760   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits **** FOUND 03:02:00.18 -01:20:00.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52860_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52860_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    13.88    03:30:49.50 +01:07:13.7   4001 1322   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52861_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52861_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    14.10    03:54:53.35 +00:15:16.1   0352 1876   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52863_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52863_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    13.69    03:40:01.29 -06:43:48.6   2665 6078   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52867_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52867_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    13.77    03:10:42.44 +02:15:51.5   7031 0595   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52870_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52870_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    13.83    03:21:54.03 -05:00:20.6   5377 4998   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52871_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52871_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    13.85    03:33:09.16 +02:02:34.7   3644 0767   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52873_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52873_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    13.87    03:32:43.53 -04:03:14.7   3747 4441   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52874_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52874_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    13.78    03:08:11.28 +00:18:05.6   7420 1780   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52876_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52876_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    14.09    03:27:33.91 +01:57:34.4   4487 0810   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52883_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52883_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    14.01    03:44:01.56 -02:49:19.7   2035 3721   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52887_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52887_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    13.93    03:08:18.65 -02:14:15.3   7411 3314   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52888_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52888_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    14.34    03:01:05.39 +01:46:22.3   8498 0872   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.1 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52895_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52895_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    14.08    03:03:01.97 -03:17:49.0   8217 3950   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52900_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52900_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    14.22    03:15:39.03 -04:24:32.1   6313 4631   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52901_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52901_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    14.31    03:42:57.06 -05:08:10.9   2213 5118   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52904_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52904_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    14.29    03:21:56.11 +00:51:12.7   5341 1470   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52906_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52906_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    14.25    03:36:42.81 -06:00:49.3   3159 5634   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52910_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52910_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    14.09    03:07:58.51 +00:41:09.0   7451 1547   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52914_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52914_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    14.43    03:51:20.44 +01:41:31.9   0884 0997   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52918_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52918_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    14.53    03:38:56.39 -05:52:10.2   2823 5552   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52923_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52923_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    14.27    03:25:28.13 -01:17:40.6   4821 2769   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52924_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52924_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    14.39    03:44:04.24 -01:31:48.0   2019 2941   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52929_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52929_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    14.13    03:34:47.70 -06:36:21.2   3451 5989   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52931_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52931_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    14.30    03:48:18.91 +02:01:25.2   1344 0793   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits **** FOUND 03:48:18.93 +02:01:23.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt **** xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52932_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52932_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    14.18    02:55:25.93 +02:52:58.8   9367 0177   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52950_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52950_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    14.43    03:55:21.49 -00:12:39.8   0284 2160   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52960_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52960_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    14.33    02:56:48.90 -00:36:18.7   9160 2311   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52963_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52963_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    14.40    03:34:27.08 +01:27:57.3   3452 1118   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52966_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 Preparing report for the candidate 52966_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52972_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52972_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    14.26    03:56:16.75 -03:40:00.9   0171 4264   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52990_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52990_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    14.48    03:10:54.22 -06:31:03.2   7039 5906   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 52998_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 52998_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    14.32    03:04:01.08 +00:23:47.6   8054 1715   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.0 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Considering the candidate 53020_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 The candidate 53020_fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111 did not pass the final checks Discovery image 2   2026 02 11.17162    2461082.67162    14.32    02:58:26.19 -06:49:42.6   8934 6101   /data_ssd/NMW-TexasTech/workdir//img_2026-02-10_CI_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_222931_TTUQ1b1x1_11659_UiRw9BLQ/fd_Eri-01-Q1b1x1_2026-02-10_22-06-57_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0111.fits Rejecting candidate as there is no shift in pixel position (shift 0.3 pix) between the two second-epoch detections and REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES is set to 'yes' make_report_in_HTML.sh Phase 2 (HTML assembly): 1s make_report_in_HTML.sh TOTAL: 23s Prepared the HTML report for the field Eri-01-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL *------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------* #### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt #### 03:06:56.19 -06:09:06.7 03:46:20.96 +02:57:47.9 03:52:26.56 -05:37:15.6 ########### Completed Eri-01-Q1b1x1 ########### The analysis was running at tau We are allowed to update the exclusion list at tau host Found ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt #### The exclusion list before filtering-out asteroids, bad pixels and adding Gaia sources #### 03:06:56.19 -06:09:06.7 03:46:20.96 +02:57:47.9 03:52:26.56 -05:37:15.6 ################################################################################### 03:06:56.19 -06:09:06.7 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 03:46:20.96 +02:57:47.9 -- asteroid (will NOT add it to exclusion list) 03:52:26.56 -05:37:15.6 -- not an asteroid (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_noasteroids' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' 03:52:26.56 -05:37:15.6 -- does not seem to be a hot pixel (will add it to exclusion list) renamed 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt_nohotpixels' -> 'exclusion_list_index_html.txt' # Count candidates with no identification (that also don't look like hot pix) 03:52:26.56 -05:37:15.6 -- not a known variable star Found 1 unidentified candidates (excluding asteroids, hot pixels and known variable stars). ################################################################################### 1 candidates found (excluding asteroids and hot pixels) This does not look like a test run ################################################################################### Adding identified Gaia sources from exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt exclusion_list_apass.txt NOT FOUND IS_THIS_TEST_RUN= NO ALLOW_EXCLUSION_LIST_UPDATE= YES #### Adding the following to the exclusion list #### 03:52:26.56 -05:37:15.6 03:31:28.65 -05:42:08.9 #################################################### The observatory MPC code is 500 ############################################################ Positions of planets computed with util/planet_finder/main.py for JD(UT)2461082.67121085 -observatory 500 22:35:30.47 -09:38:32.0 Mercury (-1.1mag) 22:12:36.83 -12:38:10.6 Venus (-3.9mag) 21:08:31.24 -17:33:07.7 Mars (1.1mag) 07:09:29.28 +22:47:57.7 Jupiter (-2.6mag) 00:00:56.89 -02:14:41.5 Saturn (1.0mag) 03:39:29.56 +19:19:51.6 Uranus (5.7mag) 00:02:21.39 -01:10:26.8 Neptune (7.8mag) 20:27:43.02 -23:02:57.9 Pluto (14.6mag) 16:29:30.85 -27:07:33.4 Moon (-9.9mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 362 Feb 10 22:35 planets.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected moons from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461082.67121085: 07:09:21.69 +22:48:14.8 Io (5.3mag) 07:09:34.25 +22:47:50.5 Europa (5.5mag) 07:09:41.64 +22:47:24.9 Ganymede (4.8mag) 07:09:49.40 +22:47:07.1 Callisto (6.0mag) 07:11:39.08 +23:08:37.7 Himalia (15.0mag) 07:09:23.32 +22:48:08.9 Thebe (15.8mag) 07:11:18.48 +23:10:46.2 Elara (17.0mag) 07:04:32.41 +24:01:36.2 Pasiphae (17.0mag) 07:18:30.17 +22:32:29.3 Carme (18.0mag) 00:00:56.50 -02:14:24.9 Titan (8.7mag) 00:00:53.20 -02:14:29.4 Rhea (10.0mag) 00:00:30.55 -02:16:23.4 Iapetus (11.5mag) 00:01:03.92 -02:14:31.8 Hyperion (14.7mag) 00:03:02.94 -02:01:14.4 Phoebe (16.8mag) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 569 Feb 10 22:35 moons.txt ############################################################ Positions of selected spacecraft from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461082.67121085: 07:34:21.82 +22:39:43.7 JWST 19:42:50.59 +06:00:20.7 Chandra 07:36:29.23 -19:54:02.2 XMM-Newton -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 96 Feb 10 22:35 spacecraft.txt ############################################################ Positions of bright comets (listed at http://astro.vanbuitenen.nl/comets and http://aerith.net/comet/weekly/current.html ) from JPL HORIZONS for JD(UT)2461082.67121085 at 500 16:38:33.60 -10:49:17.2 17.8mag 10P/Tempel 03:28:08.14 +28:22:42.0 18.1mag 123P/West-Hartley 20:44:38.50 -10:25:23.1 22.4mag 141P/Machholz 00:57:14.68 +08:45:36.3 17.5mag 145P/Shoemaker-Levy 5 11:12:56.41 +29:07:33.1 17.8mag 164P/Christensen 09:39:25.37 -34:08:16.9 18.0mag 195P/Hill 15:50:38.40 -07:30:16.0 18.4mag 210P/Christensen 17:25:02.77 -21:36:25.9 17.4mag 218P/LINEAR 16:01:52.09 -18:17:15.9 15.2mag 235P/LINEAR 03:42:02.60 +25:37:49.4 17.5mag 240P/NEAT 15:00:45.88 +07:37:14.6 14.6mag 24P/Schaumasse 23:51:53.25 +04:03:43.4 18.0mag 261P/Larson 11:27:39.00 -03:36:50.3 17.4mag 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann 1 01:06:06.15 +01:17:49.2 18.9mag 302P/Lemmon-PanSTARRS 07:07:09.63 +27:15:47.6 19.7mag 407P/PanSTARRS-Fuls 16:47:46.51 -11:17:54.4 17.5mag 40P/Vaisala 1 11:08:46.01 -09:17:24.9 16.6mag 43P/Wolf-Harrington 13:22:15.70 -05:01:58.6 19.4mag 489P/Denning 04:27:28.44 +49:30:32.3 17.7mag 493P/2024 Q2 (LONEOS) 06:02:44.79 +49:29:01.6 17.9mag 63P/Wild 1 22:53:01.06 -04:04:58.4 16.3mag 78P/Gehrels 2 19:20:12.10 -23:34:47.1 15.1mag 88P/Howell 15:21:17.24 -28:04:45.6 18.7mag P/2023 S1 (PanSTARRS) 04:43:19.89 -73:12:46.3 16.5mag C/2014 UN271 (Bernardinelli-Bernstein) 05:31:55.54 +31:10:55.2 18.1mag C/2017 K2 (PanSTARRS) 20:00:07.52 -64:54:55.6 18.1mag C/2020 V2 (ZTF) 17:16:32.09 +03:15:30.2 16.3mag C/2021 G2 (ATLAS) 22:45:19.01 +28:39:01.8 16.8mag C/2022 E2 (ATLAS) 03:27:34.73 +24:25:41.2 15.6mag C/2022 N2 (PANSTARRS) 09:12:17.32 +28:51:14.7 15.3mag C/2022 QE78 (ATLAS) 08:39:19.46 -07:52:04.6 16.6mag C/2022 R6 (PanSTARRS) 23:39:21.00 +48:04:54.6 17.9mag C/2023 C2 (ATLAS) 10:03:24.94 -22:13:34.5 17.5mag C/2023 F3 (ATLAS) 20:11:36.85 +61:17:58.5 17.2mag C/2023 H5 (Lemmon) 19:32:41.70 -03:16:46.9 16.1mag C/2023 R1 (PANSTARRS) 02:45:40.47 +35:48:10.0 18.5mag C/2023 RS61 (PanSTARRS) 20:41:23.28 +81:16:05.2 18.0mag C/2023 X2 (Lemmon) 06:57:29.52 +63:21:20.3 17.2mag C/2024 A1 (ATLAS) 00:19:42.11 -37:55:10.6 10.8mag C/2024 E1 (Wierzchos) 11:53:09.39 -04:34:07.6 18.1mag C/2024 G2 (ATLAS) 19:17:29.60 +00:19:34.0 19.0mag C/2024 G4 (PanSTARRS) 16:36:53.85 -03:04:23.2 17.8mag C/2024 G6 (ATLAS) 19:45:41.14 +01:20:09.2 15.7mag C/2024 J3 (ATLAS) 02:42:03.44 -33:39:33.8 15.4mag C/2024 T5 (ATLAS) 16:48:08.17 -53:55:47.0 15.2mag C/2025 A6 (Lemmon) 04:56:08.69 +66:40:41.9 16.7mag C/2025 J1 (Borisov) 00:00:00.00 +00:00:00.0 cannot get JPL HORIZONS ephemerides for non-periodic comet C/2025 K1 (ATLAS) 16:01:23.59 -20:52:14.9 15.0mag C/2025 L1 (ATLAS) 02:11:57.37 -17:26:38.2 16.6mag C/2025 Q3 (ATLAS) 01:55:29.69 +16:13:00.8 20.7mag C/2025 R2 (SWAN) 22:17:06.61 +17:32:52.1 16.8mag C/2025 R3 (PANSTARRS) 21:33:59.14 -14:26:06.5 20.3mag C/2025 T1 (ATLAS) 03:34:08.59 -25:37:04.1 17.5mag C/2026 A1 (MAPS) 20:21:44.85 +15:42:54.8 16.6mag C/2026 B2 (Sun-Gao) -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 2.7K Feb 10 22:36 comets.txt ############################################################ List of recent ASAS-SN transients from https://www.astronomy.ohio-state.edu/asassn/transients.html : 04:43:45.47 -15:49:01.00 SN2026azr 2026-02-5.24 16.96 06:14:48.48 -34:20:08.90 ASASSN-26ap 2026-02-5.2 13.77 02:42:33.90 -27:21:02.60 SN 2026aip 2026-02-4.09 15.85 00:43:12.26 +38:35:47.90 AT2026brt 2026-02-3.12 14.92 14:34:27.21 +21:56:59.90 SN2026atb 2026-01-29.32 15.59 13:12:04.11 -60:56:12.40 ASASSN-26ao 2026-01-28.35 15.61 13:00:36.49 -06:28:26.00 SN2026azd 2026-01-28.23 15.69 10:33:50.27 -31:00:53.40 SN 2026ayz 2026-01-25.11 15.3 05:14:22.36 -60:47:20.70 SN 2026apb 2026-01-24.08 17.35 06:39:26.57 -21:49:19.60 AT2026afe 2026-01-23.11 16.17 09:27:23.49 -32:00:30.90 SN 2023kuy 2026-01-21.16 15.43 09:38:44.42 -20:00:54.30 SN2026afi 2026-01-20.24 17.43 06:30:51.41 -74:35:46.80 AT2026ahr 2026-01-20.09 16.98 13:33:03.15 -16:14:28.70 SN2026amc 2026-01-20.29 16.9 06:57:11.13 -17:24:42.80 ASASSN-26an 2026-01-19.31 13.99 17:41:29.59 +68:57:34.90 2026abj 2026-01-18.64 17.02 10:22:24.99 +04:00:02.20 SN 2026kc 2026-01-18.61 16.1 12:42:03.30 +00:41:41.80 SN 2026pg 2026-01-18.5 17.44 03:36:21.80 -31:44:39.30 AT2025aibn 2026-01-17.04 16.7 13:45:00.71 -32:34:53.00 AT2026yi 2026-01-17.26 16.22 09:27:07.17 +62:45:24.20 AT2026nu 2026-01-17.29 17.09 12:38:41.73 +07:36:37.40 SN 2025afcr 2026-01-17.49 17.11 12:12:12.65 +13:13:18.50 SN 2026acd 2026-01-17.3 16.15 16:21:54.73 -63:36:53.10 ASASSN-26al 2026-01-17.36 15.34 15:33:45.22 -22:11:07.90 ASASSN-26aj 2026-01-16.51 14 12:27:08.33 -58:19:36.10 ASASSN-26ak 2026-01-16.2 13.94 17:21:53.10 +04:39:07.10 ASASSN-26ai 2026-01-16.67 14.83 14:46:54.08 -64:04:30.10 ASASSN-26ah 2026-01-15.07 16.84 23:02:43.24 +20:04:53.00 SN2025ajvh 2026-01-15.07 16.03 14:12:27.38 -30:12:29.10 ASASSN-26ag 2026-01-14.27 15.35 14:33:53.58 +05:27:35.40 SN 2025ajnc 2026-01-14.32 15.79 01:43:00.31 -34:11:40.60 AT2025afcm 2026-01-13.08 0.45 00:26:17.71 -52:11:38.60 AT2025ahal 2026-01-11.06 17.57 00:51:36.17 +29:42:40.10 SN2025ahxd 2026-01-11.21 15 10:19:19.14 -37:54:58.30 AT2025ahrt 2026-01-10.26 -0.54 14:37:48.78 +15:51:04.20 SN2025ajng 2026-01-9.42 16.35 05:01:03.70 -08:34:13.20 SN2026A 2026-01-9.28 16.83 00:02:52.11 +13:05:42.90 SN2025ajvg 2026-01-9.13 15.89 08:37:09.62 -02:18:08.80 SN2025aigm 2026-01-9.55 17.66 09:52:50.71 +39:36:55.70 SN2025ahyt 2026-01-9.37 16.97 11:22:19.08 -27:21:40.90 AT2026ta 2026-01-9.32 15.88 14:35:00.21 +00:59:11.40 SN 2025ahsa 2026-01-8.35 -2 09:25:42.42 +22:20:06.10 SN2025ahkt 2026-01-8.03 15.88 22:39:53.44 +34:53:50.00 SN 2025aikz 2026-01-7.09 16.3 08:21:20.95 +20:52:01.60 SN 2025aiks 2026-01-7.13 15.82 07:35:31.38 +09:10:32.40 AT2025ajvk 2026-01-7.12 -1.82 02:50:07.71 -16:37:02.30 AT2026nl 2026-01-7.16 14.19 14:05:12.75 -33:46:00.80 SN 2025ajmj 2026-01-7.31 14.93 12:35:08.33 +28:03:22.70 SN 2025aiaj 2026-01-5.44 15.76 05:30:00.47 -66:43:29.40 ASASSN-26af 2026-01-5.12 14.38 14:05:05.13 -44:14:24.00 ASASSN-26ac 2026-01-5.3 16.01 11:29:16.57 +20:35:09.00 AT2025alco 2026-01-4.39 15.93 16:42:59.28 +26:21:02.80 ASASSN-26ae 2026-01-4.52 14.31 04:13:46.52 -05:02:18.30 ASASSN-26ad 2026-01-4.1 14.57 05:00:01.32 -57:14:29.70 ASASSN-25fj/ASASSN-26ab 2026-01-1.19 13.38 13:53:51.35 -17:55:38.10 ASASSN-25fg 2025-12-23.33 16.66 06:18:15.27 +15:47:38.10 AT2025ahtd 2025-12-23.31 16.96 07:20:53.12 -33:02:58.20 SN 2025agvw 2025-12-23.32 16.84 02:58:15.63 +44:47:45.80 ASASSN-25fh 2025-12-23.13 15.63 04:51:03.78 -36:13:59.00 AT2025aftm 2025-12-20.14 17.35 03:12:59.31 +17:41:45.20 SN2025afzm 2025-12-20.15 17.22 13:33:14.27 -46:03:33.90 ASASSN-25fc 2025-12-19.32 SDSS 07:07:30.84 +24:37:55.60 SN2025agie 2025-12-19.19 16.96 12:31:24.34 -59:07:09.00 ASASSN-25fd 2025-12-19.06 14.94 14:02:20.59 -20:28:28.70 ASASSN-25fe 2025-12-19.34 SDSS 08:08:51.65 -16:39:31.50 ASASSN-25ff 2025-12-19.22 SDSS 00:34:05.69 +05:21:07.50 SN2025afty 2025-12-18.21 16.92 01:35:25.55 -05:40:42.00 AT2025agsf 2025-12-18.12 17.67 06:12:00.84 -46:50:40.70 AT2025aetd 2025-12-15.08 17.32 11:07:12.05 -55:12:59.00 ASASSN-25fa 2025-12-14.25 16.07 02:48:09.78 +37:45:17.90 AT2025afje 2025-12-13.28 17.65 08:17:38.99 +59:57:25.90 SN2025afcy 2025-12-13.43 16.8 22:58:25.70 +26:38:19.80 SN 2025afve 2025-12-12.1 16.63 03:44:52.10 -59:08:22.80 SN 2025aegk 2025-12-12.1 SDSS 04:55:47.45 -18:56:49.70 SN 2025aetg 2025-12-11.36 16.92 23:15:07.77 +13:10:19.80 SN 2025afwb 2025-12-11.2 17.13 02:19:39.33 -45:39:00.60 SN 2025aeqg 2025-12-10.07 16.77 02:03:03.89 +04:14:37.30 SN2025afih 2025-12-8.1 16.49 22:23:03.49 -56:35:57.50 AT2025aeei 2025-12-8.03 16.01 07:40:22.22 -10:00:59.30 AT2025aftz 2025-12-8.46 15.46 18:44:55.93 +47:57:37.60 ASASSN-25ez 2025-12-3.07 15.16 22:41:03.48 +38:58:01.90 ASASSN-25ey 2025-11-26.08 15.68 05:50:46.62 +58:54:53.50 SN 2025aedz 2025-11-24.25 16.66 06:35:50.19 -71:30:42.00 SN 2025adwn 2025-11-24.11 17.58 02:21:35.59 -14:18:04.90 AT2025aeft 2025-11-23.13 16.82 01:42:47.75 +12:31:45.10 AT2025aduf 2025-11-23.15 17.49 06:36:40.46 +33:18:26.10 ASASSN-25ev 2025-11-23.36 14.76 19:35:04.58 -21:08:37.40 ASASSN-25ex 2025-11-23.04 14.77 07:17:55.62 -09:26:55.10 ASASSN-25eu 2025-11-22.31 15.99 02:27:04.39 +55:22:14.40 ASASSN-25ew 2025-11-21.17 15.35 05:14:45.06 -14:26:58.00 SN 2025acrr 2025-11-20.08 17.05 23:07:18.85 +42:11:56.20 SN 2025acsn 2025-11-18.12 15.92 02:07:09.66 -09:01:32.00 SN2025acgk 2025-11-17.35 17.33 08:17:39.75 +04:36:51.80 AT 2025advo 2025-11-17.21 16.51 20:24:44.64 -50:23:02.20 SN 2025abnf 2025-11-16.03 15.61 04:22:41.06 -51:28:58.10 SN 2025aczu 2025-11-16.24 17.11 01:58:23.18 -29:19:37.10 AT 2025adsr 2025-11-16.07 17.18 02:15:50.04 -59:55:41.50 SN 2025acvj 2025-11-14.32 16.99 00:09:53.24 +03:36:48.20 SN 2025abuj 2025-11-14.09 16.79 13:28:48.71 +38:44:48.10 ASASSN-25et 2025-11-14.51 -2.76 -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 6.3K Feb 10 22:35 asassn_transients_list.txt ############################################################ Truncated list of TOCP transients from http://www.cbat.eps.harvard.edu/unconf/tocp.html : 00:42:28.44 +41:18:24.5 TCP J00422844+4118245 2025-12-22.8736 18.5mag 16:42:59.22 +26:21:02.0 TCP J16425922+2621020 2025-12-26.8538 13.0mag 08:08:08.72 -19:48:46.5 TCP J08080872-1948465 2025-12-27.7904 16.66Cmag 00:42:58.48 +41:08:11.4 PNV J00425848+4108114 2025-12-28.7654 18.9mag 07:35:31.47 +09:10:34.1 TCP J07353147+0910341 2025-12-29.7527 14.77Cmag 14:45:58.45 +39:05:10.3 TCP J14455845+3905103 2025-12-30.8196 14.1mag 00:43:23.44 +41:24:35.7 PNV J00432344+4124357 2025-12-11.684 19.7mag 00:41:01.11 +41:59:28.2 PNV J00410111+4159282 2026-01-06.1994 18.7mag 00:42:52.01 +41:14:29.2 PNV J00425201+4114292 2026-01-08.7863 18.37Cmag 02:50:07.72 -16:37:02.3 TCP J02500772-1637023 2026-01-06.6352 14.53Cmag 00:42:58.52 +41:14:44.2 PNV J00425852+4114442 2026-01-13.4991 16.89Cmag 14:47:33.95 -10:02:56.8 TCP J14473395-1002568 2026-01-13.8185 14.0mag 15:33:45.28 -22:11:07.3 TCP J15334528-2211073 2026-01-16.8451 14.9mag 22:34:01.26 +39:53:32.8 TCP J22340126+3953328 2026-01-17.5738 16.79Cmag 00:42:52.36 +41:16:13.3 PNV J00425236+4116133 2026-01-18.5502 17.41Cmag 06:57:11.19 -17:24:43.9 TCP J06571119-1724439 2026-01-18.5375 14.2mag 00:42:52.23 +41:01:44.7 PNV J00425223+4101447 2026-01-19.5505 18.74Cmag 09:54:46.47 +69:06:31.7 PNV J09544647+6906317 2026-01-26.8081 19.3mag 18:08:51.99 -26:16:21.9 TCP J18085199-2616219 2026-01-31.8519 12.2mag 08:01:11.02 -03:43:14.1 TCP J08011102-0343141 2026-02-08.8090 15.10Cmag -rw-r--r-- 1 apache apache 186K Feb 10 22:35 tocp_transients_list.txt

Profiling:

CPU temperature: 89 C