This analysis is done by the script util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ
The list of candidates will appear below. Please manually reload the page every few minutes untill the 'Processing complete' message appears.
Mean magnitude and position on the discovery images:
2026 01 09.3702 2461049.8702 12.52 03:57:23.72 +71:24:57.9
136.69485 13.70538 galactic Cam Second-epoch detections are separated by 8.0" and 6.6 pix
The object was not found in VSX
The object was not found in ASASSN-V
The object was not found in astcheck.
online_id | Gaia DR3 495284156721043456 | 03:57:27.88 +71:25:33.1 (Gaia DR3) | T | P | Gaia3var=NOT_AVAILABLE
Check this position in TNS.Search this object in SIMBAD.Search this object in VizieR catalogs.WISE atlasAladin LiteSNAD ZTF viewer
Online MPChecker may fail to identify bright comets! Please manually check the Seiichi Yoshida's and Gideon van Buitenen's pages.
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
Gaia DR3 495284156721043456,2461049.8702,12.52,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
Gaia DR3 495284156721043456 20260109.3702 12.52CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 03:57:23.72 +71:24:57.9 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0027_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0026_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0027_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0026_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461049.8702,12.96,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260109.3702 12.96CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 04:16:54.92 +69:09:47.0 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0027_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0026_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0027_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0026_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Don't forget to copy the leading white spaces and change the observatory code!
The code 'C32' is 'Ka-Dar Observatory, TAU Station, Nizhny Arkhyz', the code '500' is the geocenter.
Make sure there are no trailing white spaces after the observatory code.
The string should be exactly 80 characters long to conform to the MPC format.
Mean position:
You may copy/paste the above measurements to the following online services: MPChecker (in case the button does not work) NEOCMTChecker (NEO's and comets) sat_id2 (artificial satellites; needs at least two observations to work) fitsblink_satellites (art. sat.; you'll need to save the astrometry as a text file and upload it)
Here is a stub line for reporting a new transient to the TOCP.
Don't forget to set the constellation name and the number of days since the last non-detection!
Don't forget to change the observer code for the AAVSO and VSNET format data!
**** AAVSO file format ****
#TYPE=EXTENDED
#OBSCODE=SKA
#SOFTWARE=VaST 1.0rc89 transient pipeline
#DELIM=,
#DATE=JD
#NAME,DATE,MAG,MERR,FILT,TRANS,MTYPE,CNAME,CMAG,KNAME,KMAG,AMASS,GROUP,CHART,NOTES
target,2461049.8702,13.20,0.05,CV,NO,STD,ENSEMBLE,na,na,na,na,1,na,NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
**** VSNET file format ****
# Here are some valid formatiing examples:
#CETFZ 20230815.9829 <13.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230818.9746 12.5CV NMW
#CETFZ 20230819.9732 12.6CV NMW
#TCPJ17453768-1756253 20230831.7290 12.7CV NMW
target 20260109.3702 13.20CV NMW
The AAVSO data should be submitted to https://www.aavso.org/webobs
The VSNET data, depending on how interesting the target is, should be e-mailed to
vsnet-alert@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-outburst-wanted@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
vsnet-obs@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Time-series data may be sent to vsnet-campaign-report@ooruri.kusastro.kyoto-u.ac.jp
# Set SExtractor parameters file
cp default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex
# Plate-solve the FITS images and produce the finder charts
export TELESCOP=''
for i in /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits ;do util/wcs_image_calibration.sh $i && util/make_finding_chart_script.sh wcs_`basename $i` 04:20:33.11 +70:13:54.7 ;done
# Combine the finder charts into one image (note the '*' symbols meaning the command will work only if you have a single transient in that field)
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0027_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v1.png
montage resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0026_fits__*pix_nofov.png -tile 2x1 -geometry +0+0 finder_chart_v2.png
# Create GIF animation
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20_00sec_-15_00C_LIGHT_0027_fits__*pix.png animation_v1.gif
convert -delay 50 -loop 0 resample_wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0399_fits__*pix.png resample_wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20_00sec_-14_90C_LIGHT_0026_fits__*pix.png animation_v2.gif
Processing complete!
Total number of candidates identified: 3
Processing log:
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.82849338 23.12.2025 07:52:51.828 /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
First image: 2461032.82849338 23.12.2025 07:52:51.828 /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Last image: 2461049.87051826 09.01.2026 08:53:22.778 /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 3
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -10.53
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 1
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 43 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 10.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 10.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 55000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.37 # detector gain in e-/ADU
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 15278
Objects passed selection criteria: 15268
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.7 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 14494
Average stars matched: 14218.8 (98.1009 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 117296 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20251122 p4) 15.2.1 20251122
VaST compiled on Thu Jan 8 15:05:04 -00 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-133-gdb8b9ae6
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-01-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jan 9 09:54:48 -00 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
## VaST run with SExtractor config file default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ##
Images processed 4
Images used for photometry 4
Ref. image: 2461032.82849338 23.12.2025 07:52:51.828 /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
First image: 2461032.82849338 23.12.2025 07:52:51.828 /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Last image: 2461049.87051826 09.01.2026 08:53:22.778 /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
JD time system (TT/UTC/UNKNOWN): UTC
Transient candidates found: 83
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.80
Magnitude-Size filter: Disabled
For each source choose aperture with the smallest scatter: YES
Photometric errors rescaling: NO
Number of identified bad images: 0
Number of SysRem iterations: 1
User-specified moving object: none
Computation time: 191 seconds
Number of parallel threads: 24
SExtractor parameter file: default.sex
Some important SExtractor parameters:
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 2.1 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 2.1 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
DETECT_MINAREA 2.0 # minimum number of pixels above threshold
DETECT_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
ANALYSIS_THRESH 3.0 # or , in mag.arcsec-2
SATUR_LEVEL 57000.0 # level (in ADUs) at which arises saturation
GAIN 0.83 # detector gain in e-/ADU
WEIGHT_TYPE BACKGROUND
Total objects detected (at least 2 times): 106312
Objects passed selection criteria: 106109
Measurements per detected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Measurements per selected object (mean, median, min, max): 3.6 4.0 2 4
Average stars detected per image: 99977
Average stars matched: 97280.5 (97.3029 %)
Memory usage VmPeak: 2668024 kB
Software: VaST 1.0rc89 compiled with gcc (Gentoo 15.2.1_p20251122 p4) 15.2.1 20251122
VaST compiled on Thu Jan 8 15:05:04 -00 2026
VaST build number 1.0rc88-133-gdb8b9ae6
OpenMP enabled: Yes
SExtractor version 2.19.5 (2026-01-08)
GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Processing completed on Fri Jan 9 10:07:43 -00 2026
Host name: tau
############################################################
Filtering log:
######## Processing parameters ########
AAVSO_COMMENT_STRING= NMW-TexasTech Camera-1 135mm f/2.2 telephoto lens + QHY600M CMOS
ASTCHECK_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCSEC=
BAD_REGION_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst
CAMERA_SETTINGS= TTUQ1b1x1
CHECK_POINTING_ACCURACY= yes
DARK_FRAMES_DIR= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks
EXCLUSION_LIST= ../exclusion_list_TTUQ1.txt
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 12.5
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MAX_ELONGATION_AminusB_PIX= 0.55
FILTER_BAD_IMG__MIN_APERTURE_STAR_SIZE_PIX= 2.0
FILTER_BRIGHT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= -5
FILTER_FAINT_MAG_CUTOFF_TRANSIENT_SEARCH= 14.5
FLAT_FIELD_FILE= /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2025-12-22.fit
FRAME_EDGE_OFFSET_PIX= 50
GAIA_BAND_FOR_CATALOGED_SOURCE_CHECK=
MAX_NEW_TO_REF_MEAN_IMG_VALUE_RATIO= 100
MAX_NEW_IMG_MEAN_VALUE= 25000
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS= 0.18
MAX_SD_RATIO_OF_SECOND_EPOCH_IMGS_SOFT_LIMIT= 0.12
MPC_CODE= 500
NMW_CALIBRATION= /var/www/nmw_calibration
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_HARD_LIMIT= 3000
NUMBER_OF_DETECTED_TRANSIENTS_BEFORE_FILTERING_SOFT_LIMIT= 2000
OMP_NUM_THREADS=
ONLINE_MPCHECKER_BUTTON_ASTEROID_SEARCH_RADIUS_ARCMIN=
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=
REQUIRE_PIX_SHIFT_BETWEEN_IMAGES_FOR_TRANSIENT_CANDIDATES= no
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_BRIGHTSTARPASS= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
SEXTRACTOR_CONFIG_FILES= default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
STARMATCH_RADIUS_PIX= 3.5
SYSREM_ITERATIONS= 1
TELESCOP=
TELESCOP_NAME_KNOWN_TO_VaST_FOR_FOV_DETERMINATION=
UCAC5_PLATESOLVE_ITERATIONS= 2
#######################################
HOSTNAME= tau
USER=
HOME=
#######################################
Reference image directory is set to /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved/
VIZIER_SITE=vizier.cds.unistra.fr
INFO: MAKE_PNG_PLOTS is set to yes
FITS_FILE_EXT=fits
CALIBRATION_STATUS_PREFIX=
Fields in the data directory:
Cam-06-Q1b1x1
#######################################
########### Starting Cam-06-Q1b1x1 ###########
Processing Cam-06-Q1b1x1
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 515536 MB at /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir
server tau has sufficient free disk space available: 515536 MB at .
Checking input images (2 new)
REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE= /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
REFERENCE_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE= /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Small preview (one of the new images):
Large previews of the second-epoch (new) images:
MAKE_PNG_PLOTS=yes
renamed 'Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits_preview.png'
Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
renamed 'Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.png' -> 'transient_report/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits_preview.png'
Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Read-check the input FITS images... read-check OK
Blank image check the input FITS images... blank-image-check OK
Read date check the input FITS images... read-date-check OK
Mean value check the input FITS images... OK, at least two new images have mean values below the threshold.
----------------------------------------------
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 616.8181
INFO: REFERENCE_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 663.8512
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1522.8772
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE_SD= 707.9786
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_MEAN_VALUE= 1525.3588
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE_SD= 707.5991
----------------------------------------------
INFO: ref_to_second_epoch_img_mean_ratio= 2.46892
INFO: SECOND_EPOCH__SD_ratio= 0.001
----------------------------------------------
Calibration settings: DARK_FRAMES_DIR=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks FLAT_FIELD_FILE=/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2025-12-22.fit
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -14.9 / [degC] CCD temperature
Exploring image header: /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
CCD-TEMP= -14.900000 for /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Header: 61 keys total, 10 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-01-09T02:52:27.1561749' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-01-09T08:52:27.1561749' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61049.3697587498 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-01-09T08:52:37.0580107' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61049.3698733565 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -14.9 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 67.2307044969277 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 70.1686188550429 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 37.4997222222222 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 336.048888888889 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.64002159792393 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1013.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.748239 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958391 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 48 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 50: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 51: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 52: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 53: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 54: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 55: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 56: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 57: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 58: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 59: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 60: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 61: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-01-08.fit
CCD-TEMP= -14.900000 for /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
CCD-TEMP= -15.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-01-08.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-01-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/d_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits :)
Spent 0.439218 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-01-08.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/d_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2025-12-22.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 38918.354428
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=27736.5, right_median=26453.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2025-12-22.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration
SET-TEMP= -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint
CCD-TEMP= -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature
Exploring image header: /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
CCD-TEMP= -15.000000 for /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Header: 61 keys total, 10 keys left
Record 0: "" status=0
Record 1: "SIMPLE = T / C# FITS" status=0
Record 2: "BITPIX = 16" status=0
Record 3: "NAXIS = 2 / Dimensionality" status=0
Record 4: "NAXIS1 = 9576" status=0
Record 5: "NAXIS2 = 6388" status=0
Record 6: "BZERO = 32768" status=0
Record 7: "EXTEND = T / Extensions are permitted" status=0
Record 8: "IMAGETYP= 'LIGHT' / Type of exposure" status=0
Record 9: "EXPOSURE= 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 10: "EXPTIME = 20.0 / [s] Exposure duration" status=0
Record 11: "DATE-LOC= '2026-01-09T02:53:22.7780524' / Time of observation (local)" status=0
Record 12: "DATE-OBS= '2026-01-09T08:53:22.7780524' / Time of observation (UTC)" status=0
Record 13: "MJD-OBS = 61049.3704025233 / Modified Julian Date of observation" status=0
Record 14: "DATE-AVG= '2026-01-09T08:53:32.6798754' / Averaged midpoint time (UTC)" status=0
Record 15: "MJD-AVG = 61049.3705171179 / Modified Julian Date of averaged midpoint" status=0
Record 16: "XBINNING= 1 / X axis binning factor" status=0
Record 17: "YBINNING= 1 / Y axis binning factor" status=0
Record 18: "GAIN = 30 / Sensor gain" status=0
Record 19: "OFFSET = 30 / Sensor gain offset" status=0
Record 20: "XPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel X axis size" status=0
Record 21: "YPIXSZ = 3.76 / [um] Pixel Y axis size" status=0
Record 22: "INSTRUME= 'QHY600M' / Imaging instrument name" status=0
Record 23: "CAMERAID= 'QHY600M-33d3d743814b8b447' / Imaging instrument identifier" status=0
Record 24: "SET-TEMP= -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature setpoint" status=0
Record 25: "CCD-TEMP= -15.0 / [degC] CCD temperature" status=0
Record 26: "READOUTM= '2CMS-0' / Sensor readout mode" status=0
Record 27: "USBLIMIT= 50 / Camera-specific USB setting" status=0
Record 28: "TELESCOP= 'QHY600M-TTU1' / Name of telescope" status=0
Record 29: "FOCALLEN= 135.0 / [mm] Focal length" status=0
Record 30: "FOCRATIO= 2.2 / Focal ratio" status=0
Record 31: "RA = 67.2307045891312 / [deg] RA of telescope" status=0
Record 32: "DEC = 70.1686188208464 / [deg] Declination of telescope" status=0
Record 33: "CENTALT = 37.4236111111111 / [deg] Altitude of telescope" status=0
Record 34: "CENTAZ = 336.042777777778 / [deg] Azimuth of telescope" status=0
Record 35: "AIRMASS = 1.64285275868597 / Airmass at frame center (Gueymard 1993)" status=0
Record 36: "PIERSIDE= 'East' / Telescope pointing state" status=0
Record 37: "SITEELEV= 1013.0 / [m] Observation site elevation" status=0
Record 38: "SITELAT = 33.748239 / [deg] Observation site latitude" status=0
Record 39: "SITELONG= -101.958391 / [deg] Observation site longitude" status=0
Record 40: "OBSERVER= 'Sokolovsky' / Observer name" status=0
Record 41: "OBSERVAT= 'TTU Skyview' / Observatory name" status=0
Record 42: "SITENAME= '' / Observatory site name" status=0
Record 43: "FWHEEL = 'Simulator' / Filter Wheel name" status=0
Record 44: "FILTER = 'CV' / Active filter name" status=0
Record 45: "OBJECT = 'Cam-06' / Name of the object of interest" status=0
Record 46: "OBJCTRA = '04 48 00' / [H M S] RA of imaged object" status=0
Record 47: "OBJCTDEC= '+70 00 00' / [D M S] Declination of imaged object" status=0
Record 48: "OBJCTROT= 0.0 / [deg] planned rotation of imaged object" status=0
Record 49: "ROWORDER= 'TOP-DOWN' / FITS Image Orientation" status=0
Record 50: "EQUINOX = 2000.0 / Equinox of celestial coordinate system" status=0
Record 51: "SWCREATE= 'N.I.N.A. 3.2.0.9001 (x64)' / Software that created this file" status=0
Record 52: "QHY_EXP = 20.000096 / [s] Actual exposure time" status=0
Record 53: "QHY_PP = 13888.0 / [ps] pixelPeriod" status=0
Record 54: "QHY_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 55: "GPS_LP = 85000.0 / [ns] linePeriod" status=0
Record 56: "QHY_FP = 20000160.0 / [us] framePeriod" status=0
Record 57: "QHY_CPL = 6120.0 / clocksPerLine" status=0
Record 58: "QHY_LPF = 235295.0 / linesPerFrame" status=0
Record 59: "QHY_AET = 20000096.0 / [us] actualExposureTime" status=0
Record 60: "QHY_LEM = T / isLongExposureMode" status=0
Record 61: "QHY_OFF0= 3767.777 / [us] RollingShutterEndOffset row 0" status=0
Allocating memory for image, dark and result arrays...
Reading image /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
SET-TEMP= -15.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-01-08.fit
CCD-TEMP= -15.000000 for /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
CCD-TEMP= -15.000000 for /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-01-08.fit
Reading dark frame /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/darks/mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-01-08.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Dark frame is subtracted, output is written to /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/d_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits :)
Spent 0.442373 seconds
renamed 'mdark_TTUQ1b1x1_-15C_20s_2026-01-08.png' -> 'transient_report/dark.png'
MegaDivider v7
Reading image /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/d_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Reading flat /var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/flats/mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2025-12-22.fit 9576 6388 16 bitpix
Avarage count on flat field image: 38918.354428
Minimal real count (from overscan): 5
Output is written to /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits :)
No overscan detected - all values seem high! (left_median=27736.5, right_median=26453.5)
renamed 'mff_TTUQ1b1x1_2025-12-22.png' -> 'transient_report/flat.png'
Using calibrated image CALIBRATED_SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Dark frame used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
Flat field used to calibrate the second-epoch images:
after the calibration attempt:
SECOND_EPOCH__FIRST_IMAGE=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
SECOND_EPOCH__SECOND_IMAGE=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Previews of the CALIBRATED second-epoch images:
Updating neverexclude_list.txt
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/neverexclude_list.txt' -> './neverexclude_list.txt'
Choosing bad regions list
'/var/www/nmw_calibration/TTUQ1b1x1/TTUQ1_bad_region.lst' -> 'bad_region.lst'
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
./vast --norotation --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 1 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
The four input images were /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
The reference JD(UT) for computing planet and comet positions: 2461049.86987449
Re-using ../asassn_transients_list.txt
'../asassn_transients_list.txt' -> 'asassn_transients_list.txt'
Re-using ../tocp_transients_list.txt
'../tocp_transients_list.txt' -> 'tocp_transients_list.txt'
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits'
wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits'
wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits exists and is non-empty
Saving wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits to local_wcs_cache/
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits' -> 'local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits'
The image scale is 5.84"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.8" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:47:48.196 +70:00:29.12
Second-epoch image center 04:48:00.965 +70:00:22.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.02 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:47:48.196 +70:00:29.12
Second-epoch image center 04:48:24.006 +70:00:05.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.05 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits &> /tmp/tmp.nMPYcfcHSO
Parallel run for /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits &> /tmp/tmp.BaXjltSTMa
Parallel run for /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits &> /tmp/tmp.kZN2gqRp4B
Parallel run for /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits &> /tmp/tmp.wgbxx8t5mC
Parallel run for /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Matched with Tycho-2 58 out of 16183 detected stars.
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 22.881698
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=22.881698
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -10.53
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 12.35
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 12.35
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Filter-out faint candidates...
Filter-out suspiciously bright candidates...
Filter-out candidates with large difference between measured mags in one epoch...
Filter-out small-amplitude flares...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 3 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
2.1 pix Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
2.1 pix Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
2.1 pix fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 12.0 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
(80th percentile of magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images)
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.nMPYcfcHSO (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate...
/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
DEBUG: ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
DEBUG: FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
DEBUG: FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
verification OK: /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits'
DEBUG: FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
DEBUG: WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat
The fraction of blended stars is high!
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1300, passed=16183
Got 16183 stars (including 14865 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16183 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 931.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 931.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012935 (46.6 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010348 (37.3 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 292 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.79"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.09"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 360 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.02"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.56"
Excluding outliers - 323 stars left (next iteration limit 245)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.BaXjltSTMa (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate...
/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
DEBUG: ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
DEBUG: FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
DEBUG: FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
verification OK: /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits'
DEBUG: FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
DEBUG: WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
The fraction of blended stars is high!
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=1282, passed=16167
Got 16167 stars (including 14867 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 16167 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.38"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.35"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.kZN2gqRp4B (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate...
/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
DEBUG: ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
DEBUG: FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
DEBUG: FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
verification OK: /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
DEBUG: FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
DEBUG: WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat
The fraction of blended stars is high!
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=903, passed=12962
Got 12962 stars (including 12044 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12962 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 931.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 931.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012932 (46.6 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010346 (37.2 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 278 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.80"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 337 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.41"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.22"
Excluding outliers - 298 stars left (next iteration limit 236)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.wgbxx8t5mC (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate...
/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
DEBUG: ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
DEBUG: FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
DEBUG: FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
verification OK: /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
DEBUG: FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
DEBUG: WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat
The fraction of blended stars is high!
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=0, blended=933, passed=12944
Got 12944 stars (including 12001 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 12944 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.32"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.31"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.fz' -> '/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.fz'
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
'wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.fz' -> '/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.fz'
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21051_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 21051_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (270.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21053_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 21053_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (166.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 21062_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 21062_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (326.0") between the two second-epoch detections
Prepared the HTML report for the field Cam-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1
*------ done with default.sex.telephoto_lens_onlybrightstars_v1 ------*
#### The local exclusion list is exclusion_list_local.txt ####
wait
*------ default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL ------*
'default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL' -> 'default.sex'
Starting VaST with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
./vast --norotation --starmatchraius 3.5 --matchstarnumber 500 --selectbestaperture --sysrem 1 --type 4 --maxsextractorflag 99 --UTC --nofind --nojdkeyword /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
VaST run complete with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
The four input images were /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Checking WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Found WCS cache directory local_wcs_cache
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list.txt
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list_bsc.txt
Creating symlink local_wcs_cache/exclusion_list_tycho2.txt
Checking WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Found WCS cache directory /mnt/usb/NMW_NG/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /home/NMW_web_upload/solved_reference_images
Checking WCS cache directory /dataX/kirx/NMW_NG_rt3_autumn2019/solved_reference_images
Plate-solving the images
wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits exists and is non-empty
wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits exists and is non-empty
The image scale is 5.84"/pix, setting the soft and hard astrometric limits for filtering second-epoch detections: 5.8" and 8.8"
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the first second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:47:48.196 +70:00:29.12
Second-epoch image center 04:48:00.965 +70:00:22.04
Angular distance between the image centers 0.02 deg.
Soft limit: 0.50 deg. Hard limit: 1.00 deg.
###################################
###################################
# Check the image center offset between the reference and the second second-epoch image (pointing accuracy)
Reference image center 04:47:48.196 +70:00:29.12
Second-epoch image center 04:48:24.006 +70:00:05.69
Angular distance between the image centers 0.05 deg.
###################################
Running solve_plate_with_UCAC5...
Preparing for ar aprallel run
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits &> /tmp/tmp.whqnyNvs2B
Parallel run for /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits &> /tmp/tmp.FA2qX75WRl
Parallel run for /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits &> /tmp/tmp.vR2XWMXMjf
Parallel run for /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Running util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 --no_photometric_catalog --iterations 2 /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits &> /tmp/tmp.3J1OH8kVBZ
Parallel run for /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Calibrating the magnitude scale
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
____ Start of magnitude calibration ____
PHOTOMETRIC_CALIBRATION=TYCHO2_V
Calibrating the magnitude scale with Tycho-2 stars
util/transients/transient_factory_test31.sh is checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat
Tycho-2 catalog is found at lib/catalogs/tycho2
Tycho-2 catalog and the derived bright star exclusion list are ready
Checking for the presence of non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat
Found non-empty wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits and wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat
The reference image (wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits) and catalog (wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat) found
'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat' -> 'wcsmag.cat'
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.00
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.01
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.02
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.03
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.04
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.05
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.06
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.07
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.08
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.09
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.10
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.11
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.12
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.13
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.14
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.15
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.16
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.17
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.18
Reading Tycho2 catalog file lib/catalogs/tycho2/tyc2.dat.19
Relation between the catalog and instrumental magnitudes is written to calib.txt
Matched with Tycho-2 85 out of 113524 detected stars.
util/calibrate_magnitude_scale 0.000000 1.000000 21.485425
a=0.000000 b=1.000000 c=21.485425
From vast_summary.log: estimated ref. image limiting mag.: -7.80
Updating vast_summary.log: Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.69
Working...
Please, PLEASE, be patient!!!
All lightcurves processed! =)
Estimated ref. image limiting mag.: 13.69
____ End of magnitude calibration ____
Filter-out faint candidates...
Filter-out suspiciously bright candidates...
Filter-out candidates with large difference between measured mags in one epoch...
Filter-out small-amplitude flares...
Preparing the exclusion lists for this field
Done with filtering
Found 80 candidate transients before the final filtering. (Hard limit: 3000)
Median FWHM seeing for isolated stars:
1.9 pix Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
1.9 pix Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
2.0 pix fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
2.0 pix fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
All-image limiting magnitude estimate: 13.2 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
(80th percentile of magnitude distribution of stars detected on all four images)
Waiting for UCAC5 plate solver
wait
############ /tmp/tmp.whqnyNvs2B (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate...
/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits 570.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
DEBUG: ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
DEBUG: FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
DEBUG: FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
verification OK: /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits'
DEBUG: FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
DEBUG: WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat
The fraction of blended stars is high!
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=31, blended=9713, passed=113493
Got 113493 stars (including 103609 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 113493 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 931.3'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 931.3 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012935 (46.6 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010348 (37.3 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 303 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.36"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.47"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 368 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.45"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 5.59"
Excluding outliers - 329 stars left (next iteration limit 266)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.FA2qX75WRl (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The guess is based on the existing WCS header.
Trying to blindly solve the plate...
/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits 573.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
DEBUG: ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
DEBUG: FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
DEBUG: FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
verification OK: /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
It's a known telescope with plate solutions that are supposed to be good.
The input image /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits has a WCS header - will blindly trust it is good...
'/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits' -> 'wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits'
DEBUG: FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
DEBUG: WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
The fraction of blended stars is high!
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=17, blended=9545, passed=112768
Got 112768 stars (including 103038 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 112768 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.6'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.6 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013078 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010462 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 969 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.37"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.36"
Excluding outliers - 968 stars left (next iteration limit 1064)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/2025-12-22/LIGHT/calibrated_platesolved//Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits -region wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-53-30_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0400.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.vR2XWMXMjf (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate...
/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
DEBUG: ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
DEBUG: FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
DEBUG: FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
verification OK: /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
DEBUG: FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
DEBUG: WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat
The fraction of blended stars is high!
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=24, blended=6008, passed=88238
Got 88238 stars (including 82091 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 88238 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 931.1'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 931.1 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.012932 (46.6 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010346 (37.2 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 296 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.49"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.51"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 347 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.48"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 6.03"
Excluding outliers - 309 stars left (next iteration limit 254)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
############ /tmp/tmp.3J1OH8kVBZ (6) ############
Parsing command line arguments...
The minor axis of the CCD chip should be 24.0 mm based on the derived pixel size of 3.8 um
Internal estimated FoV 605.3'
The guess is based on the FOCALLEN keyword.
Trying to blindly solve the plate...
/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/vast_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/util/wcs_image_calibration.sh /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits 605.0
Entering WCS image calibration mode.
DEBUG: ORIGINAL_FITSFILE=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
DEBUG: FITSFILE before on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
DEBUG: FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
verification OK: /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
It's not one of the telescopes that are know to produce images with good WCS solutions - will try to re-solve!
DEBUG: FITSFILE after on_the_fly=/mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
DEBUG: WCS_IMAGE_NAME=wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS-calibrated image found: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
Checking if the catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits alredy exist and is non-empty...
Catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat corresponding to the image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits found.
The catalog is in the new format, as expected.
The plate-solved (WCS-calibrated) image is saved to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 is preparing to read a catalog corresponding to the image /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
WCS catalog name: wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat
The fraction of blended stars is high!
SExtractor catalog parsing summary: zero_flux=0, no_flux_err=0, no_mag=0, no_mag_err=0, low_SNR=15, blended=5985, passed=87569
Got 87569 stars (including 81453 good ones) from the SExtractor catalog wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat
util/solve_plate_with_UCAC5 got 87569 stars from the SExtractor catalog
Updated FoV from the plate-solved image: 941.8'
Seting catalog search parameters based on the expected field of view 941.8 arcmin
UCAC5 catalog search parameters:
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_deg= 0.013081 (47.1 arcsec)
catalog_search_parameters->brightest_mag= 1.00
catalog_search_parameters->faintest_mag= 13.50
catalog_search_parameters->search_radius_second_step_deg 0.010464 (37.7 arcsec)
ITERATION 01 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Removing outliers...
Correcting the measured astrometric positions...
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
ITERATION 02 -- talking to VizieR, this might be slow!
Found a local copy of UCAC5
Reading UCAC5 zone files...
Done reading UCAC5 zone files...
Matched 968 stars with the local copy of UCAC5.
The local UCAC5 search seems to be a success
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Estimated accuracy of the plate solution: 0.33"
Excluding outliers - 967 stars left (next iteration limit 1063)
Stop iterations.
The field is successfully solved and matched with the astrometric catalog! :)
The image catalog is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat.ucac5
The DS9 region file with the matched stars is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat.ds9.reg
You may view it with the command:
ds9 /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits -region wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat.ds9.reg
The astrometric residuals vector field is written to wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.cat.astrometric_residuals
Option '-n' not using photometric catalogs, just stick with astrometry
opt '-i': 2 is the maximum number of iterations
Copying WCS-calibrated images back to input directory
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.fits.fz
Saving fully-calibrated image wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits
The destination file is already there - not rewriting /mnt/usb2/NMW-TexasTech/workdir/img_2026-01-09_CI_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_025407_TTUQ1b1x1_11652_IovnhsHJ/wcs_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.fits.fz
Preparing the HTML report for the field Cam-06-Q1b1x1 with default.sex.telephoto_lens_vSTL
Adding exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt__out133436.dat to exclusion_list_gaiadr2.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out133163.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out133237.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
Adding exclusion_list_local.txt__out133279.dat to exclusion_list_local.txt
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132944_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 132944_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (488.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132951_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 132951_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (369.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132964_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 132964_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (67.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132968_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 132968_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (226.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132969_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 132969_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (291.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132976_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 132976_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (61.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132977_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 132977_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (129.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132979_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 132979_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (287.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132985_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 132985_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (45.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132987_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 132987_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (362.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132989_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 132989_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (185.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 132992_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 132992_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (9.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133022_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133022_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (575.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133047_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133047_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (173.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133049_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133049_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (173.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133051_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133051_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (98.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133055_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133055_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
**** FOUND 04:13:40.62 +72:09:21.4 in the exclusion list exclusion_list_bsc.txt ****
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133056_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133056_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (747.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133058_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133058_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (107.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133063_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133063_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (329.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133110_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133110_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (102.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133114_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133114_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (406.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133115_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133115_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (242.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133119_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133119_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (107.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133122_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133122_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (714.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133139_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133139_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (668.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133142_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133142_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (10.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133151_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133151_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (677.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133152_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133152_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (340.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133157_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133157_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (249.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133162_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133162_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (605.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133163_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
Preparing report for the candidate 133163_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
Successfully moved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.png to transient_report/133163_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027_reference.png
Successfully moved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.png to transient_report/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits_preview.png
Successfully moved fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.png to transient_report/133163_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027_discovery1.png
Successfully moved fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.png to transient_report/133163_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027_discovery2.png
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133164_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133164_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (500.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133165_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133165_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (242.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133167_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133167_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (121.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133175_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133175_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (84.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133176_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133176_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (118.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133184_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133184_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (98.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133185_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133185_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133186_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133186_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (200.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133187_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133187_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (48.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133188_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133188_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (145.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133193_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133193_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (683.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133194_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133194_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (123.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133196_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133196_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (75.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133198_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133198_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (147.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133199_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133199_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (195.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133200_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133200_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (226.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133201_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133201_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (414.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133203_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133203_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (234.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133222_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133222_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (237.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133237_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
Preparing report for the candidate 133237_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
Successfully moved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.png to transient_report/133237_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027_reference.png
The output file transient_report/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits_preview.png already exist
Successfully moved fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.png to transient_report/133237_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027_discovery1.png
Successfully moved fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.png to transient_report/133237_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027_discovery2.png
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133238_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133238_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (64.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133246_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133246_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (435.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133249_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133249_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (153.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133254_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133254_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (201.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133256_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133256_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (192.4") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133279_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
Preparing report for the candidate 133279_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
Successfully moved Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.png to transient_report/133279_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027_reference.png
The output file transient_report/Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2025-12-23_01-52-51_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0399.fits_preview.png already exist
Successfully moved fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-52-27_20.00sec_-14.90C_LIGHT_0026.png to transient_report/133279_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027_discovery1.png
Successfully moved fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027.png to transient_report/133279_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027_discovery2.png
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133283_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133283_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (83.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133289_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133289_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (319.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133297_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133297_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (294.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133298_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133298_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (764.9") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133300_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133300_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (181.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133301_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133301_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (202.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133322_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133322_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (577.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133353_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133353_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (74.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133354_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133354_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (130.8") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133371_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133371_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (396.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133374_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133374_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (699.7") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133394_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133394_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (172.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133398_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133398_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (595.2") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133426_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133426_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (590.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133433_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133433_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.3") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133436_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133436_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (17.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133454_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133454_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (12.0") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133463_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133463_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (11.6") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133469_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133469_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (342.1") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 133492_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 133492_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
Rejecting candidate due to large distance (27.5") between the two second-epoch detections
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Considering the candidate 77457_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027
The candidate 77457_fd_Cam-06-Q1b1x1_2026-01-09_02-53-22_20.00sec_-15.00C_LIGHT_0027 did not pass the final checks
