This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461058.7894,13.13,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260118.2894 13.13CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 04:02:48.32 +71:44:53.4 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0285_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0284_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0285_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0284_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461058.7894,12.36,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260118.2894 12.36CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 03:56:30.54 +68:51:25.1 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0285_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0284_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0285_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0284_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 01 18.2894 2461058.7894 12.78 03:47:34.98 +71:40:32.6
135.91445 13.39767 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.8" and 6.9 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 543297012007204864 | 03:47:37.62 +71:41:13.3 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Check this position in TNS.Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 543297012007204864,2461058.7894,12.78,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 543297012007204864 20260118.2894 12.78CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 03:47:34.98 +71:40:32.6 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0285_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0284_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0285_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0284_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461058.7894,13.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260118.2894 13.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 03:39:06.16 +72:32:46.6 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0285_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0284_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0285_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0284_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 01 18.2894 2461058.7894 13.26 03:36:38.51 +74:56:35.9
133.17913 15.46458 galactic Cas Second-epoch detections are separated by 4.3" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 544914187452032512 | 03:36:30.76 +74:56:51.1 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Check this position in TNS.Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 01 18.2894* 03 36 38.51 +74 56 35.9 13.3 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 544914187452032512,2461058.7894,13.26,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 544914187452032512 20260118.2894 13.26CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 03:36:38.51 +74:56:35.9 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0285_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0284_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0285_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0284_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461058.7894,13.28,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260118.2894 13.28CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 03:38:54.44 +72:20:28.2 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0285_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0284_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0285_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0284_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 01 18.2894 2461058.7894 13.48 03:43:14.78 +71:23:46.9
135.82084 12.96451 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 6.1" and 7.1 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 543274162780514944 | 03:43:10.57 +71:24:25.5 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE J-Ks=0.608+/-0.037 (K)
Check this position in TNS.Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 543274162780514944,2461058.7894,13.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 543274162780514944 20260118.2894 13.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 03:43:14.78 +71:23:46.9 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0285_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0284_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0285_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0284_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J041944.96+713510.4,2461058.7894,13.48,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J041944.96+713510.4 20260118.2894 13.48CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 04:19:44.27 +71:35:05.2 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0285_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0284_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0285_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0284_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461058.7894,13.37,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260118.2894 13.37CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 03:34:47.95 +68:14:07.8 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0285_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0284_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0285_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0284_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 489917887142564224,2461058.7894,13.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 489917887142564224 20260118.2894 13.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 04:02:25.40 +66:01:47.6 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0285_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0284_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0285_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0284_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461058.7894,13.56,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260118.2894 13.56CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 04:01:24.05 +70:57:48.7 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0285_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0284_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0285_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0284_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461058.7894,13.63,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260118.2894 13.63CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 03:50:52.28 +66:22:18.1 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0285_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0284_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0285_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0284_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461058.7894,13.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260118.2894 13.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 03:45:44.05 +74:39:46.1 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0285_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0284_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0285_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0284_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
ZTF J040209.43+704538.1,2461058.7894,13.70,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
ZTF J040209.43+704538.1 20260118.2894 13.70CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 04:02:09.12 +70:45:34.4 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0285_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0284_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0285_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0284_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461058.7894,13.62,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260118.2894 13.62CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 04:05:43.31 +73:29:22.9 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0285_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0284_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0285_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0284_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461058.7894,13.57,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260118.2894 13.57CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 03:37:58.76 +69:47:17.1 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0285_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0284_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0285_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0284_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461058.7894,13.71,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260118.2894 13.71CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 03:50:56.57 +68:24:20.3 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0285_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0284_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0285_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0284_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
TCP 2026 01 18.2894* 03 38 03.79 +73 10 58.8 13.6 U Cas 9 0
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461058.7894,13.55,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260118.2894 13.55CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 03:38:03.79 +73:10:58.8 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0285_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0284_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0285_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0284_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Processing complete!
Total number of candidates identified: 18
Processing log:
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.82849338 23.12.2025 07:52:51.828 /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
First image: 2461032.82849338 23.12.2025 07:52:51.828 /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Last image: 2461058.78975471 18.01.2026 06:57:04.807 /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 7
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 29 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 16459
Objects passed selection criteria: 16450
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.8 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 15945.8
Average stars matched: 15525.8 (97.3661 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 117592 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20251122 p4) 15.2.1 20251122
VaST compiled on Wed Jan 14 09:05:05 CST 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-183-g45c3f81a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-01-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jan 18 01:38:58 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.82849338 23.12.2025 07:52:51.828 /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
First image: 2461032.82849338 23.12.2025 07:52:51.828 /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Last image: 2461058.78975471 18.01.2026 06:57:04.807 /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 256
FILTER key from ref. img. header: CV
Magnitude scale: instrumental
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 0
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 262 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 2.1 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 2.1 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 114960
Objects passed selection criteria: 114687
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 110775
Average stars matched: 106510 (96.1501 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 1894824 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20251122 p4) 15.2.1 20251122
VaST compiled on Wed Jan 14 09:05:05 CST 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-183-g45c3f81a
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-01-14)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Sun Jan 18 01:57:43 CST 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Filtering log:
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 14.5
FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2025-12-22.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 25
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= 500
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 3000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 2000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= yes
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 0
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE= no
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
Reference image directory is set to /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Cam-06-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cam-06-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cam-06-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 405515 MB at /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 405515 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits_preview.png'
Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
renamed 'Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits_preview.png'
Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 616.8181
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 663.8512
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1053.0510
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 671.5885
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1052.7384
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 671.4172
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 1.70723
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.000
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2025-12-22.fit
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
Exploring image header: /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
CCD-TEMP= -15.000000 for /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Header: 61 keys total, 10 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-01-18T00:56:10.7119490' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-01-18T06:56:10.7119490' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61058.2890128586 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-01-18T06:56:20.6145897' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61058.289127477 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 67.0697928060831 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 70.1566423224035 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 44.0788888888889 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 338.178888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.4360106177099 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1013.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.748239 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958391 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 48 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 50: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 51: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 52: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 53: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 54: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 55: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 56: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 57: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 58: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 59: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 60: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 61: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-01-08.fit
CCD-TEMP= -15.000000 for /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
CCD-TEMP= -15.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-01-08.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-01-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/d_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits :)
Spent 0.467878 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-01-08.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/d_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2025-12-22.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 38918.354428
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=27736.5, right_median=26453.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2025-12-22.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
Exploring image header: /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
CCD-TEMP= -15.000000 for /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
Header: 61 keys total, 10 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-01-18T00:57:04.8074118' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-01-18T06:57:04.8074118' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61058.28963897 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-01-18T06:57:14.7101435' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61058.2897535879 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 67.0697928723468 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 70.1566422814963 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 44.0091666666667 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 338.135833333333 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.43781172329949 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1013.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.748239 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958391 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 48 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 50: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 51: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 52: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 53: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 54: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 55: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 56: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 57: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 58: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 59: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 60: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 61: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-01-08.fit
CCD-TEMP= -15.000000 for /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
CCD-TEMP= -15.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-01-08.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-01-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/d_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits :)
Spent 0.483581 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-01-08.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/d_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2025-12-22.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 38918.354428
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=27736.5, right_median=26453.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2025-12-22.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461058.78912860
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits'
wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits'
The image scale is 5.84"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.8" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:47:48.196 +70:00:29.12
Second-epoch image center 04:47:39.429 +70:00:53.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:47:48.196 +70:00:29.12
Second-epoch image center 04:48:03.536 +70:00:32.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.02 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:47:39.429 +70:00:53.71
Second-epoch second image center 04:48:03.536 +70:00:32.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.03482 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vx2KU0vFHB
Parallel run for /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits &> /tmp/tmp.DYqSikiAqS
Parallel run for /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits &> /tmp/tmp.WWkR6mq1GT
Parallel run for /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits &> /tmp/tmp.Q5nP5iA3ro
Parallel run for /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Matched with Tycho-2 58 out of 16183 detected stars.
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.881698
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.881698
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.62
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.26
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 15.26
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Filter-out faint candidates...
Filter-out suspiciously bright candidates...
Filter-out candidates with large difference between measured mags in one epoch...
Filter-out small-amplitude flares...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 7 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
2.1 pix Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
15.3 mag. Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
15.2 mag. Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
15.2 mag. fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 15.2 (SNR ) 12.2 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 14.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.vx2KU0vFHB (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate...
/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
verification OK: /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat
The fraction of blended stars is high!
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1300, passed=16183
Got 16183 stars (including 14865 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16183 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 931.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 931.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012935 (46.6 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010348 (37.3 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 292 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.79"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.09"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 360 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.02"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.56"
Excluding outliers - 323 stars left (next iteration limit 245)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.DYqSikiAqS (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate...
/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
verification OK: /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
The fraction of blended stars is high!
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1282, passed=16167
Got 16167 stars (including 14867 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16167 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.WWkR6mq1GT (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate...
/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
verification OK: /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.cat
The fraction of blended stars is high!
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1210, passed=15892
Got 15892 stars (including 14659 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15892 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 931.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 931.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012936 (46.6 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010349 (37.3 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 283 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.39"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.15"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 342 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.08"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.70"
Excluding outliers - 304 stars left (next iteration limit 239)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.Q5nP5iA3ro (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate...
/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
verification OK: /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.cat
The fraction of blended stars is high!
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1242, passed=15885
Got 15885 stars (including 14626 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 15885 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.34"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits' -> '/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits' -> '/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out21054.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21022_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 21022_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (93.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21054_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 21054_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (265.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21060_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 21060_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (171.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21071_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 21071_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (192.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21073_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 21073_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (161.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21080_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 21080_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (331.0") between the two second-epoch detections
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 0 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list_bsc.txt
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list_tycho2.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.84"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.8" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:47:48.196 +70:00:29.12
Second-epoch image center 04:47:39.429 +70:00:53.71
Angular distance between the image centers 0.01 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:47:48.196 +70:00:29.12
Second-epoch image center 04:48:03.536 +70:00:32.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.02 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the first and the second second-epoch image (shift should be applied between the second-epoch images)
Second-epoch first image center 04:47:39.429 +70:00:53.71
Second-epoch second image center 04:48:03.536 +70:00:32.81
Angular distance between the image centers 0.03482 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits &> /tmp/tmp.V1zSVYHSID
Parallel run for /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits &> /tmp/tmp.234oAFjtZd
Parallel run for /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits &> /tmp/tmp.5D3Ebd8Or0
Parallel run for /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits &> /tmp/tmp.87HV5SVCI2
Parallel run for /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Matched with Tycho-2 85 out of 113524 detected stars.
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 21.485425
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=21.485425
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.31
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.18
Updated vast_limiting_magnitude.log with calibrated magnitudes
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 14.18
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Filter-out faint candidates...
Filter-out suspiciously bright candidates...
Filter-out candidates with large difference between measured mags in one epoch...
Filter-out small-amplitude flares...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 248 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
1.9 pix Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
2.0 pix fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
2.0 pix fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
Limiting magnitude estimates:
14.2 mag. Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
14.2 mag. Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
14.1 mag. fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 14.1 (SNR ) 13.4 (80% of stars) with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The first estimate is the magnitude of a star detected with a signal-to-noise ratio of following Karpov (2025, Acta Polytechnica, 65, 50).
This value should be representative of the faintest stars clearly visible in the image.
The brighter of the limiting magnitude estimates for the two second-epoch images is reported here.
The second estimate is the 80th percentile of the magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images.
This value is representative of the faintest object that may enter the candidate transients list.
The hard cut-off for the candidate transients is 14.5 mag.
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.V1zSVYHSID (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate...
/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
verification OK: /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat
The fraction of blended stars is high!
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=31, blended=9713, passed=113493
Got 113493 stars (including 103609 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 113493 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 931.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 931.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012935 (46.6 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010348 (37.3 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 303 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 368 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.45"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.59"
Excluding outliers - 329 stars left (next iteration limit 266)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.234oAFjtZd (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate...
/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
verification OK: /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits'
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
The fraction of blended stars is high!
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=9545, passed=112768
Got 112768 stars (including 103038 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 112768 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/reference_imgs/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.5D3Ebd8Or0 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate...
/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
verification OK: /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.cat
The fraction of blended stars is high!
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=28, blended=9344, passed=109534
Got 109534 stars (including 100000 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 109534 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 931.4'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 931.4 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012936 (46.6 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010349 (37.3 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 290 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.47"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.31"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 341 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.31"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.62"
Excluding outliers - 306 stars left (next iteration limit 255)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.87HV5SVCI2 (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate...
/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
verification OK: /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.cat
The fraction of blended stars is high!
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=21, blended=9256, passed=109822
Got 109822 stars (including 100384 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 109822 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 971 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 970 stars left (next iteration limit 1067)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.fits
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
INFO: FPACK_FULLY_CALIBRATED_IMAGE=no (not compressing the image)
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-18_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_012446_TTUQ1b1x1_8227_dZsPIzGa/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.fits
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out134135.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out133092.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out133302.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out133399.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out133487.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out133495.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out133546.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out133571.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out133588.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out133728.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out133736.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out133856.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out133880.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out133884.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out133988.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out133999.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out134053.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out134113.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out134122.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133014_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133014_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (57.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133019_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133019_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (276.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133020_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133020_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (136.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133027_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133027_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (431.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133031_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133031_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (760.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133038_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133038_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (487.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133042_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133042_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133043_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133043_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (290.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133044_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133044_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (246.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133050_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133050_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (398.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133055_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133055_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133057_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133057_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (101.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133061_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133061_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (262.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133063_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133063_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (145.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133068_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133068_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133070_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133070_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (785.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133079_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133079_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (339.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133080_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133080_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (688.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133085_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133085_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (68.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133092_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 133092_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
Successfully moved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.png to transient_report/133092_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_reference.png
Successfully moved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.png to transient_report/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits_preview.png
Successfully moved fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.png to transient_report/133092_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_discovery1.png
Successfully moved fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.png to transient_report/133092_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_discovery2.png
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133093_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133093_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (693.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133095_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133095_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (129.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133104_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133104_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (202.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133112_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133112_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (464.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133114_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133114_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (333.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133117_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133117_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (203.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133120_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133120_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (482.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133128_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133128_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (516.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133129_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133129_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (646.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133294_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133294_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133295_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133295_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (73.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133302_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 133302_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
Successfully moved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.png to transient_report/133302_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_reference.png
The output file transient_report/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits_preview.png already exist
Successfully moved fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.png to transient_report/133302_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_discovery1.png
Successfully moved fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.png to transient_report/133302_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_discovery2.png
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133332_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133332_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (388.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133340_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133340_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (244.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133356_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133356_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (177.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133374_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133374_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133387_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133387_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (191.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133389_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133389_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (317.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133399_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 133399_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
Successfully moved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.png to transient_report/133399_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_reference.png
The output file transient_report/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits_preview.png already exist
Successfully moved fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.png to transient_report/133399_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_discovery1.png
Successfully moved fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.png to transient_report/133399_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_discovery2.png
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133417_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133417_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (430.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133418_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133418_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (275.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133427_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133427_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (115.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133433_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133433_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (188.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133441_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133441_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (699.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133454_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133454_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (790.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133459_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133459_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133461_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133461_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (538.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133466_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133466_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (113.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133470_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133470_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (534.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133472_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133472_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (632.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133479_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133479_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (176.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133480_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133480_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (222.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133487_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 133487_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
Successfully moved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.png to transient_report/133487_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_reference.png
The output file transient_report/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits_preview.png already exist
Successfully moved fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.png to transient_report/133487_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_discovery1.png
Successfully moved fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.png to transient_report/133487_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_discovery2.png
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133495_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 133495_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
Successfully moved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.png to transient_report/133495_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_reference.png
The output file transient_report/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits_preview.png already exist
Successfully moved fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.png to transient_report/133495_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_discovery1.png
Successfully moved fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.png to transient_report/133495_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_discovery2.png
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133505_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133505_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (425.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133512_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133512_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (282.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133519_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133519_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133534_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133534_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (423.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133538_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133538_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (55.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133546_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 133546_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
Successfully moved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.png to transient_report/133546_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_reference.png
The output file transient_report/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits_preview.png already exist
Successfully moved fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.png to transient_report/133546_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_discovery1.png
Successfully moved fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.png to transient_report/133546_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_discovery2.png
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133555_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133555_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (690.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133556_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133556_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (82.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133562_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133562_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133571_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 133571_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
Successfully moved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.png to transient_report/133571_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_reference.png
The output file transient_report/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits_preview.png already exist
Successfully moved fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.png to transient_report/133571_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_discovery1.png
Successfully moved fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.png to transient_report/133571_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_discovery2.png
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133575_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133575_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (257.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133583_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133583_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (193.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133588_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 133588_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
Successfully moved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.png to transient_report/133588_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_reference.png
The output file transient_report/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits_preview.png already exist
Successfully moved fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.png to transient_report/133588_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_discovery1.png
Successfully moved fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.png to transient_report/133588_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_discovery2.png
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133589_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133589_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133591_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133591_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133592_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133592_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (121.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133595_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133595_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (647.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133600_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133600_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (729.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133605_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133605_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (759.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133606_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133606_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133608_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133608_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133611_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133611_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (790.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133613_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133613_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (159.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133617_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133617_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133626_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133626_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (724.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133629_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133629_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133633_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133633_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (119.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133638_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133638_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133643_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133643_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (73.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133644_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133644_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (22.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133654_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133654_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (170.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133659_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133659_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (230.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133660_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133660_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (123.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133666_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133666_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (328.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133668_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133668_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (649.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133670_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133670_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (38.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133673_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133673_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (572.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133679_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133679_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133680_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133680_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (32.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133682_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133682_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (403.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133685_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133685_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (686.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133695_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133695_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (783.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133699_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133699_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133701_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133701_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (662.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133709_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133709_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (737.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133710_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133710_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (158.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133722_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133722_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (379.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133723_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133723_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (430.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133728_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 133728_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
Successfully moved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.png to transient_report/133728_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_reference.png
The output file transient_report/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits_preview.png already exist
Successfully moved fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.png to transient_report/133728_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_discovery1.png
Successfully moved fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.png to transient_report/133728_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_discovery2.png
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133729_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133729_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (122.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133730_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133730_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (81.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133732_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133732_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (102.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133733_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133733_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133736_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 133736_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
Successfully moved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.png to transient_report/133736_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_reference.png
The output file transient_report/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits_preview.png already exist
Successfully moved fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.png to transient_report/133736_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_discovery1.png
Successfully moved fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.png to transient_report/133736_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_discovery2.png
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133738_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133738_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133739_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133739_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (375.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133740_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133740_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (19.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133742_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133742_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (680.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133745_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133745_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133748_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133748_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (684.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133751_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133751_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133752_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133752_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133754_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133754_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133758_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133758_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (343.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133761_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133761_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133766_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133766_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (241.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133768_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133768_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (410.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133771_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133771_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133773_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133773_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (21.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133774_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133774_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133778_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133778_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (112.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133779_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133779_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (513.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133781_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133781_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (718.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133787_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133787_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (522.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133790_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133790_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (499.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133791_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133791_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (51.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133792_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133792_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (109.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133796_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133796_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133798_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133798_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (210.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133800_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133800_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (249.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133805_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133805_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133808_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133808_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (350.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133809_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133809_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (682.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133810_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133810_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (327.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133811_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133811_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (591.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133812_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133812_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133818_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133818_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (388.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133820_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133820_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (65.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133821_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133821_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133827_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133827_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (677.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133834_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133834_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (98.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133837_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133837_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (277.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133839_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133839_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (594.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133840_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133840_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133847_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133847_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133850_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133850_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (115.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133851_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133851_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (102.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133853_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133853_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (587.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133854_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133854_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (55.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133856_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 133856_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
Successfully moved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.png to transient_report/133856_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_reference.png
The output file transient_report/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits_preview.png already exist
Successfully moved fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.png to transient_report/133856_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_discovery1.png
Successfully moved fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.png to transient_report/133856_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_discovery2.png
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133859_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133859_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133863_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133863_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (284.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133866_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133866_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133870_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133870_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (571.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133875_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133875_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (372.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133876_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133876_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133880_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 133880_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
Successfully moved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.png to transient_report/133880_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_reference.png
The output file transient_report/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits_preview.png already exist
Successfully moved fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.png to transient_report/133880_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_discovery1.png
Successfully moved fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.png to transient_report/133880_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_discovery2.png
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133882_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133882_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (18.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133883_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133883_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133884_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 133884_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
Successfully moved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.png to transient_report/133884_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_reference.png
The output file transient_report/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits_preview.png already exist
Successfully moved fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.png to transient_report/133884_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_discovery1.png
Successfully moved fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.png to transient_report/133884_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_discovery2.png
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133885_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133885_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (495.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133886_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133886_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133895_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133895_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (147.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133896_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133896_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (60.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133899_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133899_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (66.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133901_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133901_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133903_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133903_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (309.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133904_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133904_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (84.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133905_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133905_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (750.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133908_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133908_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (415.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133911_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133911_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133914_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133914_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (631.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133915_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133915_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (153.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133916_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133916_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133920_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133920_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133924_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133924_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (515.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133929_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133929_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (643.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133934_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133934_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133936_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133936_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (483.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133939_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133939_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (617.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133940_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133940_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133944_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133944_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133945_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133945_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (31.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133946_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133946_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (567.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133949_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133949_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (667.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133950_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133950_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (431.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133961_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133961_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (44.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133962_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133962_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (430.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133966_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133966_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (682.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133967_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133967_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133969_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133969_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (670.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133971_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133971_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133973_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133973_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (80.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133974_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133974_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133984_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133984_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (181.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133988_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 133988_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
Successfully moved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.png to transient_report/133988_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_reference.png
The output file transient_report/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits_preview.png already exist
Successfully moved fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.png to transient_report/133988_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_discovery1.png
Successfully moved fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.png to transient_report/133988_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_discovery2.png
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133989_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133989_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133991_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133991_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (283.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133992_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133992_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133996_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 133996_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133999_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 133999_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
Successfully moved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.png to transient_report/133999_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_reference.png
The output file transient_report/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits_preview.png already exist
Successfully moved fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.png to transient_report/133999_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_discovery1.png
Successfully moved fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.png to transient_report/133999_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_discovery2.png
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134006_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 134006_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134007_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 134007_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (421.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134008_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 134008_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134013_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 134013_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (15.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134023_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 134023_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (156.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134024_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 134024_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (223.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134025_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 134025_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (273.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134027_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 134027_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (86.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134028_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 134028_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134032_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 134032_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (189.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134042_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 134042_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134044_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 134044_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (13.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134048_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 134048_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (313.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134051_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 134051_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (20.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134053_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 134053_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
Successfully moved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.png to transient_report/134053_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_reference.png
The output file transient_report/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits_preview.png already exist
Successfully moved fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.png to transient_report/134053_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_discovery1.png
Successfully moved fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.png to transient_report/134053_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_discovery2.png
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134054_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 134054_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (142.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134055_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 134055_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (501.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134060_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 134060_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (248.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134064_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 134064_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (191.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134074_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 134074_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (64.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134076_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 134076_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (140.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134077_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 134077_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (302.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134081_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 134081_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (91.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134089_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 134089_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (598.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134093_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 134093_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (54.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134094_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 134094_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134095_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 134095_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (441.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134097_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 134097_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (229.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134100_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 134100_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134106_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 134106_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (16.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134113_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 134113_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
Successfully moved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.png to transient_report/134113_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_reference.png
The output file transient_report/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits_preview.png already exist
Successfully moved fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.png to transient_report/134113_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_discovery1.png
Successfully moved fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.png to transient_report/134113_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_discovery2.png
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134118_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 134118_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (14.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134120_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 134120_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (272.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134122_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
Preparing report for the candidate 134122_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
Successfully moved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.png to transient_report/134122_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_reference.png
The output file transient_report/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits_preview.png already exist
Successfully moved fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-56-10_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0284.png to transient_report/134122_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_discovery1.png
Successfully moved fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285.png to transient_report/134122_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285_discovery2.png
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134123_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 134123_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (25.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134125_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 134125_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (168.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134135_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 134135_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134146_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 134146_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (51.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134174_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 134174_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 134199_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 134199_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (110.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77457_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 77457_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 03:41:03.65 +67:38:48.3 in the exclusion list exclusion_list.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 58701_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285
The candidate 58701_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-18_00-57-04_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0285 did not pass the final checks